Effectiveness of Interactive Augmented Reality and Electrical Neuromodulation System in Persons With Stroke
Development of Interactive Augmented Reality and Electrical Neuromodulation System to Improve Neuroplasticity and Limbs Function in Persons With Stroke
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Status
Condições
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Tipo de estudo
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Antecipado)
Inscrição
Estágio
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan
- Recrutamento
- Taipei Medical University Hospital
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients present with unilateral hemiplegia caused by a first-ever stroke
- Brunnstrom stage above stage II, mental health was stable
- Cognitive ability is sufficient to understand the nature of study (Mini-Mental State Examination score was above 23)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients having other neurologic problems, which can affect balance and walking ability
- Intake of drugs or other medical condition that can affect function or can't tolerate rehabilitation
- severe hearing or eye problem
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Número de braços
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / BraçoGrupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / TratamentoIntervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Augmented reality with functional electrical stimulation group
Ten participants in group A will undergo 30 minutes interactive augmented reality with functional electrical stimulation intervention and 30 minutes traditional physiotherapy per day, 3 days a week for 8 weeks.
|
Experimental group contains 30 minutes augmented reality combined with functional electrical stimulation training, and 30 minutes traditional physiotherapy.
Augmented reality includes treadmill and balance exercise.
Functional electrical stimulation applies on tibialis anterior muscle.
Traditional physiotherapy includes rolling, sitting, standing, overground walking, facilitation of the paretic limbs, and so on.
|
|
Comparador Ativo: Traditional physiotherapy group
Ten participants in group B will undergo 30 minutes treadmill and balance training as well as 30 minutes traditional conventional physiotherapy a day, 3 days a week, for 8 weeks.
|
Traditional physiotherapy includes treadmill and balance training for 30 minutes as well as rolling, sitting, standing, overground walking, facilitation of the paretic limbs for another 30 minutes .
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Time Up Go test (TUG)
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
The TUG test will ask participants to stand up, walk for 3 meters, turn, walk back and sit down as fast as they can during the test, and the time requires for each patient to complete the test is recorded.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
|
Change of Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
Participants performed a series of 14 functional balance tasks, including maintaining a quiet stance, sitting-to-standing, shifting weight and reaching, turning in place, standing on one leg, and maintaining a tandem stance.
Each task was scored on a 5-point ordinal scale (from 0 to 4).
A score of 0 denotes the inability of the participant to perform the task, and a score of 4 denotes that the participant can complete the task based on a preset criterion.
The highest possible score is 56.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
|
Change of Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
Our study will use 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging[GE DISCOVERY MR750w system (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin)] for functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Resting-state functional MRI image is an echo-planar Image (EPI) technique, using a parameter time of repetition of 2500 milliseconds, time of echo is 30 milliseconds, 43 axial slices,slice thickness is 3 mm, flip angle is 80 degrees, field of view is 192 x 192 millimeters, and vixen size is 3 x 3 x 3 millimeters.
The EPI scan for 525 seconds.
All subjects are asked to close their eyes and supine.
our study uses the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations analysis to confirm abnormal brain function.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)-Lower extremity
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower extremity is used to measure lower-limb recovery in stroke rehabilitation studies.The scale has 6 items ranging from reflex activity to voluntary motor control.
Each item further comprises components, with a total of 17. Scoring is done on a 3-point ordinal scale ranges from 0 (no performance) to 2 (faultless performance).
The total score range from 0 (no motor function) to 34 (good motor recovery).
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
|
Change of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity. Scoring is recorded as follows: 0: No increase in muscle tone
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
|
Change of Motor evoked potential (MEP)
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
Motor evoked potential (MEP) is recorded from tibialis anterior muscles following direct transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex.
All TMS is delivered with the participant seated upright on the chair.
Both passive and active conditions, participants are instructed to relax their right leg in the seated position.
TMS is delivered over the motor cortex (M1) using a concave double cone coil (Magstim Co., United Kingdom) attached to a BiStim magnetic stimulator (Magstim Co., United Kingdom).
To locate the optimal site, stimuli are delivered over various points along the M1.
The optimal site is the location on the M1 that evoked the greatest MEP amplitude in the bilateral tibialis anterior muscles.
The onset latency and onset to peak amplitude will be assessed.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
|
Change of 10 meter walking test
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
Individual walks without assistance 10 meters and the time is measured.
Participants will walk 10 meter at preferred walking speed and fastest speed possible, respectively.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
|
Change of Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
Diffusion tensor imaging technique apply to Echo-Planar Image(EPI) technique, fimbriodentate vein is 192X192 mm², time of repetition/time of echo is 11000/110.6
mm, matrix is 72X72 pixels, slice thickness is 2.7 mm. Diffusion weight gradient along 60 directions at b value of 3000/mm².
By observing the reduction of the degree of diffusion anisotropy, to study the recovery of motor function after stroke.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 8) in both groups
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Patrocinador
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Início do estudo
Conclusão Primária (Antecipado)
Conclusão Primária
Conclusão do estudo (Antecipado)
Conclusão do estudo
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Primeira postagem
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última Atualização Postada
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- N201904041
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .