Utilization of Guided Point of Care Ultrasound in Heart Failure Diagnosis Pilot Trial (POCUS-HF)
A Pilot Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial of Software Guided Point-of-care
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Statut
Les conditions
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
The Investogators will harness the power of a novel turn-by-turn guidance software embedded within a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) device that can generate an accurate estimate of left ventricular ejection fraction in <5 minutes by medical assistants (MA) with minimal training at a single Corewell Health outpatient practice. Using a randomized clinical trial design in patients with new cardiac symptoms, POCUS-HF will quantify the benefits of using POCUS for heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) diagnosis and establishment of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT).
Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is an adaptation of formal ultrasound technology used to evaluate cardiac structure and function known as transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). TTE is conducted by a trained sonographer and is the initial imaging modality in heart failure diagnoses. POCUS is unique in that it is portable, provides real-time imaging feedback while being relatively inexpensive and accessible to users of variating level of training. POCUS is particularly well positioned to serve the growing HF community throughout Michigan and if performed in the office, may potentially shorten the time to GDMT initiation in new cases of HF. While the investigators posit that a POCUS screening tool will have the greatest impact in rural communities who are already overburdened, the POCUS-HF findings will be applicable in other urbanization levels or geographic regions across the United States, and potentially to other under resourced areas.
One area ideal for intervention is in obtaining accurate measures of left ventricular EF via TTE. In a patient with cardiac symptomatology, the typical workflow includes: 1) initial visit with one's primary care physician including referral to a cardiology specialist and ordering a TTE, 2) TTE 3) cardiology appointment to diagnose HFrEF, and 4) discussion/review of the results with the patient, 5) followed finally by the initiation of GDMT. This process is long and burdensome and is likely particularly more challenging in underserved communities that lack specialists. Thus, TTE acquisition is an ideal place for intervention to shorten this timeline.
There are many innovative components of the POCUS-HF trial including the overarching theoretical framework and the use of guided software within the POCUS device. While POCUS is not a uniquely new concept, the combination of a rigorous POCUS device with real-time software guided turn-by-turn instructions allows for novice capture of LVEF. Another innovation is that the POCUS-HF trial is designed to not only quantitatively, but also qualitatively identify barriers and optimal use cases for POCUS. The Investigators believe this will facilitate the implementation of such screening practices by other institutions and care settings. Future work will aim to define other scenarios where POCUS may be effective, such as routine monitoring of progression in HF patients, or in vascular disease diagnosis settings.
Type d'étude
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Inscription
Phase
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Jacob M Gonzales, BA,MA
- Numéro de téléphone: 6162670612
- E-mail: Jacob.Gonzales@corewellhealth.org
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Michigan
-
Grand Rapids, Michigan, États-Unis, 49503
- Corewell Health West
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Patient Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older at time of consent
- Presenting to an enrolled CH study site with visit type:
- A. PCP - New onset cardiac complaints (e.g., dyspnea on exertion, orthopnea, etc)
- B. Cardiology - New Patient
- Weight ≥ 40kg
Exclusion Criteria:
- Documented echocardiogram in the past 3 years
- History of cardiac surgery or congenital heart disease
- O2-dependent pulmonary disease
- BMI ≥40kg/m2
- Pregnancy
- Non-native English speakers who have limited spoken or written understanding of the English language to be able to consent or complete surveys in English
- Cognitively impaired individuals with a legally authorized representative or guardian
Staff Participant Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion:
- 18 years of age or older at time of verbal consent
- Employed to work at a CH clinic where patient enrollment is planned
Exclusion:
- Deemed inappropriate or ineligible for any reason at PI discretion
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Diagnostique
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Nombre de bras
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / BrasGroupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / TraitementIntervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Aucune intervention: Norme de soins
|
|
|
Comparateur actif: POCUS
Left ventricular Ejection fraction is estimated using a novel turn-by-turn guidance software embedded within a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) device.
|
Point of care ultrasound will be used in patients as an early diagnostic tool for HFrEF
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Participation Rates
Délai: 1 year
|
Number of patients who agree to study in comparison to number of patients that decline
|
1 year
|
|
Medical assistant (MA) training and ability of MAs to conduct accurate POCUS-based estimates of EF
Délai: 1 year
|
Of the medical assistant's trained for the study how many are successful at the implementation of POCUS for accurate LVEF prediction in comparison to those trained that are unsuccessful at utilizing POCUS for LVEF prediction
|
1 year
|
|
Clinic adherence to the protocol
Délai: 1 year
|
The number of protocol deviations that occur during study timeframe.
|
1 year
|
|
Ability to conduct randomization and provide same-day POCUS results
Délai: 1 year
|
On the day of randomization how many treatment patients receive same day POCUS results in comparison to the treatment patients that don't receive same day results
|
1 year
|
|
How many days between HFrEF diagnosis and initiation of GDMT protocols
Délai: 1 year
|
For both the treatment and non-treatment groups how days between HFeEF diagnosis and the start of GDMT protocols
|
1 year
|
|
Implementation and completion rates of patient and provider quantitative and qualitative questionnaires on the burden and benefits of using POCUS in a clinical setting
Délai: 1 year
|
Number of questionnaires filled out in comparison to the number of blank or missed questionnaires.
|
1 year
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Magnitude of effect between pocus treatment and standard of care on the time to HFrEF diagnosis and GDMT initiation.
Délai: 2 years
|
Quantifying the magnitude/sample size/power needed to estimate enrollment for potential full trial
|
2 years
|
|
Difference in patient-level POCUS burden 1-week
Délai: 1-week
|
Patient level burden will be determined using the Likert-scale (zero burden to burdensome)
|
1-week
|
|
Difference in patient-level POCUS burden 3-month
Délai: 3 Months
|
Patient level burden will be determined using the Likert-scale (zero burden to burdensome)
|
3 Months
|
|
Healthcare utilization after randomization follow up outpatient visits
Délai: 1 year
|
Differences in number of follow up outpatient visits
|
1 year
|
|
Healthcare utilization after randomization Emergency room visits
Délai: 1-year
|
Number of patient ER visits
|
1-year
|
|
Healthcare utilization after randomization follow up inpatient visits
Délai: 1-year
|
Number of inpatient visits
|
1-year
|
|
Healthcare utilization after randomization GDMT prescriptions
Délai: 1-year
|
Number of patients prescribed GDMT therapy
|
1-year
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Collaborateurs
Les enquêteurs
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: David McNamara, MD, MPh, Corewell Health West
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Début de l'étude
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Première publication
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour publiée
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 2025-1219
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .