Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosing Periodontitis and Monitoring Gingival Inflammation
Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Models for Periodontitis Diagnosis and Gingival Inflammation Monitoring at Tooth and Patient Levels: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study
Background and Objective:
Periodontitis and gingivitis are highly prevalent oral diseases that require accurate diagnostic classification and continuous gingival health monitoring. This study aims to develop, internally validate, and externally evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) models for periodontitis staging and gingival inflammation assessment at both tooth and patient levels.
Study Design:
This is a multi-center observational study utilizing a large-scale primary clinical dataset for model development. To rigorously evaluate the generalizability of the trained AI models, two distinct pathways of independent external validation will be implemented across multiple clinical sites.
Research Phases & Validation Architecture:
Phase 1 (Periodontitis Diagnosis via Probing): Development of an AI model to diagnose periodontitis (binary classification: stage 0/I vs. stage II/III/IV) at both tooth and patient levels, using comprehensive clinical periodontal probing as the gold standard. External Validation I will be performed using an independent cohort from another campus of the primary hospital to test the model's diagnostic accuracy.
Phase 2 (Periodontitis Diagnosis via Radiographs): Development of an AI model to diagnose periodontitis (binary classification: stage 0/I vs. stage II/III/IV) at both tooth and patient levels, using digital panoramic radiographs as the reference standard. External Validation II will be conducted using distinct, independent image datasets acquired from two separate regional hospitals to evaluate geographic generalizability.
Phase 3 (Gingival Inflammation Monitoring): Development of an AI model to monitor and assess gingival inflammation at both tooth and patient levels, based on Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BOP) as the gold standard. This model's performance will also be evaluated through External Validation I using the independent dataset from the primary hospital's alternative campus.
Significance:
By validating the AI models across varied institutional workflows and imaging systems, this study will provide high-level evidence on the clinical utility and robustness of AI-driven digital systems for automated periodontal screening and long-term health monitoring.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Estado
Condiciones
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Intervención / Tratamiento
Tipo de estudio
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Inscripción
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Shanghai, Porcelana
- Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Método de muestreo
Población de estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged > 18 years at the time of their clinical periodontal examination.
- Availability of complete full-mouth periodontal charting records, which must include Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BOP) documented at 6 sites per tooth.
- Availability of a digital panoramic radiograph of acceptable diagnostic quality, taken within one months of the clinical periodontal examination.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are completely edentulous or those who have undergone full-arch dental implant rehabilitation (not applicable for natural teeth periodontitis staging).
- Panoramic radiographs with severe image degradation, including major motion artifacts, severe positioning errors, or poor contrast/exposure that obscures the alveolar bone crest.
- Presence of extensive metal artifacts or massive bilateral multiple fixed crowns/bridges that completely shadow the marginal bone level of interest.
- Incomplete clinical electronic medical records or missing core diagnostic descriptors required to establish the clinical gold standard for periodontitis staging or gingival inflammation.
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
Número de grupos/cohortes
Cohortes e Intervenciones
Grupo / CohorteGrupo / Cohorte |
Intervención / TratamientoIntervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Multi-center Periodontal AI Development and Validation Cohort
Development Dataset (Primary Campus): Large-scale data used for the initial training and internal validation of the AI algorithms. External Validation Dataset I (Secondary Campus): An independent dataset from an alternative campus of the primary hospital, used to validate clinical probing-based periodontitis diagnosis (Phase 1) and gingival inflammation monitoring (Phase 3). External Validation Dataset II (Two Regional Hospitals): Separate imaging datasets from two distinct regional medical centers, used to validate radiograph-based periodontitis diagnosis (Phase 2). |
The intervention evaluated in this observational study is the deployment of deep learning/artificial intelligence (AI) software models. The AI algorithms process two streams of standard clinical data to perform three automated diagnostic tasks without altering patient care: Automated classification of periodontitis stages (Stage 0/I vs. Stage II/III/IV) utilizing full-mouth clinical charting metrics. Automated classification of periodontitis stages (Stage 0/I vs. Stage II/III/IV) utilizing digital panoramic radiographs. Automated assessment and monitoring of gingival inflammation flags based on Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BOP) patterns. The outputs of these AI models will be directly compared against clinical and radiographic gold standards to calculate diagnostic accuracy metrics. |
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic Accuracy of the AI Model for Probing-Based Periodontitis Staging
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (At a single point in time for each participant (cross-sectional assessment))
|
The diagnostic performance of the deep learning AI model in classifying periodontitis stages (binary classification: Stage 0/I vs. Stage II/III/IV) at both individual tooth and patient levels, using comprehensive clinical periodontal probing as the gold standard.
Performance will be evaluated using the internal development dataset and verified using External Validation Dataset I (secondary campus data).
Metrics will include Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC), Sensitivity, Specificity, and F1-score.
|
Baseline (At a single point in time for each participant (cross-sectional assessment))
|
|
Diagnostic Accuracy of the AI Model for Radiograph-Based Periodontitis Staging
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (At a single point in time for each participant (cross-sectional assessment))
|
The diagnostic performance of the deep learning AI model in classifying periodontitis stages (binary classification: Stage 0/I vs. Stage II/III/IV) at both individual tooth and patient levels, using digital panoramic radiographs as the reference standard.
Performance will be evaluated using the internal development dataset and verified using External Validation Dataset II (multi-center data from two separate regional hospitals).
Metrics will include Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC), Sensitivity, Specificity, and F1-score.
|
Baseline (At a single point in time for each participant (cross-sectional assessment))
|
|
Diagnostic Accuracy of the AI Model for Gingival Inflammation Monitoring
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (At a single point in time for each participant (cross-sectional assessment))
|
The performance of the deep learning AI model in detecting and monitoring gingival inflammation flags at both individual tooth and patient levels, using Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BOP) metrics as the clinical gold standard.
Performance will be evaluated using the internal development dataset and verified using External Validation Dataset I (secondary campus data).
Metrics will include Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV).
|
Baseline (At a single point in time for each participant (cross-sectional assessment))
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Patrocinador
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Inicio del estudio
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización primaria
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Publicado por primera vez
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización publicada
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- SH9H-2025-T196-4
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .