To Share Or Not To Share (2Share)
11 de março de 2020 atualizado por: Nathalie Oexle, University of Ulm
To Share or Not To Share (2Share) - Group Intervention to Support Disclosure Decisions After Suicide Attempt
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the group-based intervention "To Share Or Not To Share" in a German clinical setting.
Feasibility and efficacy of the program will be tested in a pilot randomized-controlled trial.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Rescindido
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
People who have survived a suicide attempt often face public and self-stigma, and secrecy is a common strategy to minimize the risk of being labeled. Both secrecy and disclosure have pros and cons. The decision whether, when, and to whom to disclose a previous suicide attempt is complex. Interventions can provide guidance for systematic consideration and a well informed decision. Potentially, it may not be disclosure itself, but the empowered decision for or against disclosure of a previous suicide attempt that reduces distress and leads to beneficial outcomes.
The manualized peer-led group intervention "Honest, Open, Proud" (HOP) supports people with mental illness in their decision whether to disclose mental illness. Research showed positive effects of the intervention on stigma stress, disclosure-related distress and quality of life. Based on HOP, "To Share Or Not To Share" (2Share) was developed to systematically guide suicide attempt survivors through their decision whether and how to disclose a previous suicide attempt.
2Share led to significant reductions in self-stigma and depressive symptoms, as well as increased self-esteem in a recent pilot randomized-controlled trial (RCT) in the US. The aim of the current study is to evaluate 2Share in a German clinical setting. Feasibility and efficacy of 2 Share will be tested in a pilot RCT.
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
4
Estágio
- Fase 2
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Ulm, Alemanha, 89073
- University of Ulm and BKH Günzburg
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Current inpatient, outpatient or day clinical treatment at the Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Germany
- Age ≥ 18 years
- At least one previous suicide attempt
- Positive screening for disclosure distress (1 item: "In general, how distressed or worried are you in terms of secrecy or disclosure of your suicide attempt?", self-report, persons with a score ≥ 4 on a scale from 1-7 are included)
- Written informed consent
- Sufficient German language skills
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current suicidality (1 item: "Have you had thoughts that you would be better off dead for at least several days during the last week?", self-report, persons responding with yes will be excluded and will be offered support)
- Suicide attempt within the last four weeks
- Dementia or organic disease (ICD-10: F0)
- Primary substance dependence (ICD-10: F1x.2)
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention (2Share) + treatment as usual
Study participants randomized to the experimental group receive the intervention (2Share) while maintaining their current treatment (treatment as usual). 2Share is a peer-led group intervention containing three two-hour sessions within two weeks plus an additional booster session four weeks later. Fidelity to manual is rated in each session by study staff. |
The peer-led group program contains of three lessons plus one booster session:
|
|
Sem intervenção: Treatment as usual
Participants randomized to the control group do not receive the group program but maintain their current treatment (treatment as usual).
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-stigma related to suicide attempt
Prazo: 2 weeks
|
Self-Stigma of Suicide Attempt Survivor Scale (SSSAS), 14-item apply subscale (Sheehan et al, 2018); each item is rated from 1-9, we will calculate a sum score accross all items (range 9-126) with higher scores indicating more self-stigma.
|
2 weeks
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-stigma related to suicide attempt
Prazo: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Self-Stigma of Suicide Attempt Survivor Scale (SSSAS), 14-item apply subscale (Sheehan et al, 2018); each item is rated from 1-9, we will calculate a sum score accross all items (range 9-126) with higher scores indicating more self-stigma.
|
baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Self-Stigma (alienation) related to suicide attempt
Prazo: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness scale (ISMI), 6-item alienation subscale (Ritsher et al. 2003) adapted for suicide attempt, 6 items rated from 1-4, we will calculate a mean score accross all items (range: 1-6) with higher scores indicating more self-stigma.
|
baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Stigma stress related to suicide attempt
Prazo: baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Stigma Stress Scale (Rüsch et al., 2009a,b) adapted for suicide attempt, 8-items rated from 1-7 with 4 items measuring the primary appraisal of stigma as harmful and 4 items measuring the secondary appraisal of perceived resources to cope with stigma-related harm, for each of the two subscales we will calculate a mean score (range 1-7) and a total stigma stress score will be caclulated by subtracting perceived resources from perceived harm with higher difference scores (range -6 to +6) indicating more stigma-stress.
|
baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Secrecy about suicide attempt
Prazo: baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Secrecy Scale (Link et al., 1991) adapted for suicide attempt, 5 items rated from 1-6, we will calculate a mean score accross all items (range 1-6) with higher scores indicating more secrecy.
|
baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
General disclosure distress
Prazo: baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Distress Disclosure Index (Kahn et al., 2001), 12 items rated from 1-5, we will calculate a sum score accross all items (range 12-60) with higher scores indicating more disclosure distress.
|
baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Help-seeking for suicidality
Prazo: baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
General Help-Seeking Questionnaire - suicidal ideation subscale (GHSQ-SI) (Wilson et al., 2005), 10 items rated from 1-7, we will calculate mean scores (range 1-7) for items related to social contacts (items 1-4) and care providers (items 5,7,10).
|
baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Depressive symptoms
Prazo: baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale - short form (CES-D) (Hautzinger et al., 1993), 15 items rated from 0-3, we will calculate a sum score accross all items (range 0-45) with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms.
|
baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Suicidal ideation
Prazo: baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS) (Spijker et al., 2014), 5 items rated from 0-10, we will calculate a total sum score accross all items (range 0-50) with higher scores indicating more suicidality.
|
baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Recovery
Prazo: baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Recovery Assessment Scale - short version (RAS-G) (Corrigan et al., 2004), 24 items rated from 1-5, we will calculate a mean score accross all items (range 1-5) with higher scores indicating more recovery.
|
baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Self-esteem
Prazo: baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale (RSE) (Collani et al., 2003), 10 items rated from 0-3, we will caculate a sum score accross all items (range 0-30) with higher scores indicating more self-esteem.
|
baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Quality of life
Prazo: baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
EUROHIS Quality of Life Index (EUROHIS-QOL) (Brähler et al., 2007), 8 items rated from 1-5, we will calculate a sum score accross all items (range 8-40) with higher scores indicating more quality of life.
|
baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Publicações e links úteis
A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.
Publicações Gerais
- Rusch N, Corrigan PW, Wassel A, Michaels P, Olschewski M, Wilkniss S, Batia K. A stress-coping model of mental illness stigma: I. Predictors of cognitive stress appraisal. Schizophr Res. 2009 May;110(1-3):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
- Ritsher JB, Otilingam PG, Grajales M. Internalized stigma of mental illness: psychometric properties of a new measure. Psychiatry Res. 2003 Nov 1;121(1):31-49. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2003.08.008.
- Witt KG, Hetrick SE, Rajaram G, Hazell P, Taylor Salisbury TL, Townsend E, Hawton K. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 22;4(4):CD013668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013668.pub2.
- van Spijker BA, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Farrer L, Christensen H, Reynolds J, Kerkhof AJ. The suicidal ideation attributes scale (SIDAS): Community-based validation study of a new scale for the measurement of suicidal ideation. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014 Aug;44(4):408-19. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12084. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
- Link BG, Mirotznik J, Cullen FT. The effectiveness of stigma coping orientations: can negative consequences of mental illness labeling be avoided? J Health Soc Behav. 1991 Sep;32(3):302-20.
- Rusch N, Corrigan PW, Powell K, Rajah A, Olschewski M, Wilkniss S, Batia K. A stress-coping model of mental illness stigma: II. Emotional stress responses, coping behavior and outcome. Schizophr Res. 2009 May;110(1-3):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
- Sheehan L, Oexle N, Dubke R, Wan HT, Corrigan PW. The Self-Stigma of Suicide Attempt Survivors. Arch Suicide Res. 2020 Jan-Mar;24(1):34-47. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2018.1510797. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
- Kahn JH, Hessling RM. Measuring the tendency to conceal versus disclose psychological distress. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2001;20(1):41-65. doi:10.1521/jscp.20.1.41.22254
- Wilson CJ, Deane FP, Ciarrochi JV, Rickwood D. Measuring help seeking intentions: properties of the General Help Seeking Questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Counselling. 2005;39(1):15-28. doi:10.1080/09638237.2017.1370642.
- Hautzinger M, Bailer M. Allgemeine Depressions-Skala [The German version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale]. Weinheim: Beltz; 1993.
- Corrigan PW, Salzer M, Ralph RO, Sangster Y, Keck L. Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale. Schizophr Bull. 2004;30(4):1035-41. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007118.
- Collani G v., Herzberg PY. Eine revidierte Fassung der deutschsprachigen Skala zum Selbstwertgefühl von Rosenberg [A revision of the German Rosenbergs self-esteem scale]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie. 2003;24(1):3-7. doi:10.1024//0170-1789.24.1.3
- Brähler E, Mühlan H, Albani C, Schmidt S. Teststatistische Prüfung und Normierung der deutschen Versionen des EUROHIS-QOL Lebensqualität-Index und des WHO-5 Wohlbefindens-Index [Psychometrics and standardization of the German version of EUROHIS-QOL quality of life index and WHO-5 wellbeing index]. Diagnostica. 2007;53(2):83-96. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.53.2.83
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
7 de maio de 2019
Conclusão Primária (Real)
1 de janeiro de 2020
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
1 de março de 2020
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
7 de maio de 2019
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
7 de maio de 2019
Primeira postagem (Real)
9 de maio de 2019
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
13 de março de 2020
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
11 de março de 2020
Última verificação
1 de março de 2020
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 345/18
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
NÃO
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .