Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Radiographic Cortical Thickness of the Humerus in Detecting Post-Stroke Regional Bone Loss

12 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Cansin Medin, Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital

Post-stroke immobilization and reduced weight-bearing frequently lead to significant regional bone mineral density loss and asymmetry, particularly in the paretic upper extremity, which increases fracture risks. While Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for evaluating systemic bone loss, it primarily focuses on axial or lower extremity sites and lacks universal accessibility. Since routine shoulder radiographs offer an opportunistic screening tool to evaluate regional bone quality without additional radiation , this study aims to compare proximal humerus cortical bone thickness between the paretic and non-paretic sides in stroke patients and assess its correlation with systemic DXA values to determine its clinical utility.

This cross-sectional, observational study involves a retrospective data analysis of patients aged 18 and older who experienced a single unilateral stroke at least 6 months prior and present with clinical hemiparesis. Eligible participants must have concurrent standard anteroposterior shoulder radiographs and DXA measurements available from their routine clinical follow-ups. Patient demographic data, stroke characteristics, Brunnstrom stages, and systemic DXA measurements (femoral neck and lumbar spine T-scores and bone mineral density values) are systematically recorded for analysis.

Cortical bone thickness measurements are performed using ImageJ software on standard radiographs at points 10 cm and 12 cm distal to the highest point of the humerus. To ensure reliability, measurements for both the paretic and non-paretic sides are conducted independently by two researchers who are completely blinded to the DXA results. Statistical analyses, including paired t-tests or Wilcoxon tests and Pearson or Spearman correlations, will be used to compare the sides and evaluate the relationship between radiographic cortical thickness and systemic bone density.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Background Post-stroke immobilization and reduced weight-bearing often lead to significant regional bone mineral density (BMD) loss and asymmetry, particularly in the paretic upper extremity, which increases fracture risks. While Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for evaluating systemic bone loss, it primarily targets axial or lower extremity sites and may not be universally accessible in every clinical setting. Routine clinical imaging, such as standard shoulder radiographs, presents a valuable opportunistic screening tool to assess regional cortical bone quality without exposing patients to additional radiation.

Objective The primary objective of this cross-sectional, observational study is to compare proximal humerus cortical bone thickness between the paretic and non-paretic sides in patients with stroke. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate the correlation between radiographic cortical thickness measurements and systemic DXA values to determine the clinical utility of standard X-rays in identifying post-stroke regional bone loss.

Study Design and Methods This retrospective data analysis will include patients aged 18 and older with a history of a single unilateral stroke occurring at least 6 months prior, and presenting with clinical hemiparesis. Eligible participants must have concurrent standard anteroposterior shoulder radiographs and DXA measurements.

Measurement Protocol: Cortical bone thickness (CBT) will be measured at 10 cm and 12 cm distal to the highest point of the humerus using standard radiographs via ImageJ software.

Blinding: Measurements will be independently performed by two separate researchers who are completely blinded to the patients' DXA results.

Comparison: The radiographic cortical thickness values from both paretic and non-paretic sides will be correlated and compared against femoral neck and lumbar spine (L1-L4) DXA T-scores and BMD values.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

65

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Istanbul, Turquía (Türkiye)
        • Reclutamiento
        • Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
        • Contacto:

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Adults aged 18 years and older recruited from the clinics of Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital. Participants will include hemiparetic individuals with a history of a single unilateral stroke occurring at least 6 months prior, who possess concurrent standard shoulder radiographs and systemic dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 years and older.
  • A documented history of a single unilateral stroke that occurred at least 6 months prior to evaluation.
  • Presence of clinical hemiparesis.
  • Availability of concurrent standard anteroposterior (AP) shoulder radiographs taken within 6 months post-stroke alongside systemic DXA measurements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of surgical intervention in either shoulder. History of a proximal humerus fracture.
  • Co-existing metabolic bone diseases, such as primary hyperparathyroidism or osteomalacia.
  • History of malignancy.
  • Documented history of corticosteroid use.
  • Imaging artifacts that compromise the accuracy of DXA measurements.
  • History of a secondary stroke.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Poststroke Hemiparetic Individuals
This observational, retrospective cohort consists of hemiparetic adult patients aged 18 years and older who experienced a single, unilateral stroke at least 6 months prior. Selected participants must have concurrent systemic DXA measurements and standard anteroposterior shoulder radiographs taken within 6 months post-stroke from routine clinical follow-ups.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Difference in Proximal Humerus Cortical Bone Thickness Between Paretic and Non-Paretic Sides
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
The average cortical bone thickness measured in millimeters on standard anteroposterior shoulder radiographs. Measurements are taken at exact locations 10 cm and 12 cm distal to the highest anatomical peak of the humerus on both the paretic and non-paretic sides to evaluate localized bone loss asymmetry.
Baseline

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Correlation Between Radiographic Cortical Bone Thickness and Systemic Bone Mineral Density
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
The correlation between the radiographic proximal humerus cortical thickness and systemic DXA values, specifically the bone mineral density (g/cm^2) of the femoral neck and the lumbar spine.
Baseline
Correlation Between Radiographic Cortical Bone Thickness and Systemic T-scores
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
The correlation between the humerus cortical thickness measurements and systemic DXA T-scores to determine the clinical utility of standard X-rays in reflecting systemic osteopenia or osteoporosis classifications.
Baseline

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

22 de febrero de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

25 de junio de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de julio de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

10 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

12 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

16 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

16 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

12 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Osteoporosis

Suscribir