Utilisation de dispositifs de suivi pour localiser les anomalies pendant les procédures invasives
Suivi électromagnétique des appareils pendant les procédures interventionnelles
This study will evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of an experimental tracking device for locating abnormalities during invasive procedures, such as biopsy or ablation, that cannot easily be visualized by usual imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) scans or ultrasound. Some lesions, such as certain liver or kidney tumors, small endocrine abnormalities, and others, may be hard to find or only visible for a few seconds. The new method uses a needle with a miniature tracking device buried inside the metal that tells where the tip of the needle is located, somewhat like a mini GPS, or global positioning system. It uses a very weak magnet to localize the device like a miniature satellite system. This study will explore whether this system can be used in the future to more accurately place the needle in or near the desired location or abnormality.
Patients 18 years of age and older who have a lesion that needs to be biopsied or an ablation procedure that requires CT guidance may be eligible for this study. Candidates are screened with a medical history and review of medical records, including imaging studies.
Participants undergo the biopsy or ablation procedure as they normally would, with the following exceptions: some stickers are placed on the skin before the procedure and a very weak magnet is placed nearby. The needles used are similar to the ones that would normally be used except that they contain a metal coil or spring buried deep within the needle metal. The procedure involves the following steps:
- Small 1-cm plastic donuts are place on the skin with tape.
- A planning CT scan is done.
- The CT scan is sent to the computer and matched to the patient's body location with the help of a very weak magnet.
- The needle used for the procedure is placed towards the target tissue or abnormality and the "smart needle" location lights up on the old CT scan.
- A repeat CT is done as it normally is to look for the location of the needle.
- After the procedure the CT scans are examined to determine how well the new tool located the needle in the old scan....
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Statut
Les conditions
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Background:
The effectiveness of targeting lesions or a specific area for surgery, angiography, CT-guided, or ultrasound-guided biopsy, or ablation, currently may be limited by the visibility of a target during the procedure. Accurate therapeutic intervention may depend upon accurate device placement, which may be very difficult in certain settings, such as when a liver tumor only is visible for a brief moment in time during the transient arterial phase of a contrast injection, soon disappearing on dynamic imaging. Surgery, angiography, image guided therapies and diagnostic procedures could be vastly improved by enabling the use of pre-procedural imaging during the procedure [such as location of difficult to visualize or transiently visible targets].Tracking devices allow the use of preoperative imaging during the procedure. Having this information available could vastly improve targeting accuracy of surgery, angiography, CT-guided, or ultrasound-guided biopsy or ablation.
A method of improving targeting could potentially benefit patients in the future by reducing total radiation exposure during CT scan or fluoroscopic monitoring of a biopsy, or decreasing certain surgical risks, although these are not specific subjects of this study. Various methods of device tracking have been used in the past throughout the 20th and 21st century in neurosurgery with the use of stereotactic frames for a similar purpose, to register pre-operative imaging to the patient during invasive procedures to guide treatment.
Objectives:
To define the clinical utility of electromagnetic tracking during interventional procedures in specific patient populations.
Eligibility:
- All patients must have a CT, MR, or PET scan available in digital format.
- Age greater than 18 years.
- Patients must be actively enrolled on an NIH protocol and be scheduled for surgery, angiography, or CT- or ultrasound-guided biopsy.
Design:
This is an exploratory interventional study examining the use of a guidance system for navigating and monitoring devices like biopsy and ablation needles, ultrasound transducers, needle guides, guidewires, scalpels, and cauterization devices (herein referred to as device(s) ) for localization in relation to pre-operative images. There are 9 cohorts included in this protocol: The Open / Laparoscopic surgery and Angiography surgery cohorts are no longer open for accrual.
- Prostate biopsy
- Percutaneous biopsy for diagnostic correlation
- percutaneous ablation for needle placement compilations
- Open/Laparoscopic surgery
- Angiography
- Auto registration for biopsy
- Auto registration for ablation
- PET registration
- prostate biopsy on which to determine the predictive value and relative strength of each MRI sequence in predicting cancer at a specific prostate core location.
The total accrual ceiling for this protocol is 3894 subjects.
All cohorts open for accrual are using exploratory interventions to define the specific patient population where fusion used during interventional procedures may have clinical value, and to characterize that clinical value in a specific patient population, such as but not limited to patients with specific regions of the prostate targeted, specific prostate volumes, prior negative prostate biopsies, or PSA values within a specific range.
Type d'étude
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Inscription
Phase
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Maryland
-
Bethesda, Maryland, États-Unis, 20892
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
- INCLUSION CRITERIA:
Patients must fulfill all of the following criteria to be eligible for study admission. Patient enrollment is by referral only.
- All patients must have a pre-operative imaging (CT, MR, or PET scan) available in digital format.
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years.
- No serious concurrent medical illness that would preclude the patient from making a rational informed decision on participation.
- The ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent form, and to comply with the protocol. If in question, an ethics consult will be obtained.
- All patients in non-prostate biopsy cohorts, must be undergoing an image-guided surgical or interventional radiology procedure such as an angiography or a CT/ US-guided biopsy as clinically indicated or IRB-approved under a separate research protocol.
PROSTATE BIOPSY COHORT (Cohorts 1 and 9) INCLUSION CRITERIA:
1. Patients are eligible if they have undergone a prostate MRI and have had abnormalities identified as follows:
- PSA >2.5 OR abnormal digital rectal exam OR an abnormality identified on prostate MRI with a clinical indication for fusion biopsy
- Pre-biopsy prostate MRI showing targetable lesions
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Patients with any of the following will be excluded from study entry:
- Patients with an altered mental status that precludes understanding or consenting for the biopsy procedure will be excluded from this study.
- Patients unlikely able to hold reasonably still on a procedure table for the length of the procedure.
- Inability to hold breath, if procedure will be performed with conscious sedation, and without general anesthesia.
- Patients with pacemakers and other potentially electrically conductive implants.
- Gross body weight above the CT table limit (606 pounds), if CT table used.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Faisabilité de l'appareil
- Répartition: Non randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Nombre de bras
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / BrasGroupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / TraitementIntervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: All cohorts (prostate biopsy percutaneous biopsy and ablation)
This study will consist of comparison of tracked imaging with near-simultaneous actual imaging . |
Utilizing electromagnetic tracking technology as a fusion and navigation tool for minimally invasive interventional procedures. |
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of using electromagnetic devices in different cohorts.
Délai: Day 1
|
"TRE" Target Registration Error (distance between "virtual" needle position (tracking data) and the actual needle position ("CT" Computed Tomography confirmation scan)) |
Day 1
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Success of ablation as determined by imaging
Délai: 3 months
|
Primary effectiveness (success of ablation in local tumor control or success of biopsy in diagnostic biopsy sample). Successful ablation equals complete tumor ablation with a 5mm-1cm margin of normal tissue (if possible; quantified by the lack of enhancement of intravenous contrast material at 3 month follow up CT) |
3 months
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Peter A Pinto, M.D., National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Seiler PG, Blattmann H, Kirsch S, Muench RK, Schilling C. A novel tracking technique for the continuous precise measurement of tumour positions in conformal radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2000 Sep;45(9):N103-10. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/9/402.
- Frantz DD, Wiles AD, Leis SE, Kirsch SR. Accuracy assessment protocols for electromagnetic tracking systems. Phys Med Biol. 2003 Jul 21;48(14):2241-51. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/14/314.
- Solomon SB, White P Jr, Wiener CM, Orens JB, Wang KP. Three-dimensional CT-guided bronchoscopy with a real-time electromagnetic position sensor: a comparison of two image registration methods. Chest. 2000 Dec;118(6):1783-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.6.1783.
- Ahdoot M, Lebastchi AH, Long L, Wilbur AR, Gomella PT, Mehralivand S, Daneshvar MA, Yerram NK, O'Connor LP, Wang AZ, Gurram S, Bloom J, Siddiqui MM, Linehan WM, Merino M, Choyke PL, Pinsky P, Parnes H, Shih JH, Turkbey B, Wood BJ, Pinto PA; Trio Study Group. Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study. Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Apr;5(2):176-186. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
- Ahdoot M, Wilbur AR, Reese SE, Lebastchi AH, Mehralivand S, Gomella PT, Bloom J, Gurram S, Siddiqui M, Pinsky P, Parnes H, Linehan WM, Merino M, Choyke PL, Shih JH, Turkbey B, Wood BJ, Pinto PA. MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):917-928. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910038.
- Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, George AK, Rothwax J, Shakir N, Okoro C, Raskolnikov D, Parnes HL, Linehan WM, Merino MJ, Simon RM, Choyke PL, Wood BJ, Pinto PA. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):390-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17942.
- Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Truong H, Stamatakis L, Vourganti S, Nix J, Hoang AN, Walton-Diaz A, Shuch B, Weintraub M, Kruecker J, Amalou H, Turkbey B, Merino MJ, Choyke PL, Wood BJ, Pinto PA. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy. Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):713-719. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.059. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
- Krucker J, Xu S, Venkatesan A, Locklin JK, Amalou H, Glossop N, Wood BJ. Clinical utility of real-time fusion guidance for biopsy and ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Apr;22(4):515-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.10.033. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
- Krucker J, Xu S, Glossop N, Viswanathan A, Borgert J, Schulz H, Wood BJ. Electromagnetic tracking for thermal ablation and biopsy guidance: clinical evaluation of spatial accuracy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Sep;18(9):1141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.06.014.
- Borde T, Varble NA, Hazen LA, Saccenti L, Garcia C, Digennaro M, Gurram S, Pinto PA, Turkbey B, Wood BJ. Impact of Discordance Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound Volume Measurements on Prostate Fusion Biopsy Outcomes. J Urol. 2025 Apr;213(4):428-436. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004368. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
- Ahdoot M, Naser-Tavakolian A, Heard JR, Williams C, Daneshvar M, Gomella P, Mallavarapu S, Siddiqui M, Nazmifar M, Shih J, Turkbey B, Wood B, Pinto P. Prostate-Specific Antigen Density to Select Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted vs Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study. J Urol. 2025 Jun;213(6):693-701. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004480. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
Liens utiles
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Début de l'étude
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Estimé)
Première publication
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour publiée
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
- Ciliopathies
- Maladies urogénitales
- Maladies génitales
- Maladies du système nerveux
- Maladies vasculaires
- Maladies cardiovasculaires
- Tumeurs génitales, homme
- Tumeurs urogénitales
- Tumeurs par site
- Tumeurs
- Maladies génitales, sexe masculin
- Maladies de la prostate
- Maladies urogénitales masculines
- Maladies rénales
- Maladies urologiques
- Maladies urogénitales féminines
- Maladies urogénitales féminines et complications de la grossesse
- Maladies génétiques, innées
- Tumeurs par type histologique
- Tumeurs, glandulaires et épithéliales
- Tumeurs urologiques
- Carcinome
- Anomalies congénitales
- Anomalies multiples
- Tumeurs rénales
- Syndromes neurocutanés
- Angiomatose
- Maladies et anomalies congénitales, héréditaires et néonatales
- Tumeurs prostatiques
- Carcinome à cellules rénales
- Adénocarcinome
- Von Hippel-Lindau
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 050091
- 05-CC-0091
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make IPD available
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .