Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

PRIMUS : Real World Usage for Real World Evidence of CDSS Use in Multiple Sclerosis (PRIMUS)

9. Juni 2026 aktualisiert von: Nantes University Hospital

PRIMUS a Multi-centre, Controlled, Cluster-randomised, Open Study of Multiple Impacts of CDSS Use in Multiple Sclerosis : Real World Usage for Real World Evidence

This study evaluates a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS), named PRIMUS, designed to support therapeutic decision-making in MS. The CDSS is based on a validated reference database integrating retrospective data from randomized controlled trials and the French national MS cohort (Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques, OFSEP). This reference database consists of synthetic data derived from these sources.

PRIMUS enables visualization of disease activity at 1 and 2 years under different therapeutic scenarios, based on clinical and MRI characteristics of patients similar to the patient of interest. The CDSS PRIMUS aims to support informed and individualized treatment decisions. Because MRI is a critical marker of disease activity previously acquired MRI scans will be reanalyzed using automated segmentation and validated by a radiologist to standardize lesion assessment across centers. The results will be displayed to the neurologist and, if appropriate shown to the patient using a dedicated viewer, and can be discussed during the consultation.

A cluster-randomized controlled trial, with hospitals as the unit, will be conducted to evaluate the impact of the CDSS on treatment decision-making in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. The primary objective is to assess whether the use of the CDSS influences therapeutic choices during clinical consultations.

The study hypothesis is that use of the CDSS will increase the proportion of high-efficacy treatments initiated or selected, compared with usual care without CDSS support.

In parallel, an optional sub-study using a mixed-methods approach will explore clinicians' and patients' perceptions of, and interactions with, the CDSS.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

448

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

  • Frankreich
      • Angers, Frankreich, 49933
      • Antibes, Frankreich, 06606
      • Bordeaux, Frankreich, 33076
      • Brest, Frankreich, 29609
      • Caen, Frankreich, 14000
        • Caen hospital
        • Kontakt:
      • Clermont-Ferrand, Frankreich
      • Colmar, Frankreich
      • Créteil, Frankreich, 94000
        • Hôpital Henri Mondor
        • Kontakt:
      • Dijon, Frankreich, 21079
      • Grenoble, Frankreich, 38700
        • Grenoble Alpes Hospital
        • Kontakt:
      • La Roche-sur-Yon, Frankreich, 85925
      • Lille, Frankreich, 59037
      • Lyon, Frankreich, 69500
        • Hospices Civils de Lyon
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Sandra Mrs VUKUSIC, Professor
      • Marseille, Frankreich, 13385
        • Marseille Hospital / La Timone
        • Kontakt:
      • Metz, Frankreich, 57530
      • Montpellier, Frankreich, 34295
        • Montpellier Hospital
        • Kontakt:
      • Nancy, Frankreich, 54035
        • Nancy Hospital
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Guillaume M MATHEY, PHD
      • Nice, Frankreich, 06000
        • Nice Hospital
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Christine Mrs LEBRUN-FRENAY, Professor
      • Nîmes, Frankreich, 30029
      • Paris, Frankreich, 75019
        • Hopital Fondation ROTSCHILD
      • Poissy, Frankreich, 78303
      • Poitiers, Frankreich, 86021
      • Rennes, Frankreich, 35000
        • Rennes Hospital
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Laure Michel, Professor
      • Rouen, Frankreich, 76000
        • Rouen Hospital
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Bertrand BOURRE, Professor
      • Saint-Brieuc, Frankreich, 22027
        • Saint-Brieuc Hospital
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • François M LALLEMENT, PHD
      • St-Malo, Frankreich
        • Groupement Hospitalier Rance Emeraude Saint Malo
        • Kontakt:
      • Strasbourg, Frankreich, 67200
        • Strasbourg Hospital
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Jerome M DE SEZE, Professor
      • Toulouse, Frankreich, 31059
        • Toulouse Hospital
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Jonathan M CIRON, PHD
      • Tours, Frankreich, 37044
      • Vannes, Frankreich, 56017
        • Groupement Hospitalier Brocéliande Atlantique Vannes
        • Kontakt:
      • Épinal, Frankreich, 88000

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women aged >18 and ≤50 years.
  • Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) according to the McDonald 2024 criteria.

  • Patients for whom a change in therapeutic management is being considered due to:

    • intolerance to treatment or personal preference in the absence of inflammatory activity, whether patients are:

      • on a moderately effective disease-modifying therapy [Interferon beta; Glatiramer acetate; Teriflunomide; Dimethyl fumarate; Diroximel fumarate] for at least 12 months without interruption
      • on anti-S1P therapy [Fingolimod; Ponesimod] for at least 12 months without interruption or

    • recent inflammatory activity (relapse or at least one T1 Gd+ lesion or one new T2 lesion) reported or observed at inclusion, whether patients are:

      • treatment-naïve
      • on a moderately effective disease-modifying therapy for at least 6 months or on anti-S1P therapy for at least 6 months
      • untreated for at least one year
  • Patients with MRI follow-up including at least one 3D brain FLAIR sequence and a T1 Gd+ sequence in the case of a re-baseline brain MRI within the past 6 months.
  • Patients whose MRI scans are available for download on the day of consultation.
  • Patients affiliated with or beneficiaries of a social security system.
  • Patients able to provide written informed consent. For women of childbearing potential, use of an effective method of contraception throughout the study in accordance with the recommendations of the Clinical Trials Coordination Group

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a progressive form of multiple sclerosis (primary or secondary).
  • Patients with current or past history of other autoimmune diseases.
  • Patients with uncontrolled disease, other than active MS.
  • Patients exposed to Mitoxantrone, Alemtuzumab, or Cladribine within the 3 years prior to inclusion.
  • Patients exposed to Ocrelizumab or Rituximab within the 18 months prior to inclusion.
  • Patients exposed to Ofatumumab within the 12 months prior to inclusion.
  • Patients receiving high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy [Natalizumab; Ofatumumab; Alemtuzumab; Cladribine; Mitoxantrone; Ocrelizumab], or Rituximab, with the exception of S1P receptor modulators.
  • Patients receiving Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (Endoxan), or having undergone stem cell transplantation.
  • Patients participating in another clinical trial, whether therapeutic or not, that could interfere with the objectives of the study.
  • Patients who have participated in a therapeutic trial within the 24 months prior to inclusion.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or those planning pregnancy during the study.
  • Patients under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, or other protective measures).

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Sonstiges
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Consultation with clinical decision support system CDSS
Participants will undergo a consultation supported by a CDSS when initiation or modification of MS treatment is being considered.
Gerät: Clinical decision support system

The Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) PRIMUS is a software (as medical device) designed to support therapeutic decisions in multiple sclerosis (MS) and assist clinicians during consultations in which initiation or modification of MS treatment is considered.

The system uses retrospective clinical and MRI data from a reference database to generate visualizations of disease evolution over a 2-year period under different therapeutic scenarios, based on patient-specific characteristics entered by the clinician.

PRIMUS does not make treatment recommendations and does not replace clinical judgment. All treatment decisions remain at the discretion of the clinician
Kein Eingriff: Usual care (consultation without CDSS)
Participants will receive standard clinical care without the use of a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS). Treatment decisions will be made according to routine clinical practice.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Treatment choice
Zeitfenster: once at Month 1
Treatment decision at the end of the consultation with or without CDSS use. Patients will be classified into groups: high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (anti-CD20 therapies, natalizumab, cladribine, S1P receptor modulators), moderate-efficacy therapies (interferon beta, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide), or no treatment. Results will be expressed as the percentage of patients in each category/ The distribution of treatment strategies will be expressed as the percentage of patients in each category.
once at Month 1

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Treatment decision concordance with expert recommendation
Zeitfenster: Month 1
Assessment of concordance defined as agreement (Yes/no) between the treatment decision made by the neurologist at the end of the consultation (Month 1, with or without CDSS use) and the treatment decision recommended by an independent expert panel of experts.
Month 1
Patient Adherence: Concordance Between Prescribed and Actual Treatment
Zeitfenster: Month 10, last visit
Assessment of concordance (yes/no) between the treatment decision made by the neurologist at the end of the consultation (Month 1, with or without CDSS use) and the treatment actually taken by the patient at Month 10.
Month 10, last visit
Treatment Decision Concordance with Dynamic Score Recommendation
Zeitfenster: Month 1
Assessment of concordance defined as agreement (yes/no) between the treatment decision made by the neurologist at the end of the consultation (M1, with or without CDSS use) and recommendations derived from a dynamic scoring system designed to guide early switching from first-line to second-line disease-modifying therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting MS.For this outcome measure, results will be reported as the proportion of participants whose treatment decision is concordant with the recommendation generated by the dynamic score (Yes/No).The dynamic score is based on predefined clinical and radiological criteria and identifies patients who may benefit from early treatment escalation to reduce the risk of relapse.The recommendation generated by the score (maintain first-line therapy or escalate to second-line therapy) will be compared to the neurologist's treatment decision.Concordance will be considered achieved if the neurologist's treatment decision matches the recommendations
Month 1
Evolution of treatment decision
Zeitfenster: Month 1

Assessment of concordance defined as agreement (yes/no) between the treatment decision initially considered by the neurologist at inclusion (Month 0) and the treatment decision made at the end of the consultation (Month 1, with or without CDSS use).

This outcome evaluates whether the initial treatment strategy is maintained or modified between Month 0 and Month 1, including potential influence of CDSS use during the consultation
Month 1
Cost-utility analysis of CDSS use
Zeitfenster: Month 0 to Month 10

A cost-utility analysis will be conducted from a societal perspective over a 10-month period : at baseline (Month 0), Month 1, and Month 10 to evaluate the impact of CDSS use.

Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system includes five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each with five response levels.

Utility index values range from values below 0 (health states worse than death) to 1 (perfect health), with higher scores indicating better health status.

Costs related to multiple sclerosis care will be collected over the study period (M0-M10) using patient diaries. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) will be estimated from EQ-5D-5L utility values and combined with cost data to perform the cost-utility analysis.
Month 0 to Month 10
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life Questionnaire (MusiQoL) Score
Zeitfenster: Month 0 and Month 10

Health-related quality of life will be assessed using validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument : the Multiple Sclerosis-specific quality of life questionnaire (MusiQoL) at baseline (Month 0) and Month 10.

The MusiQoL provides a disease-specific assessment of quality of life in multiple sclerosis. The MusiQoL global index score ranges from 0 to 100.

Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Month 0 and Month 10
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Health-Related Quality of life : 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Score
Zeitfenster: Month 0 and Month 10

General health-related quality of life will be assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) at baseline (Month 0) and Month 10. It evaluates general health-related quality of life.

The SF-12 generates Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores. Scores generally range from 0 to 100.

Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Month 0 and Month 10
Clinician-Reported Usability of the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS)
Zeitfenster: Month 1

In the CDSS arm only, patient experience will be assessed using a dedicated 10-item questionnaire administered after a consultation supported by the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) at Month 1.

Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating a better patient experience with the CDSS-supported consultation.
Month 1
Patient experience with CDSS use Patient Experience with Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) Use
Zeitfenster: Month 1

In the CDSS arm only, patient experience will be assessed using a dedicated 10-item questionnaire administered after a consultation supported by the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) at Month 1.

Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating a better patient experience with the CDSS-supported consultation.
Month 1
Neurologist Experience with MRI Viewer Use During Consultation
Zeitfenster: Month 1

Neurologists' experience with MRI viewer use during consultation will be assessed in both study arms (with or without CDSS use).

Experience will be assessed using a dedicated 10-item questionnaire rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction and perceived usability of MRI visualization. All participating neurologists will complete the questionnaire.
Month 1
Patient Experience with MRI Viewer Use During Consultation
Zeitfenster: Month 1

Patient experience regarding MRI visualization using the viewer during neurological consultation will be assessed in both study arms.

Experience will be assessed using a dedicated 10-item questionnaire rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction and improved understanding of MRI information. All included patients will complete the questionnaire.
Month 1
Consultation duration
Zeitfenster: Month 1
Impact of the (CDSS) on the duration of the neurological consultation. Consultation duration will be defined as the time (in minutes) elapsed between the start and end of the consultation (in minutes) at Month 1, conducted either with or without CDSS support
Month 1
Device reliability
Zeitfenster: Month 1

Reliability of the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) will be assessed by recording the number of device-related issues occurring during the study period. These issues include system failures, software bugs, interface malfunctions, security issues, interpretation errors, performance degradation, and connectivity problems.

All CDSS-related malfunctions or operational issues will be recorded
Month 1

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Nantes University Hospital

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

30. Juni 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Oktober 2027

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Juli 2028

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

2. Juni 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

9. Juni 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

15. Juni 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

15. Juni 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

9. Juni 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juni 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • RC22_0577
  • 2026-A00510-51 (Andere Kennung: Nantes Hospital)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Clinical decision support system

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Egypt

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren