Benefits of Switching Antidepressants Following Early Nonresponse

September 26, 2009 updated by: Oizumi Hospital

Prospective 24-week Study, Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Switching Antidepressants and Maintaining the Same Antidepressant in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Who do Not Show a 20% Reduction in Symptoms at Week 2

Introduction and Purpose:

Most of the guidelines for the treatment of major depression recommend the use of antidepressants for 4 to 8 weeks. On the other hand, it has been recently reported that they start to show their antidepressant efficacy within a couple of weeks (1,2), contrary to the conventional theory. In addition, a good response (i.e. a 20% reduction in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) at week 2 is proposed to be a predictor of subsequent remission at week 6 (3,4), while nonresponse at week 2 could predict unfavourable outcome at week 8 (5). Furthermore, early worsening is suggested to be related to a low rate of remission at weeks 8 and 12(6).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To the researchers' knowledge, there is no report to prospectively examine the benefits of switching antidepressants following early nonresponse. In this prospective 24-week study, the researchers will compare clinical outcomes between switching antidepressants and maintaining the same antidepressant in patients with major depressive disorder who do not show a 20% reduction in symptoms at week 2.

Materials and Methods: This open-label 24-week randomized controlled trial will be performed at psychiatric hospitals in Tokyo, Japan.

This study will be conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of each participating hospital, and written informed consent will be obtained from all of the participants after providing a full explanation about the study.

In the short-term acute phase, sertraline will be initiated at 25 mg, increased to 50 mg on day 3, and maintained until day 14. If patients show an early response (i.e. ≧ 20% improvement in the MADRS total score from baseline), sertraline will be continued and titrated at 50 - 100 mg based on clinical judgment. On the other hand, if patients show no early response, they will be randomly divided into two groups. In one group, sertraline will be continued and titrated at 50 - 100 mg, whereas in the other group sertraline will be switched to paroxetine. Paroxetine will be started at 10 mg on days 15 and 16, increased to 20 mg on day 17, and further increased weekly by 10 mg from week 4 (i.e. day 22), while sertraline will be tapered by 25 mg each on days 15 and 16. In case patients are intolerant to adverse events, or they achieve remission (i.e. the MADRS total score ≦ 8), increasing the dose will be terminated. Lorazepam, lormetazepam, and mosapride will be allowed on a p.r.n. basis.

In the long-term follow-up phase after week 8, patients who achieve remission or response will be followed up and the same dose will be administered throughout. Assessments will include the MADRS, the clinical global impression scale (CGI), and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology self-reported (QIDS-SR) (weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24). Adverse events will also be monitored on every visit.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Japan
    • Tokyo
      • 6-9-1 Oizumigakuen-cho, Nerima-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 178-061
        • Recruiting
        • Oizumi Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Shinichiro Nakajima, M.D.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Shinichiro Nakajima, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Inpatients and outpatients who meet the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria of major depression disorder (MDD)
  2. Have not taken antidepressants for the previous one month
  3. Do not have emergent suicidal ideation defined as a score of 4 or less on suicidal thoughts item in the MADRS.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Unstable physical illness or clinically significant neurological disorder
  2. Having emergent suicidal idea defined as a score of 5 or more on the suicidal thoughts item in the MADRS.
  3. Having history of non-response or intolerance to paroxetine or sertraline.

This study will be conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of each participating hospital, and written informed consent will be obtained from all of the participants after providing a full explanation of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Arm-1
Sertraline to Paroxetine
Drug: Sertraline to Paroxetine
For subjects enrolled in this arm, sertraline will be initiated at 25mg, increased to 50mg on day 3, and maintained until day 14. If subjects show an early response (i.e. a 20% improvement in the MADRS total score from baseline) at week 2, sertraline will be continued and titrated at 50 - 100mg based on clinical judgment. On the other hand, if subjects fail to show an early response at week 2, they will be randomly divided into two groups. In one group, sertraline will be continued and titrated at 50 - 100mg, whereas in the other group sertraline will be switched to paroxetine. In this switching group, paroxetine will be started at 10mg on days 15 and 16, increased to 20mg on day 17, and further increased to 40mg by a weekly 10mg increase, while sertraline will be dosed at 25mg on day 15 and terminated on day 16.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 2
Paroxetine to Sertraline
Drug: Paroxetine to Sertraline
Paroxetine will be initiated at 10mg, increased to 20mg on day 3, and maintained until day 14. If subjects show an early response (i.e. a 20% improvement in the MADRS total score from baseline) at week 2, paroxetine will be continued and titrated at 20 - 40mg based on clinical judgment. On the other hand, if subjects fail to show an early response at week 2, they will be randomly divided into two groups. In one group, paroxetine will be continued and titrated at 20 - 40mg, whereas in the other group paroxetine will be switched to sertraline. In this switching group, sertraline will be started at 25mg on days 15 and 16, increased to 50mg on day 17, and further increased to 100mg by a weekly 25mg increase, while paroxetine will be dosed at 10mg on day 15 and terminated on day 16.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: at weeks1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 48 - 52.
at weeks1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 48 - 52.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The Clinical Global Impression 2. The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology self-reported
Time Frame: at weeks1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 48 - 52.
at weeks1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 48 - 52.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Oizumi Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Shinichiro Nakajima, M.D., Oizumi Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2010

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 20, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 20, 2007

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 21, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 28, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 26, 2009

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 19760629

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Sertraline to Paroxetine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings