Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

BENLYSTA® specialläkemedelsutredning

24 april 2026 uppdaterad av: GlaxoSmithKline

BENLYSTA för intravenös injektion / subkutan injektion Undersökning av särskild läkemedelsanvändning

Syftet med denna studie är att samla in och utvärdera information om långsiktig säkerhet och effektivitet av Benlysta för intravenös injektion och Benlysta för subkutan injektion (hädanefter kallad "Benlysta") i daglig klinisk praxis. Syftet med att genomföra denna droganvändningsutredning (DUI) i alla försökspersoner tills data samlas in från ett visst antal försökspersoner efter att Benlysta marknadsförts, data kommer att samlas in om säkerhet och effektivitet av Benlysta i ett tidigt skede och därigenom vidta nödvändiga åtgärder för korrekt användning av Benlysta. Cirka 600 försökspersoner kommer att vara inskrivna i denna studie. Observationsperioden per försöksperson kommer att vara 52 veckor från start av Benlysta administrering. BENLYSTA är det registrerade varumärket som tillhör GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) företagsgruppen.

Studieöversikt

Status

Status

Indikerar aktuell rekryteringsstatus eller utökad åtkomststatus.
Avslutad

Betingelser

Betingelser

Sjukdomen, störningen, syndromet, sjukdomen eller skadan som studeras. På ClinicalTrials.gov kan tillstånd även innefatta andra hälsorelaterade frågor, såsom livslängd, livskvalitet och hälsorisker.

Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En process eller handling som är i fokus för en klinisk studie. Interventioner inkluderar läkemedel, medicinsk utrustning, procedurer, vacciner och andra produkter som antingen är undersökta eller redan tillgängliga. Interventioner kan också innefatta icke-invasiva tillvägagångssätt, såsom utbildning eller modifiering av kost och träning.

Studietyp

Studietyp

Beskriver arten av en klinisk studie. Studietyper inkluderar interventionsstudier (även kallade kliniska prövningar), observationsstudier (inklusive patientregister) och utökad tillgång.
Observationell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

Inskrivning

Antalet deltagare i en klinisk studie. Den "förväntade" registreringen är det antal deltagare som forskarna behöver för studien.
1514

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studiekontakt

Studiekontakt

Namn och kontaktuppgifter för den person som kan svara på anmälningsfrågor för en klinisk studie. Varje plats där studien genomförs kan också ha en specifik kontakt, som kanske bättre kan svara på dessa frågor.

Studera Kontakt Backup

Studieorter

  • Japan
      • Hiroshima, Japan, 730-0001
        • GSK Investigational Site

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Urvalskriterier

De nyckelkrav som personer som vill delta i en klinisk studie måste uppfylla eller de egenskaper de måste ha. Behörighetskriterier består av både inklusionskriterier (som krävs för att en person ska delta i studien) och uteslutningskriterier (som hindrar en person från att delta). Typer av behörighetskriterier inkluderar om en studie accepterar friska frivilliga, har ålders- eller åldersgruppskrav eller är begränsad av kön.

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

  • Barn
  • Vuxen
  • Äldre vuxen

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Testmetod

Sannolikhetsprov

Studera befolkning

Studien kommer att omfatta alla försökspersoner som Benlysta administreras till. Bland försökspersoner som påbörjar administrering efter lansering kommer dessutom de som Benlysta redan har administrerats till innan avtalet ingicks och de som redan påbörjat administreringen vid diagnos, på grund av sjukhusförflyttning etc. också inkluderas.

Beskrivning

Inklusionskriterier:

  • Studien kommer att omfatta alla försökspersoner som Benlysta administreras till. Bland försökspersoner som påbörjar administrering efter lansering kommer dessutom de som Benlysta redan har administrerats till innan avtalet ingicks och de som redan påbörjat administreringen vid diagnos, på grund av sjukhusförflyttning etc. också inkluderas.

Exklusions kriterier:

  • N/A

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Observationsmodeller: Endast fall
  • Tidsperspektiv: Blivande

Kohorter och interventioner

Grupp / Kohort

Grupp / Kohort

En grupp eller undergrupp av deltagare i en observationsstudie som bedöms för biomedicinska eller hälsomässiga resultat.
Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En process eller handling som är i fokus för en klinisk studie. Interventioner inkluderar läkemedel, medicinsk utrustning, procedurer, vacciner och andra produkter som antingen är undersökta eller redan tillgängliga. Interventioner kan också innefatta icke-invasiva tillvägagångssätt, såsom utbildning eller modifiering av kost och träning.
Benlysta intravenous (IV)
Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) received Benlysta via intravenous (IV) administration for 52 weeks as a part of their treatment regimen.
Läkemedel: Benlysta
Benlysta was administered
Benlysta subcutaneous (SC)
Participants with SLE received Benlysta via subcutaneous (SC) administration for 52 weeks as a part of their treatment regimen.
Läkemedel: Benlysta
Benlysta was administered
Benlysta switched from IV to SC or SC to IV
Participants with SLE received Benlysta for 52 weeks as a part of their treatment regimen, where initial administration was IV but switched to SC, or where the initial administration was SC but switched to IV during the study.
Läkemedel: Benlysta
Benlysta was administered
Benlysta IV or SC (Initial route of administration unknown)
Participants with SLE received Benlysta via IV or SC administration for 52 weeks as a part of their treatment regimen. It was unknown whether the initial administration was IV or SC for participants in this arm.
Läkemedel: Benlysta
Benlysta was administered

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Primära resultatmått

I en klinisk studies protokoll är det planerade utfallsmått som är det viktigaste för att utvärdera effekten av en intervention/behandling. De flesta kliniska studier har ett primärt utfallsmått, men vissa har mer än ett.
Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
Tidsram: From the start of the study intervention (Day 1) up to maximum of 3 years
ADR is defined as a response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, and which occurred at doses normally used in human for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the modifications of physiological function.
From the start of the study intervention (Day 1) up to maximum of 3 years
Number of Participants With Serious ADR of Events Defined as a Priority Study Matter
Tidsram: From the start of the study intervention (Day 1) up to maximum of 3 years
ADR is defined as a response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, and which occurred at doses normally used in human for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the modifications of physiological function. Following serious ADRs were considered as priority study matter: 1. Serious hypersensitivity, 2. Serious infections (including tuberculosis, pneumonia, pneumocystis pneumonia, sepsis, and opportunistic infection), 3. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus, 4. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, 5. Interstitial pneumonitis, 6. Malignant tumor, 7. Depression and events related to suicide/self-injury.
From the start of the study intervention (Day 1) up to maximum of 3 years
Change From Baseline in Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA SLEDAI) Score at Week 24
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
The SELENA-SLEDAI score is a cumulative and weighted index for assessing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity in participants with SLE. It consists of 24 disease descriptors related to signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment across 9 organ systems. Each descriptor is assigned a weighted score (8 descriptors with a weight of 8 each, 6 descriptors with a weight of 4 each, 7 descriptors with a weight of 2 each, and 3 descriptors with a weight of 1 each) which is added up if the descriptor is observed during a visit or within the preceding 10 days. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease activity) to 105 (all 24 descriptors present simultaneously). A higher score indicates a more significant degree of disease activity. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in SELENA SLEDAI Score at Week 52
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
The SELENA-SLEDAI score is a cumulative and weighted index for assessing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity in participants with SLE. It consists of 24 disease descriptors related to signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment across 9 organ systems. Each descriptor is assigned a weighted score (8 descriptors with a weight of 8 each, 6 descriptors with a weight of 4 each, 7 descriptors with a weight of 2 each, and 3 descriptors with a weight of 1 each) which is added up if the descriptor is observed during a visit or within the preceding 10 days. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease activity) to 105 (all 24 descriptors present simultaneously). A higher score indicates a more significant degree of disease activity. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Lupus Impact Tracker Score at Week 24
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
Lupus impact tracker is 10-item patient reported outcome tool to measure impact of systemic lupus erythematosus or its treatment on participants' daily lives. Each answer for items is marked from 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time) points. Lower the lupus impact score, less impact lupus is having on life of participant. Total score was derived by adding up scores of all 10 items. Total score ranges from 0 (less impact on daily life) to 40 (greater impact on daily life). Higher score indicates greater impact of lupus on quality of life.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Lupus Impact Tracker Score at Week 52
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Lupus impact tracker is 10-item patient reported outcome tool to measure impact of systemic lupus erythematosus or its treatment on participants' daily lives. Each answer for items is marked from 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time) points. Lower the lupus impact score, less impact lupus is having on life of participant. Total score was derived by adding up scores of all 10 items. Total score ranges from 0 (less impact on daily life) to 40 (greater impact on daily life). Higher score indicates greater impact of lupus on quality of life.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score at Week 24
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
The PGA is used to assess the participant's current disease activity by investigator. It was collected on a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS). The score ranges from 0 (no activity) to 3 (severe activity). Lower score means no disease activity, higher score means severe disease activity. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in PGA Score at Week 52
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
The PGA is used to assess the participant's current disease activity by investigator. It was collected on a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS). The score ranges from 0 (no activity) to 3 (severe activity). Lower score means no disease activity, higher score means severe disease activity. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 4
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 4
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose. The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 8
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 8
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose. The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 8
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 12
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 12
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose. The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 16
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 16
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose. The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 20
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 20
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose. The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 20
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 24
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose. The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 28
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 28
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose. The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 28
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 32
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 32
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose. The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 32
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 36
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 36
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose. The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 36
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 40
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 40
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose. The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 40
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 44
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 44
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose. The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 44
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 48
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose. The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 52
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose. The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Response Criteria at Week 24
Tidsram: At Week 24
LLDAS was defined as a state which, if sustained, was associated with a low likelihood of adverse outcome, considering disease activity and medication safety. The LLDAS response criteria were: (1) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) less than equal to (<=)4 and no major active organ involvement (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, and pyrexia) and without hemolytic anemia or active gastrointestinal lesions; (2) no new signs or symptoms as compared to the last SELENA-SLEDAI assessment; (3) PGA score <=1 (33 millimeter); (4) corticosteroid dose <=7.5 milligram (mg)/day at time of assessment; and (5) use of the same immunosuppressant as compared with prior medication. No unapproved immunosuppressant drugs like rituximab, anifrolumab, ustekinumab, or baricitinib were used as concomitant medications.
At Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved LLDAS Response Criteria at Week 52
Tidsram: At Week 52
LLDAS was defined as a state which, if sustained, was associated with a low likelihood of adverse outcome, considering disease activity and medication safety. The LLDAS response criteria were: (1) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) less than equal to (<=)4 and no major active organ involvement (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, and pyrexia) and without hemolytic anemia or active gastrointestinal lesions; (2) no new signs or symptoms as compared to the last SELENA-SLEDAI assessment; (3) PGA score <=1 (33 millimeter); (4) corticosteroid dose <=7.5 milligram (mg)/day at time of assessment; and (5) use of the same immunosuppressant as compared with prior medication. No unapproved immunosuppressant drugs like rituximab, anifrolumab, ustekinumab, or baricitinib were used as concomitant medications.
At Week 52
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Anti-double-stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid (Anti-dsDNA) Antibody at Week 24
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
Blood samples were collected for anti-dsDNA antibody biomarker analysis. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Anti-dsDNA Antibody at Week 52
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Blood samples were collected for anti-dsDNA antibody biomarker analysis. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Complement Component-3 (C3) and Complement Component-4 (C4) at Week 24
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
Blood samples were collected from participants to assess C3 and C4 levels. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Complement Component-3 (C3) and Complement Component-4 (C4) at Week 52
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Blood samples were collected from participants to assess C3 and C4 levels. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Complement Hemolytic Activity at 50% (CH50) at Week 24
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
Blood samples were collected from participants to assess CH50 concentrations. CH50 is a blood test that measures the overall activity of the complement system, a group of proteins crucial for the immune system's function. Low CH50 levels can be associated with certain infections. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Complement Hemolytic Activity at 50% (CH50) at Week 52
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Blood samples were collected from participants to assess CH50 concentrations. CH50 is a blood test that measures the overall activity of the complement system, a group of proteins crucial for the immune system's function. Low CH50 levels can be associated with certain infections. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 24
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
Urine samples were collected from participants to assess Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio. It is a test that estimates how much protein is being excreted in urine, normalized to creatinine. It's commonly used to assess kidney function and detect proteinuria. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 52
Tidsram: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Urine samples were collected from participants to assess Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio. It is a test that estimates how much protein is being excreted in urine, normalized to creatinine. It's commonly used to assess kidney function and detect proteinuria. Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Sponsor

Sponsor

Den organisation eller person som initierar studien och som har auktoritet och kontroll över studien.
GlaxoSmithKline

Utredare

Utredare

En forskare involverad i en klinisk studie. Relaterade termer inkluderar platsens huvudutredare, platsundersökaren, studieordföranden, studieledaren och studiens huvudutredare.
  • Studierektor: GSK Clinical Trials, GlaxoSmithKline

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

Studiestart

Det faktiska datumet då den första deltagaren registrerades i en klinisk studie. Det "förväntade" studiestartdatumet är det datum som forskarna tror kommer att vara studiens startdatum.
15 januari 2018

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

Primärt slutförande

Det datum då den sista deltagaren i en klinisk studie undersöktes eller fick en intervention för att samla in slutliga data för det primära utfallsmåttet. Huruvida den kliniska studien avslutades enligt protokollet eller avslutades påverkar inte detta datum. För kliniska studier med mer än ett primärt utfallsmått med olika slutdatum avser denna term det datum då datainsamlingen är slutförd för alla primära utfallsmått. Det "förväntade" primära slutdatumet är det datum som forskarna tror kommer att vara det primära slutdatumet för studien.
31 juli 2025

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

Avslutad studie

Det datum då den sista deltagaren i en klinisk studie undersöktes eller fick en intervention/behandling för att samla in slutliga data för de primära utfallsmåtten, sekundära utfallsmåtten och biverkningar (det vill säga den senaste deltagarens senaste besök). Det "förväntade" studiens slutdatum är det datum som forskarna tror kommer att vara studiens slutdatum.
31 juli 2025

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

Först inskickad

Datumet då studiesponsorn eller utredaren först skickade in en studiepost till ClinicalTrials.gov. Det är vanligtvis en fördröjning på några dagar mellan det första inlämningsdatumet och postens tillgänglighet på ClinicalTrials.gov (det första publicerade datumet).
6 december 2017

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

Det datum då studiesponsorn eller utredaren först skickar in en studiepost som överensstämmer med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontroll (QC) granskningskriterier. Sponsorn eller utredaren kan behöva revidera och skicka in en studiepost en eller flera gånger innan NLM kvalitetskontrollkriterier uppfylls. Det är sponsorns eller utredarens ansvar att se till att studieposten överensstämmer med NLM QC-granskningskriterierna.
6 december 2017

Första postat (Faktisk)

Första postat

Datumet då studieposten först var tillgänglig på ClinicalTrials.gov efter granskning av National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontroll (QC) har avslutats. Det är vanligtvis en fördröjning på några dagar mellan det datum då studiens sponsor eller utredare skickade in studieposten och det första publicerade datumet.
12 december 2017

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

Senaste uppdatering publicerad

Det senaste datumet då ändringar i en studiepost gjordes tillgänglig på ClinicalTrials.gov. Det kan förekomma en fördröjning mellan när ändringarna skickades till ClinicalTrials.gov av studiens sponsor eller utredare (det senaste inlämningsdatumet för uppdateringen) och den senaste uppdateringen som publicerades.
18 maj 2026

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

Det senaste datumet då studiesponsorn eller utredaren lämnade in ändringar i en studiepost som överensstämmer med kvalitetskontrollkriterierna för National Library of Medicine (NLM). Det är sponsorns eller utredarens ansvar att se till att studieposten överensstämmer med NLM QC-granskningskriterierna.
24 april 2026

Senast verifierad

Senast verifierad

Det senaste datumet då studiesponsorn eller utredaren bekräftade att informationen om en klinisk studie på ClinicalTrials.gov var korrekt och aktuell. Om en studie med rekryteringsstatus av rekrytering; inte rekryterar ännu; eller aktiv, inte rekrytering har inte bekräftats under de senaste 2 åren, studiens rekryteringsstatus visas som okänd.
1 april 2026

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Nyckelord

Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor

Andra studie-ID-nummer

Andra studie-ID-nummer

Identifierare eller ID-nummer andra än NCT-numret som tilldelats en klinisk studie av studiens sponsor, finansiärer eller andra. Dessa nummer kan innehålla unika identifierare från andra försöksregister och National Institutes of Health-bidragsnummer.
  • 207735

Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)

Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?

NEJ

Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt

Nej

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt

Nej

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Cookie-inställningar

Vi använder cookies för att säkerställa att vi ger dig den bästa upplevelsen på vår webbplats. För mer information läs noggrant vår policy för sekretess och kakor. ...>>>Du kan när som helst ändra dina preferenser eller dra tillbaka ditt samtycke genom att radera kakorna från din webbplats eller dator enligt beskrivningen i policyn. Acceptera det och välj dina preferenser genom att markera motsvarande rutor i avsnittet "Hantera inställningar" nedan. Läs våra användarvillkor noga innan du fortsätter att använda någon del av denna webbplats.
«Hantera inställningar