- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT07606261
WB6Dim-LTSA: Can Workplace Well-Being Scores Predict Collective Absenteeism? (WB6Dim-LTSA)
Predictive Value of the Adaptive Load Index (ICA) Derived From the WB6Dim Instrument on Collective Absenteeism Rates at a 6-Month Horizon: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Detaillierte Beschreibung
BACKGROUND: In France, sickness benefit expenditure reached 10.2 billion euros in 2023, up 28% since 2019 (DREES/CNAM, Études & Résultats n°1321, 2024). The cost distribution follows a Pareto pattern: 7% of sick leave episodes (those exceeding 6 months) generate 45% of total expenditure (Cour des Comptes, RALFSS 2024). For group disability insurers (prévoyance collective), the pressure is acute: charges for incapacity-disability-dependence rose +24.4% in 2024, long-duration indemnified days increased +31% since 2020, and the claims-to-premiums ratio deteriorated to 56.9% (France Assureurs 2025). These 7% of episodes are the primary cost driver, yet current identification relies on retrospective administrative data - the signal arrives after the damage is done. The literature identifies two pathways to long-duration sick leave: (1) escalation from repeated short absences (≥3 episodes/year, RR 1.5-2.5; Koopmans 2008, Hultin 2012, Roelen 2018, Sørensen et al. 2025), where administrative data detect the pattern but often too late for effective prevention; and (2) the 'cliff effect' - sudden onset without prior absence signal, driven by prolonged presenteeism masking progressive deterioration (Gustafsson & Marklund 2011, Ahola 2009, López-Bueno & Clausen 2021). Administrative data are entirely blind to the second pathway. Composite psychometric instruments can detect risk during the presenteeism window: they reach C-index 0.73-0.74 vs 0.65 for absence-only models (Airaksinen et al. 2018; Roelen 2013), and combining questionnaire + administrative data reaches C-index 0.79 (Nyberg et al. 2023).
The WB6Dim (Well-Being 6 Dimensions) is a 28-item digital psychometric instrument assessing 9 well-being dimensions, validated on 808 participants across 4 cohorts with 2 pre-registered protocols (NCT07301879, NCT07433764). All 19 convergent validity hypotheses were confirmed against 10 international gold-standard scales (PSS-10, WHO-5, CBI, ISI-7, RSES, SAS-SV, MSPSS, UCLA-3, CFQ-13, BPNS). The test-retest reliability (ICA) reached .904 (excellent). The Adaptive Load Index (ICA) classifies each respondent into 4 levels: low-to-moderate load, high load, very high load, and critical load. The Environmental Attentional Dysregulation (DAE) further characterizes the dominant source of strain (internal, digital, relational, or mixed). No published study has tested the predictive value of a composite well-being index, measured at the collective level, on sick leave ≥30 days - the threshold triggering group disability insurance benefits.
DESIGN: Prospective multicenter cohort study with 4 measurement waves over 6 months (June-November 2026). The unit of analysis is the company (collective level). No individual diagnosis or prognosis is delivered. Data sources include: (1) company-level HR data on absenteeism stratified by duration (aggregated, anonymized) for 2024, 2025, and 2026; (2) individual self-reported absence integrated into the WB6Dim at T0, T2, and T3. The study includes two analytical components: a retrospective analysis correlating T0 WB6Dim scores with 2024-2025 absenteeism, and a concurrent analysis testing whether T0-T2 trajectories predict T2-T3 absenteeism. Six pre-registered hypotheses are tested, including an exploratory hypothesis (H6) targeting the added value of ICA for companies with no elevated absence history but degraded well-being scores - directly testing whether the WB6Dim can identify the costly 7% before administrative data show any signal.
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
- Name: Quentin ALITTA, MBA
- Telefonnummer: +33 686505361
- E-Mail: quentin.alitta@gmail.com
Studienorte
-
-
-
Bandol, Frankreich, 83150
- Clover Link
-
Kontakt:
- quentin ALITTA
- Telefonnummer: 0686505361
- E-Mail: quentin.alitta@gmail.com
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Probenahmeverfahren
Studienpopulation
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Employee of a participating French company (≥ 50 employees)
- Age 18 years or older
- Access to a smartphone or computer to complete the digital questionnaire
- Electronic informed consent provided at baseline
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to participate or withdrawal of consent
- Inability to complete the questionnaire in French
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
Kohorten und Interventionen
Gruppe / Kohorte |
|---|
|
Multi-company workforce cohort
Single-cohort design.
All participants receive the same observational protocol: 4 WB6Dim assessments over 6 months.
The predictive analysis is conducted at the company level, comparing companies above versus below the sample median of collective critical ICA proportion at T0.
No group assignment is made at the individual level.
Stratification is performed post-hoc based on observed ICA distributions.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Company-level incidence rate of sick leave episodes ≥ 30 days over 6 months, as measured from aggregated HR records
Zeitfenster: 6 months post-enrollment
|
Company-level incidence of sick leave episodes lasting 30 days or more, measured from aggregated HR data provided by each participating company for the period June-November 2026.
This threshold marks the transition from short-term to long-term sickness absence in the French social security system and is associated with sharply reduced return-to-work probability.
|
6 months post-enrollment
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Company-level incidence rate of sick leave episodes ≥ 90 days over 6 months, as measured from aggregated HR records
Zeitfenster: 6 months post-enrollment
|
Company-level incidence of sick leave episodes lasting 90 days or more, corresponding to long-term illness (affection de longue durée) classification and elevated risk of permanent disability transition.
|
6 months post-enrollment
|
|
Number of employees with ≥ 3 distinct absence episodes within 6 months per company, as measured from aggregated HR records
Zeitfenster: 6 months post-enrollment
|
Company-level count of employees with 3 or more distinct absence episodes within a 6-month period.
Repeated short absences are an established early marker of subsequent long-duration leave (Koopmans 2008, RR=1.9;
Hultin 2012, OR=2.0).
|
6 months post-enrollment
|
|
Self-reported cumulative absence duration and episode count, as measured by WB6Dim questionnaire items
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months post-enrollment
|
Self-reported work absence collected via two items in the WB6Dim questionnaire.
Item 1: cumulative duration (0 / 1-7 days / 8-30 days / 31-90 days / >90 days).
Item 2: number of separate episodes (0 / 1 / 2 / 3+).
Each assessment covers the period since the previous measurement.
|
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months post-enrollment
|
|
Change in collective ICA distribution from baseline to 3 months as a predictor of sick leave ≥ 30 days between 3 and 6 months
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 3 months (predictor); 3 to 6 months post-enrollment (outcome)
|
Change in collective ICA distribution between baseline and 3 months (slope of degradation) as a predictor of sick leave ≥ 30 days observed between 3 and 6 months post-enrollment.
Tests whether longitudinal worsening of collective well-being adds predictive value beyond static baseline measurement.
|
Baseline and 3 months (predictor); 3 to 6 months post-enrollment (outcome)
|
|
Change in predictive model AUC when adding DAE profile distribution to the ICA-based model for sick leave ≥ 30 days
Zeitfenster: 6 months post-enrollment
|
Improvement in predictive model discrimination (AUC) when adding DAE profile distribution (internal, digital, relational, mixed) to the ICA-based model.
Tests whether characterizing the dominant source of strain improves identification of at-risk companies beyond overall load level.
|
6 months post-enrollment
|
|
Agreement (Cohen's kappa) between aggregated self-reported absence and company-level HR absence data, stratified by duration class
Zeitfenster: 6 months post-enrollment
|
Agreement between aggregated individual self-reports and company-level HR data, assessed using Cohen's kappa at the company level.
Stratified by duration class.
Validates the use of self-reported absence as a complementary data source when HR records are unavailable.
|
6 months post-enrollment
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Ermittler
- Studienstuhl: Frédérique RETORNAZ, MD, PhD, European Hospital, Unit of Care and Research in Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases.
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- WB6DIM-LTSA-2026-01
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Beschreibung des IPD-Plans
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .
Klinische Studien zur Beruflicher Stress
-
University of Thi-QarAbgeschlossenPsychologischer Stress | Akademischer StressIrak
-
Canterbury Christ Church UniversitySussex Partnership NHS Foundation TrustNoch keine RekrutierungBeruflicher Stress oder Stress am ArbeitsplatzVereinigtes Königreich
-
Universita di VeronaUniversity of Roma La SapienzaRekrutierungStress, emotional | Stress, PsychischItalien
-
Inspiration at WorkNorthwestern UniversityAbgeschlossenStress, emotional | Job-StressVereinigte Staaten
-
Maharishi International UniversityCenter for Wellness and Achievement in EducationAbgeschlossenJob-Stress | Wahrgenommener Stress
-
Massachusetts General HospitalAbgeschlossenBetonen | Emotionaler Stress | Psychologischer Stress | Sozialer Stress | LebensstressVereinigte Staaten
-
Holly RisdonBPAi; American Institute of StressNoch keine Rekrutierung
-
Mälardalen UniversityAbgeschlossenGesundheitsverhalten | Psychischer Stress | Occupation-Related Stress DisorderSchweden
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcRigshospitalet, Denmark; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfNoch keine RekrutierungBetonen | Stress und Burnout | Stress BiomarkerDeutschland, Dänemark
-
Kamuran CeritNoch keine RekrutierungAchtsamkeitsbasiertes Programm für Stress, Zufriedenheit und Leistung von Pflegekräften (MIND-NURSE)Job-Stress | Arbeitszufriedenheit | Arbeitsleistung