Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

BIS-Guided Sedation Versus Standard Clinical Sedation During Elective Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation (BIS-ECV-RCT)

12 maggio 2026 aggiornato da: AYLA ESİN, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Bispectral Index-Guided Sedation Versus Standard Clinical Assessment-Guided Sedation During Elective Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized Controlled, Assessor-Blinded Trial

Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is a standard procedure used to restore normal heart rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by delivering a brief electrical shock to the heart. Because the procedure is painful and distressing, patients receive sedation - a controlled state of reduced consciousness - using short-acting intravenous medications. However, the optimal depth of sedation for ECV has not been well defined: too deep may cause breathing problems and low blood pressure, while too light may result in pain, awareness, or patient movement during the shock.

Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring is a non-invasive technology that continuously measures brain activity using an EEG sensor placed on the forehead, generating a numerical score from 0 (no brain activity) to 100 (fully awake). BIS scores between 61 and 80 correspond to moderate sedation, which preliminary observations suggest may be sufficient for ECV without the risks associated with deeper sedation.

This randomized controlled trial will compare two approaches to sedation monitoring during elective ECV for AF:

  • Group 1 (BIS Group): Sedation is guided by BIS monitoring, targeting a score of 61-80.
  • Group 2 (Control Group): Sedation is guided by standard clinical assessment (loss of response to verbal commands and eyelash reflex), with BIS recorded but not visible to the treating team.

Both groups will receive the same medications (propofol and fentanyl). The primary outcome is how quickly patients recover after the procedure, measured by the Modified Aldrete Score - a standard clinical recovery assessment tool. Secondary outcomes include patient and physician satisfaction, procedural pain, risk of awareness during the procedure, cardioversion success rate, hemodynamic stability, and complication rates.

The trial will enroll 60 adult patients at Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Cardiology Institute. Findings are expected to provide evidence-based guidance for standardizing sedation protocols during ECV.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Background:

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained cardiac arrhythmia. Elective electrical cardioversion (ECV) is a widely used rhythm control strategy. Procedural sedation is a critical component of ECV; however, the optimal monitoring method and depth of sedation remain undefined. Excessive sedation risks respiratory depression and hemodynamic instability, particularly in patients with structural heart disease, while inadequate sedation may result in patient movement, pain, and procedural awareness.

Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring offers objective, real-time quantification of sedation depth. Preliminary clinical observation at our center suggests that BIS 61-80 provides adequate procedural conditions for ECV with propofol-fentanyl sedation, while deeper sedation (BIS <60) is associated with increased respiratory depression without additional procedural benefit.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

60

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Luoghi di studio

      • Istanbul, Turchia (Türkiye)
        • Reclutamento
        • Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cardiology Institute
        • Contatto:
        • Investigatore principale:
          • Kerem Erkalp, Professor MD

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Documented atrial fibrillation with indication for elective electrical cardioversion
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I, II, or III
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥30% on echocardiography
  • Adequate anticoagulation: INR ≥2.0, OR ≥3 weeks of therapeutic anticoagulation, OR absence of left atrial thrombus confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or contraindication to propofol or fentanyl, or their excipients (soy, egg)
  • Hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or symptomatic hypotension)
  • Decompensated heart failure (NYHA functional class IV)
  • Severe obstructive sleep apnea requiring CPAP or BiPAP therapy
  • Anticipated difficult airway (modified Mallampati classification class III or IV)
  • Baseline oxygen saturation <94% or active chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Severe hepatic impairment (transaminases >3× upper limit of normal) or severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m²)
  • Active psychiatric illness or cognitive impairment precluding questionnaire completion
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Alcohol or substance use within the preceding 24 hours
  • Prior participation in this trial

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: BIS-Guided Sedation (BIS Group)
Patients in this group receive sedation with intravenous fentanyl (0.5-1 µg/kg) followed by titrated propofol (0.5-1 mg/kg) guided by continuous BIS monitoring, targeting a BIS range of 61-80. Cardioversion is initiated once the target BIS range is achieved and clinical endpoints (loss of verbal contact, loss of eyelash reflex) are confirmed.
IV propofol 0.5-1 mg/kg titrated to BIS 61-80, preceded by IV fentanyl 0.5-1 µg/kg. Additional propofol 0.25-0.5 mg/kg boluses as needed for repeat shocks within target range.
Comparatore attivo: Standard Clinical Sedation (Control Group)
Patients in this group receive sedation with intravenous fentanyl (0.5-1 µg/kg) followed by titrated propofol (0.5-1 mg/kg) guided by standard clinical assessment (loss of verbal contact, loss of eyelash reflex). BIS monitoring is applied but the monitor screen is physically concealed from the treating team. BIS values are recorded for analysis only.
IV propofol 0.5-1 mg/kg titrated to clinical endpoints, preceded by IV fentanyl 0.5-1 µg/kg. BIS recording passive (blinded to operator).

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Time to Recovery (Modified Aldrete Score ≥9)
Lasso di tempo: From sedation induction to Modified Aldrete Score ≥9, assessed every 5 minutes post-ECV for up to 60 minutes.
Time in minutes from sedation induction (first propofol dose) to achievement of Modified Aldrete Score ≥9, assessed by an independent, blinded anesthesiologist. The Modified Aldrete Score evaluates activity, respiration, circulation, consciousness, and oxygen saturation (0-2 points each; maximum 10). Score ≥9 indicates readiness for discharge from monitored care.
From sedation induction to Modified Aldrete Score ≥9, assessed every 5 minutes post-ECV for up to 60 minutes.

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Patient Satisfaction
Lasso di tempo: Within 60 minutes post-procedure.
Patient-reported global satisfaction with the procedure assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied to 5 = very satisfied), administered by the blinded assessor after Modified Aldrete Score ≥9 is achieved.
Within 60 minutes post-procedure.
Physician Satisfaction
Lasso di tempo: Immediately post-procedure (within 5 minutes of ECV completion).
Treating cardiologist's global satisfaction with sedation conditions assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied to 5 = very satisfied), recorded immediately after the procedure.
Immediately post-procedure (within 5 minutes of ECV completion).
Procedural Pain
Lasso di tempo: Within 60 minutes post-procedure (after Modified Aldrete Score ≥9).
Patient-reported pain intensity during the procedure assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain), administered after recovery.
Within 60 minutes post-procedure (after Modified Aldrete Score ≥9).
Cardioversion Success Rate
Lasso di tempo: Within 1 hour post-ECV.
Proportion of patients achieving restoration of sinus rhythm confirmed by 12-lead ECG within 1 hour of the procedure.
Within 1 hour post-ECV.
Incidence of sedation related complications
Lasso di tempo: From sedation induction to 60 minutes post-procedure.
Proportion of patients experiencing any of the following: hypotension (systolic BP <90 mmHg), bradycardia (HR <50 bpm), oxygen desaturation (SpO₂ <90%), apnea, laryngospasm, or procedurally significant arrhythmia. Recorded as a composite binary outcome (yes/no).
From sedation induction to 60 minutes post-procedure.
Number of Cardioversion Shocks and Total Energy Delivered
Lasso di tempo: During the ECV procedure.
Total number of synchronized shocks delivered and cumulative energy (Joules) used per patient.
During the ECV procedure.
Total Anesthetic Drug Consumption
Lasso di tempo: During procedure
Total dose (mg/kg) of propofol and fentanyl (µg/kg) administered during the procedure.
During procedure

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Kerem Erkalp, Professor Dr, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

13 aprile 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

15 giugno 2026

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

15 luglio 2026

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

12 aprile 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

1 maggio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

6 maggio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

15 maggio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

12 maggio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 maggio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Descrizione del piano IPD

Individual participant data will not be shared publicly. Aggregate de-identified results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications.

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su BIS-guided propofol sedation

Sottoscrivi