Guided Biofilm Therapy Versus Conventional Polishing for Tooth Re-Staining
Guided Biofilm Therapy Versus Conventional Polishing for Extrinsic Tooth Re-Staining, Patient Comfort, and Procedure Time: A Randomized Split-Mouth Trial
This study compared Guided Biofilm Therapy with conventional polishing in adults with visible extrinsic tooth staining. Each participant received Guided Biofilm Therapy on one side of the mouth and conventional polishing on the other side.
The study evaluated whether the two methods differed in the amount of tooth re-staining after treatment, patient discomfort during the procedures, and total procedure time. Tooth color was measured with a spectrophotometer immediately after treatment, at 1 month, and at 2 months. Patient discomfort was recorded using a visual analog scale, and procedure time was measured with a stopwatch.
A total of 34 participants completed the study.
연구 개요
상태
상태
정황
정황
개입 / 치료
개입 / 치료
상세 설명
This randomized split-mouth clinical trial was conducted in adults with visible extrinsic tooth staining. The aim was to compare Guided Biofilm Therapy (GBT) with conventional polishing in terms of post-procedural extrinsic tooth re-staining, patient discomfort, and procedure time.
Each participant received both interventions. One side of the mouth was assigned to GBT and the contralateral side to conventional polishing. The right-left allocation of the interventions was determined by randomization, with the two allocation sequences equally distributed among participants.
In the GBT intervention, dental biofilm was first disclosed and then removed using an air-water-powder system with a low-abrasive erythritol-based powder. Supragingival ultrasonic instrumentation was performed where necessary. In the conventional polishing intervention, supragingival instrumentation was followed by mechanical polishing with a brush and polishing paste.
Tooth color was assessed using a SpectroShade Micro spectrophotometer and the CIELAB color system. Measurements were performed immediately after treatment at baseline (T0), at 1 month (T1), and at 2 months (T2). Color change between assessment periods was calculated using ΔE*ab values.
Patient-reported discomfort was assessed immediately after each half-mouth procedure using a visual analog scale. Total procedure time for each intervention was recorded with a stopwatch.
The primary outcome was color change from immediately after treatment to 2 months. Secondary outcomes included color change from immediately after treatment to 1 month, color change from 1 month to 2 months, patient discomfort, and procedure time.
A total of 34 participants completed all study visits and follow-up assessments.
연구 유형
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
등록
단계
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
Erzurum
-
Erzurum, Erzurum, 터키 (Türkiye), 25080
- Ataturk University
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age over 18 years.
- Willingness to participate in the study and provision of written informed consent.
- Good general health with no systemic disease.
- Clinical presence of extrinsic staining on tooth surfaces at a level warranting professional polishing.
- Right-handed tooth brushing.
- No professional dental cleaning within the previous 6 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age under 18 years.
- Diagnosis of periodontitis.
- Current smoking.
- Antibiotic use within the previous 3 months.
- Presence of acute periodontal disease.
- Allergy to polishing powders, specifically erythritol.
- Presence of a communicable disease.
- Teeth to be measured with restorations, caries, excessive wear, or structural defects that could affect measurement.
- Active orthodontic treatment.
- Developmental or structural anomalies affecting enamel and potentially increasing susceptibility to extrinsic staining, including hypomineralization, amelogenesis imperfecta, or dentinogenesis imperfecta.
- Severe dental crowding preventing standardized measurements.
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 방지
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 크로스오버 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
팔의 수
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Sequence A: Right GBT / Left Conventional Polishing
Participants assigned to Sequence A received Guided Biofilm Therapy on the right half of the mouth and conventional polishing on the left half of the mouth.
Both interventions were performed within the split-mouth study design.
|
Dental biofilm was first disclosed to guide treatment.
Supragingival biofilm and extrinsic staining were then removed using an air-water-powder system with a low-abrasive erythritol-based powder.
Supragingival ultrasonic instrumentation was performed where necessary, followed by final surface control.
다른 이름들:
Supragingival instrumentation was performed as needed, followed by mechanical polishing with a prophylaxis brush and polishing paste at 2500 to 3000 rpm.
The procedure was completed with final surface control.
다른 이름들:
|
|
실험적: Sequence B: Right Conventional Polishing / Left GBT
Participants assigned to Sequence B received conventional polishing on the right half of the mouth and Guided Biofilm Therapy on the left half of the mouth.
Both interventions were performed within the split-mouth study design.
|
Dental biofilm was first disclosed to guide treatment.
Supragingival biofilm and extrinsic staining were then removed using an air-water-powder system with a low-abrasive erythritol-based powder.
Supragingival ultrasonic instrumentation was performed where necessary, followed by final surface control.
다른 이름들:
Supragingival instrumentation was performed as needed, followed by mechanical polishing with a prophylaxis brush and polishing paste at 2500 to 3000 rpm.
The procedure was completed with final surface control.
다른 이름들:
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Tooth Color From Immediately After Treatment to 2 Months Assessed by CIELAB ΔE*ab Using a SpectroShade Micro Spectrophotometer
기간: Immediately after treatment (Day 1) and at 2 months
|
Tooth color was measured using a SpectroShade Micro spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB color system.
Color change between immediately after treatment (T0) and 2 months (T2) was calculated as ΔEab using the formula: ΔEab = [(ΔL*)² + (Δa*)² + (Δb*)²]^(1/2).
ΔEab is a continuous color-difference measure, with 0 indicating no color difference and higher values indicating greater color change.
Therefore, lower ΔEab values indicate greater color stability.
|
Immediately after treatment (Day 1) and at 2 months
|
2차 결과 측정
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Tooth Color From Immediately After Treatment to 1 Month Assessed by CIELAB ΔE*ab Using a SpectroShade Micro Spectrophotometer
기간: Immediately after treatment (Day 1) and at 1 month
|
Tooth color was measured using a SpectroShade Micro spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB color system.
Color change between immediately after treatment (T0) and 1 month (T1) was calculated as ΔEab using the formula: ΔEab = [(ΔL*)² + (Δa*)² + (Δb*)²]^(1/2).
ΔEab is a continuous color-difference measure, with 0 indicating no color difference and higher values indicating greater color change.
Therefore, lower ΔEab values indicate greater color stability.
|
Immediately after treatment (Day 1) and at 1 month
|
|
Change in Tooth Color From 1 Month to 2 Months
기간: At 1 month and 2 months
|
Tooth color was measured using a SpectroShade Micro spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB color system.
Color change between 1 month (M1) and 2 months (M2) was calculated as ΔE*ab using the formula: ΔE*ab = [(ΔL*)² + (Δa*)² + (Δb*)²]^(1/2).
Lower ΔE*ab values indicate less color change.
|
At 1 month and 2 months
|
|
Patient-Reported Discomfort Assessed Using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale
기간: Immediately after completion of each half-mouth intervention (Day 1)
|
Patient-reported discomfort was assessed immediately after each half-mouth procedure using a 10-cm visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicated no discomfort and 10 indicated unbearable discomfort.
The score reflected the overall perception of pain or sensitivity, heat, pressure or vibration, and discomfort related to water spray or aerosol.
Lower scores indicate greater patient comfort.
|
Immediately after completion of each half-mouth intervention (Day 1)
|
|
Total Procedure Time Measured Using a Digital Stopwatch
기간: Periprocedural
|
Total procedure time for each intervention was recorded using a digital stopwatch.
Timing began with the first clinical step of the relevant intervention and ended after completion of the final surface check.
Patient preparation, isolation, and oral hygiene instruction were excluded.
Procedure time was recorded in minutes and seconds, with shorter times indicating greater procedural efficiency.
|
Periprocedural
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
수사관
- 연구 책임자: Recep Orbak, DDS, PhD, Ataturk University
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
연구 시작
기본 완료 (실제)
기본 완료
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 완료
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
처음 게시됨
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
마지막 업데이트 게시됨
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
기타 연구 ID 번호
- 926
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 계획 설명
IPD 공유 기간
IPD 공유 액세스 기준
IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형
- 연구_프로토콜
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
미국에서 제조되어 미국에서 수출되는 제품
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .