Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Online Socio-emotional Dyad Training for Healthcare Professionals' Well-being and Social Skills, Phase II. (EduSocHealth2)

4. juni 2026 opdateret af: Max Planck Social Neuroscience Lab

The Edu:Social Health Care Project Phase II: Investigating the Effects of an Online Socio-emotional Dyad Intervention on Healthcare Professionals' Mental Health, Resilience, Social Competencies and Behaviors.

Edu:Social Health Care Project Phase II is a non-randomized waitlist-controlled trial with sequential recruitment of the intervention and waitlist control groups (nrWLC), designed to evaluate the effects of a partner-based Dyad-based empathy-compassion mental training (EmCo) intervention on healthcare professionals with regard to following primary outcome domains: 1) mental health, 2) resilience, 3) social cohesion and support, 4) social skills, 5) coping and emotion regulation, and 6) social behaviors.

One main goal is to examine the effects of such adapted 8-week EmCo Dyad intervention within the health care context, with a particular focus on strengthening healthcare professionals' mental health, resilience, social skills and behaviors, and social cohesion as well as fostering interprofessional attitudes by pairing every week study partners across different healthcare disciplines with each other for practicing their daily Dyads (e.g., nurses will practice daily via app with medical doctors or midwives).

A further aim is to validate the novel Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA) task, which explores the use of app-based voice recordings as indicators of healthcare professionals' emotional states during their daily partner-based Dyad practice. By combining healthcare professionals' self-reported practice-related emotions with partner-based evaluations, this approach aims to generate new and innovate, more objective markers of training-induced changes in emotional processing and regulation over time in a real-live applied setting.

The final aim is to investigate the cognitive and affective mechanisms and factors underlying observed changes in healthcare professionals' mental health, resilience, social cohesion, social skills and social behaviors, that may explain observed training-related effects in primary outcome domains. Based on previous research, we expect the socio-emotional EmCo Dyad training to activate evolutionary old care- and affiliation-based motivational systems that foster positive affect and motivation, acceptance, trust social capacities and behavioral tendencies. These processes should go along with reduction in loneliness, stress and other mental vulnerabilities (anxiety, depression, burn-out etc.) and foster social skills such as empathy, compassion as well as social cohesion and resilience.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Healthcare professionals experience high rates of mental health difficulties, including stress, burnout, anxiety, and depression, with burnout prevalence among physicians and nurses estimated between 30% and over 50% depending on the work context and country. These challenges have intensified in recent years, partly also due to the world-wide Covid19 pandemic, with increased workload, time pressure, and exposure to emotionally demanding situations contributing to elevated psychological distress and reduced well-being. Chronic occupational stress in this population is associated not only with impaired mental health and reduced work engagement but also with decreased quality of care and increased risk of medical errors. Given these high job demands and vulnerabilities, interventions such as mindfulness- and compassion-based programs and socio-emotional training have shown promise in reducing burnout and enhancing resilience and well-being among healthcare professionals. At the same time, these interventions allow to foster social skills such as empathy, compassion and high-quality listening which are essential to healthcare professions.

In recent years, classic mindfulness-based interventions focusing on individual mental practices have been expanded to include partner-based social practices, known as Dyads, which particularly target social skills such as empathy, (self-)compassion, and social cohesion. However, despite growing research on student well-being, partner-based Dyadic interventions have not yet been systematically investigated in healthcare contexts. Available evidence suggests that Dyads may be more effective than solitary mindfulness practices in reducing loneliness and social stress, strengthening social connection and cohesion, and enhancing resilience and optimism. Moreover, findings indicate that dyadic social practices engage mechanisms that differ from those underlying traditional mindfulness-based interventions.

Empathy, (self-)compassion, and deep, high-quality listening are core socio-emotional skills in healthcare, supporting effective communication and emotional understanding when providing care for patients across medical and therapeutical domains. However, empathy can lead to empathic distress when individuals are repeatedly exposed to others' suffering, whereas compassion is considered more protective, as it relies on altruistic and care-based motivational systems associated with positive affect and regulatory processes that buffer emotional overwhelm. Despite this distinction, empathy and compassion have not yet been systematically taught in healthcare contexts in an evidence-based manner. To address this gap, the Edu:Social Health Care phase II implements the empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo), which trains a variety of different healthcare professionals to distinguish between empathy (empathic listening), empathy regulation to avoid moving into empathic distress during the first four weeks, and (self)compassion and compassionate listening during the subsequent four weeks.

The EmCo program builds on the Affect Dyad developed in the ReSource project and the online Dyad 10-week intervention program with weekly online coachings and daily app-based Dyads implemented in the CovSocial project. The ReSource project demonstrated the effectiveness of partner-based dyadic mental training in inducing brain plasticity, while both the ReSource and CovSocial projects showed beneficial effects on reducing stress, enhancing psychological resilience, and strengthening social cohesion across multiple indicators of biopsychosocial health. Unlike the ReSource and CovSocial projects, the present program includes a novel empathy-versus-compassion listening component. Further, compared with earlier 10-week online Dyad programs, EmCo reduces the intervention duration to eight weeks, aligning with standard mindfulness-based interventions such as MBSR and MBCT and improving feasibility for implementation in healthcare and educational settings.

The present study is implemented as a non-randomized controlled trial in a sample of healthcare professionals (target N = 600). A multimethod assessment strategy will be used, including self-report validated trait and state questionnaires, behavioral computer tasks delivered at home through webapp, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods based on push-notifications by the app. These different assessments are capturing changes across mental health, resilience, social cohesion and support, social skills, coping and emotion regulation, and social behaviors (e.g., listening, attachment behaviors).

Participants assigned to the EmCo intervention group and the non-randomized waitlist control condition (nrWLC) are recruited concurrently from the same participant pool. After providing informed consent, participants will be pre-screened via a questionnaire and an interview with the intervention trainers. The allocation to empathy-compassion training group (EmCo) or non-randomized waitlist control group (nrWLC) will be based on expressed availability and indicated preference of the participants regarding the two intervention periods for the EmCo Dyad training (option 1: one in autum 2026; option 2: one beginning of 2027) as well as on certain matching criteria, such as gender, age, PHQ-9-scores, to obtain two comparable groups.

All participants will complete a pre-test (T0) assessment phase, including baseline psychometric measures, computer-based tasks, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Participants in the intervention group will then attend two onboarding sessions (Onboarding I and II) and complete an 8-week program delivered via a web and smartphone application, including daily Dyad practices and weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert mental training teachers. During this period, they will complete weekly self-reports, EMA, and daily pre-post Dyad practice ratings (DPR). The nrWLC will complete EMA and scheduled assessments during the same period. At the end of the first EmCo intervention period, all participants will complete a post-test (T1) assessment comparable to the pre-test. Following completion of the initial post-test (T1), participants in the nrWLC will start their 8-week socio-emotional Dyad intervention (EmCo). The nrWLC will complete additional post-test assessments (T2) after completion of their EmCo training.

The study constitutes Phase II of the Health Care umbrella project, extending the intervention framework previously implemented with healthcare students in Phase I (NCT07407413) to practicing healthcare professionals.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

666

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

  • Navn: Lab Manager Social Neuroscience Lab
  • Telefonnummer: +49 30 209346-180
  • E-mail: office@social.mpg.de

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Between 18- and 65-years old.
  2. Currently practicing a healthcare profession in Germany or Austria 2a. Belongs to one of the eligible state-regulated professions with legally defined independent responsibility for patient care, including diagnosis, treatment, psychotherapy, maternity care, or the overall nursing process (e.g., physician, psychotherapist, midwife, or registered nurse).

2b. Regular direct contact with patients or clients as part of the professional role (3) Proficient in German. (4) Informed consent. (5) No diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder within the past two years. (6) Stable internet access and necessary technical equipment (mobile phone with internet access).

(7) No regular contemplative practice (≤ 50 hours total within the past six months); healthy population, non-clinical population.

Exclusion Criteria:

(8) Insufficient German proficiency. (9) Lack of stable internet access or required devices (mobile phone with internet access).

(10) No informed consent. (11) Not currently practicing the profession, or working only in administrative, research, or teaching roles without patient contact.

11a. Professions are excluded if their primary role is supportive, assistive, emergency transport, preventive, counseling-focused, or based on prescribed adjunct therapies rather than independent responsibility for patient care, along with non-human-related professions. This includes, for example, nursing assistants, health psychologists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech therapists, dietitians, massage therapists, paramedics (Sanitäter), and other comparable support or adjunct roles.

11b. No regular direct patient or client contact (12) Regular contemplative practice (> 50 hours in the past six months (e.g., dyad, mindfulness, compassion-based practices).

(13) Current psychiatric diagnosis or therapy, or reaching screening cutoffs on:

  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9 ; Martin et al., 2006 ; Löwe et al., 2004 ; Cutoff ≥ 15 ; or endorsing suicidality on the item 9),
  • Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Löwe et al., 2007; Spitzer et al., 2006; Cutoff ≥ 15)
  • Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20; Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000; Cutoff ≥ 61)
  • Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; Moran et al., 2003; Söchtig et al., 2012, Cutoff ≥ 4).

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Grundvidenskab
  • Tildeling: Ikke-randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Dobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training (EmCo)
EmCo includes onboarding sessions, weekly coaching, and daily Dyad practice over 8 weeks.
  1. Participants engage in a structured 13-minute partner-based contemplative exercise. Each dyad reflects on two experiences from the previous 24 hours: one involving a difficult emotion and one involving gratitude. Partners take turns speaking while the other listens non-judgmentally. During weeks 1-4, the practice emphasizes empathic listening; during weeks 5-8, compassionate listening. Participants are instructed to attend to bodily sensations associated with the emotions described. The practice aims to improve coping with difficult emotions, empathic and compassionate listening, (self)acceptance, compassion, gratitude, resilience.
  2. Participants also attend eight 1.5-hour online group sessions led by Expert Dyad teachers. The coaching sessions help deepen the Dyad practice and educate participants about body language, coping better with difficult emotions/stress, the benefits of empathy versus compassion and the act of listening from a mindset of empathy versus compassion.
Andet: Non-randomised waitlist control group (nrWLC)
Initially, participants in the non-randomised waitlist control group will not receive the intervention and will be offered the EmCo training only after the intervention group has completed the EmCo training program.
Participants in the control group will not receive the intervention. They will complete pre- and post-test procedures consisting primarily of self-report questionnaires, and behavioral tasks, as well as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) conducted on four days within two weeks at pre-test and post-test 1 & 2.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
UCLA Ensomhedsskala (UCLA)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ved baseline (prøve) og efter 8-ugers interventionsperioden (post-test 1 & 2)
En skala, der måler ensomhedens sværhedsgrad (Döring & Bortz, 1993; Russell et al., 1980). Højere score indikerer mere ensomhed.
Vurderet ved baseline (prøve) og efter 8-ugers interventionsperioden (post-test 1 & 2)
Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ved baseline (pre-test) og efter 8-ugers interventionsperiode (post-test 1 & 2)
En skala, der måler psykologisk modstandsdygtighed (Connor & Davidson, 2003; Sarubin et al., 2015).
Højere scorer indikerer større modstandsdygtighed.
Vurderet ved baseline (pre-test) og efter 8-ugers interventionsperiode (post-test 1 & 2)
Social nærhed (IOS pr. profession)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ved baseline (pretest) og efter 8-ugers interventionsperiode (posttest 1 & 2)
En skala, der måler den følte nærhed mellem personer eller grupper/fællesskaber ved hjælp af en visuel repræsentation (Aron et al., 1992; Kinnunen & Windmann, 2013). Højere score indikerer større social nærhed.
Vurderet ved baseline (pretest) og efter 8-ugers interventionsperiode (posttest 1 & 2)
Interprofessionalism Scale (IPAS-D)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ved baseline (pretest) og efter den 8-ugers interventionsperiode (posttest 1 & 2)
En skala (Norris et al., 2015; Pedersen et al., 2020), der måler holdninger relateret til de grundlæggende kompetencer for interprofessionelt samarbejde (IPEC-rapporten, 2011). Højere score indikerer mere positive holdninger til samarbejdspraksis.
Vurderet ved baseline (pretest) og efter den 8-ugers interventionsperiode (posttest 1 & 2)
Social Support Scale (F-SozU K-6)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ved baseline (pretest) og efter den 8-ugers interventionsperiode (posttest 1 & 2)
En skala, der måler den subjektive følelse af at have støtte til rådighed (Kliem et al., 2015).
Højere score indikerer større oplevet social støtte.
Vurderet ved baseline (pretest) og efter den 8-ugers interventionsperiode (posttest 1 & 2)
Socio-Affektiv Video Opgave (SoVT)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ved baseline (prætest), efter 4 uger med empatisk lyttetræning (midterste intervention) og efter de 4 uger med medfølende lyttetræning (posttest 1 & 2)
Denne opgave vurderer adfærdsmæssig empati og medfølelse ved hjælp af følelsesmæssige videoklip (Klimecki et al., 2014). Højere score indikerer mere empati eller mere medfølelse.
Vurderet ved baseline (prætest), efter 4 uger med empatisk lyttetræning (midterste intervention) og efter de 4 uger med medfølende lyttetræning (posttest 1 & 2)
Sussex-Oxford Medfølelsesskala for Selv og Andre (SOCS)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ved baseline (pre-test), efter 4 ugers empatisk lyttetræning (midtvejsintervention) og efter de 4 ugers medfølende lyttetræning (post-test 1 & 2)
En skala, der måler selvmedfølelse (SOCS-S) og medfølelse for andre (SOCS-O; Gu et al., 2020). Højere score indikerer større medfølelse.
Vurderet ved baseline (pre-test), efter 4 ugers empatisk lyttetræning (midtvejsintervention) og efter de 4 ugers medfølende lyttetræning (post-test 1 & 2)
Stressintensitet
Tidsramme: Vurderet ved hjælp af et EMA-design med fem push-notifikationsmålinger pr. dag, fordelt over fem 3-timers intervaller, på fire dage inden for en to-ugers periode, ved for-test (baseline) og efter 8-ugers interventionsperioden (post-intervention).
Brugerdefinerede elementer baseret på Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM; Delahaye et al., 2015; Peacock & Wong, 1990), der måler stressintensitet. Højere score indikerer mere intens stress.
Vurderet ved hjælp af et EMA-design med fem push-notifikationsmålinger pr. dag, fordelt over fem 3-timers intervaller, på fire dage inden for en to-ugers periode, ved for-test (baseline) og efter 8-ugers interventionsperioden (post-intervention).
Bæredygtighedsstrategier
Tidsramme: Vurderet ved hjælp af et EMA-design med fem push-beskedmålinger om dagen, fordelt på fem 3-timers intervaller, på fire dage inden for en to-ugers periode, ved for-test (Baseline) og efter den 8-ugers interventionsperiode (efter intervention).
Tilpassede emner baseret på Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005) og Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011), der måler Copingstrategier (Accept, Positiv fortolkning, Social støtte, Ruminering, Selvbebrejdelse, Distraktion). Højere score indikerer en højere anvendelse af de specificerede copingstrategier.
Vurderet ved hjælp af et EMA-design med fem push-beskedmålinger om dagen, fordelt på fem 3-timers intervaller, på fire dage inden for en to-ugers periode, ved for-test (Baseline) og efter den 8-ugers interventionsperiode (efter intervention).
Active Empathic Listening Scale (AELS)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ved baseline (for-test), efter 4 ugers empatisk lytte-træning (midt-i-intervention) og efter de 4 ugers medfølende lytte-træning (efter-test 1 & 2)
En skala, der måler aktiv empatisk lytning (Bodie, 2011). Højere scorer indikerer mere aktiv empatisk lytning.
Vurderet ved baseline (for-test), efter 4 ugers empatisk lytte-træning (midt-i-intervention) og efter de 4 ugers medfølende lytte-træning (efter-test 1 & 2)
Tilknytningsadfærd (ASQ)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ved baseline (pretest) og efter 8-ugers interventionsperiode (posttest 1 & 2)
Et selvrapporteringsspørgeskema, der måler tilknytningsrelaterede adfærdsmønstre i mellemmenneskelige forhold, herunder nærhedssøgen, undgåelse og tryghed (Hexel, 2004). Højere scoringer indikerer mere udtalte tilknytningsrelaterede adfærdsmønstre.
Vurderet ved baseline (pretest) og efter 8-ugers interventionsperiode (posttest 1 & 2)
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)
Tidsramme: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring depression, anxiety, and stress (Henry & Crawford, 2005; Nilges & Essau, 2021). Higher scores indicate more depression, anxiety, and stress
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Maslach burnout inventory-human services survey (MBI-HSS)
Tidsramme: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring burnout (Maslach, 1996). Higher scores indicate more burnout.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Mentalization Scale (MENTS)
Tidsramme: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring the capacity of envisioning one's and others' behaviors with reference to the underlying mental states (Dimitrijević et al., 2018). Higher scores suggesting a more sophisticated capacity for mentalizing.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Prosodic Feature Pitch
Tidsramme: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature pitch (measured in Hz) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Loudness
Tidsramme: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature loudness (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Speaking Rate
Tidsramme: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature speaking rate (measured in syllables per minute) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Intonation
Tidsramme: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature intonation (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Affect Dimensions of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
Tidsramme: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Assessment of continuous affective dimensions of vocalized emotional expressions during participants' daily Dyad practice using audEERING devAIce software. The following parameters will be assessed: arousal, valence, and dominance (each ranging from -1 to 1). Based on arousal-valence scores, the following affect-quadrant values will be calculated: high-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-low-valence; and high-arousal-low valence.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Affect Categories of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
Tidsramme: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Classification of vocalized emotional expressions intro affect categories during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. The following parameters will be assessed: angry, happy, and sad, expressed as unitless values ranging from 0 to 1 representing category likelihood.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Positiv Affekt (Affektgitter) (forklarende mekanisme)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 ugers intervention
Vurdering af følelsesmæssig tilstand (valens) og opstemthed (Russell et al., 1989). Højere score på valens og opstemthed indikerer mere positiv affekt og højere opstemthed.
Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 ugers intervention
Gratitude Questionnaire-6 (GQ-5-G) (forklarende mekanisme)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
En skala, der måler taknemmelighed (Hudecek et al., 2021; McCullough et al., 2002). Højere score indikerer mere taknemmelighed.
Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
Selvvenlighedsskala (SCS-SF) (forklarende mekanisme)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
Et selvrapporteringsspørgeskema, der måler selvomsorg og medfølende holdinger over for sig selv (Hupfeld & Ruffieux, 2011; Raes et al., 2011). Højere score indikerer større selvomsorg.
Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
Positiv fortolkningsbias (ERT) (forklarende mekanisme)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ved baseline (pre-test) og efter 8-ugers interventionsperiode (post-test 1 & 2)
Denne opgave vurderer tendensen til at bedømme personers ansigtsudtryk mere positivt ved hjælp af morfede sekvenser af ansigtsudtryk (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015). Højere score indikerer en stærkere positiv fortolkningstendens.
Vurderet ved baseline (pre-test) og efter 8-ugers interventionsperiode (post-test 1 & 2)
Kort Enskalaskala (SLS) (forklarende mekanisme)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
En kort skala, der måler hyppighed, intensitet og varighed af ensomhed (Hughes et al., 2004; Qualter et al., 2021). Højere score indikerer større ensomhed.
Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
Opfattet Stress (PSS-10) (forklarende mekanisme)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
Et selvrapporteringsspørgeskema, der måler i hvilken grad situationer i ens liv vurderes som stressende (Cohen et al., 1983; Klein et al., 2016). Højere score indikerer større oplevet stress.
Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
Depression (PHQ-2) (forklarende mekanisme)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
En kort selvrapporteringsscreeningmåling, der vurderer kerne depressive symptomer, herunder depressivt humør og anhedoni (Kroenke et al., 2003). Højere score indikerer større sværhedsgrad af depressive symptomer.
Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
Empatisk Omsorg & Nød (IRI) (forklarende mekanisme)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
En skala, der måler forskellige aspekter af sociale følelser, herunder personlig nød og empatisk omsorg (Davis, 1980; Paulus, 2009). Højere score indikerer højere personlig nød eller empatisk omsorg.
Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
Tillid (KUSIV3) (forklarende mekanisme)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
Et selvrapporteringsspørgeskema, der måler generaliseret interpersonel tillid, inklusiv tillid til andres pålidelighed og integritet (Beierlein et al., 2012). Højere score indikerer større interpersonel tillid.
Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
In-gruppe-Ud-gruppe bias (ERT) (forklarende mekanisme)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ved baseline (pretest) og efter 8 ugers interventionsperiode (posttest 1 & 2)
Denne opgave vurderer tendensen til at bedømme personer fra ens egen gruppe som mere positive i ansigtsfølelsesgenkendelse ved hjælp af morfede sekvenser af ansigtsudtryk (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015).
Højere score indikerer en stærkere indgruppe-udgruppe-bias.
Vurderet ved baseline (pretest) og efter 8 ugers interventionsperiode (posttest 1 & 2)
Håndteringsstrategier (forklarende mekanisme)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
Brugerdefinerede emner baseret på Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005) og Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011), der måler Copingstrategier (Accept, Positiv fortolkning, Social støtte, Grubleri, Selvbebrejdelse, Afledning). Højere score indikerer en større anvendelse af de specificerede copingstrategier.
Vurderet ugentligt i løbet af 8 uger
DPR-Affect (Affekt Grid; forklarende mekanisme)
Tidsramme: Vurderet i 8 uger under interventionsperioden, før den daglige motion
Vurdering af følelsesmæssig tilstand (valens) og opstemthed (Russell et al., 1989) lige inden start af Dyad. Højere scoringer på valens og opstemthed indikerer mere positiv affekt og højere opstemthed.
Vurderet i 8 uger under interventionsperioden, før den daglige motion
DPR-involvering (forklarende mekanisme)
Tidsramme: Vurderet i 8 uger under interventionsperioden, kun i interventionsgruppen, efter den daglige motion
Vurdering af lytteinvolvering (1 brugerdefineret spørgsmål; kun efter-dyade-øvelse). Højere score indikerer større lytteinvolvering.
Vurderet i 8 uger under interventionsperioden, kun i interventionsgruppen, efter den daglige motion
DPR-Emotions
Tidsramme: Vurderet ugentligt fra uge 1 til uge 8, som en del af Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Følelsesintensiteter (fx glæde, taknemmelighed, sorg, vrede) vurderet af taleren og af lytteren i et par direkte efter parret.
Vurderet ugentligt fra uge 1 til uge 8, som en del af Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
DPR-Lytning-Affekt
Tidsramme: Vurderet ugentligt fra uge 1 til uge 8, efter Dyad-træningen
Brugerdefinerede elementer (selvgenererede), der måler den selvrapporterede affektive tilstand under lytning til partnerens fortælling om den vanskelige situation og den begivenhed, som de er taknemmelige for. Højere score indikerer en mere positiv affekt.
Vurderet ugentligt fra uge 1 til uge 8, efter Dyad-træningen
Dyad empatiske og medfølende lyttefærdigheder (DPR-listening-skills)
Tidsramme: Vurderet ugentligt fra uge 1 til uge 8, efter Dyad-praksis
Brugerdefinerede elementer (selvgenererede) der måler den selvrapporterede evne til at lytte empatisk og medfølende til partnerens fortælling om den vanskelige situation og den begivenhed, som de er taknemmelige for. Højere scorer indikerer henholdsvis en højere grad af empatisk eller medfølende lytning.
Vurderet ugentligt fra uge 1 til uge 8, efter Dyad-praksis
Emotion Acceptance (EAQ) (explanatory mechanism)
Tidsramme: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
A self-report questionnaire measuring emotional awareness, and acceptance of emotions (Beblo et al., 2011; Kisley et al., 2025).
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Weekly-Mentalizing items (explanatory mechanism)
Tidsramme: Assessed thrice a week during the course of 8 weeks
Two study-based items measuring the capacity to understand one's own and others' mental states (Dimitrijević et al., 2018). Higher scores indicate greater mentalizing ability.
Assessed thrice a week during the course of 8 weeks
Dyad closeness - Inclusion of Other in Self Scale (explanatory mechanism)
Tidsramme: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Assessment of how close participants felt to their Dyad partner (post-Dyad exercise). Higher scores indicate more closeness (Aron et al., 1992; Kinnunen & Windmann, 2013)
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Dyad listening quality (DPR- listening-quality)
Tidsramme: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the quality of listening to the Dyad partner. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of active, attentive listening.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice

Andre resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; forundersøgelse)
Tidsramme: Vurderet før interventionen, kun én gang, for at foretage en forhåndsundersøgelse for at udelukke personer med kliniske niveauer af depressive symptomer fra studiet
En skala til vurdering af depression (Löwe et al., 2004; Martin et al., 2006). Højere score indikerer mere depression.
Vurderet før interventionen, kun én gang, for at foretage en forhåndsundersøgelse for at udelukke personer med kliniske niveauer af depressive symptomer fra studiet
Generaliseret Angstlidelse (GAD-7; forundersøgelse)
Tidsramme: Vurderet før interventionen, kun én gang, for at forudscreeningsudelukke fra studiet personer, der har kliniske niveauer af angstsymptomer
En skala, der vurderer generaliseret angst (Spitzer et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2007).
Højere score indikerer mere angst.
Vurderet før interventionen, kun én gang, for at forudscreeningsudelukke fra studiet personer, der har kliniske niveauer af angstsymptomer
Generelle demografiske spørgsmål
Tidsramme: Vurderet før interventionen, kun én gang, for at indsamle demografiske oplysninger
Selvgenererede demografiske elementer.
Vurderet før interventionen, kun én gang, for at indsamle demografiske oplysninger
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; pre-screening)
Tidsramme: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
A scale assessing alexithymia (Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000). Higher scores indicate more alexithymia.
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; pre-screening)
Tidsramme: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms
A self-report scale used to screen personality disorders (Moran et al., 2003; Söchtig et al., 2012)
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Tania Singer, Prof. Dr., Social Neuroscience Lab, Max Planck Society
  • Ledende efterforsker: Patrick Kutschar, Ass. - Prof. Dr., Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität (PMU)
  • Ledende efterforsker: Beate Priewasser, Dr., Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität (PMU)
  • Ledende efterforsker: Antonia Dinzinger, Dr., Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität (PMU)
  • Ledende efterforsker: Philipp Beuchel, Dr., Social Neuroscience Lab, Max Planck Society
  • Ledende efterforsker: Ananda Zeas-Sigüenza, Dr., Social Neuroscience Lab, Max Planck Society

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Anslået)

31. august 2026

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

20. december 2026

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

3. april 2027

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

26. maj 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

4. juni 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

9. juni 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

9. juni 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

4. juni 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. maj 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Kontroltilstand

Kliniske forsøg med Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training (EmCo)

Abonner