Heart Smart: A Virtual Self-Management Program for Homebound People With Heart Failure
2022年3月7日 更新者：Sara Frye, MS OTR/L ATP、University of Pennsylvania
The purpose of this capstone project is to pilot Heart Smart, a virtual group program to improve self-efficacy for self-management skills for homebound people with heart failure.
研究概览
详细说明
The purpose of this capstone project is to pilot Heart Smart, a virtual group program to improve self-efficacy for self-management skills for homebound people with heart failure.
Heart Smart will provide synchronous virtual group education to homebound people with heart failure receiving services from Penn Medicine at Home.
The primary clinical goal is to improve self-efficacy for heart failure self-management and improve their knowledge of heart failure self-management strategies.
Secondary outcomes will explore the feasibility of the program by exploring technology, adherence and satisfaction with the program.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
5
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Bala-Cynwyd、Pennsylvania、美国、19004
- Penn Medicine at Home
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of heart failure
- Receiving home health care from Penn Medicine at Home at time of screening.
- Technology capabilities to participate in the program (laptop or tablet with a camera, internet access).
- Able to read and write in English.
- Cognitive ability to participate in the program if the participant is able to score12/15 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) 5 Minute Phone Test.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hearing impairment that impacts communication.
- Previous experience receiving occupational therapy services from the principal investigator.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：不适用
- 介入模型：单组作业
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Heart Smart Group
Receives Heart Smart Intervention
|
The Heart Smart Intervention is a 6 week virtual program consisting of one individual technology training session followed by 5 one hour group education sessions.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Self-Efficacy Measure for Chronic Disease (SEMCD)
大体时间：At first and final sessions (weeks 1 and 6)
|
This self-report scale has 6 items which are each rated on a scale of 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident).
The score for the scale is the mean of the scores for the six items.
Possible scores are 1-10 with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.
This scale is an appropriate outcome measure for a heart failure self-management group because it was designed to measure self-efficacy in people with chronic conditions such as heart failure and has undergone psychometric evaluation.
This scale is free to use without permission.
Administration takes less than 10 minutes.
|
At first and final sessions (weeks 1 and 6)
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
大体时间：At first and final sessions (weeks 1 and 6)
|
This 23-item, Likert scale, self-report heart failure specific outcome measure.
The instrument measures six domains: physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.
This instrument is appropriate because it is designed for use for people with heart failure, will give an indication of participant heart failure severity for demographic purposes, and has a validated self-efficacy component.
This scale requires a license which has been obtained for this pilot project.
Administration takes less than 10 minutes.
Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher cardiac health status.
|
At first and final sessions (weeks 1 and 6)
|
|
Change in Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test V3 (AHFKT)
大体时间：At first and final sessions (weeks 1 and 6)
|
This 30 item multiple choice measure of heart failure self-management knowledge yields scores 0-30 which are commonly reported as a percentage (higher scores indicate more knowledge).
Content validity was established through a panel of expert heart failure nurses.
|
At first and final sessions (weeks 1 and 6)
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Attendance
大体时间：At each weekly session for 6 weeks
|
The number of participants at each meeting will be recorded.
|
At each weekly session for 6 weeks
|
|
Minutes of training
大体时间：This will be recorded in the first session at week 1.
|
The number of minutes spent in the pre-training session will be recorded.
|
This will be recorded in the first session at week 1.
|
|
Participant Satisfaction
大体时间：At the final session on week 6
|
Participants will answer three likert scale questions.
|
At the final session on week 6
|
|
Technology failures
大体时间：At each weekly session for 6 weeks.
|
Total number of minutes missed per participant per session.
|
At each weekly session for 6 weeks.
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Sara Frye, MS OTR/L ATP、Penn Medicine at Home Professional Development Department
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
一般刊物
- Ritter PL, Lorig K. The English and Spanish Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale measures were validated using multiple studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Nov;67(11):1265-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
- Green CP, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, Spertus JA. Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Apr;35(5):1245-55. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00531-3.
- Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, Laurent D, Hobbs M. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Nov-Dec;4(6):256-62.
- Lorig KR, Holman H. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(1):1-7. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01.
- Butler J, Khan MS, Mori C, Filippatos GS, Ponikowski P, Comin-Colet J, Roubert B, Spertus JA, Anker SD. Minimal clinically important difference in quality of life scores for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;22(6):999-1005. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1810. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
- Butts B, Higgins M, Dunbar S, Reilly C. The Third Time's a Charm: Psychometric Testing and Update of the Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):13-21. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000413.
- Spertus JA, Jones PG, Kim J, Globe D. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in anemic heart failure patients. Qual Life Res. 2008 Mar;17(2):291-8. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9302-5. Epub 2007 Dec 29.
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2021年9月28日
初级完成 (实际的)
2021年12月31日
研究完成 (实际的)
2021年12月31日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2021年8月31日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2021年9月15日
首次发布 (实际的)
2021年9月27日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2022年3月9日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2022年3月7日
最后验证
2022年3月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.