A Preregistered Multi-Cohort Evaluation of the FATHOM AI System for Molecular Testing Prioritization to Support Clinical Trial Enrollment (FATHOM)
Many clinical trials evaluating cancer treatments require patients to undergo testing for specific molecular markers as part of eligibility screening, typically using immunohistochemistry or sequencing. Because relatively few patients may carry a required marker, trial investigators often test large numbers of patients to identify the few who may ultimately qualify for enrollment.
Pathology laboratories routinely produce hematoxylin-and-eosin (H&E) slides during cancer diagnosis. Pathology foundation models-large neural networks pretrained on millions of histology images-have shown promise in predicting molecular characteristics from these slides. Researchers can use these models to build classifiers that predict specific molecular markers and prioritize patients for confirmatory testing.
This study evaluates FATHOM (Facilitating Accrual through Tumor Histology and Omics Matching), an autonomous research system powered by large multimodal models. Its agents read registered clinical trial records, identify molecular markers used as enrollment criteria, build prediction models using pathology foundation models, select the individual models or model combinations that best meet prespecified criteria, set their decision thresholds, and determine whether to deploy them. Together, a prediction model, its decision threshold, and the decision to deploy it constitute an AI prediction policy.
Before FATHOM runs, the investigators preregister the clinical trial records that its agents may read, the cutoff date that defines which trial information they may use, the rules governing the agents, and the analysis plan. The system timestamps and locks each policy immediately after an agent produces it. The investigators then apply the policies to archived patient slides and compare their predictions with existing molecular marker results.
The primary outcome is the proportion of prespecified evaluation scenarios in which an agent-generated policy, compared with universal molecular testing, either enriches the population selected for confirmatory testing with marker-positive patients or safely spares patients from confirmatory testing while meeting prespecified performance criteria.
This study analyzes existing pathology images and clinical trial records only. It does not enroll or contact patients, influence patient care, or affect participation in any clinical trial.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Estado
Condiciones
Condiciones
Descripción detallada
WHAT IS REGISTERED. This study evaluates screening policies generated by autonomous research agents using archived pathology slides and existing molecular marker profiles. The study does not prospectively enroll or contact patients. The investigators register the clinical trial corpus that the agents may read, the trial-record cutoff date, the information that the agents may access, the rules governing their work, and the methods used to score their policies.
THE AGENTS. Each agent may access the registered clinical trial corpus, published literature, out-of-fold performance estimates for its own classifiers, and any development data identified in its manifest. The agent receives no results from any sealed evaluation cohort. For visual recognition, each agent uses pathology AI models as feature extractors and trains classifiers on the extracted features. The agent determines which molecular markers to model, which model to use, how to set each operating threshold, and whether to deploy the resulting policy. The agent records each decision and its rationale.
THE MANIFEST. Each agent run produces a timestamped manifest listing every policy generated and each policy's final deployment decision. On the study start date, the investigators designate the autonomous-agent approach and its comparators for the primary evaluation.
TRIAL DEMAND CUTOFF. Trials first posted before January 1, 2026, define retrospective trial demand. Trials first posted on or after January 1, 2026, are used for the temporal generalization evaluation.
SEALED ANALYSIS RULE. Each policy result corresponds to an evaluation scenario, defined as one cohort paired with one molecular marker. For each scenario, the study logs and publishes the date on which investigators first compare any model output with the ground-truth marker result.
COHORTS. The study uses archived institutional and consortium cohorts containing routine diagnostic H&E slides linked to molecular profiles. No clinician uses model output from this study to make patient-care decisions.
Tipo de estudio
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Inscripción
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Estudio Contacto
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: Chi-Kang Pai
- Número de teléfono: 6172334924
- Correo electrónico: chikang_pai@fas.harvard.edu
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos, 02115
- Harvard Medical School
-
Contacto:
- Chi-Kang Pai
- Número de teléfono: 6172334924
- Correo electrónico: chikang_pai@fas.harvard.edu
-
Investigador principal:
- Kun-Hsing Yu
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Niño
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Método de muestreo
Población de estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a histologically confirmed cancer
- Availability of relevant molecular profiling results
- At least one diagnostic hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole-slide image
Exclusion Criteria:
- Poor-quality or unreadable slides, assessed independently of model output
- Patients whose slides were used to train a policy's classifier, for that policy's evaluation
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
Número de grupos/cohortes
Cohortes e Intervenciones
Grupo / CohorteGrupo / Cohorte |
|---|
|
Archived evaluation cohorts
Patient records and data from archived multi-institutional cohorts with routine H&E whole-slide images and molecular profiles.
No intervention is assigned, and no patient is contacted.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of prespecified evaluation scenarios in which an AI-generated deployment policy demonstrates effective screening enrichment or rule-out performance
Periodo de tiempo: Periprocedural (at the time of pathology slide evaluation)
|
An evaluation scenario consists of one molecular marker evaluated in one study cohort.
For each prespecified scenario, the study assesses whether the AI system generates a policy that either prioritizes patients more likely to carry the marker for confirmatory testing or identifies patients who may safely be spared testing, compared with testing everyone.
The outcome is the proportion of scenarios in which the policy meets these performance criteria.
|
Periprocedural (at the time of pathology slide evaluation)
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Per-scenario performance of each AI-generated deployment policy
Periodo de tiempo: Periprocedural (at the time of pathology slide evaluation)
|
For each evaluation scenario, the study reports sensitivity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, the proportion of patients spared confirmatory testing, and the applicable enrichment or depletion ratio with its confidence interval.
|
Periprocedural (at the time of pathology slide evaluation)
|
|
Temporal generalizability for trials first posted on or after January 1, 2026
Periodo de tiempo: Periprocedural (at the time of pathology slide evaluation)
|
Among trials first posted on or after January 1, 2026 that require a molecular biomarker for enrollment, the study evaluates: (1) the proportion of biomarkers and trials for which the agentic AI screening approach is useful; and (2) the estimated number of patients who would benefit from AI-guided screening compared with universal molecular testing.
Estimates are based on model performance and biomarker prevalence observed in the evaluation cohorts.
|
Periprocedural (at the time of pathology slide evaluation)
|
|
Temporal performance for trials first posted on or before December 31, 2025
Periodo de tiempo: Periprocedural (at the time of pathology slide evaluation)
|
Among trials first posted on or before December 31, 2025, that require a molecular biomarker for enrollment, the study evaluates: (1) the proportion of biomarkers and trials for which the agentic AI screening approach is useful; and (2) the estimated number of patients who would benefit from AI-guided screening compared with universal molecular testing.
Estimates are based on model performance and biomarker prevalence observed in the evaluation cohorts.
|
Periprocedural (at the time of pathology slide evaluation)
|
|
Proportion of evaluation scenarios in which a non-default AI-generated deployment policy demonstrates effective screening enrichment or rule-out performance
Periodo de tiempo: Periprocedural (at the time of pathology slide evaluation)
|
Among scenarios in which the deployed policy is not the default strategy of testing everyone, the study assesses whether the AI system generates a policy that either prioritizes patients more likely to carry the marker for confirmatory testing or identifies patients who may safely be spared testing, compared with testing everyone.
The outcome is the proportion of these scenarios in which the policy meets these performance criteria.
|
Periprocedural (at the time of pathology slide evaluation)
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Patrocinador
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Estimado)
Inicio del estudio
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
Finalización primaria
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Publicado por primera vez
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización publicada
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
- Enfermedades urogenitales
- Enfermedades Genitales
- Enfermedades del sistema endocrino
- Neoplasias urogenitales
- Neoplasias por sitio
- Enfermedades urogenitales masculinas
- Enfermedades Renales
- Enfermedades urológicas
- Enfermedades urogenitales femeninas
- Enfermedades urogenitales femeninas y complicaciones del embarazo
- Enfermedades intestinales
- Enfermedades de las vías respiratorias
- Neoplasias por tipo histológico
- Neoplasias Gastrointestinales
- Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo
- Enfermedades del Sistema Digestivo
- Enfermedades Gastrointestinales
- Enfermedades del Estómago
- Neoplasias Intestinales
- Enfermedades Rectales
- Enfermedades uterinas
- Enfermedades Genitales Femeninas
- Enfermedades pulmonares
- Neoplasias de glándulas endocrinas
- Enfermedades pancreáticas
- Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales
- Neoplasias de las vías respiratorias
- Neoplasias torácicas
- Enfermedades del Colon
- Enfermedades Ováricas
- Enfermedades anexiales
- Neoplasias Genitales Femeninas
- Trastornos gonadales
- Enfermedades de la piel
- Enfermedades de los senos
- Neoplasias Urológicas
- Neoplasias Neuroepiteliales
- Tumores neuroectodérmicos
- Neoplasias De Células Germinales Y Embrionarias
- Neoplasias De Tejido Nervioso
- Neoplasias Uterinas
- Enfermedades de la piel y del tejido conectivo
- Neoplasias
- Neoplasias de Estómago
- Neoplasias Pulmonares
- Neoplasias colorrectales
- Neoplasias Ováricas
- Neoplasias de mama
- Neoplasias pancreáticas
- Glioma
- Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello
- Neoplasias Endometriales
- Neoplasias Renales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- FATHOM
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .