Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Improving Sexual and Reproductive Health Communication for Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Patients (ReSPECT)

15 de junho de 2026 atualizado por: Connecticut Children's Medical Center

Improving Sexual and Reproductive Health Communication Between Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Patients and Clinicians: ReSPECT Intervention Proof-of-Concept Testing

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if ReSPECT, which includes a pre-visit checklist for patients to complete and an informational website, can work well in practice to help adolescent and young adult oncology patients communicate with their clinicians about sexual and reproductive health (SRH). SRH includes topics such as how cancer may impact puberty and development, best methods for contraception during cancer treatment, fertility risk and fertility preservation strategies, and dating/relationships during and after cancer. The study will also help researchers better understand how to best measure the impact of ReSPECT on improving SRH communication for future testing of ReSPECT.

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

How well does ReSPECT work in practice? Do patients and clinicians like ReSPECT, and do they find it helpful? What are the best ways to test ReSPECT and measure whether it works?

Participants will:

Use ReSPECT to support a conversation about SRH during an outpatient oncology clinic appointment Complete surveys before and after using ReSPECT Provide feedback on their experience using ReSPECT in a short interview

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Ainda não está recrutando

Condições

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

Psychosexual development is a key aspect of adolescence and young adulthood, which may be significantly disrupted by a cancer diagnosis. Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients are at risk for complications that can detrimentally impact their sexual and reproductive health (SRH) during and after cancer treatment. Prior research has shown that pediatric oncologists rarely discuss many important aspects of SRH, and AYA cancer patients repeatedly report unmet communication needs related to these topics.

To address these needs, we have developed ReSPECT, an interactive, web-based digital platform designed to improve communication about insufficiently addressed SRH topics. ReSPECT integrates (1) a pre-visit questionnaire (PVQ) that will allow AYA patients to discreetly alert clinicians to relevant SRH questions/concerns (2) targeted patient education based on PVQ selections, and (3) clinician-centered guidance for addressing specific SRH questions/concerns. Previous stages of this research involved developing and refining a prototype of ReSPECT based on stakeholder feedback. Utilizing this prototype, this proof-of-concept study will assess the feasibility, acceptability, and perceived usefulness of ReSPECT with AYA patients on active cancer treatment and their oncology clinicians. In addition to assessing operational viability, this study will also assess the feasibility of collecting secondary outcomes measures. Data collected will lay the foundation for a future randomized controlled trial to assess ReSPECT intervention efficacy, with the ultimate goal of improving HRQOL communication for AYAs across the cancer continuum.

Primary Aim: Evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, usability, and perceived usefulness of ReSPECT in the outpatient setting with AYA oncology patients and clinicians.

ReSPECT will undergo proof-of-concept testing with AYAs (n=30) and their oncology clinicians (n~10-30) to determine if the intervention is feasible (recruitment >60%, retention >80%), acceptable (>70% with an average score ≥4 on the Lyon Satisfaction Questionnaire), and perceived useful (>70% with an average score ≥4 on the Usability/Sustainability of Intervention scale). Qualitative interviews with participants will provide additional information on acceptability, perceived usefulness, and opportunities for intervention improvement.

Secondary Aim: Collect and examine descriptive data on preliminary outcomes of ReSPECT and assess feasibility of procedures for a future randomized controlled trial.

Pre- and post-intervention questionnaires (T1: pre-visit, T2: within 48 hrs post-visit, T3: 8 weeks post-visit) to assess signals of intervention efficacy will include communication behavior, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, decision-making, therapeutic alliance, distress/bother, and developmentally relevant health risk behaviors.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

30

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

  • Estados Unidos
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, Estados Unidos, 90027
        • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Filho
  • Adulto

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 15-25 years old
  • Has a cancer diagnosis
  • ≥2 months from diagnosis/initiation of therapy, whichever occurred later
  • Currently on cancer-directed therapy
  • Speaks and reads English
  • Approval from primary oncology team
  • Study participation by primary oncology clinician

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not able to provide informed consent/assent
  • Insufficient cognitive functioning to complete study measures, as determined by a member of the patient's primary oncology team
  • Exceeds primary oncologist's participant limit (3 patients/clinician)

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Cuidados de suporte
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: ReSPECT Intervention Arm
AYA oncology patients and their primary oncology clinicians who will receive the ReSPECT intervention
Comportamental: ReSPECT
ReSPECT is a multi-modal digital intervention that integrates a pre-visit questionnaire and targeted patient and clinician education to support SRH communication in the outpatient oncology clinic setting. For the purposes of this study it will be used in conjunction with a single regularly scheduled clinic visit.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Feasibility (as assessed by intervention completion and retention rates)
Prazo: From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
Feasibility will be evaluated based on intervention completion (% of AYAs completing all steps through T2) and retention (% of enrolled AYAs and clinicians completing all steps through T3). ReSPECT will be deemed feasible if intervention completion and retention rates are ≥80% and ≥70%, respectively.
From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
Acceptability (as assessed by Lyon Satisfaction Questionnaire)
Prazo: From enrollment until T2 survey completion (within 48 hours post-visit)
Acceptability will be measured using the 11-item Lyon Satisfaction Questionnaire, included in the T2 survey, with a threshold of ≥70% of AYA and clinician participants rating the intervention acceptable (average score 4 or higher).
From enrollment until T2 survey completion (within 48 hours post-visit)
Perceived Usefulness (as assessed by Intervention Usability/Sustainability Scale, qualitative interviews)
Prazo: From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
Perceived Usefulness will encompass usability and utility. Usability will be assessed by the 4-item Intervention Usability/Sustainability Scale, included in the T2 and T3 surveys, with a threshold of ≥70% of AYA and clinician participants rating the intervention usable (average score 4 or higher). Utility will be evaluated in post-encounter qualitative interviews with AYAs and clinicians.
From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Exchange of Information
Prazo: From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
Initiation and content of AYA-clinician SRH conversations will be evaluated with a three-item instrument adapted for this study from similar health communication research
From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
Self-Efficacy
Prazo: From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
Self-efficacy will be measured by a two-item scale assessing AYA and clinician confidence (1) initiating and (2) participating in discussions about SRH topics. Responses range from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (extremely confident) for each topic.
From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
Fostering Healing Relationships (Therapeutic Alliance)
Prazo: From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
The Human Connection (THC) scale is a 16-item scale measuring therapeutic alliance (TA) between AYAs and clinicians. Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, with response categories based on question content, and higher scores indicating greater TA.
From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
Decisional Confidence (Decision Making)
Prazo: From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
Decisional confidence will be assessed by a single-item survey measure to assess whether ReSPECT helped AYAs make an informed decision about a SRH question/concern. Participants will be asked to respond with yes/no, then to describe why/why not.
From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
Distress/Bother
Prazo: From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
The Level of Bother Scale is a single-item scale assessing the extent to which participants have been bothered by specific SRH concerns in the last month. Responses are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater levels of bother.
From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
Outcome Expectancies
Prazo: From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
The Outcome Expectancy Scale is a 6-item scale assessing AYA's perception of the extent to which outcomes may result from discussing SRH topics with their oncology clinician. Potential outcomes include answering question(s), finding a solution to a problem, giving peace of mind, helping play an active role in one's health care, improving SRH, and helping make decisions. For each item, responses range from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much).
From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
Risk Behaviors (Decision Making)
Prazo: From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)
A 9-item questionnaire adapted from the National Youth Risk Behavior Survey will be used to characterize quality and frequency of health risk behaviors among AYA participants.
From enrollment until T3 survey completion (8 weeks post-visit)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Connecticut Children's Medical Center

Colaboradores

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Natasha N Frederick, MD, MPH, Connecticut Children's Medical

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

15 de novembro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

30 de junho de 2028

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

30 de junho de 2029

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

2 de junho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

15 de junho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

22 de junho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

22 de junho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

15 de junho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de junho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Palavras-chave

Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 26-029 (The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Institutional Review Board)
  • K08CA286736-01A1 (Concessão/Contrato do NIH dos EUA)

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Descrição do plano IPD

Given the relatively small sample size and the rarity of pediatric cancer, even after removal of identifiers we believe a risk remains of deductive identification of participants. Consequently, we are not planning to share IPD.

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Ensaios clínicos em Câncer

Ensaios clínicos em ReSPECT

Pesquisar ensaios semelhantes

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

CROs by country

CROs in Croatia

Condições

Doenças Raras

Intervenções de drogas

Suplementos Alimentares

Patrocinador / Colaboradores

Localizações

Se inscrever