Safety and Efficacy of Zemplar Capsule in Reducing Serum iPTH Levels in Chronic Kidney Disease Subjects (Three Times Weekly)

July 31, 2006 updated by: Abbott
The objective of this study is to determine whether paricalcitol is safe and effective compared to placebo in reducing elevated serum PTH levels in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
68

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Poland
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny
  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85712
        • Tucson Therapeutic Research Institute, Inc.
    • California
      • Pasadena, California, United States, 91105
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92120
        • California Institute of Renal Research
      • Tarzana, California, United States, 91356
        • Nephrology Educational Services and Research, Inc.
    • Connecticut
      • Waterbury, Connecticut, United States, 06708
        • Phoenix Internal Medicine Associates
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33143
        • Miami Kidney Group
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34232
        • ICSL Clinical Studies
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33614
        • Genesis Clinical Research Corporation
    • Illinois
      • Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60201
        • Evanston Northwestern Healthcare
    • Indiana
      • Evansville, Indiana, United States, 47714
        • Medisphere Medical Research Center
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
        • Ochsner Clinic Chronic Dialysis
    • Maryland
      • Rockville, Maryland, United States, 20852
        • Biolab Research, LLC
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • The Rogosin Institute
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45206
        • Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Kidney Associates
      • Lubbock, Texas, United States, 79430
        • Texas Tech University Health Science Center
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • University of Texas Health Science Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Under care of physician at least 2 months (for CKD)
  • Not on active Vitamin D therapy for at least 4 weeks prior

  • If female:

    • Not of childbearing potential, OR
    • Practicing birth control
    • Not breastfeeding
  • If taking phosphate binders, on a stable regimen at least 4 weeks prior

  • For entry into Pretreatment Phase:

    • iPTH at least 120 pg/mL
    • GFR of 15-60 mL/min and no dialysis expected for at least 6 months

  • For entry into Treatment Phase:

    • Average of 2 consecutive iPTH values of at least 150 pg/mL, taken at least 1 day apart (all values not less than 120 pg/mL
    • 2 consecutive corrected serum calcium levels between 8.0-10.0 mg/dL
    • 2 consecutive serum phosphorus levels of not more than 5.2 mg/mL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of allergic reaction or sensitivity to similar drugs
  • Acute Renal Failure within 12 weeks of study
  • Chronic gastrointestinal disease
  • Spot urine result demonstrating a urine-calcium-to-urine creatinine ratio of greater than 0.2, or a history of renal stones
  • Taken aluminum-containing phosphate binders within last 12 weeks, or requires such medication for more than 3 weeks during study
  • Current malignancy, or clinically significant liver disease
  • Active granulomatous disease (TB, sarcoidosis, etc.)
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse within 6 mos. prior
  • Evidence of poor compliance with diet or medication
  • Received any investigational drug or participated in any device trial within 30 days prior
  • Taking maintenance calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or drugs that may affect calcium or bone metabolism (other than females on stable estrogen and/or progestin therapy)
  • On glucocorticoids for a period of more than 14 days within the last 6 months
  • HIV positive

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
The efficacy endpoint is achievement of two consecutive > or = 30% decreases from baseline iPTH levels.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Abbott

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Laura Williams, M.D., Abbott

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2002

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 31, 2002

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 1, 2002

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 4, 2002

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 2, 2006

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 31, 2006

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2006

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2001-020

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings