Patient Priorities Aligned Discrete Decision Making for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions.
The purpose of the study is to to evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI) powered large language model (LLM) chatbot -PrioritiesAI -that assists patients in understanding, clarifying, and communicating their health priorities and desired outcomes related to elective hernia surgery.
Studienübersicht
Status
Status
Bedingungen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Intervention / Behandlung
Studientyp
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Einschreibung
Phase
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
Studienkontakt
- Name: Aanand D Naik, MD
- Telefonnummer: 713-500-9000
- E-Mail: Aanand.Naik@uth.tmc.edu
Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung
- Name: Geethika Yalavarthy
- Telefonnummer: (713) 500-4040
- E-Mail: Geethika.Yalavarthy@uth.tmc.edu
Studienorte
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 77030
- Rekrutierung
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
-
Kontakt:
- Aanand D Naik, MD
- Telefonnummer: 713-500-9000
- E-Mail: Aanand.Naik@uth.tmc.edu
-
Kontakt:
- Geethika Yalavarthy
- Telefonnummer: (713) 500-4040
- E-Mail: Geethika.Yalavarthy@uth.tmc.edu
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Capacity to provide informed consent
- Ability to communicate effectively by phone in English
- Access to a working email address that the participant checks regularly
- Scheduled for an upcoming outpatient consultation with one of our partner surgeons to discuss elective hernia surgery (femoral, ventral, inguinal, or umbilical)
- No significant cognitive impairment that would interfere with meaningful participation
To ensure focus on surgical decisions, participants must fall into one of these categories:
- Patients scheduled for an upcoming outpatient consultation with one of our partner surgeons specifically to discuss a potential surgical procedure
- Patients who have undergone a surgical procedure performed one of our partner surgeons after January 1, 2025
- Participants must meet criteria #1 or #2 above and must not have participated in Phase 1 of the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive impairment sufficient to interfere with meaningful participation in Patient Priorities Care (PPC) discussions
- Communication challenges that cannot be reasonably accommodated within the study protocol
- Inability to complete patient-reported outcome measures independently or with minimal assistance
- Lack of decision-making capacity regarding surgical care
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Sonstiges
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Single
Anzahl der Arme
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / ArmTeilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlungIntervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Kein Eingriff: Steuerarm
|
|
|
Experimental: AI Chatbot
|
Participants receive a personalized web link by email .The link provides access to the Priorities AI chatbot on any internet-connected device. The chatbot guides participants through a structured conversation to identify their health priorities and goals related to their surgical decision, |
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Decision regret as assessed by the Decision regret scale
Zeitfenster: 4 months after surgery
|
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(no regret)-5 (high regret). Average of the item scores are calculated then 1 is subtracted and the final score is multiplied by 25 for a final metric from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicating worse outcome |
4 months after surgery
|
|
Self-identified health goals following elective hernia surgery, as measured by the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Zeitfenster: 4 months after surgery
|
This is rated on a 5-point scale from -2 (much less than expected) to +2 (much better than expected), with 0 representing the expected level of goal attainment. Higher scores indicate greater attainment of individualized goals. |
4 months after surgery
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Decision-making quality in surgical consultations using the Shared Decision-Making Process (SDMP)Scale
Zeitfenster: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
The Shared Decision-Making Process (SDMP) Scale is a 4-item, patient-reported measure. Maximum scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater shared decision-making. |
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
|
Perceived involvement in care using the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS, binary format)
Zeitfenster: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
This is a 13 item questionnaire and each is scored as 1(agree) or 0(disagree) for a total score 0-13, with higher scores indicating greater perceived involvement in care. |
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
|
Decisional confidence using the SURE scale
Zeitfenster: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored as a 1(yes) or 0(no) for a maximum score of 0-4,higher score indicating greater decisional confidence |
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
|
Acceptability as assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Zeitfenster: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1( completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree) for a maximum score of 4-20, higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability |
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
|
Appropriateness as assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Zeitfenster: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1( completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree) for a maximum score of 4-20, higher scores indicate greater perceived appropriateness |
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
|
Feasibility as assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Zeitfenster: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1( completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree) for a maximum score of 4-20, higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility |
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
|
Assigned preparation approach on health-related quality of life using the Short Form (SF-12) Quality of Life Scale
Zeitfenster: 4 months after surgery
|
The SF-12 assesses physical and mental health across eight health concepts and generates two summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and Mental Component Summary (MCS-12). Both scores are calculated using responses to all 12 items and are typically reported on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. |
4 months after surgery
|
|
Comfort and function following surgery using the Carolina's Comfort Scale (CCS)
Zeitfenster: 4 months after surgery
|
This is a 23 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(no symptoms) to 5( disabling symptoms) for a score range of 0-115, higher score indicating worse postoperative comfort |
4 months after surgery
|
|
Satisfaction as assessed by the Satisfaction Measure
Zeitfenster: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
This is a 1 item questionnaire and scored from 0(worst visit possible)-10 ( best visit possible) , higher value means better outcome |
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Sponsor
Ermittler
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Aanand D Naik, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Zuerst gepostet
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes Update gepostet
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- HSC-SPH-22-0586
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .