이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

정신과 정신병 적 클리닉의 업무 관련 도전 (HIPP)

2026년 9월 22일 업데이트: Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH

독일의 정신과 정신병 적 임상 실습의 의료 전문가 : 업무 관련 문제에 대한 이론 가이드 평가.

The aim of this project is to evaluate the work-related challenges faced by healthcare professionals (nurses, psychologists, and doctors) in German psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics. By applying the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, this study investigates how job demands and resources influence job satisfaction, turnover intention, and subjective service quality. Special focus is given to the roles of burnout, engagement, and psychological safety as mediators and moderators in these relationships.

The project consists of two phases. In Phase 1, a cross-sectional online survey targeting healthcare professionals in psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics across Germany is conducted to identify key factors affecting well-being and performance in mental health settings. In Phase 2, a participatory co-design workshop with multiprofessional healthcare professionals is conducted to further explore work-related challenges, supportive factors, interprofessional collaboration, and possible practical support approaches for the clinical work environment.

The findings will contribute to a better understanding of work-related experiences in psychiatric-psychosomatic care and support the development of feasible and practice-oriented approaches to improve working conditions and service quality.

연구 개요

상태

완전한

정황

상세 설명

This study uses an online questionnaire to collect data from healthcare professionals (nurses, psychologists, and doctors) working in psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics in Germany. The survey aims to assess their experiences and perceptions regarding work-related challenges, job demands, and resources, as well as their impact on job satisfaction, turnover intention, and subjective service quality. The study applies the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model to explore the relationships between these factors, with a particular focus on the mediating roles of burnout and engagement and the moderating role of psychological safety.

In addition to the quantitative survey component, the project also includes a qualitative participatory co-design phase. This phase consists of a structured workshop with multiprofessional healthcare professionals working in psychiatric-psychosomatic care. The workshop aims to explore everyday work-related challenges, supportive factors, interprofessional collaboration, and possible approaches to support healthcare professionals in their clinical work environment.

The workshop uses participatory and reflective group methods, including visual activation exercises, moderated group discussions, World Café elements, and co-creative idea development. Discussions focus on experiences of workload, supportive resources, practical challenges, and realistic approaches that may support healthcare professionals in their daily work. Audio recordings and visual workshop materials are used for qualitative analysis. Participation is voluntary, and all collected data are handled confidentially and in accordance with ethical and data protection regulations.

The survey will be conducted at a single time point, targeting 600 healthcare professionals (200 nurses, 200 psychologists, and 200 doctors) across various psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics in Germany. Data will be collected using standardized scales to ensure reliability and validity. Participants will be recruited via email invitations sent to clinics, with the survey distributed through the SoSci Survey platform. Participation is voluntary, and all data will be anonymized and handled in compliance with ethical and data protection regulations.

Main Research Questions are:

I. How do the surveyed resources and demands of healthcare professionals impact job satisfaction, turnover intention and subjective service quality? II. What roles do burnout, engagement, and psychological safety play as mediators and moderators in these relationships? III. What are the key challenges and resources identified by healthcare professionals in their daily work within psychiatric-psychosomatic settings? IV. Which practical and feasible support approaches do healthcare professionals identify within participatory co-design discussions regarding the clinical work environment in psychiatric-psychosomatic care?

연구 유형

관찰

등록 (실제)

296

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

      • Bremen, 독일, 28759
        • Constructor University Bremen and online
      • Bremen, 독일, 28759
        • Constructor University

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

해당 없음

연구 대상 성별

모두

샘플링 방법

비확률 샘플

연구 인구

Healthcare professionals (nurses, psychologists, and doctors) working in German psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthcare professionals (nurses, psychologists, or doctors) working in psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics in Germany
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Sufficient German language proficiency to complete the questionnaire
  • Willingness to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals not working as nurses, psychologists, or doctors in psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics
  • Age under 18 years
  • Insufficient German language proficiency to complete the questionnaire
  • Massively limited cognitive abilities

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 관찰 모델: OTHER
  • 시간 관점: CROSS_SECTIONAL

코호트 및 개입

그룹/코호트
Healthcare professionals in psychiatric-psychosomatic care

Healthcare professionals working in psychiatric-psychosomatic care in Germany, including nurses, psychologists, physicians, and other multiprofessional staff. Participants take part in a cross-sectional online survey and/or a participatory co-design workshop exploring work-related demands, resources, collaboration, and possible support approaches in the clinical work environment.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Job Satisfaction
기간: Baseline

The 'Arbeitszufriedenheit Skala' (Job Satisfaction Scale) from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) by Nübling et al. (2010) assesses job satisfaction among healthcare professionals in psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics. This scale captures various dimensions of job satisfaction, including satisfaction with career prospects, colleagues, physical working conditions, management, utilization of skills, salary, and overall job satisfaction. Responses are measured on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (Very satisfied) to 5 (Very dissatisfied). Higher scores indicate lower job satisfaction, while lower scores reflect higher job satisfaction.

Baseline
Emotional Exhaustion
기간: Baseline

The 'Emotionale Erschöpfung Skala' (Emotional Exhaustion Scale) from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) by Nübling et al. (2010) assesses emotional exhaustion among healthcare professionals in psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics. This scale captures participants' experiences of exhaustion and feelings of being emotionally drained due to work. Responses are measured on a 5-point frequency scale, ranging from 1 (Always) to 5 (Never/Almost never). Lower scores indicate greater emotional exhaustion, while higher scores reflect lower levels of exhaustion.

Baseline
Engagement
기간: Baseline

The 'Engagement Skala' from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) by Nübling et al. (2010) assesses work engagement among healthcare professionals in psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics. They collect data on participants' levels of energy, enthusiasm, and absorption in their work. Responses are measured on a 5-point frequency scale ranging from 1 (Always) to 5 (Never/Almost never). Lower scores indicate grater engagement, while higher scores reflect lower levels of engagement.

Baseline

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Turnover Intention
기간: in the last 12 Months

The 'Gedanke an Beruf-/Stellenwechsel Skala' (Turnover Intention Scale) from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) by Nübling et al. (2010) assesses turnover intention among healthcare professionals in psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics. They collect data on participants' thoughts about leaving their profession or their current job over the past 12 months. Responses are measured on a 5-point frequency scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (Every day). Lower scores indicate a lower desire to leave the job, while higher scores reflect greater desire to leave.

in the last 12 Months
Subjective Service Quality
기간: Baseline

The 'Service Quality Scale' by Rafferty et al. (2001) assesses subjective service quality among healthcare professionals in psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics. They collect data on participants' perceptions of the quality of care provided on their unit, including reliability, consistency, and alignment with expectations. Responses are measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). Lower scores indicate a subjective lower service quality, while higher scores reflect higher subjective service quality.

Baseline

기타 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Qualitative themes related to work-related challenges and supportive factors
기간: During the single workshop session (Day 1)

Qualitative themes identified during participatory group discussions regarding work-related demands, supportive resources, and interprofessional collaboration in psychiatric-psychosomatic care.

During the single workshop session (Day 1)
Co-designed support approaches for the clinical work environment
기간: During the single workshop session (Day 1)

Ideas and approaches collaboratively developed by healthcare professionals regarding feasible and practice-oriented support strategies for the clinical work environment.

During the single workshop session (Day 1)

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

수사관

  • 연구 책임자: Sonia Lippke, Prof. Dr., Constructor University Bremen gGmbH & Bremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences, Germany

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2025년 3월 10일

기본 완료 (실제)

2026년 6월 30일

연구 완료 (실제)

2026년 9월 20일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2025년 2월 26일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2025년 3월 4일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2025년 3월 10일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 9월 24일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 9월 22일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 9월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • HIPP_27112024

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .