A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Underwater Versus Conventional Preventive Coagulation for Intraprocedural Vessel Management During Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) has become an established, minimally invasive therapy for achalasia and esophageal motility disorders. Submucosal tunnelling is a critical phase of POEM and requires meticulous haemostasis to avoid bleeding, loss of orientation, reduced visibility, and prolonged procedural time.
The current standard method of vessel coagulation during POEM involves conventional coagulation under CO₂ insufflation using the hybrid knife (HK). However, this approach can require additional hemostatic devices-most commonly coagulation forceps-particularly when dealing with large-calibre vessels or resistant bleeding.
A novel technique-underwater preventive coagulation-leverages water as a conductive medium. Preliminary evidence suggests that:
- electrosurgical current in water is focalized at the interface of the vessel,
- allowing a soft sealing of the vessel wall,
- reducing the risk of vessel rupture or unintended deep thermal injury,
- and potentially eliminating the need to convert to coagulation forceps. Pilot data from our center demonstrate that underwater prophylactic sealing of large vessels during POEM is feasible, safe, and associated with markedly reduced need for rescue coagulation forceps. The technique is already used in practice but lacks systematic evidence from prospective randomized trials.
This study is designed to provide high-quality evidence on whether underwater vessel coagulation improves haemostatic efficiency, reduces intra-procedural bleeding, and minimizes device changes during POEM.
All POEM procedures will be performed under general anesthesia in the supine position using Fujifilm high-definition gastroscopes with a 2.8 mm channel and transparent distal cap.
Steps (Both Arms)
- Identify the esophagogastric junction (EGJ).
- Inject saline + methylene blue submucosally.
- Create a 2 cm mucosal incision at 5-6 o'clock position, 10 cm above EGJ.
- Enter the submucosal space.
- Perform submucosal tunnelling down to EGJ and 2-3 cm into cardia.
Perform vessel haemostasis according to group allocation:
- Underwater coagulation (intervention)
- CO₂-based conventional coagulation (control)
- Perform circular myotomy (with occasional full-thickness myotomy when indicated).
- Close the mucosal entry using hemostatic clips.
- Record procedure time, instrument exchanges, bleeding events, and forceps usage.
Equipment
- Hybrid Knife (Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH)
- VIO 3 generator + ERBEJet 2 water-jet system
- Methylene-blue tinted saline
- Electrosurgical settings: ENDO CUT Q 2-3-3 for mucosal incision and myotomy
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Estado
Condiciones
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Primary Objective
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:
1. Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and 2. Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation. Secondary Objectives
- To compare composite forceps use (rescue + prophylactic) between groups.
- To evaluate the frequency of prophylactic-only forceps use.
- To compare total number of forceps applications per procedure.
- To determine differences in intra-procedural bleeding episodes.
- To compare procedural efficiency (procedure time, number of instrument exchanges).
- To compare hematological and inflammatory markers (Hb drop, Hct, CRP, WBC).
- To compare delayed bleeding rates within 30 days.
- To evaluate overall complication rates (intra- and post-procedural).
- To assess patient-reported outcomes (pain, tolerability). A prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial.
Study Arms Intervention Arm: Underwater Coagulation
- Vessel coagulation performed entirely underwater using the Hybrid Knife.
- SWIFT COAG: E3 (89 W) for POEM.
- Physiological saline instilled to completely displace air around the target vessel.
Control Arm: Conventional Coagulation (CO₂ Setting)
- Standard vessel isolation and coagulation under CO₂ insufflation.
- SWIFT COAG: E3 (89 W) for POEM.
Tipo de estudio
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Inscripción
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Estudio Contacto
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: Rajesh Goud Mr Maragoni, M.Pharm
- Número de teléfono: 312 04023378888
- Correo electrónico: rajeshgoud761@gmail.com
Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio
- Nombre: Zaheer Nabi Dr Mohammed, MD DNB
- Número de teléfono: 427 04023378888
- Correo electrónico: zaheernabi1978@gmail.com
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Telangana
-
Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 500082
- Reclutamiento
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospital
-
Contacto:
- Mohan Ramchandani, MBBS
- Número de teléfono: 802 04023378888
- Correo electrónico: ramchandanimohan@gmail.com
-
Contacto:
- Rajesh Goud Mr Maragoni, M.Pharm MBA
- Número de teléfono: 301 04023378888
- Correo electrónico: rajeshgoud761@gmail.com
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Método de muestreo
Población de estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Diagnosis of achalasia or esophageal motility disorder planned for POEM
- Ability to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Anticoagulant or antithrombotic therapy not safely stoppable
- Known coagulopathy or platelet disorder
- Esophageal/gastric varices
- Previous POEM or Heller's myotomy
- Prior treatment for same condition
- Inability or refusal to consent
- Visualized vessels smaller than the HK inner diameter (1.2 mm)
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
Número de grupos/cohortes
Cohortes e Intervenciones
Grupo / CohorteGrupo / Cohorte |
Intervención / TratamientoIntervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Under Water Coagulation
Intervention Arm: Underwater Coagulation
|
Leverages water as a conductive medium. Preliminary evidence suggests that:
|
|
Conventional Coagulation
Control Arm: Conventional Coagulation (CO₂ Setting)
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:
Periodo de tiempo: 60 minutes
|
|
60 minutes
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
To compare composite forceps use (rescue + prophylactic) between groups.
Periodo de tiempo: 60 minutes
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
60 minutes
|
|
To evaluate the frequency of prophylactic-only forceps use.
Periodo de tiempo: 60 minutes
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
60 minutes
|
|
To compare total number of forceps applications per procedure.
Periodo de tiempo: 60 minutes
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
60 minutes
|
|
To determine differences in intra-procedural bleeding episodes
Periodo de tiempo: 60 minutes
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
60 minutes
|
|
To compare procedural efficiency (procedure time, number of instrument exchanges
Periodo de tiempo: 60 minutes
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
60 minutes
|
|
To compare hematological and inflammatory markers (Hb drop, Hct, CRP, WBC)
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
24 hours
|
|
To compare delayed bleeding rates
Periodo de tiempo: 30 days
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation
|
30 days
|
|
To evaluate overall complication rates (intra- and post-procedural)
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
24 hours
|
|
To assess patient-reported outcomes (pain, tolerability).
Periodo de tiempo: 72 hours
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
72 hours
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Patrocinador
Investigadores
Investigadores
- Director de estudio: Mohan Dr Ramchandani, MD DM, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Inicio del estudio
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
Finalización primaria
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Publicado por primera vez
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización publicada
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Otros números de identificación del estudio
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- POEM UWC 2026
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .