此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Comparison of Nasal and Forehead Oximetry in Critically Ill Patients at Risk for Decreased Peripheral Perfusion

2017年5月8日 更新者:Lynn Schallom、Washington University School of Medicine
Continuous pulse oximetry monitoring is the standard of care in critically ill patients in emergency departments, operating rooms and intensive care units. In patients with poor peripheral perfusion (low blood flow) due to peripheral vascular disease, low body temperature, or shock and the use of medications to raise the blood pressure, clinicians have difficulty obtaining an accurate measurement. This study compares the accuracy of forehead oximetry sensors to nasal alar sensors to lab oximetry measures and on the rate of device related pressure ulcers with both.

研究概览

地位

完全的

条件

详细说明

Continuous pulse oximetry monitoring is the standard of care in critically ill patients in emergency departments, operating rooms and intensive care units. In patients with poor peripheral perfusion (low blood flow) due to peripheral vascular disease, low body temperature, or shock and the use of medications to raise the blood pressure, clinicians have difficulty obtaining an accurate measurement. Several studies have demonstrated the utility of forehead sensor measurements under these clinical conditions. Forehead sensor measurement is considered to be a more central measurement than with digit or ear sensors. However the sensor requires a head band for accurate measurement. On a regular basis, the forehead sensor has led to pressure ulcer development at Barnes-Jewish Hospital despite following vendor recommendations for alternating placement every 8 hours from one side of the forehead to the other. An alternate sensor placed on the nose has recently demonstrated rapid detection of induced drops in oxygen saturation. It has also demonstrated correlation with arterial oxygen saturation measured in a clinical laboratory. The oxygen saturation measurement from the nose is also considered a central measurement. However, studies of the nose sensor were conducted in healthy subjects or during anesthesia care over several hours. Therefore, research is needed to examine the accuracy of the nose sensor in the ICU patient population. In addition, due to concerns for sensor related pressure ulcers in patients with decreased perfusion, the sensor needs to be evaluated for extended periods of time.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

43

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis、Missouri、美国、63110
        • Barnes-Jewish Hospital at Washington University

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 90年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Presence of an existing arterial catheter for blood sampling and one of the following:

  1. Difficulty obtaining a consistent signal from a digit or ear sensor or
  2. On pressors of at least 0 .10 mcg/kg/min of norepinephrine or
  3. Core temperature < or equal to 35 degrees C

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Anatomic impediments (burns, wounds, dressings, etc.) to placement of the sensor on the forehead or nasal alar
  2. History of known dyshemoglobinemias evidenced by carboxyhemoglobin levels > 10% or methemoglobin level > 2%
  3. Severe anemia with hemoglobin < 5 g/dL
  4. Pregnant women

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:诊断
  • 分配:不适用
  • 介入模型:单组作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
其他:Nasal alar oxygen sensor
Application of a nasal alar oxygen sensor
Application of a nasal alar oxygen sensor

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Accuracy as Indicated by Co-oximetry Measure of Arterial Oxygen Saturation
大体时间:24 hours
accuracy of sensor measure was defined as sensor measurements within 3% of co-oximetry measures
24 hours

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Device Related Pressure Ulcer
大体时间:5 days
assessment for development of pressure ulcer at forehead sensor, "OxiMaxTM, Nellcor,Covidien" and nasal alar sensor, "Alar One-SenseTM, Xhale Assurance"
5 days

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Marilyn E Schallom, RN, PhD、Barnes-Jewish Hospital at Washington University

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2014年10月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2016年7月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2016年9月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2015年2月10日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2015年3月5日

首次发布 (估计)

2015年3月6日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2017年6月7日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2017年5月8日

最后验证

2017年5月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 201408123

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

3
订阅