Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Active Engagement Game Versus Passive Media During Pediatric Inhalational Induction

26 agosto 2026 aggiornato da: Yick Man Jasmin Tong, Hong Kong Children's Hospital

Active Engagement Game Versus Passive Media During Pediatric Inhalational Induction: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether an active, breath-controlled iPad/phone game can reduce the need for physical restraint during mask-based anesthesia induction in children undergoing surgery.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Does an active-engagement game reduce the need for physical restraint during mask induction, compared with standard passive media distraction (such as watching cartoons)?

Investigators will compare children who use the new interactive game to children who receive standard passive audiovisual distraction, to see if the active game lowers rates of physical restraint during induction.

Participants will:

Play an interactive game on an iPad or phone while awake, before anesthesia begins, controlling it themselves.

Continue "playing" once the anesthesia mask is placed over their face, at which point the anesthesiologist takes over the controls using a phone remote.

Have the game synced to their own natural breathing pattern, so the visuals on the screen move in time with each breath, giving them a sense of active control without needing to physically touch the device.

Be compared to a group of children who instead watch passive video content (cartoons or similar) during induction, following standard care.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Preoperative anxiety is a highly prevalent complication in pediatric anesthesia, occurring in up to 50-60% of children undergoing surgery. High anxiety during the induction of anesthesia-particularly during the application of the face mask-is strongly correlated with poor induction compliance, increased risk of emergence delirium, higher postoperative analgesic requirements, and long-term negative behavioral changes.

To mitigate these risks, non-pharmacological behavioral interventions are widely integrated into routine pediatric perioperative care. While tablet-based audiovisual distraction (e.g., watching cartoons or playing games) has been shown to be a safe and effective alternative to pharmacological premedication, it is fundamentally limited by the physical realities of inhalational induction. Specifically, once the anesthesia mask is applied, children lose the physical ability to interact with standard digital games. Consequently, active distraction strategies frequently revert to passive observation at the exact moment when the child experiences the highest sensory distress.

Emerging evidence suggests that active cognitive engagement is superior to passive observation for sustained anxiolysis. However, there is a lack of specialized active distraction tools that safely integrate with the hands-on airway management workflow of the anesthesiologist. To address this gap, the investigators developed a novel, two-phase interactive iPad/phone game. During the awake pre-induction phase, the child interacts directly with the screen. As the anesthesia mask is applied, control of the game seamlessly transfers to a phone remote operated by the anesthesiologist. The anesthesiologist synchronizes the remote to the child's spontaneous respiratory rate, providing the child with active, breath-driven visual feedback on the iPad/phone screen without requiring their physical interaction.

The primary objective of this pragmatic randomized controlled trial is to determine whether this breath-synchronized active engagement game reduces the need for physical restraint during pediatric mask induction compared to standard passive media distraction.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

128

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

  • Nome: Jasmin YM Tong, FHKCA, FHKAM, FRCPC (Anes)
  • Numero di telefono: +852 35133760
  • Email: tym651@ha.org.hk

Backup dei contatti dello studio

  • Nome: Vivian Yuen, FHKCA, FHKAM
  • Numero di telefono: +852 35133752
  • Email: yuenmyv@ha.org.hk

Luoghi di studio

      • Hong Kong, Cina
        • Hong Kong Children's Hospital
        • Contatto:
          • Vivian Yuen, FHKCA, FHKAM
          • Numero di telefono: +852 35133752
          • Email: yuenmyv@ha.org.hk
        • Contatto:
          • Jasmin YM Tong, FHKCA, FHKAM, FRCPC
          • Numero di telefono: +852 35133760
          • Email: tym651@ha.org.hk
        • Investigatore principale:
          • Jasmin YM Tong, FHKCA, FHKAM, FRCPC

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Bambino

Accetta volontari sani

Sì

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 3 to 8 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II
  • Elective surgery or sedation requiring general anesthesia
  • Planned mask (inhalational) induction
  • Assessed by the attending anesthesiologist as sufficiently calm and cooperative to participate without pharmacological premedication for anxiolysis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receipt of pharmacological premedication for anxiolysis (e.g., intranasal dexmedetomidine, oral midazolam)
  • Developmental, cognitive, or communication impairment severe enough to preclude engagement with the interactive game or understanding of instructions
  • Profound visual or hearing impairment that would prevent participation in the game or usual care distraction
  • Any clinical airway scenario in which the attending anesthesiologist determines that study participation poses a safety risk

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Altro
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Altro: 3-5 years
patients of 3-5 years
Interactive balloon game
Passive media
Altro: 6-8 years
older children
Interactive balloon game
Passive media

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Physical restraint
Lasso di tempo: Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min
Yes or No
Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min
Degree of physical restraint
Lasso di tempo: Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min

4 point pragmatic clinical scale: 0 = No restraint: The patient is cooperative or requires only verbal guidance; no physical holding is needed to apply the mask

  1. = Mild restraint: Gentle holding of the child's hands or arms (usually by one person) to prevent interference with the mask, accompanied by minimal physical resistance from the child.
  2. = Moderate restraint: Firm holding of the limbs and/or torso by one or two individuals due to active physical resistance or attempts to sit up.
  3. = Severe restraint: Forceful holding of multiple body parts, including the head or full torso, often requiring multiple clinical staff and/or parents/legal guardians due to vigorous struggling, flailing, or combative behavior.
Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Induction compliance
Lasso di tempo: Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min
Measured by the Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC) during mask application. The Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC) is an 11-item behavioral observation scale used to assess a child's reaction to the face mask during anesthesia induction. Each item corresponds to a specific mask-rejecting behavior, and the total score ranges from 0 to 10. A score of 0 indicates full cooperation with no mask-rejecting behavior, while a score of 10 represents the most severe rejection response. Higher ICC scores reflect greater resistance to the surgical mask during induction. Per the scale's originators, a total score of ≥6 is classified as indicating traumatic anesthesia induction.
Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min
Caregiver satisfaction and acceptability
Lasso di tempo: Within 24hrs after anesthetic induction, during PACU stay
Caregiver satisfaction and acceptability regarding the anesthetic induction will be assessed using a questionnaire comprising a series of statements, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Within 24hrs after anesthetic induction, during PACU stay
Child self-reported acceptability
Lasso di tempo: Within 24 hours after anesthetic induction, during PACU stay or, if the child remains sleepy, on the ward
Patient satisfaction with the anesthetic induction will be assessed using an age-appropriate visual smiley-face scale, ranging from 1 (☹️, very unsatisfied) to 5 (?, very satisfied).The child's level of fear during the anesthetic induction will also be assessed using an age-appropriate visual smiley-face scale, ranging from 1 (?,, very scared) to 5 (?, very calm).
Within 24 hours after anesthetic induction, during PACU stay or, if the child remains sleepy, on the ward

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Jasmin YM Tong, FHKCA, FHKAM, FRCPC, Hong Kong Children's Hospital

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 settembre 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

31 dicembre 2026

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

28 febbraio 2027

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

18 agosto 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

21 agosto 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

26 agosto 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

31 agosto 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

26 agosto 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 agosto 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • Breatheballoon

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .