Home Visit Simulation-based Earthquake Preparedness Training for Nursing Students
Home Visit Simulation-based Earthquake Preparedness Training for Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Quasi-experimental Study
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Estado
Condiciones
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Even if theoretical knowledge of disaster nursing is provided within the scope of public health courses, in a subject requiring the development of complex experiental skills outside of clinical settings, such as disasters, educational methods that support learning by doing are recommended. Simulation-based learning is an educational method that supports nurses in learning and developing skills by experiencing nursing practices through the simulation of basic situations they may encounter in a hospital setting using structured scenarios. However, a systematic review examining studies on simulation-based learning indicates that the vast majority of studies were conducted in hospital-level simulations, and there are very few studies at the community level. Experiential learning is an important component of simulation-based training. Experiential learning emphasizes that learning is not only a mental activity but also includes bodily and emotional processes by integrating individuals' experiences into the learning process. In experiential learning, participants are actors playing a role assigned to them in the scenario. Thus, through the experiences they gain within the structured scenario, participants achieve cognitive, psychomotor, and affective learning objectives, and the learning process gains a holistic quality. There are few community-based studies that directly involve participants in the scenario using simulation-based experiential learning. Therefore, this planned study aims to enable nursing students to achieve cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning objectives in home visit and earthquake preparedness processes by implementing earthquake preparedness training based on home visit simulations through experiential learning. Furthermore, the study aims to improve students' skills in evaluating real-life environments, identifying risks, and implementing protective measures through home visit simulations. The findings are important both for the design of educational programs and for strengthening the role of nurses in community-based disaster response and preparedness processes. Thus, the study aims to provide concrete and applicable suggestions for both academic literature and practical applications.
In the 2025-2026 spring semester, fourth-year nursing students taking the public health nursing course were given earthquake preparedness training based on home visit simulations. The scenario was created by the researchers and expert opinions were obtained. Data collection tools were applied for a pre-test before the scenario. The scenario was carried out in stages as two home visits. The first home visit aimed to focus on initiating the home visit, data collection, and in-home risk assessment, while the second home visit aimed to focus on earthquake preparedness health education applications. In the study, communication skills, awareness of earthquake preparedness, and self-regulated learning skills were applied before and after the home visit simulation. The applications were carried out in the Preventive Health Practices Laboratory of the Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Duzce University. The laboratory was arranged as a simulation of a home environment consisting of a living room, a bedroom, and a bathroom. The applications were recorded by a recording device in this room. The simulation stages consisted of Briefing, Scenario, and Debriefing. The first home visit was planned to last a maximum of 10 minutes, and the second home visit a maximum of 15 minutes. Analysis sessions were conducted in groups of 10, with each session lasting approximately 30 minutes. Institutional permission was obtained for the research, informed consent was obtained from the students, and permission to use the scales was secured.
Tipo de estudio
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Inscripción
Fase
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Düzce
-
Center, Düzce, Turquía (Türkiye), 81100
- Düzce University
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Niño
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being a nursing student
- Volunteering to participate in the study
- Being able to understand and answer the study questions
- Completing all data collection forms
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusing to participate in the study
- Incomplete completion of data collection forms
- Withdrawal from the study at any stage
- Having communication problems that may prevent participation in the study
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Prevención
- Asignación: N / A
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Número de brazos
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazoGrupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / TratamientoIntervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Simulation group
Participants in the intervention group participated in two home visit simulations where the first home visit, where they acted as a public health nurse, lasted a maximum of 10 minutes, and the second home visit lasted a maximum of 15 minutes.
Debriefings averaging 30 minutes were conducted at the end of each visit.
|
Participants conducted home visits in a simulated home environment.
The first home visit involved data collection and assessment of indoor earthquake risks.
The second home visit involved earthquake preparedness training (preparing an earthquake kit, identifying a survival triangle area, demonstrating the "drop, cover, and hold" procedure, etc.).
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Earthquake Preparedness Attitudes and Beliefs
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and immediately after the simulation intervention
|
Earthquake Preparedness Attitudes and Beliefs Scale:This scale is used to evaluate individuals' attitudes and beliefs regarding earthquake preparedness behaviors.
The scale consists of four sub-dimensions: attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intention.
Consisting of a total of 8 items, the scale is structured using a 7-point Likert type, with items scored between "1=Strongly disagree" and "7=Strongly agree".
The minimum possible score on the scale is 8, and the maximum score is 56.
A higher score indicates that individuals have positive attitudes and strong beliefs regarding earthquake preparedness behaviors.
|
Baseline and immediately after the simulation intervention
|
|
The Communication Skills
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and immediately after the simulation intervention
|
The Communication Skills Scale was adapted into Turkish by and to assess individuals' communication skills.
The scale consists of four subdimensions: competence, barriers, body language, and valuing.
It includes a total of 36 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "1 = Strongly disagree" to "5 = Strongly agree."
Some items are reverse scored.
The minimum possible score on the scale is 36, while the maximum possible score is 180.
Higher scores indicate better communication skills and more effective interpersonal communication.
|
Baseline and immediately after the simulation intervention
|
|
The Self-Directed Learning Skills
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and immediately after the simulation intervention
|
The Self-Directed Learning Skills Scale was developed by and to evaluate individuals' self-directed learning skills.
The scale consists of four subdimensions: motivation, self-monitoring, self-control, and self-confidence.
It includes a total of 21 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "1 = Never" to "5 = Always."
The minimum possible score on the scale is 21, while the maximum possible score is 105.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-directed learning skills and greater ability to manage one's own learning process effectively.
|
Baseline and immediately after the simulation intervention
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Patrocinador
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Inicio del estudio
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización primaria
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Publicado por primera vez
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización publicada
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Otros números de identificación del estudio
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- Duzce-U-merve0006
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .