Omega 3 Fatty Acids in the Treatment of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

January 7, 2021 updated by: Sherie Novotny, M.D., University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey

Published studies on omega 3 fatty acids in the treatment of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia have shown reductions in time to recurrence, a decrease in the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and improvements in Clinical Global Impression Scale, Young Mania Rating Scale, and HAM-D scores. The following are the hypotheses:

  • Omega 3 fatty acids will be superior to placebo in the acute treatment of global autism.
  • Omega 3 fatty acids will be superior to placebo in improving aggression and irritability associated with autism.
  • Omega 3 fatty acids will be superior to placebo in improving functional ability.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is an innovative treatment approach to autism. It adapts a promising adjunct therapy for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia to a new population, that of children and adolescents with autism. It will analyze the possible relationship between dosage of omega 3 fatty acids and treatment outcomes. Finally, it will attempt to identify which specific subgroups of subjects will respond to this intervention, which components and associated features are most responsive and whether this impacts subjects' quality of life. The data generated by this study is intended to support the rationale for a full scale, large multi-site clinical trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
17

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New Jersey
      • Piscataway, New Jersey, United States, 08854
        • University Behavioral Health Care Building, UMDNJ-RWJMS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 17 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child/Teen has autism.
  • He/She is between five and seventeen years of age.
  • He/She is not in the hospital.
  • He/She has a parent or legal guardian who is willing and able to sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child/Teen has been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder (such as schizophrenia) or a mood disorder, including depression or bipolar disorder (manic depression).
  • He/She has caused visible harm to him/herself or is at risk for suicide.
  • He/She has an active seizure disorder or epilepsy (seizures within the past year).
  • He/She has an unstable medical illness, including heart disease.
  • He/She has experienced brain injury.
  • He/She has a history of diabetes.
  • He/She has a history of prior treatment with Omega 3 Fatty Acids.
  • He/She lives in a far away area and/or does not have regular access to transportation to the clinical facility.
  • A pregnant female or unwilling to use acceptable contraception if sexually active.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Omega 3 fatty Acids, drug
Omega 3 Fatty acids will be dispensed to subjects in the active experimental group of the study.
Drug: Omega 3 fatty acids
The study will start with low doses and based on the weight of the individual the dosage will be increased biweekly.
Other Names:
  • DHA and EPA
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
The placebo will be dispensed to subjects in the control group
Other: Placebo
Same dosage as that of omega 3 fatty acids

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impression Scale(CGI)- Improvement
Time Frame: Administered biweekly, endpoint score (week 12) only used for data analysis
This scale measures the impression of improvement as assessed from interviewing the subject and informant.The scale is measured with numbers from 0 through 7 with 0 not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse. Units = scores on a scale.
Administered biweekly, endpoint score (week 12) only used for data analysis
Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)
Time Frame: Administered every 4 weeks, 12 week scores used for means, score on irritability subscale reported
Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)-Community Version (Irritability Subscale) (Aman et al. 1985). It is designed to objectively identify five behavior subscales through observation by the primary caregiver. The five behavior subscales include (ranges show no problem to severe problem): irritability (range 0-45), lethargy (range 0-48), stereotypy (range 0-21), hyperactivity range 0-48), and inappropriate speech (range 0-12), all possible signs and symptoms of affective instability in autistic individuals (Lainhart & Folstein, 1994). Improvement is shown with scores decreasing over time. Total score is not used. Inter-rater reliability for the ABC-CV is moderate to high across subscales with a mean of .63. Test-retest reliability correlations are .98 -Irritability, .99 -Lethargy, .98 -Stereotypy, .98 -Hyperactivity, and .96 -Inappropriate Speech. The ABC will be filled out by an informant (teacher/parent), and then reviewed by the IE. Administration time is approximately 10 minutes.
Administered every 4 weeks, 12 week scores used for means, score on irritability subscale reported
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale
Time Frame: Administered during the baseline visit and on week 12 ( termination)
The Vineland Scale is a semi-structured informant interview that assesses subjects' functioning. It is administered to a caretaker/family member. The scale has been revised and standardized in all populations. This scale has been found to assess social deficits in autism and strengths in daily living skills. Items are classified under four major adaptive domains: communication, daily living skills, socialization and motor skills. The items are scored 0-2 (yes/sometimes/never). Each domain is summed, and the domain scores are converted to standardized scores. The normative score is 100, with standard deviation of 15. The standardized score is used in this study. A higher score (above 100) means better adaptive behavior. Minimum value is 0, maximum value is infinity.
Administered during the baseline visit and on week 12 ( termination)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overt Aggression Scale-Modified
Time Frame: Administered biweekly and at week 12 (termination)
The Modified version, Coccaro et al. is designed for outpatient use and assessment of behavior over one week. This scale was assessed biweekly. The OAS-M consists of 3 domains: Aggression, Irritability, and Suicidality (not used). Aggression Domain: 4 subscales of weighted behavior: Verbal Aggression (1), Aggression Against Objects (2), Aggression Against Others (3), and Self-Aggression (4). Within each category, severity of an event receives a scaled score (0-5) (higher score for worse behaviors) which is then multiplied by the weekly frequency of this event and weight, then totaled (for use in this study). Irritability subscale is divided into subjective/objective, 0 (low)-5 (high). The total scale has a minimum value of 0 (no display of aggressive/irritable behavior) and a maximum value of infinity (worse aggressive/irritable behavior) as reporting the number of times an aggressive/irritable behavior occurred does not have a maximum value). Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Administered biweekly and at week 12 (termination)
Parental Stress Index
Time Frame: Administered during the baseline visit and on week 12 ( termination)
This measurement assesses child and parental characteristics and parent-child relationship dimensions associated with the presence of parenting stress/ troubled relationships. It is a self-report scale completed by the parent, consisting of 101 items organized into two domains with the following subscales: (1) child characteristics domain - adaptability, demandingness, mood, distractibility/hyperactivity, acceptability of child to parent, and child's reinforcement of parent, and (2) parent characteristics domain - depression, attachment to child, social isolation, sense of competence in the parenting role, relationship with spouse/parenting partner, role restrictions, and parental health. Scores are 1-5 with 1 being strongly agree and 5 being strongly disagree. Scores are collected and standardized. The higher a score is, the more stress a parent is experiencing. Minimum value is 101 and maximum value is 505.
Administered during the baseline visit and on week 12 ( termination)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sherie L. Novotny, MD, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Amminger GP, Berger GE, Schafer MR, Klier C, Friedrich MH, Feucht M. Omega-3 Fatty Acids Supplementation in Children with Autism. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Aug 22 Harel Z, Gascon G, Riggs S, Vaz R, Brown W, Exil G. Supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in the management of recurrent migraines in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2002 Aug;31(2):154-61. Itomura M, Hamazaki K, Sawazaki S, Kobayashi M, Terasawa K, Watanabe S, Hamazaki T. The effect of fish oil on physical aggression in schoolchildren. J Nutr Biochem. 2005 Mar;16(3):163-71. Mitchell EA, Aman MG, Turbott SH, Manku M. Clinical characteristics and serum essential fatty acid levels in hyperactive children. Clin Pediatr 1987; 26:406-11. Nemets H, Nemets B, Apter A, Bracha Z, Belmaker RH Omega-3 treatment of childhood depression: Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;163(6):1098-100. Richardson AJ, Montgomery P. The Oxford-Durham study. Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):1360-6.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 27, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 30, 2007

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 1, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 7, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0220060238
  • 5R21AT002927 (NIH)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan at this time.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings