Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

OPTIMIZE 5.5 - Optimizing Impella 5.5 Outcomes Through Advanced Data Science (OPTIMIZE)

27 maggio 2026 aggiornato da: Thomas Schlöglhofer, PhD, MSc, Medical University of Vienna

Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events Associated With Microaxial Flow Pump Support: An Explorative Retrospective Study

The main goal of this observational, study is to develop a clinical decision support tool utilizing Impella 5.5 pump parameters to predict native heart recovery and prevent adverse events, by leveraging data science and real-world clinical data of cardiogenic shock patients.

Therefore, secondary objectives are essential to consolidating a retrospective longitudinal analysis of Impella 5.5 pump data alongside ICU digital health record datasets to:

  1. Validate the Impella 5.5 placement signal by comparing it with ICU arterial line waveforms.
  2. Integrate pump data with ICU clinical data to identify patterns associated with therapy outcomes, including native heart recovery, heart replacement therapy, and mortality while on device support.
  3. Define clinical scenarios linked to hemolysis, HRAEs, and arrhythmias and develop predictive models to mitigate their occurrence.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

The clinical management of patients experiencing severe cardiogenic shock requires precise, real-time monitoring to optimize hemodynamic support and guide therapeutic transitions. The Impella 5.5 micro-axial flow pump provides left ventricular unloading, generating automated internal continuous parameters that reflect moving cardiac states. This study establishes a retrospective, longitudinal framework that integrates these high-frequency device metrics with corresponding clinical data housed within intensive care unit (ICU) digital health records (DHR). By synthesizing these disparate data streams, this research aims to build an advanced analytical framework to support clinical decisions in the cardiogenic shock landscape.

Signal Validation and Data Preprocessing:

The initial phase of the study validates the physiological fidelity of the continuous data stream. High-frequency digital logs generated by the pump console-specifically the optical placement signal-will undergo time-series alignment with standard physiological waveforms recorded in the ICU, using indwelling arterial line pressure data as the reference standard. This signal validation ensures that the longitudinal parameter data accurately capture mechanical positioning and true left ventricular dynamics prior to entering the downstream modeling pipeline.

Analytical Framework and Modeling Strategy:

Following data integration and signal validation, the consolidated dataset will be leveraged to develop predictive models aimed at distinguishing patient trajectories and forecasting complications. The computational pipeline is divided into two primary analytical pathways:

Endpoint Classification:

An artificial neural network will be developed to evaluate patient trajectories toward distinct clinical endpoints: native heart recovery, escalation to heart replacement therapy, or death. The modeling pipeline incorporates a rigorous framework to ensure generalizability and guard against overfitting. The complete dataset will be partitioned into an 80% development subset and a 20% independent testing subset. The development subset will undergo 5-fold cross-validation to drive comprehensive model architecture optimization, systematically testing structural variations to identify the highest-performing network configuration.

Adverse Event Forecasting:

Separate statistical and machine learning architectures will be constructed to evaluate risk patterns and clinical scenarios associated with severe on-device complications, specifically clinical hemolysis, new-onset arrhythmias, and hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs). These models focus on identifying early-warning clusters within the high-frequency pump log data to identify sub-clinical changes before manifest physiological degradation occurs.

Through these combined pathways, this observational study seeks to lay the foundational algorithmic groundwork for a real-time clinical decision support tool utilizing objective, automated device analytics to improve safety and personalization in mechanical circulatory support.

Tipo di studio

Osservativo

Iscrizione (Stimato)

100

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Backup dei contatti dello studio

Luoghi di studio

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Metodo di campionamento

Campione non probabilistico

Popolazione di studio

The study population comprises adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) presenting with severe cardiogenic shock who required temporary mechanical circulatory support between January 2019 and March 2026, treated at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Eligible individuals are those who undergo clinical management utilizing the Impella 5.5 micro-axial flow pump as part of their standard of care. Only patients with available high-resolution pump data (downloaded from the clinical console) and ICU digital health record datasets extracted from ICCA (IntelliSpace Critical Care and Anesthesia, Philips Medical Systems Development and Manufacturing Centre, Hamburg, Germany) will be included for analysis.

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients who were treated for cardiogenic shock and supported with an Impella 5.5 micro-axial flow pump
  • Only patients with available high-resolution pump data (downloaded from the clinical console) and ICU digital health record datasets

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients supported with an Impella 5.5 for indications other than cardiogenic shock (e.g., protected PCI or CABG)
  • Patients younger than 18 years
  • Patients with incomplete data, procedural records, or demographic information

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

Coorti e interventi

Gruppo / Coorte
Intervento / Trattamento
Native heart recovery
Patients supported with the Impella 5.5 device (J&J MedTech) achieving native heart recovery
Temporary circulatory support using the Impella 5.5 micro-axial flow pump. The device is surgically placed (typically via the axillary artery) across the aortic valve into the left ventricle to provide active forward flow, unloading the left ventricle and maintaining systemic perfusion during cardiogenic shock. Management of the device includes the collection and analysis of continuous device-derived hemodynamic data and associated clinical parameters throughout the duration of support.
Heart replacement therapy (durable MCS or HTX)
Patients supported with the Impella 5.5 device (J&J MedTech) transitioning to heart replacement therapy (durable mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation
Temporary circulatory support using the Impella 5.5 micro-axial flow pump. The device is surgically placed (typically via the axillary artery) across the aortic valve into the left ventricle to provide active forward flow, unloading the left ventricle and maintaining systemic perfusion during cardiogenic shock. Management of the device includes the collection and analysis of continuous device-derived hemodynamic data and associated clinical parameters throughout the duration of support.
All-cause mortality
Patients supported with the Impella 5.5 device (J&J MedTech) suffering from all-cause mortality during mechanical circulatory support.
Temporary circulatory support using the Impella 5.5 micro-axial flow pump. The device is surgically placed (typically via the axillary artery) across the aortic valve into the left ventricle to provide active forward flow, unloading the left ventricle and maintaining systemic perfusion during cardiogenic shock. Management of the device includes the collection and analysis of continuous device-derived hemodynamic data and associated clinical parameters throughout the duration of support.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Predictive Performance and Optimization of the Clinician Decision Support Tool
Lasso di tempo: From the time of Impella 5.5 insertion up to device explant (estimated average of 5 to 14 days).

The predictive performance of the developed clinical decision support tool will be evaluated by its ability to classify patient trajectories toward native heart recovery versus adverse outcomes. The model will undergo comprehensive model architecture optimization to identify the structural configuration that yields optimal performance.

Model training, validation, and testing will follow a standard data split: 80% of the dataset will be utilized for training and internal validation using 5-fold cross-validation, and the remaining 20% will be held out as a definitive testing dataset.

Final classification performance will be quantified using specific metrics derived from Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, including: Area Under the Curve (AUC), Sensitivity, Specificity

From the time of Impella 5.5 insertion up to device explant (estimated average of 5 to 14 days).

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Bias Between the Impella 5.5 Placement Signal and ICU Arterial Line Waveforms
Lasso di tempo: Continuously through the duration of active Impella 5.5 device support (from device insertion up to explant, estimated average of 5 to 14 days).

The systematic difference (bias) between the automated Impella 5.5 optical placement signal and the gold-standard ICU indwelling arterial line pressure waveforms will be quantified using Bland-Altman analysis to evaluate signal alignment.

Unit of Measure: Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)

Continuously through the duration of active Impella 5.5 device support (from device insertion up to explant, estimated average of 5 to 14 days).
Correlation Coefficient Between the Impella 5.5 Placement Signal and ICU Arterial Line Waveforms
Lasso di tempo: Continuously through the duration of active Impella 5.5 device support (from device insertion up to explant, estimated average of 5 to 14 days).

The strength and direction of the linear relationship between the continuous time-series data of the Impella 5.5 optical placement signal and the ICU arterial line waveforms will be evaluated.

Unit of Measure: Correlation coefficient (r) on a scale from -1.0 to 1.0.

Continuously through the duration of active Impella 5.5 device support (from device insertion up to explant, estimated average of 5 to 14 days).
Concordance Rate of Directional Trends Between the Impella 5.5 Placement Signal and ICU Arterial Line Waveforms
Lasso di tempo: Continuously through the duration of active Impella 5.5 device support (from device insertion up to explant, estimated average of 5 to 14 days).

The trending ability of the placement signal will be assessed via concordance plots. The concordance rate represents the percentage of data points where the directional change (increase or decrease) matches between both signal streams over time, excluding zones of clinical noise.

Unit of Measure: Percentage (%) of concordant data pairs.

Continuously through the duration of active Impella 5.5 device support (from device insertion up to explant, estimated average of 5 to 14 days).
Percentage of Participants Exhibiting Specific Device-Support Clinical Endpoints
Lasso di tempo: Through the duration of hospital stay (estimated average of 30 days).

The final clinical trajectory of the cohort on device support will be categorized into one of three mutually exclusive outcomes:

  1. Native heart recovery (successful device weaning and explant)
  2. Escalation to heart replacement therapy (durable LVAD implantation or heart transplantation)
  3. All-cause mortality while on active device support.

Unit of Measure: Percentage (%) of participants within each categorical outcome category.

Through the duration of hospital stay (estimated average of 30 days).
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Device-Related Hemolysis
Lasso di tempo: From device insertion up to 30 days post-explant or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.

The incidence of clinically significant hemolysis on device support, defined by standard laboratory criteria (e.g., plasma free hemoglobin greater than 40 mg/dL or a doubling of lactate dehydrogenase alongside clinical signs).

Unit of Measure: Percentage (%) of participants.

From device insertion up to 30 days post-explant or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing New-Onset Clinically Significant Arrhythmias
Lasso di tempo: From device insertion up to 30 days post-explant or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.

The incidence of new-onset atrial or ventricular arrhythmias occurring during device support that require immediate pharmacological, electrical, or device-setting intervention.

Unit of Measure: Percentage (%) of participants.

From device insertion up to 30 days post-explant or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.
Number of Hemocompatibility-Related Adverse Events (HRAEs) Per Participant
Lasso di tempo: From device insertion up to 30 days post-explant or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.

The rate of hemocompatibility-related adverse events, including major bleeding episodes (requiring transfusion or reoperation) and thromboembolic events (e.g., ischemic stroke, peripheral arterial embolization) occurring during device support.

Unit of Measure: Number of events per participant.

From device insertion up to 30 days post-explant or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Thomas Schlöglhofer, PhD, MSc, Medical University of Vienna

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

8 maggio 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

8 gennaio 2029

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

30 maggio 2029

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

21 maggio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

27 maggio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

1 giugno 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

1 giugno 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

27 maggio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 maggio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • EK Nr: 1245/2026

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Descrizione del piano IPD

IPD will not be shared because the dataset contains highly sensitive, high-frequency physiological data linked with intensive care health records. Further, IPD is currently not planned for public sharing as the dataset is being actively used to develop a proprietary clinical decision support tool and model architecture optimization.

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

Sì

prodotto fabbricato ed esportato dagli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .