이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

전이성 암 환자의 오피오이드 유발 변비 예방 (OMAMA)

2026년 9월 30일 업데이트: Lia van Zuylen, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

OMAMA 연구 - 전이성 암 환자의 오피오이드 유발 변비 예방

More than 70% of patients with cancer in the palliative phase have pain that often requires treatment with opioids (morphine-like agents). Constipation occurs in 59% of patients treated with opioids. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) has consequences that range from daily discomfort with social insecurity and disability to intestinal obstruction. It leads to limitations in self-management, a reduced quality of life and a risk of the need for more care. In the guideline "Diagnosis and treatment of pain in patients with cancer" it is recommended to start preventively with an osmotic laxative such as macrogol/electrolytes or magnesium hydroxide when starting opioids. Macrogol/electrolytes has been proven to be effective for OIC, but is sometimes perceived by patients as unpleasant due to its taste. Magnesium hydroxide, which is less commonly prescribed for OIC, has a neutral taste. Although it is mentioned in the guideline, it is not studied for the treatment of OIC and also not officially registered for this. To support the advice of the guideline and to prove that a choice is possible, it is important to investigate whether there are differences in effectiveness and/or side effects between macrogol/electrolytes and magnesium hydroxide in the prevention of OIC.

The aim of this study is to compare macrogol/electrolytes with magnesium hydroxide in the prevention of opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer in the palliative (incurable) phase, who start opioids because of pain. The choice of laxative is determined by drawing lots (randomisation). After two weeks, its effect will be assessed and will be presented as the percentage of patients who have not developed constipation after starting opioids. If the laxative, as assigned by lot, is described as satisfactory by the patient, the patient can continue with the drug that the patient used, after the study through regular prescription.

The investigators will ask the patients in the study about their satisfaction with the laxative used, any side effects and the degree of pain. Furthermore, the appeal to care for possible constipation will be examined. Because the best attainable quality of life in the palliative phase is the objective of all care, the investigators will also measure this perceived quality with a questionnaire in this study. The results of this study will lead to the best achievable prevention of opioid constipation in patients with cancer in the palliative phase.

연구 개요

상태

모병

정황

개입 / 치료

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

258

단계

  • 4단계

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 연락처 백업

연구 장소

  • 네덜란드
    • Flevoland
      • Almere Stad, Flevoland, 네덜란드, 1315 RA
    • Gelderland
      • Arnhem, Gelderland, 네덜란드, 6815 AD
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, 네덜란드, 6525 GA
    • North Brabant
      • 's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant, 네덜란드, 5223 GZ
        • 모병
        • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
        • 연락하다:
    • North Holland
      • Amsterdam, North Holland, 네덜란드, 1081 HV
        • 모병
        • Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
        • 연락하다:
      • Hoofddorp, North Holland, 네덜란드, 2134 TM
    • Provincie Groningen
      • Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 네덜란드, 9713 GZ
        • 모병
        • University Medical Center Groningen
        • 연락하다:
      • Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 네덜란드, 9728 NT
        • 모병
        • Martini Hospital Groningen
        • 연락하다:
    • South Holland
      • Gouda, South Holland, 네덜란드, 2803 HH
        • 모병
        • Groene Hart Hospital
        • 연락하다:
      • Leiden, South Holland, 네덜란드, 2333 ZA
        • 모병
        • Leiden University Medical Center
        • 연락하다:
      • Rotterdam, South Holland, 네덜란드, 3015 GD
      • The Hague, South Holland, 네덜란드, 2512 VA
    • Utrecht
      • Utrecht, Utrecht, 네덜란드, 3584 CX
        • 모병
        • University Medical Center Utrecht
        • 연락하다:
        • 연락하다:

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion criteria:

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Patients with advanced cancer (≥18 years);
  • Starting with slow release or transdermal opioids for pain;
  • Able to complete a Dutch questionnaire. Previous treatment with opioids is allowed, if discontinued more than 4 weeks ago.

Exclusion Criteria:

A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  • Patients with contra-indications for laxatives
  • Maintenance treatment with laxatives during the last 14 days
  • Severely impaired renal function (serum creatinine >180 umol/l)
  • Estimated life expectancy <1 month

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 방지
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
활성 비교기: Macrogol/electrolytes

Macrogol/electrolytes is started at a dose of 1 sachet once a day orally, based on the current guideline 'Diagnosis and treatment of pain in patients with cancer' (www.pallialine.nl). The dose of macrogol/electrolytes may be increased to 2 sachets a day during the study period.

The effect of laxatives will be judged after 14 days.
의약품: Macrogol Only Product in Oral Dose Form

Information already included in arm/group description.

다른 이름들:
  • 마크로골/전해질
활성 비교기: Magnesium hydroxide

Magnesium hydroxide is started at a dose of 724 mg three times a day orally, based on the current guideline 'Diagnosis and treatment of pain in patients with cancer' (www.pallialine.nl). The dose of magnesium hydroxide may be increased to 1448 mg three times a day during the study period. The effect of laxatives will be judged after 14 days.
의약품: Magnesium hydroxide 724mg

Information already included in arm/group description.

다른 이름들:
  • 산화마그네슘

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
The percentage of patients with a score of <30 of the Bowel Function Index
기간: On day 14

A clinician-administered patient-reported questionnaire to assess clinically significant constipation, validated in patients receiving opioids for chronic non-malignant pain and for malignant pain (Abramovitz 2013, Rentz 2009 and 2011). It consists of three questions, assessing ease of defecation, feeling of incomplete bowel evacuation and personal judgement of the patient regarding constipation, each during the last 7 days and each rated on a scale of 0 (best possible outcome) to 100 (worst possible outcome). A total score ≥30 (mean of the three separate scores) indicates clinically significant constipation. A change of the total score of >12 is regarded as clinically meaningful. It has been used in a large observational study in cancer patients receiving opioids (Davies 2021) and in randomised trials of opioid antagonists for OIC (Ahmedzai 2012, Dupoiron 2017, Leng 2020, Poelaert 2015). It has been recommended as the assessment tool of choice for OIC (Argoff 2015, Farmer 2019).
On day 14

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
The EQ5D
기간: On day 0 and day 14

A self-administered, generic assessment tool developed by the EuroQol Group, a network of international research teams, and consists of questions on five dimensions of health (i.e., mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, usual activities, and anxiety/depression) (Pickard 2007). It has been used in cost-effectiveness studies on OIC (Dunlop 2012, Hjalte 2016, Lawson 2016).
On day 0 and day 14
Rome IV criteria for opioid-induced constipation
기간: On day 0 and day 14

Rome IV criteria for opioid-induced constipation as judged by professional care givers (Davies 2021, Drossman 2016), including:

  • straining during >25% of defecations
  • lumpy or hard stools in >25% of defecations
  • sensation of incomplete evacuation in >25% of defecations
  • sensation of anorectal obstruction/blockage in >25% of defecations
  • manual manoeuvres to facilitate >25% of defecations
  • <3 spontaneous defecations per week At least two of these criteria have to be fulfilled in order to diagnose constipation, to be judged by the treating physician or clinical nurse specialists/nurse practitioners
On day 0 and day 14
Cancer pain score
기간: On day 0 and day 14

Numeric Rating SDcale, ranging from 0 to 10
On day 0 and day 14
Patient satisfaction with laxative
기간: On day 14

A single four-item question, ranging from unsatisfied to very satisfied.
On day 14
Side effects of laxatives
기간: On day 14

All side-effects are scored on a four-point Likert scale (not at all, a bit, rather, very much):

  • Bad taste
  • Problems with swallowing
  • Abdominal cramps
  • Nausea
  • Flatulence
  • Diarrhea
  • Other (to be specified by the patient)
On day 14
Cost-effectiveness of macrogol/electrolytes compared to magnesium hydroxide
기간: On day 14

We aim to perform a comparative cost-effectiveness of the laxatives. This requires data collection on healthcare procedures and QOL in responders, non-responders and patients with side-effects of laxatives for the follow-up period of the study. These healthcare procedures will be extracted from hospital databases and healthcare use outside the hospital will be collected with the iMCQ at 4 weeks. All individual health care procedures will be linked to their unit costs. Reimbursement prices issued by the Dutch Healthcare Authority and national reference prices will be used for this assessment as outlined in current Dutch pharmaco-economic guidance. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed using a decision tree including different branches for initial therapy and responders and non-responders. The costs and QOL of the patients in the trial will be used as input for this decision tree. Total costs and effects will be calculated by summing the costs and effects of each branch.
On day 14

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

협력자

Radboud University Medical Center
University Medical Center Groningen
UMC Utrecht
Erasmus Medical Center
Leiden University Medical Center
Rijnstate Hospital
Groene Hart Ziekenhuis
Flevoziekenhuis
Spaarne Gasthuis
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
Isala
Martini Hospital Groningen
Bernhoven Hospital
Haaglanden Medical Centre
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Lia van Zuylen, Prof.dr., Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

유용한 링크

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2022년 12월 2일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2027년 1월 1일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2027년 6월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2022년 1월 19일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2022년 1월 19일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2022년 1월 31일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 10월 5일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 9월 30일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 9월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

키워드

추가 관련 MeSH 약관

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 08440012010002

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

예

IPD 계획 설명

Due to the sensitivity of the data, the underlying data sets will not be shared publicly but will be made available for verification/ inspection purposes. Additional sharing conditions will be considered (e.g. via the Personal Health Train initiative from Health-RI, which is currently under development) while respecting the type of informed consent provided by the subjects and discussed with the support of Legal/Privacy/RDM experts where appropriate. For descriptive documentation (protocol, data dictionary, syntax/script, etc.) the study team will collaborate with RDM, to ensure such data can be found and made available to other researchers. Providing information in an online (metadata) catalogue that is certified holds preference.

We are considering using a DANS repository or similar. DANS EASY is commonly used, uses the Dublin Core Metadata standard, provides a PID and holds a Core Trust Seal. However, DANS is initiatiating Data Stations, with a specific one for the Life Sciences and

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

미국에서 제조되어 미국에서 수출되는 제품

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다