Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Utilization of Guided Point of Care Ultrasound in Heart Failure Diagnosis Pilot Trial (POCUS-HF)

14 de septiembre de 2026 actualizado por: David Mcnamara, Corewell Health West

A Pilot Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial of Software Guided Point-of-care

The purpose of the study is to implement point of care ultrasound (POCUS) to generate preliminary, or pilot, data to support a full future POCUS study across multiple Corewell Health outpatient rural facilities. The study aims to demonstrate feasibility of the procedure utilizing input from the patient, provider, and the clinic staff. Preliminary data will also be used to estimate the magnitude of effect in estimating sample size and power in participants who receive the POCUS procedure versus those who continue with standard of care. Up to 100 participants will be enrolled.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

The Investogators will harness the power of a novel turn-by-turn guidance software embedded within a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) device that can generate an accurate estimate of left ventricular ejection fraction in <5 minutes by medical assistants (MA) with minimal training at a single Corewell Health outpatient practice. Using a randomized clinical trial design in patients with new cardiac symptoms, POCUS-HF will quantify the benefits of using POCUS for heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) diagnosis and establishment of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT).

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is an adaptation of formal ultrasound technology used to evaluate cardiac structure and function known as transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). TTE is conducted by a trained sonographer and is the initial imaging modality in heart failure diagnoses. POCUS is unique in that it is portable, provides real-time imaging feedback while being relatively inexpensive and accessible to users of variating level of training. POCUS is particularly well positioned to serve the growing HF community throughout Michigan and if performed in the office, may potentially shorten the time to GDMT initiation in new cases of HF. While the investigators posit that a POCUS screening tool will have the greatest impact in rural communities who are already overburdened, the POCUS-HF findings will be applicable in other urbanization levels or geographic regions across the United States, and potentially to other under resourced areas.

One area ideal for intervention is in obtaining accurate measures of left ventricular EF via TTE. In a patient with cardiac symptomatology, the typical workflow includes: 1) initial visit with one's primary care physician including referral to a cardiology specialist and ordering a TTE, 2) TTE 3) cardiology appointment to diagnose HFrEF, and 4) discussion/review of the results with the patient, 5) followed finally by the initiation of GDMT. This process is long and burdensome and is likely particularly more challenging in underserved communities that lack specialists. Thus, TTE acquisition is an ideal place for intervention to shorten this timeline.

There are many innovative components of the POCUS-HF trial including the overarching theoretical framework and the use of guided software within the POCUS device. While POCUS is not a uniquely new concept, the combination of a rigorous POCUS device with real-time software guided turn-by-turn instructions allows for novice capture of LVEF. Another innovation is that the POCUS-HF trial is designed to not only quantitatively, but also qualitatively identify barriers and optimal use cases for POCUS. The Investigators believe this will facilitate the implementation of such screening practices by other institutions and care settings. Future work will aim to define other scenarios where POCUS may be effective, such as routine monitoring of progression in HF patients, or in vascular disease diagnosis settings.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

100

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, Estados Unidos, 49503
        • Corewell Health West

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Patient Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older at time of consent
  • Presenting to an enrolled CH study site with visit type:
  • A. PCP - New onset cardiac complaints (e.g., dyspnea on exertion, orthopnea, etc)
  • B. Cardiology - New Patient
  • Weight ≥ 40kg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented echocardiogram in the past 3 years
  • History of cardiac surgery or congenital heart disease
  • O2-dependent pulmonary disease
  • BMI ≥40kg/m2
  • Pregnancy
  • Non-native English speakers who have limited spoken or written understanding of the English language to be able to consent or complete surveys in English
  • Cognitively impaired individuals with a legally authorized representative or guardian

Staff Participant Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion:

  • 18 years of age or older at time of verbal consent
  • Employed to work at a CH clinic where patient enrollment is planned

Exclusion:

  • Deemed inappropriate or ineligible for any reason at PI discretion

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Diagnóstico
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Sin intervención: Estándar de cuidado
Comparador activo: POCUS
Left ventricular Ejection fraction is estimated using a novel turn-by-turn guidance software embedded within a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) device.
Point of care ultrasound will be used in patients as an early diagnostic tool for HFrEF

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Patient Participation Rates
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year
Number of patients who agree to study in comparison to number of patients that decline
1 year
Medical assistant (MA) training and ability of MAs to conduct accurate POCUS-based estimates of EF
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year
Of the medical assistant's trained for the study how many are successful at the implementation of POCUS for accurate LVEF prediction in comparison to those trained that are unsuccessful at utilizing POCUS for LVEF prediction
1 year
Clinic adherence to the protocol
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year
The number of protocol deviations that occur during study timeframe.
1 year
Ability to conduct randomization and provide same-day POCUS results
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year
On the day of randomization how many treatment patients receive same day POCUS results in comparison to the treatment patients that don't receive same day results
1 year
How many days between HFrEF diagnosis and initiation of GDMT protocols
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year
For both the treatment and non-treatment groups how days between HFeEF diagnosis and the start of GDMT protocols
1 year
Implementation and completion rates of patient and provider quantitative and qualitative questionnaires on the burden and benefits of using POCUS in a clinical setting
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year
Number of questionnaires filled out in comparison to the number of blank or missed questionnaires.
1 year

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Magnitude of effect between pocus treatment and standard of care on the time to HFrEF diagnosis and GDMT initiation.
Periodo de tiempo: 2 years
Quantifying the magnitude/sample size/power needed to estimate enrollment for potential full trial
2 years
Difference in patient-level POCUS burden 1-week
Periodo de tiempo: 1-week
Patient level burden will be determined using the Likert-scale (zero burden to burdensome)
1-week
Difference in patient-level POCUS burden 3-month
Periodo de tiempo: 3 Months
Patient level burden will be determined using the Likert-scale (zero burden to burdensome)
3 Months
Healthcare utilization after randomization follow up outpatient visits
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year
Differences in number of follow up outpatient visits
1 year
Healthcare utilization after randomization Emergency room visits
Periodo de tiempo: 1-year
Number of patient ER visits
1-year
Healthcare utilization after randomization follow up inpatient visits
Periodo de tiempo: 1-year
Number of inpatient visits
1-year
Healthcare utilization after randomization GDMT prescriptions
Periodo de tiempo: 1-year
Number of patients prescribed GDMT therapy
1-year

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Colaboradores

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: David McNamara, MD, MPh, Corewell Health West

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

30 de septiembre de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

30 de septiembre de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

30 de septiembre de 2028

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

8 de enero de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

14 de septiembre de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

18 de septiembre de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

18 de septiembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

14 de septiembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 2025-1219

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

Sí

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

Sí

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .