此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Online Socio-emotional Dyad Training for Healthcare Professionals' Well-being and Social Skills, Phase II. (EduSocHealth2)

2026年9月11日 更新者:Max Planck Social Neuroscience Lab

The Edu:Social Health Care Project Phase II: Investigating the Effects of an Online Socio-emotional Dyad Intervention on Healthcare Professionals' Mental Health, Resilience, Social Competencies and Behaviors.

Edu:Social Health Care Project Phase II is a non-randomized waitlist-controlled trial with sequential recruitment of the intervention and waitlist control groups (nrWLC), designed to evaluate the effects of a partner-based Dyad-based empathy-compassion mental training (EmCo) intervention on healthcare professionals with regard to following primary outcome domains: 1) mental health, 2) resilience, 3) social cohesion and support, 4) social skills, 5) coping and emotion regulation, and 6) social behaviors.

One main goal is to examine the effects of such adapted 8-week EmCo Dyad intervention within the health care context, with a particular focus on strengthening healthcare professionals' mental health, resilience, social skills and behaviors, and social cohesion as well as fostering interprofessional attitudes by pairing every week study partners across different healthcare disciplines with each other for practicing their daily Dyads (e.g., nurses will practice daily via app with medical doctors or midwives).

A further aim is to validate the novel Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA) task, which explores the use of app-based voice recordings as indicators of healthcare professionals' emotional states during their daily partner-based Dyad practice. By combining healthcare professionals' self-reported practice-related emotions with partner-based evaluations, this approach aims to generate new and innovate, more objective markers of training-induced changes in emotional processing and regulation over time in a real-live applied setting.

The final aim is to investigate the cognitive and affective mechanisms and factors underlying observed changes in healthcare professionals' mental health, resilience, social cohesion, social skills and social behaviors, that may explain observed training-related effects in primary outcome domains. Based on previous research, we expect the socio-emotional EmCo Dyad training to activate evolutionary old care- and affiliation-based motivational systems that foster positive affect and motivation, acceptance, trust social capacities and behavioral tendencies. These processes should go along with reduction in loneliness, stress and other mental vulnerabilities (anxiety, depression, burn-out etc.) and foster social skills such as empathy, compassion as well as social cohesion and resilience.

研究概览

详细说明

Healthcare professionals experience high rates of mental health difficulties, including stress, burnout, anxiety, and depression, with burnout prevalence among physicians and nurses estimated between 30% and over 50% depending on the work context and country. These challenges have intensified in recent years, partly also due to the world-wide Covid19 pandemic, with increased workload, time pressure, and exposure to emotionally demanding situations contributing to elevated psychological distress and reduced well-being. Chronic occupational stress in this population is associated not only with impaired mental health and reduced work engagement but also with decreased quality of care and increased risk of medical errors. Given these high job demands and vulnerabilities, interventions such as mindfulness- and compassion-based programs and socio-emotional training have shown promise in reducing burnout and enhancing resilience and well-being among healthcare professionals. At the same time, these interventions allow to foster social skills such as empathy, compassion and high-quality listening which are essential to healthcare professions.

In recent years, classic mindfulness-based interventions focusing on individual mental practices have been expanded to include partner-based social practices, known as Dyads, which particularly target social skills such as empathy, (self-)compassion, and social cohesion. However, despite growing research on student well-being, partner-based Dyadic interventions have not yet been systematically investigated in healthcare contexts. Available evidence suggests that Dyads may be more effective than solitary mindfulness practices in reducing loneliness and social stress, strengthening social connection and cohesion, and enhancing resilience and optimism. Moreover, findings indicate that dyadic social practices engage mechanisms that differ from those underlying traditional mindfulness-based interventions.

Empathy, (self-)compassion, and deep, high-quality listening are core socio-emotional skills in healthcare, supporting effective communication and emotional understanding when providing care for patients across medical and therapeutical domains. However, empathy can lead to empathic distress when individuals are repeatedly exposed to others' suffering, whereas compassion is considered more protective, as it relies on altruistic and care-based motivational systems associated with positive affect and regulatory processes that buffer emotional overwhelm. Despite this distinction, empathy and compassion have not yet been systematically taught in healthcare contexts in an evidence-based manner. To address this gap, the Edu:Social Health Care phase II implements the empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo), which trains a variety of different healthcare professionals to distinguish between empathy (empathic listening), empathy regulation to avoid moving into empathic distress during the first four weeks, and (self)compassion and compassionate listening during the subsequent four weeks.

The EmCo program builds on the Affect Dyad developed in the ReSource project and the online Dyad 10-week intervention program with weekly online coachings and daily app-based Dyads implemented in the CovSocial project. The ReSource project demonstrated the effectiveness of partner-based dyadic mental training in inducing brain plasticity, while both the ReSource and CovSocial projects showed beneficial effects on reducing stress, enhancing psychological resilience, and strengthening social cohesion across multiple indicators of biopsychosocial health. Unlike the ReSource and CovSocial projects, the present program includes a novel empathy-versus-compassion listening component. Further, compared with earlier 10-week online Dyad programs, EmCo reduces the intervention duration to eight weeks, aligning with standard mindfulness-based interventions such as MBSR and MBCT and improving feasibility for implementation in healthcare and educational settings.

The present study is implemented as a non-randomized controlled trial in a sample of healthcare professionals (target N = 600). A multimethod assessment strategy will be used, including self-report validated trait and state questionnaires, behavioral computer tasks delivered at home through webapp, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods based on push-notifications by the app. These different assessments are capturing changes across mental health, resilience, social cohesion and support, social skills, coping and emotion regulation, and social behaviors (e.g., listening, attachment behaviors).

Participants assigned to the EmCo intervention group and the non-randomized waitlist control condition (nrWLC) are recruited concurrently from the same participant pool. After providing informed consent, participants will be pre-screened via a questionnaire and an interview with the intervention trainers. The allocation to empathy-compassion training group (EmCo) or non-randomized waitlist control group (nrWLC) will be based on expressed availability and indicated preference of the participants regarding the two intervention periods for the EmCo Dyad training (option 1: one in autum 2026; option 2: one beginning of 2027) as well as on certain matching criteria, such as gender, age, PHQ-9-scores, to obtain two comparable groups.

All participants will complete a pre-test (T0) assessment phase, including baseline psychometric measures, computer-based tasks, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Participants in the intervention group will then attend two onboarding sessions (Onboarding I and II) and complete an 8-week program delivered via a web and smartphone application, including daily Dyad practices and weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert mental training teachers. During this period, they will complete weekly self-reports, EMA, and daily pre-post Dyad practice ratings (DPR). The nrWLC will complete EMA and scheduled assessments during the same period. At the end of the first EmCo intervention period, all participants will complete a post-test (T1) assessment comparable to the pre-test. Following completion of the initial post-test (T1), participants in the nrWLC will start their 8-week socio-emotional Dyad intervention (EmCo). The nrWLC will complete additional post-test assessments (T2) after completion of their EmCo training.

The study constitutes Phase II of the Health Care umbrella project, extending the intervention framework previously implemented with healthcare students in Phase I (NCT07407413) to practicing healthcare professionals.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

666

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • State of Berlin
      • Berlin、State of Berlin、德国、10557
        • Social Neuroscience Lab manages the Edu:Social study-based application (app)

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Between 18- and 65-years old.
  2. Currently practicing a healthcare profession in Germany or Austria 2a. Belongs to one of the eligible state-regulated professions with legally defined independent responsibility for patient care, including diagnosis, treatment, psychotherapy, maternity care, or the overall nursing process (e.g., physician, psychotherapist, midwife, or registered nurse).

2b. Regular direct contact with patients or clients as part of the professional role (3) Proficient in German. (4) Informed consent. (5) No diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder within the past two years. (6) Stable internet access and necessary technical equipment (mobile phone with internet access).

(7) No regular contemplative practice (≤ 50 hours total within the past six months); healthy population, non-clinical population.

Exclusion Criteria:

(8) Insufficient German proficiency. (9) Lack of stable internet access or required devices (mobile phone with internet access).

(10) No informed consent. (11) Not currently practicing the profession, or working only in administrative, research, or teaching roles without patient contact.

11a. Professions are excluded if their primary role is supportive, assistive, emergency transport, preventive, counseling-focused, or based on prescribed adjunct therapies rather than independent responsibility for patient care, along with non-human-related professions. This includes, for example, nursing assistants, health psychologists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech therapists, dietitians, massage therapists, paramedics (Sanitäter), and other comparable support or adjunct roles.

11b. No regular direct patient or client contact (12) Regular contemplative practice (> 50 hours in the past six months (e.g., dyad, mindfulness, compassion-based practices).

(13) Current psychiatric diagnosis or therapy, or reaching screening cutoffs on:

  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9 ; Martin et al., 2006 ; Löwe et al., 2004 ; Cutoff ≥ 15 ; or endorsing suicidality on the item 9),
  • Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Löwe et al., 2007; Spitzer et al., 2006; Cutoff ≥ 15)
  • Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20; Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000; Cutoff ≥ 61)
  • Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; Moran et al., 2003; Söchtig et al., 2012, Cutoff ≥ 4).

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:基础科学
  • 分配:非随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training (EmCo)
EmCo includes onboarding sessions, weekly coaching, and daily Dyad practice over 8 weeks.
  1. Participants engage in a structured 13-minute partner-based contemplative exercise. Each dyad reflects on two experiences from the previous 24 hours: one involving a difficult emotion and one involving gratitude. Partners take turns speaking while the other listens non-judgmentally. During weeks 1-4, the practice emphasizes empathic listening; during weeks 5-8, compassionate listening. Participants are instructed to attend to bodily sensations associated with the emotions described. The practice aims to improve coping with difficult emotions, empathic and compassionate listening, (self)acceptance, compassion, gratitude, resilience.
  2. Participants also attend eight 1.5-hour online group sessions led by Expert Dyad teachers. The coaching sessions help deepen the Dyad practice and educate participants about body language, coping better with difficult emotions/stress, the benefits of empathy versus compassion and the act of listening from a mindset of empathy versus compassion.
其他:Non-randomised waitlist control group (nrWLC)
Initially, participants in the non-randomised waitlist control group will not receive the intervention and will be offered the EmCo training only after the intervention group has completed the EmCo training program.
Participants in the control group will not receive the intervention. They will complete pre- and post-test procedures consisting primarily of self-report questionnaires, and behavioral tasks, as well as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) conducted on four days within two weeks at pre-test and post-test 1 & 2.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
UCLA孤独量表(UCLA)
大体时间:在基线(测试前)和8周干预期后(测试后1和2)进行评估
一项测量孤独感严重程度的量表(Döring & Bortz,1993;Russell等人,1980)。 分数越高表明孤独感越强。
在基线(测试前)和8周干预期后(测试后1和2)进行评估
康纳-戴维森心理韧性量表 (CD-RISC)
大体时间:在基线(预测试)和8周干预期后(后测试1和2)进行评估
一个测量心理韧性的量表(Connor & Davidson,2003;Sarubin 等人,2015)。 分数越高表示韧性越强。
在基线(预测试)和8周干预期后(后测试1和2)进行评估
社会亲近度(按职业划分的IOS)
大体时间:在基线(测试前)和8周干预期后(测试后1和2)进行评估
一种通过视觉表征测量个人或群体/社区之间感知亲密程度的量表(Aron等人,1992年;Kinnunen & Windmann,2013年)。 分数越高表示社会亲密度越高。
在基线(测试前)和8周干预期后(测试后1和2)进行评估
跨专业合作量表 (IPAS-D)
大体时间:在基线(前测)和8周干预期后(后测1和2)进行评估
该量表(Norris等,2015;Pedersen等,2020)用于测量与《跨专业协作实践核心能力》(IPEC报告,2011)相关的态度。
分数越高表明对协作实践的态度越积极。
在基线(前测)和8周干预期后(后测1和2)进行评估
社会支持量表(F-SozU K-6)
大体时间:在基线(测试前)和8周干预期后(测试后1和2)进行评估
一个衡量主观感受是否有支持可用的量表(Kliem等人,2015年)。 分数越高表明感知到的社会支持越大。
在基线(测试前)和8周干预期后(测试后1和2)进行评估
社会情感视频任务(SoVT)
大体时间:在基线(前测)、经过4周共情倾听训练(干预中期)以及完成4周慈悲倾听训练后(后测1和2)进行评估
本任务通过情感视频片段评估行为共情和同情心(Klimecki等人,2014年)。 得分越高表示共情或同情心越强。
在基线(前测)、经过4周共情倾听训练(干预中期)以及完成4周慈悲倾听训练后(后测1和2)进行评估
苏塞克斯-牛津自我与他人共情量表(SOCS)
大体时间:在基线(前测)、共情倾听训练4周后(中期干预)以及同情倾听训练4周后(后测1和2)进行评估
测量自我慈悲(SOCS-S)和对他人的慈悲(SOCS-O;Gu等人,2020年)的量表。 分数越高表示慈悲程度越高。
在基线(前测)、共情倾听训练4周后(中期干预)以及同情倾听训练4周后(后测1和2)进行评估
应力强度
大体时间:采用EMA设计进行评估,每日通过五次推送通知进行测量,分布在五个3小时的时间间隔内,在两周内的四天中进行,分别在干预前(基线)和8周干预期后(干预后)实施。
基于压力评估量表(SAM;Delahaye 等人,2015;Peacock & Wong,1990)定制的测量压力强度的项目。 分数越高表示压力越强烈。
采用EMA设计进行评估,每日通过五次推送通知进行测量,分布在五个3小时的时间间隔内,在两周内的四天中进行,分别在干预前(基线)和8周干预期后(干预后)实施。
应对策略
大体时间:采用EMA设计进行评估,在两周内的四天中,每天通过五次推送通知进行测量,分布在五个3小时间隔内,分别在测试前(基线期)和8周干预期后(干预后)进行。
基于简要应对方式问卷(Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005)和认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011)设计的定制项目,用于测量应对策略(接纳、积极重评、社会支持、沉思、自责、分心)。 得分越高表示对特定应对策略的使用频率越高。
采用EMA设计进行评估,在两周内的四天中,每天通过五次推送通知进行测量,分布在五个3小时间隔内,分别在测试前(基线期)和8周干预期后(干预后)进行。
积极共情倾听量表 (AELS)
大体时间:在基线(测试前)、共情倾听训练4周后(干预中期)以及慈悲倾听训练4周后(测试后1和2)进行评估
一项测量主动共情倾听的量表(Bodie,2011)。 分数越高表示主动共情倾听能力越强。
在基线(测试前)、共情倾听训练4周后(干预中期)以及慈悲倾听训练4周后(测试后1和2)进行评估
依恋行为(ASQ)
大体时间:在基线(测试前)和8周干预期后(测试后1和2)进行评估
一种测量人际关系中依恋相关行为的自评问卷,包括寻求亲近、回避和安全等方面(Hexel,2004年)。 分数越高表示依恋相关行为越明显。
在基线(测试前)和8周干预期后(测试后1和2)进行评估
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)
大体时间:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring depression, anxiety, and stress (Henry & Crawford, 2005; Nilges & Essau, 2021). Higher scores indicate more depression, anxiety, and stress
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Maslach burnout inventory-human services survey (MBI-HSS)
大体时间:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring burnout (Maslach, 1996). Higher scores indicate more burnout.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Mentalization Scale (MENTS)
大体时间:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring the capacity of envisioning one's and others' behaviors with reference to the underlying mental states (Dimitrijević et al., 2018). Higher scores suggesting a more sophisticated capacity for mentalizing.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Prosodic Feature Pitch
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature pitch (measured in Hz) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Loudness
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature loudness (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Speaking Rate
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature speaking rate (measured in syllables per minute) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Intonation
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature intonation (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Affect Dimensions of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Assessment of continuous affective dimensions of vocalized emotional expressions during participants' daily Dyad practice using audEERING devAIce software. The following parameters will be assessed: arousal, valence, and dominance (each ranging from -1 to 1). Based on arousal-valence scores, the following affect-quadrant values will be calculated: high-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-low-valence; and high-arousal-low valence.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Affect Categories of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Classification of vocalized emotional expressions intro affect categories during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. The following parameters will be assessed: angry, happy, and sad, expressed as unitless values ranging from 0 to 1 representing category likelihood.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
积极情感(情感网格)(解释机制)
大体时间:在8周干预期间每周评估
情绪状态(效价)与唤醒度评估(Russell等人,1989年)。 效价与唤醒度得分越高,表明积极情感越强、唤醒度越高。
在8周干预期间每周评估
感恩问卷-6(GQ-5-G)(解释机制)
大体时间:在8周疗程期间每周评估
一种衡量感恩程度的量表(Hudecek等人,2021年;McCullough等人,2002年)。 分数越高表示感恩程度越高。
在8周疗程期间每周评估
自我仁慈量表(SCS-SF)(解释机制)
大体时间:在为期8周的疗程期间每周评估
一份衡量自我仁慈和对自己富有同情心态度的自陈式问卷(Hupfeld & Ruffieux, 2011; Raes et al., 2011)。 分数越高表明自我仁慈程度越高。
在为期8周的疗程期间每周评估
积极解释偏倚(ERT)(解释机制)
大体时间:在基线(预测试)和8周干预期后(后测试1和2)进行评估
该任务通过使用面部表情的渐变序列(DeBruine & Jones,2017;Griffiths 等人,2015),评估对人物面部表情做出更积极判断的倾向。 分数越高表示更强的积极解释偏差。
在基线(预测试)和8周干预期后(后测试1和2)进行评估
简短孤独感量表(SLS)(解释机制)
大体时间:在8周疗程期间每周评估一次
一项测量孤独感频率、强度和持续时间的简短量表(Hughes等人,2004年;Qualter等人,2021年)。 分数越高表明孤独感越强。
在8周疗程期间每周评估一次
感知压力(PSS-10)(解释机制)
大体时间:在8周疗程期间每周评估一次
一份自评问卷,用于测量个体生活中情境被评估为压力源的程度(Cohen等人,1983年;Klein等人,2016年)。 分数越高表示感知压力越大。
在8周疗程期间每周评估一次
抑郁症(PHQ-2)(解释机制)
大体时间:在8周疗程期间每周评估一次
一项简短的自我报告筛查工具,用于评估核心抑郁症状,包括抑郁情绪和快感缺乏(Kroenke等人,2003年)。 分数越高表明抑郁症状越严重。
在8周疗程期间每周评估一次
共情关切与困扰(IRI)(解释机制)
大体时间:在8周疗程期间每周评估
一种测量社会情绪不同维度的量表,包括个人困扰和共情关怀(Davis, 1980; Paulus, 2009)。 分数越高表示个人困扰或共情关怀程度越高。
在8周疗程期间每周评估
信任 (KUSIV3) (解释机制)
大体时间:在8周疗程期间每周评估
一种测量广义人际信任的自我报告问卷,包括对他人可靠性和诚信度的信任(Beierlein等人,2012年)。 得分越高表示人际信任度越高。
在8周疗程期间每周评估
群内-群外偏见(ERT)(解释机制)
大体时间:在基线(前测)和8周干预期后(后测1和2)进行评估
该任务通过使用面部表情的渐变序列(DeBruine & Jones,2017;Griffiths等,2015),评估个体在面部情绪识别中倾向于认为来自自己群体的人更为积极的倾向。 分数越高表示内群体-外群体偏见越强。
在基线(前测)和8周干预期后(后测1和2)进行评估
应对策略(解释机制)
大体时间:在为期8周的疗程中每周评估一次
根据简要应对方式问卷(Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005)和认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011)制定的自定义项目,用于测量应对策略(接纳、积极重评、社会支持、沉思、自责、分心)。 分数越高表明使用特定应对策略的频率越高。
在为期8周的疗程中每周评估一次
DPR-Affect(情感网格;解释机制)
大体时间:在干预期间评估8周,在每日锻炼之前
在开始双人任务前评估情绪状态(效价)和唤醒度(Russell等人,1989年)。 效价和唤醒度得分越高,表示积极情绪越强且唤醒度越高。
在干预期间评估8周,在每日锻炼之前
DPR参与(解释机制)
大体时间:在干预期间评估8周,仅在干预组中进行,在每日锻炼后
评估倾听参与度(1个自定义项目;仅于双人练习后)。 得分越高表示倾听参与度越高。
在干预期间评估8周,仅在干预组中进行,在每日锻炼后
DPR-情绪
大体时间:作为Dyad语音评估(DYVA)的一部分,从第1周到第8周每周评估一次
由对话双方(说话者和倾听者)在对话结束后直接评定的情绪强度(例如,快乐、感激、悲伤、愤怒)。
作为Dyad语音评估(DYVA)的一部分,从第1周到第8周每周评估一次
DPR-听力-情感
大体时间:从第1周至第8周每周评估,在双人练习后
自定义项目(自我生成),用于测量在聆听搭档讲述困难情境及感恩事件时的自我评定情感状态。 分数越高表示情感越积极。
从第1周至第8周每周评估,在双人练习后
双人共情与慈悲倾听技巧(DPR倾听技巧)
大体时间:从第1周至第8周,在双人练习后每周评估
自定义项目(自行生成),用于测量受试者自评在倾听伴侣讲述困难情境及感恩事件时,表现出共情与同情倾听技能的自我评估水平。 分数越高,分别表示共情倾听或同情倾听的程度越高。
从第1周至第8周,在双人练习后每周评估
Emotion Acceptance (EAQ) (explanatory mechanism)
大体时间:Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
A self-report questionnaire measuring emotional awareness, and acceptance of emotions (Beblo et al., 2011; Kisley et al., 2025).
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Weekly-Mentalizing items (explanatory mechanism)
大体时间:Assessed thrice a week during the course of 8 weeks
Two study-based items measuring the capacity to understand one's own and others' mental states (Dimitrijević et al., 2018). Higher scores indicate greater mentalizing ability.
Assessed thrice a week during the course of 8 weeks
Dyad closeness - Inclusion of Other in Self Scale (explanatory mechanism)
大体时间:Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Assessment of how close participants felt to their Dyad partner (post-Dyad exercise). Higher scores indicate more closeness (Aron et al., 1992; Kinnunen & Windmann, 2013)
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Dyad listening quality (DPR- listening-quality)
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the quality of listening to the Dyad partner. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of active, attentive listening.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
患者健康问卷(PHQ-9;预筛选)
大体时间:在干预前评估,仅一次,以预先筛查出具有临床抑郁症状水平的个体
评估抑郁程度的量表(Löwe等人,2004年;Martin等人,2006年)。 分数越高表示抑郁程度越严重。
在干预前评估,仅一次,以预先筛查出具有临床抑郁症状水平的个体
广泛性焦虑症(GAD-7;预筛查)
大体时间:在干预前进行评估,仅一次,以从研究中预先筛选出具有临床水平焦虑症状的个体
评估广泛性焦虑的量表(Spitzer 等人,2006;Löwe 等人,2007)。 分数越高表示焦虑程度越高。
在干预前进行评估,仅一次,以从研究中预先筛选出具有临床水平焦虑症状的个体
一般人口统计问题
大体时间:在干预前评估,仅一次,以收集人口统计信息
自我生成的人口统计项目。
在干预前评估,仅一次,以收集人口统计信息
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; pre-screening)
大体时间:Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
A scale assessing alexithymia (Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000). Higher scores indicate more alexithymia.
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; pre-screening)
大体时间:Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms
A self-report scale used to screen personality disorders (Moran et al., 2003; Söchtig et al., 2012)
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Tania Singer, Prof. Dr.、Social Neuroscience Lab, Max Planck Society
  • 首席研究员:Patrick Kutschar, Ass. - Prof. Dr.、Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität (PMU)
  • 首席研究员:Beate Priewasser, Dr.、Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität (PMU)
  • 首席研究员:Antonia Dinzinger, Dr.、Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität (PMU)
  • 首席研究员:Philipp Beuchel, Dr.、Social Neuroscience Lab, Max Planck Society
  • 首席研究员:Ananda Zeas-Sigüenza, Dr.、Social Neuroscience Lab, Max Planck Society

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年9月2日

初级完成 (估计的)

2026年12月20日

研究完成 (估计的)

2027年4月3日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年5月26日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月4日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月9日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年9月15日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年9月11日

最后验证

2026年5月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅