A Trial Comparing Moxifloxacin Versus Levofloxacin Plus Metronidazole In Uncomplicated Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

September 2, 2014 updated by: Bayer

A Prospective, Randomized, Double Dummy, Double Blind, Multi-center Multinational Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Moxifloxacin 400 mg PO QD 24 Hours for 14 Days to That of Levofloxacin 500 mg PO QD 24 Hours Plus Metronidazole 500 mg BID for 14 Days in Subjects With an Uncomplicated Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID). Moxifloxacin, Metronidazole, and Levofloxacin in Asia (MONALISA Study)

To assess the efficacy and safety of oral moxifloxacin compared to oral levofloxacin plus oral metronidazole in uncomplicated pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
460

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China, 100083
      • Beijing, China, 100034
      • Chongqing, China, 400010
      • Shanghai, China, 200011
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110004
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
  • Indonesia
      • Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 133792
  • Pakistan
      • Karachi, Pakistan
  • Philippines
      • Manila, Philippines
  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 10002
      • Taizung, Taiwan, 402
  • Thailand
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10700

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of uncomplicated PID based on the absence of pelvic or tubo-ovarian abscess at pelvic ultrasound and/or laparoscopic examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with impaired liver and renal function; known hypersensitivity to study drugs, related compounds or any of the excipients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Moxifloxacin
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) 400 mg by mouth (PO) once daily for 14 days
Drug: Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) 400 mg by mouth (PO) once daily for 14 days
Active Comparator: Levofloxacin plus Metronidazole
Levofloxacin 500 mg by mouth (PO) once daily for 14 days plus Metronidazole 500 mg (PO) twice daily for 14 days
Drug: Levofloxacin & Metronidazole
Levofloxacin 500 mg by mouth (PO) once daily for 14 days plus Metronidazole 500 mg (PO) twice daily for 14 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Response 7 to 14 Days After Completion of Study Drug Therapy in Per Protocol (PP) Population
Time Frame: 7 - 14 days after completion of study drug therapy
Clinical cure was defined as: Reduction of the tenderness score (modified McCormack) by > 70% and apyrexia (rectal/tympanic/oral temperature value < 38.0°C or axillary temperature value < 37.5°C) and white blood cell count < 10,500/mm^3.
7 - 14 days after completion of study drug therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Response 7 to 14 Days After Completion of Study Drug Therapy on Intent To Treat (ITT) Population
Time Frame: 7 - 14 days after completion of study drug therapy
For any subject in the ITT population also valid for the PP analysis, same clinical response as in the PP analysis was applied to the ITT analysis. For those subjects in the ITT population invalid for the PP analysis, any clinical response different from clinical cure was set to "non-success".
7 - 14 days after completion of study drug therapy
Clinical Response on Treatment for Per Protocol Population
Time Frame: 4 - 7 days after start of therapy
At the During Therapy (Day 4 to 7) assessment, the clinical response was graded as clinical Improvement (severity score reduced by >30% with improvement in temperature, clinical failure (reduction in severity score of < or equal 30% and/or no improvement in temperature) or indeterminate (clinical assessment not possible to determine).
4 - 7 days after start of therapy
Clinical Response on Treatment for Intent To Treat Population
Time Frame: 4 - 7 days after start of therapy
Clinical response during treatment was analyzed exploratively in the same way as the primary efficacy variable. At the During Therapy (Day 4 to 7) assessment, the clinical response was graded as clinical Improvement, clinical failure or indeterminate accordingly. Clinical improvement was considered success, all other outcomes as non-success.
4 - 7 days after start of therapy
Bacteriological Response at Test Of Cure (TOC) Visit Microbiologically Valid
Time Frame: 7 - 14 days at TOC visit
The bacteriological responses was based on the results of appropriate cultures taken before and, if necessary, during treatment, at the TOC visit and within the follow-up period. Bacteriological response at the TOC visit would also be based on repeated PCR tests for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis.
7 - 14 days at TOC visit
Bacteriological Response at Test Of Cure (TOC) Visit in Intent To Treat Population With Causative Organism
Time Frame: 7 - 14 days at TOC visit
Bacteriological response at the TOC was analyzed exploratively in the same way as the primary efficacy variable based on the subgroup of microbiologically valid subjects. At the TOC visit, eradication was considered a bacteriological success, and persistence, presumed persistence and superinfection were considered bacteriological failures.
7 - 14 days at TOC visit
Clinical Response at Follow-up Visit on Per Protocol Population
Time Frame: 28 - 42 days after completion of study drug therapy
Clinical response at follow up was analyzed exploratively in the same way as the primary efficacy variable. At Follow-up, the clinical response was graded as continued cure, clinical relapse, or indeterminate, of which only continued cure was considered success. Failures from end of treatment were carried forward.
28 - 42 days after completion of study drug therapy
Clinical Response at Follow-up Visit on Intent To Treat Population
Time Frame: 28 - 42 days after completion of study drug therapy
All successfully treated subjects and subjects evaluated as"indeterminate" at TOC, who were not administered an additional antibiotic therapy would have their clinical response rate assessed at the follow-up visit. Patients with missing or indeterminate outcome were treated as non-successes.
28 - 42 days after completion of study drug therapy
Bacteriological Response at Follow-up Visit Microbiologically Valid
Time Frame: 28 - 42 days after completion of study drug therapy
Subjects with at least one causative organism identified in the pre-therapy culture or a positive pre-therapy PCR result and an appropriate post-therapy bacteriological evaluation available were analyzed. Bacteriological responses at follow-up visit was analyzed exploratively in the same way as the primary efficacy variable.
28 - 42 days after completion of study drug therapy
Bacteriological Response at Follow-up Visit in Intent To Treat Population With Causative Organism
Time Frame: 28 - 42 days after completion of study drug therapy
Subjects with at least one causative organism identified in the pre-therapy culture or a positive pre-therapy PCR result and an appropriate post-therapy bacteriological evaluation available were analyzed. Bacteriological responses at follow-up visit was analyzed exploratively in the same way as the primary efficacy variable.
28 - 42 days after completion of study drug therapy
Number of Subjects Who Received Alternative Medicine
Time Frame: Up to 42 days after end of treatment
As alternative medicine any systemic antibacterial medication was considered.
Up to 42 days after end of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bayer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 27, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 27, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 28, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 8, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 2, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 11981
  • 2006-000874-56 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings