Patient Priorities Aligned Discrete Decision Making for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions.
The purpose of the study is to to evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI) powered large language model (LLM) chatbot -PrioritiesAI -that assists patients in understanding, clarifying, and communicating their health priorities and desired outcomes related to elective hernia surgery.
연구 개요
상태
상태
정황
정황
개입 / 치료
개입 / 치료
연구 유형
연구 유형
등록 (추정된)
등록
단계
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 연락처
연구 연락처
- 이름: Aanand D Naik, MD
- 전화번호: 713-500-9000
- 이메일: Aanand.Naik@uth.tmc.edu
연구 연락처 백업
- 이름: Geethika Yalavarthy
- 전화번호: (713) 500-4040
- 이메일: Geethika.Yalavarthy@uth.tmc.edu
연구 장소
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, 미국, 77030
- 모병
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
-
연락하다:
- Aanand D Naik, MD
- 전화번호: 713-500-9000
- 이메일: Aanand.Naik@uth.tmc.edu
-
연락하다:
- Geethika Yalavarthy
- 전화번호: (713) 500-4040
- 이메일: Geethika.Yalavarthy@uth.tmc.edu
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Capacity to provide informed consent
- Ability to communicate effectively by phone in English
- Access to a working email address that the participant checks regularly
- Scheduled for an upcoming outpatient consultation with one of our partner surgeons to discuss elective hernia surgery (femoral, ventral, inguinal, or umbilical)
- No significant cognitive impairment that would interfere with meaningful participation
To ensure focus on surgical decisions, participants must fall into one of these categories:
- Patients scheduled for an upcoming outpatient consultation with one of our partner surgeons specifically to discuss a potential surgical procedure
- Patients who have undergone a surgical procedure performed one of our partner surgeons after January 1, 2025
- Participants must meet criteria #1 or #2 above and must not have participated in Phase 1 of the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive impairment sufficient to interfere with meaningful participation in Patient Priorities Care (PPC) discussions
- Communication challenges that cannot be reasonably accommodated within the study protocol
- Inability to complete patient-reported outcome measures independently or with minimal assistance
- Lack of decision-making capacity regarding surgical care
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 다른
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
팔의 수
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
간섭 없음: 컨트롤 암
|
|
|
실험적: AI Chatbot
|
Participants receive a personalized web link by email .The link provides access to the Priorities AI chatbot on any internet-connected device. The chatbot guides participants through a structured conversation to identify their health priorities and goals related to their surgical decision, |
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Decision regret as assessed by the Decision regret scale
기간: 4 months after surgery
|
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(no regret)-5 (high regret). Average of the item scores are calculated then 1 is subtracted and the final score is multiplied by 25 for a final metric from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicating worse outcome |
4 months after surgery
|
|
Self-identified health goals following elective hernia surgery, as measured by the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
기간: 4 months after surgery
|
This is rated on a 5-point scale from -2 (much less than expected) to +2 (much better than expected), with 0 representing the expected level of goal attainment. Higher scores indicate greater attainment of individualized goals. |
4 months after surgery
|
2차 결과 측정
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Decision-making quality in surgical consultations using the Shared Decision-Making Process (SDMP)Scale
기간: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
The Shared Decision-Making Process (SDMP) Scale is a 4-item, patient-reported measure. Maximum scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater shared decision-making. |
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
|
Perceived involvement in care using the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS, binary format)
기간: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
This is a 13 item questionnaire and each is scored as 1(agree) or 0(disagree) for a total score 0-13, with higher scores indicating greater perceived involvement in care. |
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
|
Decisional confidence using the SURE scale
기간: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored as a 1(yes) or 0(no) for a maximum score of 0-4,higher score indicating greater decisional confidence |
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
|
Acceptability as assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
기간: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1( completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree) for a maximum score of 4-20, higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability |
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
|
Appropriateness as assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
기간: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1( completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree) for a maximum score of 4-20, higher scores indicate greater perceived appropriateness |
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
|
Feasibility as assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
기간: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1( completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree) for a maximum score of 4-20, higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility |
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
|
Assigned preparation approach on health-related quality of life using the Short Form (SF-12) Quality of Life Scale
기간: 4 months after surgery
|
The SF-12 assesses physical and mental health across eight health concepts and generates two summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and Mental Component Summary (MCS-12). Both scores are calculated using responses to all 12 items and are typically reported on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. |
4 months after surgery
|
|
Comfort and function following surgery using the Carolina's Comfort Scale (CCS)
기간: 4 months after surgery
|
This is a 23 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(no symptoms) to 5( disabling symptoms) for a score range of 0-115, higher score indicating worse postoperative comfort |
4 months after surgery
|
|
Satisfaction as assessed by the Satisfaction Measure
기간: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
This is a 1 item questionnaire and scored from 0(worst visit possible)-10 ( best visit possible) , higher value means better outcome |
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
스폰서
스폰서
수사관
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Aanand D Naik, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
연구 시작
기본 완료 (추정된)
기본 완료
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
처음 게시됨
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
마지막 업데이트 게시됨
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
기타 연구 ID 번호
- HSC-SPH-22-0586
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .