Online Caregiver Psychoeducation and Support for Alzheimer's

April 7, 2015 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs

Caregiver Psychoeducation and Support: Improving Outcomes in AD/ADRD

This study is piloting an internet-based intervention to provide support for caregivers of VA patients with Alzheimer's disease or related memory difficulties (ADRD). Veterans with a clinical diagnosis of ADRD and their caregiver/relatives will be randomized to receive one of two interventions: (1) customary care (cc) and access to an intensive, interactive online education and support website intervention for 6 months, or (2) cc and monthly brief telephone calls with project staff for six month. It is hypothesized that participation in the intensive intervention will result in a reductions in patient problematic behavior and caregiver responses to it, reduced caregiver burden and depression, and improved medication adherence at the end of treatment, and more patients remaining at home through the 12 months post-randomization period..

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive brain disease resulting in cognitive and functional decline. While some pharmacological agents and behavioral programs are now available to slow the rate of decline, there is no cure. Caregivers, who typically are the female spouses or daughters of afflicted individuals, must confront both the deterioration of a loved one, and that person's need for increasingly demanding care. Caregivers tend to experience high levels of depression, anxiety, and burden. Data suggest that providing education, social support, and ongoing professional consultation to families involved in the care of a relative with AD results in improvement in caregiver psychological status, and sometimes even slows the functional decline of the patient.

Recent technological advancements in video conferencing, online communication, and streaming audio/video presentations, which are increasingly easy to use and gaining widespread acceptance among mental health professionals as well as the public, have given rise to a great deal of interest in telemedicine and telepsychiatry. This study tested an Internet-based family intervention for AD that relatives can access from their homes with ease, and at no cost. In addition to improving patient outcomes through instruction of effective behavioral management, we proposed that participation in an Internet program would also reduce caregiver depression and burden. Fifty-three veterans with a clinical diagnosis of AD and their caregiver/relatives were randomized to receive one of two interventions: (1) customary care (cc) and access to an intensive, interactive online education and support website intervention for 6 months, or (2) cc and monthly brief telephone calls with project staff for 6 months. We hypothesized that, at the end of the active intervention, participation in the intensive intervention would result reduced patient problematic behavior, caregiver burden, depression, and negative responses to problematic patient behaviors, as well as improved patient medication compliance. At 12 month follow-up, we hypothesized access to the online program would result in more patients remaining at home. The overriding longterm project objective was to develop an effective online education and support program for caregivers of patients with AD that can be manualized, replicated, and disseminated to other clinical and research centers, within both the VA health care system and the community, to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of psychosocial treatment in AD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
53

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • West Los Angeles, California, United States, 90073
        • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West LA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient living in community and ambulatory
  • Patient has diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease
  • Patient age 50-95
  • Caregiver age 18-90
  • Patient currently under treatment for Alzheimer's disease
  • Patient and caregiver reside within 2 hours of Los Angeles
  • Caregiver has home internet access
  • Patient has close contact with caregiver

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient lives in residential setting
  • No family contact
  • Acute illness or chronic disease in patient or caregiver
  • Patient or caregiver plans to leave area within the year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: caregiver website support
caregiver access to website support for 6 months embedded in one year of customary care
Behavioral: caregiver website support
caregiver access to website support for 6 months embedded in one year of customary care
Active Comparator: caregiver brief supportive phone calls
caregiver brief supportive telephone calls for 6 months embedded in one year of customary care
Behavioral: caregiver brief supportive phone calls
caregiver brief supportive telephone calls for 6 months embedded in one year of customary care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Caregiver Burden From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline to end-of-treatment (6 months)
Total score on the Zarit Short Burden Scale, a 12 item instrument that utilizes a likert scale 1-5 rating of frequency. The range is 12 (never) to 60 (nearly always) wherein higher scores are more indicative of caregiver burden.
baseline to end-of-treatment (6 months)
Change in Frequency of Patient Problematic Behavioral Patterns From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline to end of treatment (6 months)
Total Score on the Frequency of Problematic Behaviors on the Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist. The Revised Memory and Behavior Checklist is a 24 item instrument that measures the frequency of a behavior on a 0-4 likert scale wherein higher numbers indicate greater frequency. The range is 0-96.
baseline to end of treatment (6 months)
Change in Caregiver Negative Reactions to Problematic Behavioral Patterns From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline to end of treatment (6 months)
Total Score on the Negative Reactions Scale from the Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist. The scale measures the caregiver's level of reaction to a series of potential problematic behaviors on a 0-4 likert scale; higher numbers indicate a greater degree of distress. The range is 0-96.
baseline to end of treatment (6 months)
Change in Caregiver Depression From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline to end-of-treatment (6 months)
Total score on the Beck Depression Inventory. The Beck Depression Inventory is a 21 item likert scale instrument with a total range of 0 to 63. Higher scores are indicative of increased endorsement of depressive symptoms. Additionally, it utilizes a cutoff score of13 to indicate probable depression
baseline to end-of-treatment (6 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Caregiver Report of Patient Medication Adherence From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline to end-of-treatment (6 months)
Adherence to prescribed medication regimen rated by caregiver on a 1 (0%) to 5 (100%) scale. Higher scores indicate better adherence. Values in statistical table below are least square estimates, and thus may be slightly out-of-range of actual respondent choices on scale.
baseline to end-of-treatment (6 months)

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Placed in Assisted Living or Nursing Homes 12 Months From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline to end-of-follow-up (12 months from baseline)
Frequency count of individuals placed in assisted living or nursing homes
baseline to end-of-follow-up (12 months from baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
US Department of Veterans Affairs

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Theodore J. Hahn, MD, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West LA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 22, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 26, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 27, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 29, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 7, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IIR 05-107

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings