Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Comfort Between Two Clear Aligner Trimming-Line Designs: A Split-Mouth Study (COMFORT-ALIGN)

Comparison of Patient-Reported Comfort Between Supragingival and Juxtagingival Clear Aligner Trimming-Line Designs: A Cross-Sectional, Within-Subject Split-Mouth Study

  • The trimming-line design of clear aligners (supragingival versus juxtagingival) is a routine clinical decision whose influence on patient-reported comfort has not been established; available evidence on aligner comfort derives almost exclusively from comparisons with fixed appliances.
  • This observational, cross-sectional study compares two clear aligner trimming-line designs with respect to patient-reported comfort: a supragingival design, whose edge rests on the marginal gingiva, and a juxtagingival design, whose edge follows the gingival contour without covering it. Because the two designs sit differently against the gingival soft tissue, they may be experienced differently during wear.
  • Participants are patients already wearing one trimming-line design on one dental arch and the other on the contralateral arch; each participant thus serves as their own control. After a minimum of four weeks of wear, participants complete a 20-item questionnaire once, rating the frequency of defined oral experiences for the maxillary and mandibular arch separately on a three-point ordinal scale (0 = none, 1 = occasional, 2 = frequent).
  • The questionnaire is anonymous; the design worn on each arch is identified from which of two identical forms a participant completes. Responses for the two designs are compared within each participant. The study evaluates whether trimming-line design is associated with differences in patient-reported comfort.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

  • BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE
  • Clear aligner therapy is an established modality in contemporary orthodontics. At the gingival margin, aligners are commonly trimmed according to one of two trimming-line designs, supragingival or juxtagingival. While the biomechanical and periodontal implications of trimming-line geometry have received attention, its influence on patient-reported outcomes remains uncharacterized. Available evidence on the comfort and oral health-related quality of life associated with aligner therapy derives predominantly from comparisons between aligners and fixed appliances, rather than from comparisons among aligner design parameters. The present study was designed to address this gap by evaluating whether trimming-line design is associated with differences in patient-reported comfort.
  • THE TWO TRIMMING-LINE DESIGNS
  • The supragingival design presents a straight marginal edge extending approximately 2 mm onto the marginal gingiva, in contact with the gingival surface without entering the gingival sulcus. The juxtagingival (festooned) design follows the scalloped contour of the gingival margin and terminates at the free gingival margin without overlying the gingiva. Both designs are fabricated from the same tri-layer thermoplastic aligner material (CA Pro, SCHEU-DENTAL GmbH, Iserlohn, Germany; CE-marked).
  • STUDY DESIGN AND POPULATION
  • This is an observational, cross-sectional, within-subject (split-mouth) study. Participants are patients in active clear aligner treatment who wear the two trimming-line designs, one per dental arch, prescribed as part of their orthodontic care. Each participant concurrently wears both designs and serves as their own control; the unit of comparison is the dental arch within the participant. Eligibility requires a minimum of four weeks of wear of the two designs. The planned enrollment is 70 participants.
  • STUDY INSTRUMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
  • The study instrument is a 20-item questionnaire developed for this study. The items address the functional and soft-tissue dimensions of aligner wear, including speech and phonation, mucosal and gingival sensation, retention and insertion, foreign-body sensation, and salivation and taste, corresponding to the oral surfaces in contact with the aligner margin. Each item is rated for frequency of occurrence during wear on a three-point ordinal scale (0 = none, 1 = occasional, 2 = frequent) and is answered separately for the maxillary and mandibular arch. The questionnaire is administered once, online, and is anonymous; no personal or identifying data are collected. Participants are aware that they are wearing two distinct trimming-line designs but are not informed which design corresponds to which arch, in order to limit response (expectation) bias.
  • DESIGN ALLOCATION AND ANALYSIS
  • The trimming-line design allocated to each arch varies among participants. Two identical questionnaire forms are employed: one is completed by participants in whom the maxillary arch carries the supragingival design (mandibular juxtagingival), and the other by participants with the reciprocal allocation. The form completed thereby encodes the arch-to-design correspondence without recourse to a participant identifier or any identifying data, preserving anonymity. Responses are classified by design accordingly, and supragingival and juxtagingival responses are compared within each participant. The primary analysis is an item-level comparison between designs using a paired non-parametric test (Wilcoxon signed-rank, two-sided, alpha = 0.05), supplemented by descriptive statistics (frequencies, means, standard deviations). A pre-specified secondary analysis compares the per-design total score (range 0 to 40), with assessment of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha).
  • RELATIONSHIP TO THE RESEARCH PROGRAM
  • This study is the patient-experience component of a coordinated doctoral research program of four parallel split-mouth investigations of clear aligner trimming-line design (periodontal status, subgingival microbiota, optical stability, and patient-reported comfort); findings are interpreted alongside the companion studies at the group level.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

70

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: EMILIA (PRODEA) RUSU, DDS, Specialist Orthodontist
  • Número de teléfono: +40756607316
  • Correo electrónico: rusu.emilia.24@stud.umfst.ro

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Sibiu County
      • Sibiu, Sibiu County, Rumania, 550027
        • Aorys Clinic

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Adolescent and adult patients (aged 15 years or older) in active orthodontic treatment with clear aligners, including finishing (refinement) aligners, in whom a supragingival trimming-line design is worn on one dental arch and a juxtagingival design on the contralateral arch. Eligible participants have worn the two designs for at least four weeks at the time the questionnaire is completed. Recruitment is conducted at a single orthodontic practice.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adolescent or adult patient (aged 15 years or older)
  • Active orthodontic treatment with clear aligners, including finishing (refinement) aligners
  • Wearing two clear aligners with different trimming-line designs, one per dental arch: a supragingival design on one arch and a juxtagingival design on the contralateral arch
  • At least 4 weeks of wear of the two designs at the time of questionnaire completion
  • Good treatment compliance
  • Willing and able to complete the online questionnaire and provide the required consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mixed orthodontic treatment (aligners combined with fixed appliances)
  • Pre-existing neurological, cognitive, or speech disorders
  • Systemic conditions affecting the oral cavity (e.g., xerostomia, mucosal disorders)

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
Group/Cohort (1): Split-mouth participants (both trimming-line designs)
Patients wearing the supragingival trimming-line design on one dental arch and the juxtagingival design on the contralateral arch, who completed the comfort questionnaire after at least four weeks of wear.
Clear aligner edge covering approximately 2 mm of marginal gingiva (straight cut), worn on one dental arch.
Clear aligner edge following the scalloped gingival contour, terminating at the free gingival margin without covering the gingiva, worn on the contralateral arch.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Per-item patient-reported frequency (0-2) for the supragingival versus juxtagingival design
Periodo de tiempo: Day 28 (+/- 2 days) after the start of wear of the two designs
For each of the 20 questionnaire items (each rated 0 = no, 1 = occasionally, 2 = frequently, recorded separately for the two dental arches), the response associated with the supragingival design is compared with the response associated with the juxtagingival design within each participant, using a paired non-parametric test (Wilcoxon signed-rank, two-sided, alpha 0.05). Responses are also summarized descriptively (frequencies, means, standard deviations).
Day 28 (+/- 2 days) after the start of wear of the two designs

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Total patient-reported discomfort score per design (0-40)
Periodo de tiempo: Day 28 (+/- 2 days) after the start of wear of the two designs
Pre-specified secondary analysis. For each participant, the 20 item scores associated with each design are summed to a total from 0 (no reported discomfort) to 40 (maximum reported frequency across all items); the supragingival and juxtagingival totals are compared within participants (Wilcoxon signed-rank, two-sided, alpha 0.05). Internal consistency of the total score is assessed (Cronbach's alpha).
Day 28 (+/- 2 days) after the start of wear of the two designs

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: EMILIA (PRODEA) RUSU, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology of Targu Mures, 38 Gheorghe Marinescu Street, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania
  • Silla de estudio: LUMINITA LAZAR, DDS, PhD, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology of Targu Mures, 38 Gheorghe Marinescu Street, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de julio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Actual)

7 de agosto de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

7 de agosto de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

16 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

16 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

22 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

21 de agosto de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

20 de agosto de 2026

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • COMFORT-ALIGN-ORTHO
  • 3885/2025 (Otro identificador: Ethics Committee for Scientific Research, UMFST Targu Mures)

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

The study collects anonymous questionnaire responses, with no participant code or identifying data; the trimming-line design per arch is derived from which of two identical forms a participant completed. A minimal de-identified dataset (per-design total discomfort scores) will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author following publication. Companion-study data are not linked.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

Beginning 6 months after publication of primary study results.

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

Upon reasonable request to the corresponding author (PI); requests reviewed within 30 days.

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .