Velcade (Bortezomib), Adriamycin Dexamethasone (PAD) or Vincristine Adriamycin Dexamethasone in Second Line Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
A Phase 2, Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Velcade When Added to Adriamycin-Dexamethasone Treatment Versus Vincristine-Adriamycin-Dexamethasone Standard Treatment in Subjects With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Refractory to or Have Relapsed After Primary Therapy for Multiple Myeloma
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Zagreb, Croatia
-
-
-
-
-
Leer, Germany
-
Velbert, Germany
-
-
-
-
-
Debrecen, Hungary
-
-
-
-
-
Kaunas, Lithuania
-
Klaipeda, Lithuania
-
Vilnius, Lithuania
-
-
-
-
-
Bialystok, Poland
-
Gdansk, Poland
-
Poznan, Poland
-
-
-
-
-
Moscow, Russian Federation
-
Samara, Russian Federation
-
St Petersburg, Russian Federation
-
-
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey
-
Bursa, Turkey
-
Eskisehir, Turkey
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma following 1 previous line of therapy and, is scheduled by the investigator to be treated with vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone standard therapy
- measurable secretory multiple myeloma based on defined criteria
- Karnofsky performance status of >or = 60%
- fulfils defined laboratory requirements within 14 days before baseline
- if female, the patient is either postmenopausal or surgically sterilised or willing to use an acceptable method of birth control for defined period of time
- if male, the patient agrees to use an acceptable barrier method for contraception for a defined period of time.
Exclusion Criteria:
- More than one previous line of therapy for multiple myeloma
- use of bortezomib in the previous line of therapy and/or received bortezomib in a previous trial
- known allergy or hypersensitivity to bortezomib, boron or mannitol
- peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain of grade 2 or higher
- myocardial infarction within 6 months of enrollment or had New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, or electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia or active conduction system abnormalities.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: VAD Treatment
vincristine in combination with adriamycin and dexamethasone
|
adriamycin: 9mg/m² intravenous (IV) push on days 1 to 4
dexamethasone: 40 mg daily days 1- 4/9-12/17-20 - cycle 1 / days 1-4/17-20 - subsequent cycle
vincristine: 0.4mg IV push on days 1 to 4
|
|
Experimental: PAD Treatment
bortezomib in combination with adriamycin and dexamethasone
|
adriamycin: 9mg/m² intravenous (IV) push on days 1 to 4
dexamethasone: 40 mg daily days 1- 4/9-12/17-20 - cycle 1 / days 1-4/17-20 - subsequent cycle
bortezomib: 1.3 mg/m² intravenous (IV) bolus on days 1, 4, 8, and 11
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Best Confirmed Disease Response
Time Frame: every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles
|
The primary efficacy analysis was based on the best response obtained during the treatment period according to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria as assessed by the investigator.
The best confirmed response was defined as 2 separate and consecutive evaluations of response, at least 6 weeks apart (for progressive disease [PD], 1 to 3 weeks apart).
The ordering of the responses was: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), no change (NC) and PD.
CR was the best response and the poorest response was PD.
|
every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles
|
|
Best Reported Disease Response
Time Frame: every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles
|
The primary efficacy analysis was based on the best response obtained during the treatment period according to the EBMT criteria as assessed by the investigator.
The ordering of the responses was: CR, PR, MR, NC and PD.
CR was the best response and the poorest response was PD.
|
every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles
|
DOR was defined as the duration from the date of the best confirmed response for subjects who achieved CR or PR to the date of first documented evidence of PD (or relapse for subjects who experienced CR) over the duration of the study.
DOR = ([Date of PD or date of censoring - Date of best response]+1)/30.44.
|
every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Neoplasms
- Lymphoproliferative Disorders
- Immunoproliferative Disorders
- Hematologic Diseases
- Hemorrhagic Disorders
- Hemostatic Disorders
- Paraproteinemias
- Blood Protein Disorders
- Multiple Myeloma
- Neoplasms, Plasma Cell
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Tubulin Modulators
- Antimitotic Agents
- Mitosis Modulators
- Antiemetics
- Gastrointestinal Agents
- Glucocorticoids
- Hormones
- Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
- Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
- Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
- Topoisomerase II Inhibitors
- Topoisomerase Inhibitors
- Antibiotics, Antineoplastic
- Dexamethasone
- Bortezomib
- Doxorubicin
- Liposomal doxorubicin
- Vincristine
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CR011065
- 26866138MMY2038 (Other Identifier: Janssen-Cilag International NV)
- 2006-001709-27 (EudraCT Number)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.