Study Investigating Rapamune For Post-Marketing Surveillance

November 21, 2016 updated by: Pfizer

Post Marketing Surveillance Study To Observe Safety And Efficacy Of Rapamune

To provide safety and effectiveness information for Rapamune during the post-marketing period as required by Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA) regulations in order to identify any potential drug related treatment factors in the Korean population, such as:

  1. Unknown adverse reactions, especially serious adverse reactions
  2. To assess the incidence of adverse reactions under the routine drug uses
  3. Factors that may affect the safety of the drug (e.g., proteinuria)
  4. Factors that may affect the effectiveness of the drug

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

All patients who receive Rapamune for certain period of time should be included as far as patients consent to participate

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
209

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 705-717
        • Yeungnam University Medical Center
      • Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 480-717
        • The Catholic University of Korea Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital
      • Pusan, Korea, Republic of, 600-730
        • Maryknoll Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-710
        • Samsung Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
        • Asan Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 143-729
        • Konkuk University Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 136-705
        • Korea University Anam Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 134-814
        • Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 137-701
        • The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-720
        • Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
        • Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who receive Rapamune after kidney transplantation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects aged 13 years or older receiving renal transplants, who are newly administered Rapamune after a contract is made between Pfizer Korea and an investigator and/or an institution for conducting this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient who does not agree that Pfizer and companies working with Pfizer use his/her information.
  • Patients who have known hypersensitivity to Rapamune or its derivatives or any excipients in the formulation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Rapamune
Drug: sirolimus
Dosage and treatment duration will be decided by physician's discretion considering patient's clinical situations
Other Names:
  • Rapamune

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)/Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), Serious AEs (SAEs)/Serious ADRs (SADRs), Unexpected AEs/ADRs, and Unexpected SAEs/SADRs
Time Frame: Six months (±1 month) after initiating Rapamune administration or until completion of Rapamune administration, whichever was earlier.
All AEs reported after the start of administration of Rapamune were considered as treatment-emergent AEs and summarized. All AEs, except for those with causal relationship to the study drug assessed as "unlikely", were considered as AEs whose causal relationship to the study drug could not be excluded and classified as ADRs. Unexpected AEs/ADRs were classified by medical review with reference to the local product document and confirmed by Pfizer.
Six months (±1 month) after initiating Rapamune administration or until completion of Rapamune administration, whichever was earlier.
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significent Abnormal Laboratory Test
Time Frame: Six months (±1 month) after initiating Rapamune administration or until completion of Rapamune administration, whichever was earlier.
Laboratory test was not mandatory because this study was a non-interventional study.
Six months (±1 month) after initiating Rapamune administration or until completion of Rapamune administration, whichever was earlier.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-Confirmed Acute Rejection Using Banff 09 Diagnostic Categories for Renal Allograft Biopsies
Time Frame: At 6 months (±1 month) after initiating Rapamune administration or at the time of completion of Rapamune administration, whichever was earlier.
Renal biopsy was required to confirm the diagnosis of acute rejection. However, due to the non-interventional nature of this study, biopsy could not be mandatory. The decision of whether to perform a biopsy was made at the discretion of the investigator and the result was collected if performed.
At 6 months (±1 month) after initiating Rapamune administration or at the time of completion of Rapamune administration, whichever was earlier.
Percentage of Participants Alive
Time Frame: At 6 months (±1 month) after initiating Rapamune administration or at the time of completion of Rapamune administration, whichever was earlier.
The investigator recorded the participant's survival status and evaluation date on the CRF.
At 6 months (±1 month) after initiating Rapamune administration or at the time of completion of Rapamune administration, whichever was earlier.
Percentage of Participants With Survived Graft
Time Frame: At 6 months (±1 month) after initiating Rapamune administration or at the time of completion of Rapamune administration, whichever was earlier.
Graft survival was defined as not showing graft loss at the time of evaluation.
At 6 months (±1 month) after initiating Rapamune administration or at the time of completion of Rapamune administration, whichever was earlier.
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Calculated by Nankivell Formula
Time Frame: At 6 months (±1 month) after initiating Rapamune administration or at the time of completion of Rapamune administration, whichever was earlier.
Graft function was evaluated by eGFR using Nankivell formula. The investigator recorded the date of evaluation and the calculated value on the CRF.
At 6 months (±1 month) after initiating Rapamune administration or at the time of completion of Rapamune administration, whichever was earlier.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 7, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 7, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 8, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 16, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 21, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0468X1-4411
  • B1741015 (Other Identifier: Alias Study Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings