Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Inflammation and Medical Provider Attitudes, Cognition, and Treatment Decisions Study (IMPACT)

25 de septiembre de 2026 actualizado por: University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

The Impacts of Adverse Provider Conditions on Medical Decision-Making and Patient Care

This is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving emergency medicine and internal medicine healthcare providers as participants. The intervention involves the administration of the seasonal influenza vaccine or a saline placebo; this protocol is used in psychoneuro-immunology to simulate a state of mild illness. The primary aim is to examine whether acute inflammation induced by receiving the vaccine affects decision-making on standardized psychological reaction time tasks and questionnaires. Participants attend two laboratory sessions on consecutive days, receive either a seasonal influenza vaccine or a saline placebo at the first session, provide blood samples to measure inflammatory cytokines, and complete a series of standardized assessments of medical decision-making and social attitudes. Participants who received the placebo during the first session will receive the vaccine during the second session.

Overall, the study is designed to examine how adverse provider conditions particularly acute inflammation, burnout, and concerns about one's own health affect provider judgments and healthcare-related decision-making. The primary hypothesis is that providers experiencing greater adverse conditions at the time of research participation would have altered decision-making compared to those experiencing fewer adverse conditions.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Reclutamiento

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Participants will provide informed consent during a call (Zoom, Teams, Phone) with the University of Arkansas research team. The research team member will explain the study procedures to the participants and will give them the opportunity to ask questions. During the call, they will review the electronic consent form and will sign the form after all of their questions have been answered. They will receive a paper copy of the consent documents to review one more time when they arrive at the first research session at their site.

Participants will complete two lab sessions on consecutive days (scheduled as close to 24-hours apart as possible) at a collaborating research site. At each site, a member of the local team will coordinate the sessions, including providing instructions before participants complete various study tasks. During each session, participants will complete standardized measures of decision-making that will allow us to comprehensively document how adverse provider conditions (acute inflammation, burnout, stress, concern about own health) affect objectivity in decision-making across multiple domains. These standardized measures include reaction time tasks and questionnaires. Participants will also complete questionnaires that assess demographic information, personality information, and questions about their experiences with adverse provider conditions (burnout, stress, other workplace demands, mood, concerns about own health). During each session, participants will provide blood samples (~3mL) that will be assayed for pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 and interleukin-1beta. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental or control condition using stratified permuted block randomization. Those in the experimental condition will receive the influenza vaccine at the end of Session 1 and those in the control condition will receive a saline placebo injection instead. We will use a double-blind design so that neither the participant nor the research assistant administering the decision-making tasks will know the condition.

At the end of the second session, participants will be debriefed and informed about the condition they were assigned to (up until this point, the research coordinator and participant will be blind to participant condition). Those in the control condition will receive the vaccine before they leave.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

210

Fase

  • Fase 2

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Anastasia Makhanova, PhD
  • Número de teléfono: 479-575-8798
  • Correo electrónico: ammakhan@uark.edu

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Arkansas
      • Fayetteville, Arkansas, Estados Unidos, 72703
        • Reclutamiento
        • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
        • Contacto:
          • Roy Kamoga, MD
          • Número de teléfono: 785-639-3110
          • Correo electrónico: gkamoga@uams.edu
        • Investigador principal:
          • Roy Kamoga, MD
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, Estados Unidos, 87106
        • Reclutamiento
        • University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center
        • Contacto:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Joe Alcock, MD
    • Virginia
      • Roanoke, Virginia, Estados Unidos, 24016
        • Reclutamiento
        • Carilion Medical Center
        • Investigador principal:
          • Michael Wilson, MD
        • Contacto:

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthcare providers currently employed in emergency medicine or internal medicine
  • Must be one of the following: Resident, fellow, attending, or advanced practice provider (NP, PA)
  • Individual is able to travel to the research site for sessions
  • Has not had an acute viral or bacterial infection within the previous 14 days
  • Has not taken an antiviral medication such as Tamiflu in the previous 48 hours
  • Has not taken corticosteroids or immunosuppressants in the previous 30 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not want to receive a flu vaccine as part of the study
  • Has received a flu vaccine this season already (after August of current year)
  • Has had a prior allergic reaction or bad side effect, including Guillain-Barre, due to a flu vaccine or another vaccine
  • Is allergic to eggs or have had an adverse reaction to egg-derived vaccine
  • Is pregnant or suspects a possible pregnancy
  • Has congenital or acquired immunodeficiency such as common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) or HIV/AIDS
  • Has an active hematologic malignancy (like leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma)
  • Has Type 1 diabetes
  • Has Graft vs. Host Disease
  • Uses aspirin, ibuprofen (i.e., NSAIDs), acetaminophen, or naproxen daily
  • Uses corticosteroids or immunosuppressants daily
  • Is currently receiving systemic chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy
  • Has had changes in daily prescription medication in the last 3 months (starting, stopping, changing dose)

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Influenza Vaccine Injection

Receives the influenza vaccine at the end of Session 1

A single administration of a seasonal trivalent cell-based influenza vaccine delivered by injection into the arm at the end of the first study session.

Comparador de placebos: Placebo Injection

Receives a saline placebo injection at the end of Session 1

Control group will receive a saline placebo injection at the end of Session 1

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Testing Automatic Judgments: "Implicit Association Test"
Periodo de tiempo: 2 days

This task calculates a "d" score across trials to quantify the strength of implicit associations. Higher d scores indicate more negative automatic attitudes.

2 days
Testing Deliberate Judgments: "Feeling Thermometers"
Periodo de tiempo: 2 days

Explicit attitudes are assessed via 100-point Feeling Thermometers that ask for feeling toward different patient groups. Lower values indicate more negative attitudes.

2 days

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Questionnaire Assessing Social Avoidance: "Patient Sorting Task"
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day

A behavioral decision-making task order patients within an array of three. The three patients are arranged in an order in which the participant would choose to see them. The outcome is the number of trials when a patient from a target group is seen later than a patient from a control group. Higher values indicate greater potential for treatment inconsistencies.

1 day
Questionnaire Assessing Perception of Others' Pain: "Threshold for Detecting Pain on Faces"
Periodo de tiempo: 2 days

Participants will see 11 images of targets of different racial groups that have each been morphed to go from no pain to high pain, responding to a yes/no question about whether the target is in pain in each image. The threshold at which participants begin perceiving pain will be calculated for each target and averaged within racial groups. Differences between groups indicate potential for greater treatment inconsistencies.

2 days
Questionnaire Assessing Cognitive Depletion: "Stroop Task"
Periodo de tiempo: 2 days

To measure the delay in reaction time between neutral and incongruent stimuli. The task calculates an interference score across many trials to show the difference in response latency between incongruent and congruent trials. Greater interference is a measure of cognitive depletion.

2 days
Questionnaire Assessing Motivation: "Motivation to Respond without Prejudice Scale"
Periodo de tiempo: 2 days

It is administered on a scale of 1 to 9, and the questions are about both internal and external motivation. Higher scores represent more motivation.

2 days

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Colaboradores

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de septiembre de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de octubre de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de diciembre de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

14 de septiembre de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

21 de septiembre de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

25 de septiembre de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

30 de septiembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

25 de septiembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • R01MD019051 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

Sí

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

Sí

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .