このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Utilization of Guided Point of Care Ultrasound in Heart Failure Diagnosis Pilot Trial (POCUS-HF)

2026年9月14日 更新者:David Mcnamara、Corewell Health West

A Pilot Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial of Software Guided Point-of-care

The purpose of the study is to implement point of care ultrasound (POCUS) to generate preliminary, or pilot, data to support a full future POCUS study across multiple Corewell Health outpatient rural facilities. The study aims to demonstrate feasibility of the procedure utilizing input from the patient, provider, and the clinic staff. Preliminary data will also be used to estimate the magnitude of effect in estimating sample size and power in participants who receive the POCUS procedure versus those who continue with standard of care. Up to 100 participants will be enrolled.

調査の概要

状態

まだ募集していません

条件

介入・治療

詳細な説明

The Investogators will harness the power of a novel turn-by-turn guidance software embedded within a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) device that can generate an accurate estimate of left ventricular ejection fraction in <5 minutes by medical assistants (MA) with minimal training at a single Corewell Health outpatient practice. Using a randomized clinical trial design in patients with new cardiac symptoms, POCUS-HF will quantify the benefits of using POCUS for heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) diagnosis and establishment of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT).

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is an adaptation of formal ultrasound technology used to evaluate cardiac structure and function known as transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). TTE is conducted by a trained sonographer and is the initial imaging modality in heart failure diagnoses. POCUS is unique in that it is portable, provides real-time imaging feedback while being relatively inexpensive and accessible to users of variating level of training. POCUS is particularly well positioned to serve the growing HF community throughout Michigan and if performed in the office, may potentially shorten the time to GDMT initiation in new cases of HF. While the investigators posit that a POCUS screening tool will have the greatest impact in rural communities who are already overburdened, the POCUS-HF findings will be applicable in other urbanization levels or geographic regions across the United States, and potentially to other under resourced areas.

One area ideal for intervention is in obtaining accurate measures of left ventricular EF via TTE. In a patient with cardiac symptomatology, the typical workflow includes: 1) initial visit with one's primary care physician including referral to a cardiology specialist and ordering a TTE, 2) TTE 3) cardiology appointment to diagnose HFrEF, and 4) discussion/review of the results with the patient, 5) followed finally by the initiation of GDMT. This process is long and burdensome and is likely particularly more challenging in underserved communities that lack specialists. Thus, TTE acquisition is an ideal place for intervention to shorten this timeline.

There are many innovative components of the POCUS-HF trial including the overarching theoretical framework and the use of guided software within the POCUS device. While POCUS is not a uniquely new concept, the combination of a rigorous POCUS device with real-time software guided turn-by-turn instructions allows for novice capture of LVEF. Another innovation is that the POCUS-HF trial is designed to not only quantitatively, but also qualitatively identify barriers and optimal use cases for POCUS. The Investigators believe this will facilitate the implementation of such screening practices by other institutions and care settings. Future work will aim to define other scenarios where POCUS may be effective, such as routine monitoring of progression in HF patients, or in vascular disease diagnosis settings.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

100

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究場所

    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids、Michigan、アメリカ、49503
        • Corewell Health West

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Patient Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older at time of consent
  • Presenting to an enrolled CH study site with visit type:
  • A. PCP - New onset cardiac complaints (e.g., dyspnea on exertion, orthopnea, etc)
  • B. Cardiology - New Patient
  • Weight ≥ 40kg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented echocardiogram in the past 3 years
  • History of cardiac surgery or congenital heart disease
  • O2-dependent pulmonary disease
  • BMI ≥40kg/m2
  • Pregnancy
  • Non-native English speakers who have limited spoken or written understanding of the English language to be able to consent or complete surveys in English
  • Cognitively impaired individuals with a legally authorized representative or guardian

Staff Participant Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion:

  • 18 years of age or older at time of verbal consent
  • Employed to work at a CH clinic where patient enrollment is planned

Exclusion:

  • Deemed inappropriate or ineligible for any reason at PI discretion

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:診断
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
介入なし:標準治療
アクティブコンパレータ:POCUS
Left ventricular Ejection fraction is estimated using a novel turn-by-turn guidance software embedded within a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) device.
Point of care ultrasound will be used in patients as an early diagnostic tool for HFrEF

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Patient Participation Rates
時間枠:1 year
Number of patients who agree to study in comparison to number of patients that decline
1 year
Medical assistant (MA) training and ability of MAs to conduct accurate POCUS-based estimates of EF
時間枠:1 year
Of the medical assistant's trained for the study how many are successful at the implementation of POCUS for accurate LVEF prediction in comparison to those trained that are unsuccessful at utilizing POCUS for LVEF prediction
1 year
Clinic adherence to the protocol
時間枠:1 year
The number of protocol deviations that occur during study timeframe.
1 year
Ability to conduct randomization and provide same-day POCUS results
時間枠:1 year
On the day of randomization how many treatment patients receive same day POCUS results in comparison to the treatment patients that don't receive same day results
1 year
How many days between HFrEF diagnosis and initiation of GDMT protocols
時間枠:1 year
For both the treatment and non-treatment groups how days between HFeEF diagnosis and the start of GDMT protocols
1 year
Implementation and completion rates of patient and provider quantitative and qualitative questionnaires on the burden and benefits of using POCUS in a clinical setting
時間枠:1 year
Number of questionnaires filled out in comparison to the number of blank or missed questionnaires.
1 year

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Magnitude of effect between pocus treatment and standard of care on the time to HFrEF diagnosis and GDMT initiation.
時間枠:2 years
Quantifying the magnitude/sample size/power needed to estimate enrollment for potential full trial
2 years
Difference in patient-level POCUS burden 1-week
時間枠:1-week
Patient level burden will be determined using the Likert-scale (zero burden to burdensome)
1-week
Difference in patient-level POCUS burden 3-month
時間枠:3 Months
Patient level burden will be determined using the Likert-scale (zero burden to burdensome)
3 Months
Healthcare utilization after randomization follow up outpatient visits
時間枠:1 year
Differences in number of follow up outpatient visits
1 year
Healthcare utilization after randomization Emergency room visits
時間枠:1-year
Number of patient ER visits
1-year
Healthcare utilization after randomization follow up inpatient visits
時間枠:1-year
Number of inpatient visits
1-year
Healthcare utilization after randomization GDMT prescriptions
時間枠:1-year
Number of patients prescribed GDMT therapy
1-year

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

協力者

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:David McNamara, MD, MPh、Corewell Health West

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年9月30日

一次修了 (推定)

2027年9月30日

研究の完了 (推定)

2028年9月30日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年1月8日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年9月14日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年9月18日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年9月18日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年9月14日

最終確認日

2026年9月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • 2025-1219

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

はい

米国で製造され、米国から輸出された製品。

はい

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。