このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

乳がんスクリーニングの取り込み: 意思決定支援の効果を評価するランダム化比較試験 (DEDICACES2)

2026年9月22日 更新者:Nantes University Hospital

プライマリケアにおける乳がん検診の意思決定の共有

Shared decision-making for organised breast cancer screening (OBCS) could be improved by fostering interaction and exchanges of information between women and General Practitioners (GPs), for instance by including an assistance tool in the dispatch of the invitation letter for Organised Screening for breast cancer. In 2018 the national cancer Institute funded the development of a decisional aid (DA) on the theme of whether or not to take part in breast cancer screening, specific to the French setting. It is the website lamammo-etvous.fr DEDICACES project 1.

DEDICACES 2 is a population-based trial with a cluster design. It studies humans, without modifying their usual care. The experiment assesses the effect of the lamammo-etvous.fr/ tool on the decision to take part (or not) in OBCS among women who are invited for screening.

調査の概要

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

20000

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

      • Nantes、フランス、44093
        • University Hospital

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

50年~74年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

女性

説明

Inclusion Criteria :

- General practitioners (GPs):

The following GPs will be included:

1) Practicing in one of the French départements (administrative area) covered by the study.

- Women:

The following women will be included:

  1. Invited to participate in OBCS by the National Health Insurance Agency (Caisse Nationale d'Assurance Maladie; CNAM) during the studied month: eligible for OBCS, therefore aged between 50 and 74 at the time of inclusion;
  2. On the patient list of a GP who is covered by the study at the time of inclusion;
  3. Covered by one of the CPAM (Caisse Primaire d'Assurance Maladie) in the participating departments.

Exclusion Criteria :

- General practitioners (GPs) :

The following GPs will be excluded:

  1. Those who do not have any patients invited for OBCS in the studied month;

  2. Those whose practice does not correspond to the usual activities of a GP (known as a Mode d'Exercice Particulier), or who have very few patients (who have seen fewer than 100 different patients in the year preceding the experiment);

  3. Those who practice within a health centre (as it is impossible to evaluate the activity of an individual practitioner in health insurance databases);

  4. Those who explicitly state that they do not want to take part in the study, in response to an initial letter of invitation. This letter will inform them that the study is being run, and will inform them of the option to refuse to participate if they so wish;

  5. Those who are participating in the MyPEBS study (the only national study of OBCS at the time the present protocol was drawn up).

    • Women:

The following women will not be included:

  1. Participants in the MyPEBS study ( the only national study of OBCS at the time the present protocol was drawn up); or,
  2. If their GP refuses to participate in the study; or,
  3. women under guardianship.

The following women will be excluded:

  • Those who object to the study in accordance with regulatory procedures issued by the Data Protection Officer (DPO),
  • Those who do not respond within 1 month after the questionnaire has been sent.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:防止
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Decisional aid for organised cancer screening

Women will receive a leaflet that presents the tool. The leaflet includes a link to access the tool, and encourages the person to consult their GP to initiate the shared decision-making process. GPs will receive a letter presenting the study that includes: a) information about shared decision-making and how to implement it; b) the letter that is sent to their patients, and c) a recommendation to implement shared decision-making with their patients.

The leaflet will include a link to access the https://lamammo-etvous.fr DA aid tool, and will inform women about shared decision-making.

The GPs of women who are sent the leaflet will also be sent a letter encouraging shared decision-making. This material will be sent 3 months after women have received their breast cancer screening invitation letter.

Data related to primary and secondary objectives will be collected by questionnaire from the 2 groups. The questionnaire will be sent 2 months after participants are informed about the tool.

介入なし:Standard organised cancer screening

Women and their GPs will continue to carry out usual screening.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the /lamammo-etvous.fr/ DA tool on decision-making concerning the choice of whether or not to participate in OBCS among women who are invited for screening.
時間枠:2 months

Overall score on the 16-item Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). Measured 2 months after participants are informed about the tool, in both arms. 5 response categories: 1 = strongly agree; 5 = strongly disagree. Scores range from 0 [no decisional conflict] to 100 [extremely high decisional conflict].

2 months

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Evaluation of the effect of the presentation of the /lamammo-etvous.fr/ tool on the intention to participate in OBCS.
時間枠:2 months

Score on a one-item (Measures of Decision) scale measuring intention to participate in OBCS. Measured 2 months after participants are informed about the tool, in both arms. Respondents check a box lying on a 15-point scale ranging from "I wish to participate in breast cancer screening" to "I do not wish to participate in breast cancer screening", with "I'm not sure" in the middle. Scores will be reclassified as follows: 1-5 (yes); 6-10 (unsure); 11-15 (no).

2 months
Evaluation of the effect of presenting the /lamammo-etvous.fr/ DA tool on the implementation of shared decision-making.
時間枠:2 months

Scores on the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM Q9). Measured 2 months after presentation of the tool, in both arms. Six response categories: 10 = completely disagree; 5 = completely agree. Scores are reported on a scale ranging from 0 (the lowest possible level of SDM) to 100 ( the highest extent of SDM).

2 months
Evaluation of the effect of presenting the /lamammo-etvous.fr/ DA tool on women's knowledge of OBCS.
時間枠:2 months

Number of correct responses to a 10-item questionnaire that tests OSBC-related knowledge. The questionnaire was developed in the context of the DEDICACES project (part 1) and is based on items included in the IPDAS (International Patient Decision Aid Standards) score. Measured 2 months after presentation of the support tool, in both arms.

2 months
Evaluation of the effect of the presentation of the /lamammo-etvous.fr/ DA tool on women's care pathways following an invitation to participate in OBCS.
時間枠:2 months

Data related to care pathways 2 months after presentation of the DA tool, in both arms: mammograms completed; appointments made to undergo mammography; appointments made to discuss screening; type of professionals contacted by participants (GP, midwife, gynaecologist, other).

2 months
Evaluation of the effect of presenting the /lamammo-etvous.fr/ DA tool on decisional conflict in subgroups characterized by lower participation in OBCS.
時間枠:2 months

Collection of socio-demographic patient data (home, work, marital status, in receipt of state aid) and health data (long-term illness, history of participation in OBCS, history of participation in colon cancer screening). Data collected 2 months after presentation of the DA tool, in both arms.

2 months

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • スタディディレクター:Cédric Rat, M.D. PhD.、Nantes University Hospital, Faculty of medicine, General Practice Department, Nantes, France
  • 主任研究者:Sandrine Hild, M.D.、Nantes University Hospital, Faculty of medicine, General Practice Department, Nantes, France

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2025年4月16日

一次修了 (実際)

2025年9月15日

研究の完了 (実際)

2025年9月15日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2022年10月24日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2022年11月2日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2022年11月7日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年9月25日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年9月22日

最終確認日

2025年9月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • RC20_0532
  • 2024-A00987-40 (その他の助成金/資金番号:National Cancer Institute)

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する