The Sleep Health and Fatigue Education Program for the Administrators of Emergency Medical Services Agencies (CODE3)
The CODE3 First Responder Sleep Health Program
The investigators aim to pilot test an education program designed to address workplace sleep health and fatigue. The education program targets employers (administrators) of United States (U.S.)-based emergency medical services (EMS) and fire department operations. Data from this pilot, proof-of-concept study will provide data to inform larger studies.
調査の概要
状態
状態
条件
条件
介入・治療
介入・治療
詳細な説明
Poor sleep and fatigue are widespread among first responder personnel such as EMTs and paramedics. Prior research shows that greater than 80% of frontline EMS personnel report fatigue. Unfortunately, there is no gold standard education program specifically for the administrators of EMS / first responder operations that raises awareness of current evidence based guidelines for sleep health and fatigue risk management.
The investigators aim to pilot test an education program specifically designed for employers (administrators) of U.S.-based EMS / fire operations. Data from this pilot study will provide much needed data regarding this type of education program and guide future, larger studies focused on poor sleep and fatigue in first responder operations.
研究の種類
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
入学
段階
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究連絡先
研究連絡先
- 名前：Paul D Patterson, PhD
- 電話番号：412-647-3078
- メール：pdp3@pitt.edu
研究連絡先のバックアップ
- 名前：Maureen Morgan
- 電話番号：412-647-3078
- メール：morganma@upmc.edu
参加基準
適格基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
-
EMS administrators are eligible if they are:
- 18 years of age or older
- Actively working as EMS administrator at any type of EMS agency
Frontline EMS personnel are eligible if they are:
- 18 years of age or older
- Actively working a minimum of 1 shift per week on the ambulance
- Affiliated with an agency involved in this research study based on an EMS administrator signing up first
Exclusion Criteria:
-
EMS administrators are not eligible if they are:
- Affiliated with a first responder organization that does not employ frontline EMS clinicians
- Daily operations do not involve frontline EMS personnel operating ambulances and taking care of patients either in an emergent or non-emergent situation 24 hours a day
- Administrator does not provide direct oversight of frontline EMS personnel
Frontline EMS personnel are not eligible if they:
- Are not affiliated with an EMS operation that is enrolled in this research study by an EMS administrator at their agency/operation
- Do not work at least 1 shift per week at the agency as a frontline EMS personnel taking care of patients in emergent or non-emergent situations
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て：非ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）
アーム数
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：EMS Administrators
A short education program focused on importance of sleep health and fatigue delivered to emergency medical services administrators (EMS Administrator Arm) |
A short education program focused on importance of sleep health and fatigue delivered to emergency medical services administrators
他の名前：
|
|
実験的：Frontline EMS personnel
Frontline EMS personnel employed at EMS agencies where EMS administrators are exposed to the Sleep Health and Fatigue Education Program |
A short education program focused on importance of sleep health and fatigue delivered to emergency medical services administrators
他の名前：
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in policy (EMS Administrators)
時間枠：At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
A single question: "Did participant's EMS agency create a new or change an existing policy after watching the CODE3 Sleep & Fatigue in EMS Program? __Yes. __No." |
At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
|
Change in sleep quality (Frontline EMS personnel)
時間枠：At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
Sleep quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) among frontline EMS personnel. The PSQI solicits self-reported responses on 19 survey items that primarily use a Likert type response scale that are weighted using prescribed formulas and reference the prior month. Scores range from 0 - 21 with scores 6- 21 indicating poor sleep quality. A PSQI score decrease > = 3 points is considered clinically meaningful and associated with a reduction in signs and symptoms of poor sleep. |
At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
二次結果の測定
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in sleep health (Frontline EMS personnel)
時間枠：At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
Sleep health as measured by the RU-SATED survey instrument (Regularity, Satisfaction, Alertness, Timing, Efficiency, and Duration). The survey solicits self-reported responses on a Likert type response scale to 6 items that reference the prior month. Six items, each scored 0-2. Response of 0 = Never/rarely; 1 = Sometimes; 2 = Usually/always. Total score = sum of six items. There are no universally established clinical cut points for the RU-SATED; however, higher scores suggest good sleep health. |
At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
|
Change in daytime sleepiness (Frontline EMS personnel)
時間枠：At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
Daytime sleepiness is measured with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The ESS solicits self-reported responses on a Likert type scale to 8 items. Items are scored using a prescribed algorithm with scores ranging from 0 - 24. Higher scores indicate greater daytime sleepiness. A score decrease of > = 2 points is considered clinically meaningful and associated with a reduction in signs and symptoms of daytime sleepiness. |
At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
|
Change in fatigue (Frontline EMS personnel)
時間枠：At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
Fatigue (mental and physical) is measured with the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ). The CFQ solicits self-reported responses on a Likert type response scale to 11 survey items. One approach to scoring includes: Less than usual = 0; No more than usual = 1; More than usual = 2; Much more than usual = 3. The more commonly used approach to scoring (bimodal approach) includes: Less than usual = 0; No more than usual = 0; More than usual = 1; Much more than usual = 1. Scores > = 4 suggest severe mental and physical fatigue. |
At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
|
Change in chronic fatigue (Frontline EMS personnel)
時間枠：At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
Chronic fatigue (CF) is measured with the CF sub-scale survey instrument of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion/Recovery Scale (OFER-15). Responses for the CF sub-scale are solicited for 5 items using a Likert response scale: 0 = strongly disagree to 6 = strongly agree. Scoring involves summing the 5 items, dividing by 30 and then multiplying by 100. Scores range from 0 to 100. Final scores 0 - 25 suggest Low CF; scores 26 - 50 suggest Low to Moderate CF; scores 51 - 75 suggest Moderate to High CF; scores 76 to 100 suggest High CF. |
At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
|
Change in acute fatigue (Frontline EMS personnel)
時間枠：At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
Acute fatigue (AF) is measured with the AF sub-scale survey instrument of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion/Recovery Scale (OFER-15). Responses for the AF sub-scale are solicited for 5 items using a Likert response scale: 0 = strongly disagree to 6 = strongly agree. Scoring involves summing the 5 items, dividing by 30 and then multiplying by 100. Scores range from 0 to 100. Final scores 0 - 25 suggest Low AF; scores 26 - 50 suggest Low to Moderate AF; scores 51 - 75 suggest Moderate to High AF; scores 76 to 100 suggest High AF. Two items of the AF sub-scale are reverse scored/coded. |
At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
|
Change in Intershift Recovery (Frontline EMS personnel)
時間枠：At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
Intershift Recovery between shifts (IR) is measured with the IR sub-scale survey instrument of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion/Recovery Scale (OFER-15). Responses for the IR sub-scale are solicited for 5 items using a Likert response scale: 0 = strongly disagree to 6 = strongly agree. Scoring involves summing the 5 items, dividing by 30 and then multiplying by 100. Scores range from 0 to 100. Final scores 0 - 25 suggest Low IR; scores 26 - 50 suggest Low to Moderate IR; scores 51 - 75 suggest Moderate to High IR; scores 76 to 100 suggest High IR. Three items of the IR sub-scale are reverse scored/coded. |
At baseline and at 6-9 months follow-up
|
協力者と研究者
協力者
協力者
捜査官
捜査官
- 主任研究者：Paul D Patterson, PhD、University of Pittsburgh
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (推定)
研究開始
一次修了 (推定)
一次修了
研究の完了 (推定)
研究の完了
試験登録日
最初に提出
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
最初の投稿
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
投稿された最後の更新
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
その他の研究ID番号
- STUDY26070003
- 307-SR-23 (その他の助成金/資金番号：American Academy of Sleep Medicine Foundation)
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
De-identified data and a data dictionary will be shared with other researchers (investigators) on a case-by-case basis and based on the required procedures and guidance as outlined by the University of Pittsburgh in the Data Use Agreements provided by the Office of Sponsored Programs.
IPD 共有時間枠
Requests for sharing data will be reviewed 12 months after publication of the study's main findings by the study investigators.
IPD 共有アクセス基準
Requests must adhere to the policies and requirements of the University of Pittsburgh as outlined in Data Use Agreements. De-identified data files and a data dictionary can be shared using University of Pittsburgh approved mechanisms.
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。