Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

CEST-PROTECT: Proximal Flow Control With a Balloon Guide Catheter Plus Distal Embolic Protection: a Randomised, Open-label Trial Evaluating Cerebral Protection Techniques (CEST-PROTECT)

20 settembre 2026 aggiornato da: Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Balloon Guide Catheter-Mediated Proximal Flow Control Plus Distal Embolic Protection Versus Distal Embolic Protection Alone During Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients With Complex High-Risk Carotid Stenosis-A Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Blinded Trial

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether a proximal-distal dual cerebral protection strategy can reduce the occurrence of new cerebral ischemic lesions compared with a single cerebral protection strategy in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive either dual cerebral protection using proximal flow control combined with a distal embolic protection device or conventional single cerebral protection. Brain magnetic resonance imaging will be performed after the procedure to assess new ischemic lesions. The study will also evaluate peri-procedural neurological events and other safety and efficacy outcomes.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Carotid artery stenting is an established treatment for selected patients with carotid artery stenosis, but peri-procedural cerebral embolization remains an important concern. Distal embolic protection devices are commonly used during carotid artery stenting; however, embolization may occur during lesion crossing or device manipulation before complete distal protection is established.

The CEST-PROTECT trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study designed to investigate whether a proximal-distal dual cerebral protection strategy provides additional cerebral protection compared with a conventional single protection strategy during carotid artery stenting. Participants will be randomly assigned to the dual-protection group or the single-protection group.

In the dual-protection group, proximal flow control will be combined with a distal embolic protection device during carotid artery stenting. In the single-protection group, carotid artery stenting will be performed using conventional distal embolic protection alone.

Brain magnetic resonance imaging, including diffusion-weighted imaging, will be performed after the procedure to identify new cerebral ischemic lesions. Clinical neurological outcomes, procedural outcomes, and safety events will also be assessed during follow-up. The study is intended to determine whether the dual-protection strategy can reduce peri-procedural cerebral embolic injury without increasing procedure-related complications.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

500

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Backup dei contatti dello studio

Luoghi di studio

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Cina, 100053
        • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • Contatto:

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

Da 18 anni a 80 anni (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 to 80 years, regardless of sex.
  2. Symptomatic carotid artery stenosis ≥50% or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis ≥70%, with the degree of stenosis determined according to the prespecified NASCET method and confirmed by CTA, DSA, or MRA.
  3. Presence of at least one protocol-defined complex high-risk carotid stenosis feature confirmed by carotid ultrasonography, CTA, DSA, HR-VWI, or other protocol-specified imaging modalities.
  4. Written informed consent provided by the participant or legally authorized representative.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Other cerebrovascular lesions that may substantially increase peri-procedural risk or interfere with assessment of the primary outcome, including an untreated ipsilateral intracranial aneurysm >5 mm, cerebral arteriovenous malformation, dural arteriovenous fistula, or other vascular lesions considered to pose significant risk by multidisciplinary assessment.
  2. Severe ipsilateral intracranial tandem stenosis ≥70% that is related to a recent ischemic event, is planned for intervention during the study follow-up period, or may interfere with attribution of post-procedural stroke; or complete occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery with an unacceptable risk of intolerance to proximal flow arrest.
  3. Technical conditions precluding carotid artery stenting or preventing safe implementation of either randomized cerebral protection strategy, including target-vessel occlusion or near-occlusion with distal collapse; free-floating thrombus or high-burden active intraluminal thrombus; absence of an appropriate landing zone for the distal embolic protection device or balloon flow-control segment in the common carotid artery; inability to safely cross, deploy, or retrieve the distal protection device; inability to safely and stably position the balloon guide catheter; severe aortic arch, supra-aortic, carotid-origin, or iliofemoral disease resulting in unacceptable transfemoral access risk; severe vascular tortuosity, angulation, or calcification resulting in unacceptable device-passage, vascular-injury, or stent-deployment risk; unacceptable risk of intolerance to proximal flow arrest; or any other condition preventing safe implementation of either randomized strategy.
  4. Previous stenting, angioplasty, or other endovascular mechanical treatment of the target carotid artery; or carotid lesions not prespecified for inclusion in the etiologic complex-lesion cohort, including carotid dissection, vasculitis, traumatic or infectious lesions, pseudoaneurysm, or fibromuscular dysplasia other than carotid web.
  5. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥3 after a recent stroke, or the presence of a large cerebral infarction, significant cerebral edema or mass effect, hemorrhagic transformation, impaired consciousness, progressive neurological deficits, or clinically unstable neurological status.
  6. Contraindication to contrast agents, antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, or medications required during the procedure that cannot be adequately managed; or inability or expected inability to receive or complete protocol-required dual antiplatelet therapy.
  7. A recent ischemic event considered primarily cardioembolic, or the presence of a high-risk cardiac source of embolism such as left atrial or left ventricular thrombus, infective endocarditis, a mechanical heart valve with inadequate anticoagulation, or an intracardiac mass. Atrial fibrillation alone is not an absolute exclusion criterion unless it is considered the primary cause of the qualifying ischemic event or required anticoagulation cannot be safely combined with the protocol-required antiplatelet regimen.
  8. A serious medical condition precluding elective carotid artery stenting, including active bleeding, uncorrectable coagulopathy, severe renal dysfunction without adequate risk-control measures, persistent uncontrolled severe hypertension, active severe infection, myocardial infarction within 6 weeks before screening, unstable acute coronary syndrome, decompensated heart failure, uncontrolled severe arrhythmia, or another serious systemic disease.
  9. Contraindication to MRI or anticipated inability to complete the protocol-required baseline and post-procedural MRI/DWI examinations.
  10. Current participation, or participation within 3 months before screening, in another clinical study that may affect the study intervention, safety assessment, or primary outcome evaluation; or planned major surgery or endovascular treatment during the peri-procedural period or 30-day follow-up that may interfere with assessment of study outcomes.
  11. Inability to understand or comply with study procedures, provide valid informed consent, complete the 30-day clinical follow-up or neurological assessments, or provide reliable primary outcome data; or life expectancy shorter than the required study follow-up period.
  12. Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the participant unsuitable for the study, substantially increases study-related risk, or may compromise the reliability of the study results.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: BGC proximal flow control plus distal filter embolic protection device

Carotid artery stenting will be performed via a transfemoral approach. Proximal flow control will be established using a balloon guide catheter (BGC) and combined with a distal filter embolic protection device, allowing the procedure to be performed under dual proximal and distal cerebral protection

Carotid artery stenting will be performed via a transfemoral approach. Proximal flow control will be established using a balloon guide catheter (BGC) and combined with a distal filter embolic protection device. Carotid artery stenting will then be completed under dual proximal and distal cerebral protection.

Comparatore attivo: Single distal filter embolic protection device

Carotid artery stenting will be performed according to a standardized procedure under the protection of a distal embolic protection device. The selection criteria for the distal protection device and stent will be consistent with those used in the experimental group. The brand, model, size, rationale for selection, and details of device use will be fully documented.

Carotid artery stenting will be performed according to a standardized procedure under the protection of a distal embolic protection device. The selection criteria for the distal protection device and stent will be consistent with those used in the experimental group. The brand, model, size, rationale for selection, and details of device use will be fully

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Proportion of Participants With at Least One New Ipsilateral Cerebral Ischemic Lesion on Diffusion-Weighted MRI
Lasso di tempo: Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting

The primary outcome is the proportion of participants with at least one new cerebral ischemic lesion on the side of the target carotid artery detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) after carotid artery stenting, compared with the pre-procedural baseline MRI. New ischemic lesions will be assessed by an independent central imaging core laboratory blinded to treatment allocation.

Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Composite of Any Stroke or All-Cause Death Within 30 Days
Lasso di tempo: Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

First occurrence of any stroke or all-cause death within 30 days after carotid artery stenting. Clinical events will be adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee blinded to treatment allocation.

Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
Number and Distribution of New Cerebral Ischemic Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted MRI
Lasso di tempo: Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting

The number and distribution of new cerebral ischemic lesions detected on post-procedural diffusion-weighted MRI compared with the pre-procedural baseline MRI. Distribution of new ischemic lesions according to laterality (ipsilateral or contralateral to the target carotid artery) and vascular territory involvement (single or multiple vascular territories). Lesions will be assessed by an independent central imaging core laboratory blinded to treatment allocation.

Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting
Characteristics of New Cerebral Ischemic Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted MRI
Lasso di tempo: Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting

New cerebral ischemic lesions will be classified as cortical or subcortical. Lesions will also be categorized according to the maximum lesion diameter.

Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting
Proportion of Participants With New Symptomatic or Asymptomatic Cerebral Infarction
Lasso di tempo: Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

The proportions of participants with newly developed symptomatic cerebral infarction and newly developed asymptomatic cerebral infarction after carotid artery stenting will be assessed separately. Symptomatic cerebral infarction is defined as a new cerebral infarction associated with corresponding new neurological symptoms, whereas asymptomatic cerebral infarction is defined as a new cerebral infarction without corresponding new neurological symptoms.

Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
Incidence of Ipsilateral Ischemic Stroke
Lasso di tempo: Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

The incidences of ipsilateral ischemic stroke will be assessed individually.

Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
Incidence of Ipsilateral TIA
Lasso di tempo: Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

The incidences of ipsilateral TIA will be assessed individually.

Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
Incidence of All-cause Death
Lasso di tempo: Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

The incidences of all-cause death will be assessed individually.

Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
NIHSS Score and Change From Baseline
Lasso di tempo: At 7 (±2) days or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first, and at 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

Neurological impairment will be assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The NIHSS score and its change from the pre-procedural baseline will be evaluated at 7 days or hospital discharge and again at 30 days after carotid artery stenting.

At 7 (±2) days or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first, and at 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
Modified Rankin Scale Score and Change From Baseline
Lasso di tempo: At 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

Functional status will be assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The mRS score and its change from the pre-procedural baseline will be evaluated at 30 days after carotid artery stenting.

At 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
Incidence of Intracranial Hemorrhage
Lasso di tempo: Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting

The proportion of participants experiencing any intracranial hemorrhage after carotid artery stenting.

Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting
Incidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Lasso di tempo: Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

The proportion of participants experiencing any adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE) after carotid artery stenting.

Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
Incidence of Device- or Procedure-Related Adverse Events
Lasso di tempo: Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

The proportion of participants experiencing adverse events or serious adverse events considered related to the study device or study procedure.

Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 ottobre 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 aprile 2029

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 maggio 2029

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

20 settembre 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

20 settembre 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

25 settembre 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

25 settembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

20 settembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 settembre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • CEST-PROTECT

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Descrizione del piano IPD

Deidentified individual participant data will not be shared.

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .