Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Effectiveness of an Advanced Practice Nurse-Led Health Education Program (APN-HEALTH) (APN-HEALTH)

Effectiveness of an Advanced Practice Nurse-Led Health Education Program (Efectividad de un Programa de educación en Salud Desarrollado Por la Enfermera de Práctica Avanzada)

Advanced Practice Nursing (APN) has demonstrated a positive impact on improving health outcomes in various international clinical settings. In Spain, however, its integration is still limited and variable, especially in specialized fields such as neurology and surgery. Existing evidence suggests that health education led by an APN can improve key indicators such as health literacy, self-efficacy, and patient satisfaction, although further research is needed in our context.

Hypothesis: Health education provided by an APN significantly improves health literacy, self-efficacy, quality of life, and the healthcare experience of patients seen in neurology and surgery nursing clinics.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of health education provided by an APN on health literacy, self-efficacy, quality of life, and the experience of patients seen in a neurology and surgery nursing clinic.

Methods: A quasi-experimental, pre- and post-intervention, single-group study. The study will begin after approval by the relevant Ethics Committee. The intervention will consist of providing comprehensive, individualized health education that includes information on the person's health history, recommended lifestyle habits and practices, available treatment options, identification of warning signs and symptoms, how to respond appropriately to them, available care pathways, and contact information for the unit. Patients seen by a Primary Care Team (PCT) in neurology and surgery nursing consultations will be included, with data collected at three points in care: before the intervention, after the intervention, and at 6 months. The primary variable is health literacy, and secondary variables are self-efficacy, quality of life, and patient experience. A pre-post comparability analysis will be performed on the variables studied.

Relevance: The results will provide applicable evidence to promote organizational models that integrate PCTs into specialized care, improving the quality of care and the patient experience, and guiding future lines of research and implementation policies. In turn, they intend to demonstrate the value provided by the EPAs on the outcome indicators and the experience of the people attended in the neurology and surgery nursing consultations.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

50

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Patients referred for their first individualized health education visit at the Advanced Practice Nursing clinics in the Department of Neurosciences and Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.
  • Willingness to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment preventing active participation in or understanding of the educational intervention and assessment questionnaires.
  • Language barriers that prevent adequate understanding of the intervention or completion of the questionnaires.
  • Failure to complete the pre- and post-intervention assessments

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Ricerca sui servizi sanitari
  • Assegnazione: N / A
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Advanced Practice Nursing Model

The intervention will consist of providing comprehensive, individualized health education tailored to each specific health situation and condition. This health education will take place during routine healthcare visits and will include: information about the person's health status, recommended lifestyle habits and practices, available treatment options, identification of warning signs and symptoms and how to respond appropriately, available healthcare pathways, and contact information for the unit. The health education will be supplemented with printed materials to facilitate understanding and self-care at home. The duration of these visits varies depending on the individual's health condition and situation, typically ranging from 30 to 60 minutes.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Health literacy
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.

Health literacy will be assessed using the 12-item Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-Q12). Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 4 (very easy). The total score ranges from 12 to 48, with higher scores indicating better health literacy.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Self-efficacy for managing chronic disease
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.

Self-efficacy will be assessed using the 4-item Spanish version of the Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale (SEMCD-S). Each item is scored from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident). The overall score is calculated as the mean of the four items and ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy in managing chronic disease.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.
Health-related quality of life
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.

Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-12v2). The questionnaire provides two summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Scores will be calculated using norm-based scoring based on the 2009 US general population norms (mean 50, standard deviation 10). The theoretical score ranges are 9.9 to 76.0 for PCS and 3.2 to 77.9 for MCS, assuming complete data. Higher scores indicate better physical and mental health-related quality of life, respectively.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.
Patient experience
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.

Patient experience will be assessed using the Instrument for Evaluation of the Experience of Chronic Patients (IEXPAC). The questionnaire includes 11 core items scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with responses converted to values ranging from 0 to 10. The overall score is calculated as the mean of the 11 core items and ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a better patient experience. Additional conditional items are scored separately and are not included in the overall score.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 febbraio 2027

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 febbraio 2028

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 febbraio 2028

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

13 luglio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

14 ottobre 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

19 ottobre 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

13 novembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

12 novembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 novembre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • PR(AG)295/2025

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .