Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

More Appreciation and Less Criticism Project

21. Juni 2020 aktualisiert von: The University of Hong Kong

A Pilot Intervention Study to Increase Appreciation and Reduce Criticism Among Families in Hong Kong

The project "More Appreciation and Less Criticism Project" (MALC) is a collaboration between the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals (TWGHs) and the School of Public Health of The University of Hong Kong (HKUSPH), funded by The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust. The objectives are to develop and test theory-driven group programmes to increase parents' intention and actual behaviours to express more appreciation or less criticism when interacting with their children, thereby enhancing family harmony and happiness.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

This study is a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) with three arms: More Appreciation (MA), Less Criticism and Fruit and Vegetable (FV) group. Clusters, mostly schools, are the unit of random allocation to one of the three arms. Participants from all three arms will be assessed a total of four times, i.e. baseline (before the intervention workshop; (T1), immediate post-workshop (T2), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).

"Fruit and vegetable consumption" is a subsidiary study to the More Appreciation and Less Criticism (MALC) Project. The study will take advantage of the cluster RCT design adopted by the MALC study, and aims at testing the active HAPA-based intervention (increasing fruit and vegetable intervention) delivered to the MALC control group. The fruit and vegetable group will serve as the intervention arm, and the groups that received interventions regarding increasing appreciation or decreasing criticism, served as the control arms.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

803

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Kind
  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parents who are Cantonese-speaking, able to complete study questionnaire, and who have children attending p.4 to p.6 will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parents with active psychiatric problems, suicidal ideations, personality disorders, emotional problems, and mental retardartion will be excluded from the study.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Versorgungsforschung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: More Appreciation
A 6-minute engaging video will be shown, illustrating examples where a mother initially withholds her appreciation for her son's effort in school and later express it. The video will also capture the effect on the child and the family. Attributional discussion questions will follow to elicit positive outcomes of expressing appreciation and the negative outcomes of withholding appreciation (e.g., What may be the long-term effects of showing appreciation on your child, family, or on yourself?). Key points will be summarised and reinforced to enhance behavioural intention (Schwarzer & Luszczynska, 2008). Then the participants will be asked to plan by indicating when (e.g., Saturday afternoon), what (e.g., child helping a younger sibling prepare for a dictation test), and how (e.g., "I can see that you gave up your leisure time to help your sister with the spelling. Thank you!") they would express appreciation to their children.
Verhalten: More appreciation
Experimental: Less Criticism
Participants will watch a 6-minute video showing examples of a father criticising his son, which will be replaced by positive communication later, and the different reactions evoked in the child and the family. Then, participants will have an attributional discussion on the negative effects of criticism (e.g., negative effect on self-worth and motivation) and positive outcomes of using constructive feedback (e.g., promptly identifying undesirable behaviours without relating to personal traits or abilities). In small groups, they will work out alternatives (i.e., constructive feedback; termed "positive reminder" in the intervention) to criticism, and each plan and write down when (e.g., after school), what (e.g., low test marks), and how (e.g., "How do you prepare for the tests?)
Verhalten: Less criticism
Experimental: Fruit and Vegetable
This workshop will emphasise the importance of consuming at least 5 portions of fruit and vegetable daily for a healthy diet, and aim to boost participants' self-efficacy in achieving this. Participants will be presented with examples of one portion of fruit or vegetable, and then create their own recipes. They will also consider how to overcome obstacles of consuming more portions. Each participant will set goals and write down plans on when, where, what, and how they would increase their fruit and vegetable intake of their children and family as a whole.
Verhalten: More Fruit and Vegetable

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Changes from baseline self-reported appreciation behaviours at follow-ups
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Being assessed by averaging two items, measuring the frequency with which parents expressed appreciation (express appreciation towards children's efforts; express appreciation towards children's strengths) in the past 7 days. Responses range from 0 to 6 (0: '0 time,' 1: 'one to two times per week,' 2: 'three to four times per week,' 3: 'five to six times per week,' 4: 'once a day,' 5: 'two to three times a day,' and 6: 'four times or more per day'). The Cronbach's alpha is 0.90.
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Changes from baseline self-reported criticism behaviours at follow-ups
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Being assessed by averaging two items, measuring the frequency with which parents expressed criticism (criticise children; express dissatisfaction towards children's behavior) in the past 7 days. Responses range from 0 to 6 (0: '0 time,' 1: 'one to two times per week,' 2: 'three to four times per week,' 3: 'five to six times per week,' 4: 'once a day,' 5: 'two to three times a day,' and 6: 'four times or more per day'). The Cronbach's alpha is 0.93.
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Changes from baseline self-reported fruit and vegetable intake behaviours at follow-ups
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Being assessed by summing two items, one each for the number of servings of fruits and vegetables consumed in the past week.
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Changes from baseline outcome expectancies of more appreciation at post-workshop
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), and T2 (immediately after the workshop).
Measured by averaging three items, "If I express my appreciation through words or action more often, my children will be more positive to themselves", "If I express my appreciation through words or action more often, my children will appreciate the other family members more", "If I express my appreciation through words or action more often, my family will be happier and more harmonious". Participants rated their agreement using a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), and T2 (immediately after the workshop).
Changes from baseline outcome expectancies of less criticism at post-workshop
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), and T2 (immediately after the workshop).
Measured by averaging three items. "If I criticize my children, they will be more negative to themselves", "If I criticize my children, they will learn to criticize the other family members", "If I criticize my children, my family will be less happy and less harmonious". Participants rated their agreement using a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), and T2 (immediately after the workshop).
Changes from baseline outcome expectancies of fruit and vegetable intake at post-workshop
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), and T2 (immediately after the workshop).
Measured by averaging two items. "if I eat more servings of fruit and vegetables every day, that would be good for my health", "If I eat more fruit and vegetable, I will set a good example for my children". Participants rated their agreement using a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), and T2 (immediately after the workshop).
Changes from baseline intention to express more appreciation at post-workshop and 2-week
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).
Measured by a single item "In the coming 2 weeks, I intend to express appreciation to my child through words or action more often". Participants rated their agreement on a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).
Changes from baseline intention to criticize less at post-workshop and 2-week
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).
Measured by a single item "In the coming 2 weeks, I intend to criticize my child less often". Participants rated their agreement on a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).
Changes from baseline intention of more fruit and vegetable intake at post-workshop and 2-week
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).
Measured by a single item "in the coming 2 weeks, I intend to eat more servings of fruit and vegetables every day". Participants rated their agreement on a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).
Changes from baseline self-efficacy of more appreciation at post-workshop and 2-week
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).
Measured by a single item "In the coming 2 weeks, I am confident that I can express appreciation to my child through words or action more often". Participants rated their agreement on a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).
Changes from baseline self-efficacy of less criticism at post-workshop and 2-week
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).
Measured by a single item "In the coming 2 weeks, I am confident that I can criticize my child less often". Participants rated their agreement on a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).
Changes from baseline self-efficacy of more fruit and vegetable intake at post-workshop and 2-week
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).
Measured by a single item "In the coming 2 weeks, I am confident that I could eat more servings of fruit and vegetables every day". Participants rated their agreement on a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).
Changes from baseline action planning of more appreciation at post-workshop, 2-week and 6-week
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), 2-week post-workshop (T3), and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Measured by a single item "In the coming 2 weeks, I have a clear plan on how to express appreciation to my child through words or action more often". Participants rated their agreement on a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), 2-week post-workshop (T3), and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Changes from baseline action planning of less criticism at post-workshop, 2-week and 6-week
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), 2-week post-workshop (T3), and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Measured by a single item "In the coming 2 weeks, I have a clear plan on how to criticize my child less often. Participants rated their agreement on a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), 2-week post-workshop (T3), and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Changes from baseline action planning of more fruit and vegetable intake at post-workshop, 2-week and 6-week
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), 2-week post-workshop (T3), and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Measured by a single item "In the coming 2 weeks, I have a clear plan on how to eat more servings of fruit and vegetables every day". Participants rated their agreement on a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), 2-week post-workshop (T3), and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Changes from baseline coping planning of more appreciation at post-workshop, 2-week and 6-week
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), 2-week post-workshop (T3), and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Measured by a single item "In the coming 2 weeks, I have a clear plan on how to overcome challenges in expressing appreciation to my child through words or action more often". Participants rated their agreement on a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), 2-week post-workshop (T3), and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Changes from baseline coping planning of less criticism at post-workshop, 2-week and 6-week
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), 2-week post-workshop (T3), and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Measured by a single item "in the coming 2 weeks, I have a clear plan on how to overcome challenges to criticize my child less often". Participants rated their agreement on a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), 2-week post-workshop (T3), and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Changes from baseline coping planning of more fruit and vegetable intake at post-workshop, 2-week and 6-week
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), 2-week post-workshop (T3), and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Measured by a single item "In the coming 2 weeks, I have a clear plan on how to overcome challenges to eat more servings of fruit and vegetables every day". Participants rated their agreement on a 10-point scale (1 = totally disagree, 10 = totally agree).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), 2-week post-workshop (T3), and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Changes from baseline family well-being
Zeitfenster: Baseline (before the workshop, T1), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Being assessed by a composite score of 3 items, namely the 3Hs: family harmony, family happiness, and family health. Participants rated each item on a scale from 0 (not at all harmonious/ happy/ healthy) to 10 (very harmonious/ happy/ healthy). This composite score has been used in another study in Hong Kong (M. P. Wang et al., 2014) which showed a satisfactory Cronbach's alpha (0.84).
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

The University of Hong Kong

Mitarbeiter

Tung Wah Group of Hospitals

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Samantha Fung, PhD, The University of Hong Kong

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. April 2012

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

31. Mai 2013

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

31. Mai 2013

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

16. Juni 2020

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

21. Juni 2020

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

24. Juni 2020

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

24. Juni 2020

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

21. Juni 2020

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juni 2020

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • HKUSPH-MALC

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Generally, individual participant data will not be shared with a third party. People not involved in the project can check the data availability from the principal investigator.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur More appreciation

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Bosnia & Herzegovina

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

3
Abonnieren