- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07146581
- Juicio original
Usabilidad de la intervención basada en tecnología y pruebas piloto (SIRENS)
Detección e intervención de atención primaria para la evaluación y apoyo del cuidado de la atención para pacientes con demencia: usabilidad de intervención basada en tecnología y pruebas piloto
This research project has three main goals:
(1) To create a new screening tool that helps primary care doctors spot signs of neglect in older adults with dementia. (2) To design a support program that can be delivered both in person and through a mobile app on Android phones. (3) To run a clinical trial with three groups of participants to find out how effective the screening tool is on its own, and how effective it is when combined with the support program-compared to standard care.
This current phase of the project focuses on parts of goals 1 and 2, as described below.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Elder abuse is common and has serious health consequences but is under-recognized and under-reported. Older adults with dementia are at much higher risk of mistreatment than other older adults, and the risk of mistreatment has been shown to be greater with increasing severity of dementia. This mistreatment is usually perpetrated by caregivers.
Screening for elder mistreatment and initiation of intervention in primary care clinics may be helpful, but few evidence-based tools or strategies exist. As few tools exist that may be effectively used in a busy clinical setting, evidence of the impact of screening and potential subsequent intervention on patient-important outcomes is lacking. Further, existing tools were developed for and studied in cognitively intact older adults and may not be appropriate for older adults with AD/ADRD.
In addition, elder mistreatment includes physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal/emotional/psychological abuse, financial exploitation, and caregiver neglect. These different types of elder mistreatment represent very different phenomena, occur in various groups of older adults, and respond to very different intervention strategies. These discrepancies have made connecting positive identifications of mistreatment in the primary care setting to the next steps, including interventions, very challenging. Focusing on an intervention for caregiver neglect in older adults with dementia has the potential to address these challenges. Given that the severity of dementia represents a significant risk factor in the caregiving relationship, our goal is to provide support for dementia caregivers.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: Chelsie Burchett, PhD
- Número de teléfono: 6469627141
- Correo electrónico: cob2014@med.cornell.edu
Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio
- Nombre: Sophie Park
- Correo electrónico: sep4008@med.cornell.edu
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, Estados Unidos, 10065
- Reclutamiento
- Weill Cornell Medicine
-
Contacto:
- Chelsie Burchett, PhD
- Número de teléfono: 646-962-7141
- Correo electrónico: cob2014@med.cornell.edu
-
Investigador principal:
- Anthony Rosen, MD
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Caregiver Inclusion Criteria
-
21 years old or older
-
Provides care for a patient of Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian who meets the following criteria: (pilot only)
- Patient is at least 60 years old
- Patient has diagnosed dementia
- Patient requires assistance with at least 1 ADL
-
Self-identifies as primary informal caregiver for an older adult
-
Provides 8 or more hours per week of direct care (may include logistics, oversight, observation, as well as hands-on care, but must include at least some in-person assistance)
-
Can read and speak English at a 6th grade level or above
-
Not blind or deaf
-
No active plan to disengage from providing care to the older adult within the next year
-
Ability to travel to the COA or CABR for study activities and/or attend study session(s) virtually through Zoom on their personal device
Caregiver Exclusion Criteria
- Non-fluent English speaker
- Hired caregiver
- Provides care for a patient in hospice care
- Too ill or weak to complete the interviews (per the interviewer)
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Cuidados de apoyo
- Asignación: N / A
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental: SIRENS Intervention
The SIRENS intervention is a technology intervention designed specifically for caregivers of those with dementia, providing them with easy access to expert-reviewed information and helpful resources. The content includes take-home messages summarizing the main points discussed and a goal-setting feature that encourages the care givers to establish small, actionable goals. |
The SIRENS intervention is a technology intervention designed specifically for caregivers of those with dementia, providing them with easy access to expert-reviewed information and helpful resources. The content includes take-home messages summarizing the main points discussed and a goal-setting feature that encourages the care givers to establish small, actionable goals. |
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived system feasibility, acceptability, and usability of the SIRENS intervention as measured by the Mean Difference in Score of the Program Evaluation Questionnaire.
Periodo de tiempo: 1 week post-intervention
|
System feasibility, acceptability and usability will be assessed in the Program Evaluation Questionnaire. This is based on the Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance Scale. Response options range from 1= Strongly Disagree to 7= Strongly agree. Questions include those asking about the technology and components of the intervention. Total scores range from 23 to 161. Higher scores indicate greater user acceptance of the technology. |
1 week post-intervention
|
|
Perceived system feasibility, acceptability, and usability of the SIRENS intervention as measured by a qualitative interview assessment
Periodo de tiempo: 1-week post intervention
|
System feasibility, acceptability and usability will be assessed in care partner participants using a semi-structured interview. Thematic analyses will be used to assess qualitative interviews. |
1-week post intervention
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean difference in score of caregiver burden, as measured by the Zarit Caregiver Burden Assessment.
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and 1 week post-intervention
|
Caregiver burden will be assessed in care partner participants using the reliable and valid Zarit Caregiver Burden Assessment. Response options range from 0= Never to 4= Nearly always. Questions include those asking about relationship with the care recipient and stress. Overall scores range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating more caregiver burden. |
Baseline and 1 week post-intervention
|
|
Mean difference in score of caregiver quality of life, as measured by the Quality of Life Inventory
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and 1 week post-intervention
|
Caregiver quality of life will be assessed in care partner participants using the reliable and valid Quality of Life Inventory. Questions include those asking about importance (on a 3-point rating scale, higher value indicating more importance) and satisfaction (on a 6-point rating scale, higher value indicating more satisfaction) of life domains. Importance scores are multiplied by satisfaction scores for each domain, and then these scores are summed to determine the overall score. Overall scores range from -96 to 96, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life. |
Baseline and 1 week post-intervention
|
|
Mean difference in score of caregiver preparedness, as measured by the Caregiver Preparedness Scale
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and 1 week post-intervention
|
Caregiver preparedness will be assessed in care partner participants using the Preparedness Scale. Response options range from 0= Not at all prepared to 4= Very well prepared. Overall scores range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating more feelings of preparedness. |
Baseline and 1 week post-intervention
|
|
Mean difference in score of caregiving self-efficacy, as measured by the Caregiving Self-Efficacy Scale
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and 1 week post-intervention
|
Caregiving self-efficacy will be measured in care partner participants by a modified Caregiving Self-Efficacy Scale. Response options range from 0= Can not do at all to 100= Certainly can do. Overall scores range from 0 to 900 with higher scores indicating more confidence. |
Baseline and 1 week post-intervention
|
|
Mean difference in score of caregiver depression, as measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and 1 week post-intervention
|
Caregiver depression will be assessed in care partner participants using the reliable and valid Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Response options range from 0= Rarely or none of the time to 3= Most or almost none of the time. Overall scores range from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms. |
Baseline and 1 week post-intervention
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Anthony Rosen, MD, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 24-05027492
- R61AG079012 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Descripción del plan IPD
The investigators plan for resource sharing is based on the National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging (NIH/NIA) Data Sharing Policy. The investigators plan, consistent with the NIH goals of data sharing, is to promote use of the rich SIRENS database by the larger research community as this will further the impact of SIRENS and expand possibilities for collaboration. It will also allow other researchers to expedite the translation of the research findings into knowledge, products, and procedures. Further, the plan is devised to make the data as widely and freely available as possible while at the same time safeguarding the privacy of participants and protecting confidential and proprietary data.
Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD
The data from research projects will be made available no later than acceptance of publication of the main findings from the final data set. There is no end date to access the data from the research projects.
Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD
The investigators agree to share the data with researchers working under an institution with Federal Wide Assurance who agree to a data sharing agreement that stipulates protection of participant privacy and data confidentiality, acknowledgement of SIRENS, that the data will be used for research purposes only, and that the data will not be transferred to other users. The computerized data will include raw data, derived variables, all necessary documentation as described in the National Archive of Computerized Data on Aging depositor agreement. All data will be de-identified. The investigators will follow the guides published by the US Department of Health and Human Services in this respect. Each data set will include data documentation to ensure that others can use the data set and to minimize confusion. Information about where and how to locate and access the data will be available in any publications and presentations authored by SIRENS investigators.
Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
- SAVIA
- CIF
- CÓDIGO_ANALÍTICO
- RSC
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .