このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

AIを活用したワクチン誤情報に対する認知的レジリエンスの構築:ランダム化比較試験からのエビデンス

会話型AIを用いたワクチン誤情報に対する認知的レジリエンス構築:英国ランダム化比較試験からのエビデンス

This study aims to understand how parents and caregivers in the United Kingdom engage with information about childhood vaccination (routine vaccines for children and adolescents, excluding tetanus or international travel-related vaccines) and how tailored digital health tools can help address childhood vaccine misinformation.

調査の概要

状態

完了

条件

介入・治療

詳細な説明

Global evidence shows that harmful and misleading information spreads rapidly online and can undermine trust in public health guidance. The World Health Organization has described this challenge as an "infodemic." In the United Kingdom (UK), most people obtain news through online platforms, and false information travels faster and further than accurate content. Vaccination is among the areas most affected. Many UK parents report encountering anti- vaccine claims online, and research shows that such exposure is linked to reduced vaccine confidence and lower uptake.

These concerns arise at a time when routine childhood vaccination rates in the UK have declined below WHO targets, contributing to renewed outbreaks of preventable diseases such as measles. Studies also show that simply providing more factual information is often insufficient to counter misinformation. Cognitive biases - such as confirmation bias, emotional reasoning, and low perceived risk - shape how people interpret health information. Systematic reviews suggest that pre-emptive approaches based on inoculation theory ("prebunking"), which warn people about common manipulation tactics and provide weakened examples of misinformation, can strengthen their ability to recognise and resist false claims.

At the same time, advances in artificial intelligence have created opportunities to deliver personalised, interactive health communication at scale. Emerging evidence indicates that brief conversations with AI-enabled, vaccine-focused chatbots can improve rumour recognition, encourage informed decision-making, and reduce belief in false narratives by providing personalised, interactive, and accessible information. Building on this evidence, this project will test whether an AI-based chatbot can help parents identify misleading claims about childhood vaccinations and increase their confidence in making childhood vaccination decisions.

This study aims to evaluate whether an AI-driven chatbot, MindShield, can strengthen resilience to vaccine misinformation by directly engaging the cognitive biases - such as confirmation bias, affective reasoning, and optimism bias - that shape vaccine risk perception and decision-making. We will first identify bias patterns underlying misinformation beliefs among parents in the UK. MindShield, grounded in inoculation theory, will then be evaluated in a randomised controlled trial to test whether short, bias-aware conversations improve bias recognition, misinformation discernment, and vaccine confidence compared with factual information alone. Finally, we will assess the scalability, acceptability, and ethical considerations of bias-targeted AI interventions for broader misinformation contexts. The study asks whether conversational AI can act as a cognitive safeguard, helping individuals recognise and resist manipulative narratives while supporting informed, confident health decisions.

We will conduct a randomised controlled trial with 1,000 parents or caregivers of children under 18 in the UK. Eligible participants will be recruited online and randomly assigned to either:

  1. Intervention group: a brief interaction with MindShield, an AI-based chatbot introducing three common misinformation tactics-logical fallacies, emotional manipulation, and risk-perception biases-through short explanations and interactive examples; or
  2. Control group: a "myth versus fact" infographic adapted from official public health communication materials presenting evidence-based information on the same topics

All participants will complete baseline and immediate post-intervention questionnaires. The primary outcome is parents' ability to correctly distinguish true from false childhood vaccine statements. Secondary outcomes include vaccine confidence, willingness to vaccinate, perceived risks, self-efficacy, and perceptions of AI. Participants in the intervention group will also assess the chatbot's acceptability and usability. Quantitative data will be analysed using mixed-effects models following intention-to-treat principles. The findings will help determine whether an AI-based, vaccine-focused chatbot can strengthen resilience to misinformation and improve informed decision-making around childhood vaccination. A subsequent scale-up to additional countries is planned, intended to evaluate cross-cultural generalizability.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

1008

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

      • London、イギリス
        • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

20年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parents or primary caregivers of at least one child under 18 years of age in the UK who is able to answer questions about their child's vaccination status;
  • Those who have basic literacy in English;
  • Those who have regular access to a digital device and the internet; and
  • Those who provide informed consent and agree to participate in the trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who have a visual/reading disability that could prevent their participation in or completion of the study activities

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:ダブル

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:AI-driven chatbot

An interactive, web-based, AI-driven chatbot intervention designed to counter vaccine misinformation. It can be accessed via a personal computer, tablet, or mobile device through a web- browser link.

A tailored AI-driven chatbot designed to counter vaccine misinformation.

アクティブコンパレータ:Social media infographic

A UNICEF social media infographic with three "myth vs. fact" statements on vaccination that correspond to the same misinformation tactics explained by the MindShield chatbot.

A UNICEF social media infographic with three "myth vs. fact" statements on vaccination.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Parental susceptibility to misinformation about childhood vaccination
時間枠:From enrollment to the endpoint assessment immediately following the intervention during the same survey session (approximately 20-30 minutes)

The primary outcome of this study will assess parental susceptibility to misinformation about childhood vaccination, defined as parents' ability to accurately distinguish between true and false vaccine-related information. This will be measured using ten statements on childhood vaccines, including four true and six false, rumour-related statements. Two of the rumour-related statements correspond to each of the three misinformation tactics introduced by the chatbot and the UNICEF infographic. This measure reflects parents' ability to identify misinformation containing manipulation tactics they were inoculated against and to distinguish true from false information regarding childhood vaccination. Responses will be recorded as "True", "False", or "Don't know". A composite misinformation susceptibility score will be calculated based on the number of correct responses, with higher scores indicating greater ability to identify vaccine misinformation accurately.

From enrollment to the endpoint assessment immediately following the intervention during the same survey session (approximately 20-30 minutes)

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Self-efficacy
時間枠:From enrollment to the endpoint assessment immediately following the intervention during the same survey session (approximately 20-30 minutes)

Participants' self-efficacy will be evaluated in two domains: (a) confidence in making informed vaccination decisions for their children, measured with a binary response of "Yes" or "No", and (b) confidence in seeking trustworthy information about childhood vaccinations, measured on a four-point scale from "Not at all confident" to "Very confident".

From enrollment to the endpoint assessment immediately following the intervention during the same survey session (approximately 20-30 minutes)

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

協力者

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2026年7月6日

一次修了 (実際)

2026年7月22日

研究の完了 (実際)

2026年7月22日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年3月9日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年3月18日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年3月23日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年9月28日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年9月23日

最終確認日

2026年3月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • LSHTM32923
  • 2025-KEP-1223 (その他の識別子:London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。