Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Denosumab in the Treatment of Osteoporosis
An Open Label, Single Arm, Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Sustained Efficacy of Denosumab (AMG162) in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Postmenopausal women who have attended the 20030216 (NCT00089791) study month 36 visit will be eligible to participate if they meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria given below.
Inclusion Criteria
- Subjects must sign the informed consent before any study specific procedures are performed and agree to receive denosumab 60 mg subcutaneous injection every 6 months
- Subjects must not have discontinued investigational product during the 20030216 study and must have attended the 20030216 study month 36 visit
- Subjects must be re-consented prior to (or at) the 24 month visit for participation beyond month 24.
Exclusion Criteria
- Permanently non-ambulatory subjects (use of an assistive device eg, cane, walker, etc. is permitted)
- Missed 2 or more investigational product doses during the 20030216 study
- Any disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or comply with study procedures
- Developed sensitivity to mammalian cell derived drug products during the 20030216 study
- Unable to tolerate calcium supplementation during the last 6 months of participation in the 20030216 study (between the month 30 and month 36 20030216 study visits)
- Currently receiving any investigational product other than denosumab or having received any investigational product during the 20030216 study
- Current use of the following osteoporosis agents: bisphosphonates, calcitonin, fluoride, parathyroid hormone, selective estrogen receptor modulators, systemic oral or transdermal estrogen (except vaginal preparations and estrogen creams which are acceptable), strontium, or tibolone
- For bone biopsy sub-study subjects only: known or suspected sensitivity or contraindication to tetracycline derivatives
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Denosumab
Participants received a 60 mg subcutaneous injection of denosumab every 6 months for seven years.
|
Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 6 months.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: 84 months
|
A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an adverse event that: • is fatal • is life threatening • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • is other significant medical hazard.
Treatment-related adverse events includes only events for which the investigator indicated there was a reasonable possibility they may have been caused by study drug.
The following were classified as adverse events of interest (events that are considered to be identified or potential risks of denosumab treatment): positively adjudicated osteonecrosis of the jaw, positively adjudicated atypical femoral fracture, hypocalcemia, adverse events potentially related to hypersensitivity, serious infection (including bacterial cellulitis), malignancy, cardiac disorders, vascular disorders, fracture healing complications, eczema, acute pancreatitis, and musculoskeletal pain.
|
84 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Toxicities of Grade ≥ 3
Time Frame: 84 months
|
Laboratory toxicity grading was based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0.
Grade 3 indicates severe toxicity and Grade 4 indicates life-threatening toxicity.
|
84 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Antibodies to Denosumab
Time Frame: Every 12 months through Month 84
|
Every 12 months through Month 84
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
|
Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center.
|
Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
|
Total hip bone mineral density was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center.
|
Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
|
Femoral neck bone mineral density was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center.
|
Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in 1/3 Radius Bone Mineral Density by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
|
1/3 radius bone mineral density was measured in a subset of participants by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center.
|
Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
|
|
Percent Change From Study 20030216 Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density by Visit
Time Frame: Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
|
Lumbar spine bone mineral density was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center.
Measurements at some time points during the core study 20030216 were only taken in a subset of participants.
|
Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
|
|
Percent Change From Study 20030216 Baseline in Total Hip BMD by Visit
Time Frame: Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
|
Total hip bone mineral density was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center.
Measurements at some time points during the core study 20030216 were only taken in a subset of participants.
|
Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
|
|
Percent Change From Study 20030216 Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD by Visit
Time Frame: Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
|
Femoral neck bone mineral density was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center.
Measurements at some time points during the core study 20030216 were only taken in a subset of participants.
|
Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
|
|
Percent Change From Study 20030216 Baseline in 1/3 Radius BMD by Visit
Time Frame: Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84
|
1/3 radius BMD was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center.
Measurements at some time points during the core study 20030216 were only taken in a subset of participants.
|
Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84
|
|
Number of Participants With New Vertebral Fractures
Time Frame: 84 months
|
A new vertebral fracture, assessed by lateral spine X-ray using Genant semiquantitative scoring method, was identified as an ≥ 1 grade increase from the previous grade of 0 in any vertebra from T4 to L4, excluding any fracture associated with high trauma severity or a pathologic fracture.
|
84 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fractures
Time Frame: 84 months
|
Non-vertebral fractures (osteoporotic) were defined as a fracture present on a copy of radiographs or other diagnostic images such as computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirming the fracture, and/or documented in a copy of the radiology report, surgical report, or discharge summary, excluding skull, facial, mandible, cervical vertebrae, thoracic vertebrae, lumbar vertebrae, metacarpus, finger phalanges, and toe phalanges.
In addition, fractures associated with high trauma severity or pathologic fractures were excluded.
|
84 months
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in C-Telopeptide 1 (CTX-1) by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (of extension study), day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
|
Bone turnover markers were collected in a subset of participants who participated in the 20030216 Bone Marker sub-study and in new participants continuing beyond month 24 who were not previously in the Bone Turnover Markers sub-study.
|
Baseline (of extension study), day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 N-telopeptide (P1NP) by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (of extension study), day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
|
Bone turnover markers were collected in a subset of participants who participated in the 20030216 Bone Marker sub-study and in new sparticipants continuing beyond month 24 who were not previously in the Bone Turnover Markers sub-study.
|
Baseline (of extension study), day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
|
|
Percent Change From Study 20030216 Baseline in CTX-1 by Visit
Time Frame: Study 20030216 Baseline and extension study day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
|
Bone turnover markers were collected in a subset of participants who participated in the 20030216 Bone Marker sub-study and in new participants continuing beyond month 24 who were not previously in the Bone Turnover Markers sub-study.
|
Study 20030216 Baseline and extension study day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
|
|
Percent Change From Study 20030216 Baseline in P1NP by Visit
Time Frame: Study 20030216 Baseline and extension study day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
|
Bone turnover markers were collected in a subset of participants who participated in the 20030216 Bone Marker sub-study and in new participants continuing beyond month 24 who were not previously in the Bone Turnover Markers sub-study.
|
Study 20030216 Baseline and extension study day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Albumin-adjusted Serum Calcium at Day 10
Time Frame: Baseline (of extension study) and day 10
|
Baseline (of extension study) and day 10
|
|
|
Serum Denosumab Concentration
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-dose in extension study), day 10, and Months 3, 4 and 6 (pre-dose)
|
Serum concentrations of denosumab were measured by a validated conventional sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.8 ng/mL.
Values of 0 in the table below indicate data below the lower limit of quantification.
|
Baseline (pre-dose in extension study), day 10, and Months 3, 4 and 6 (pre-dose)
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Cancellous Bone Volume
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.
Cancellous (trabecular) bone volume is the percent of the total marrow cavity that is occupied by cancellous bone (both mineralized and non-mineralized) measured by quantitative histomorphometry.
|
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Trabecular Number
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.
Trabecular number is the number of trabeculae present per lineal mm and is calculated as trabecular bone volume/trabecular thickness.
Trabecular number is a measure of trabecular connectivity and decreases with bone loss.
|
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Trabecular Separation
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.
Trabecular separation is the mean distance between trabeculae (measured by integrated computer graphics).
Trabecular separation increases with trabecular bone loss.
|
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Trabecular Thickness
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.
Mean trabecular thickness is a measure of trabecular structure and is calculated as the reciprocal of total bone (trabecular) surfaces.
Trabecular thickness is reduced by aging and osteoporosis.
|
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Cortical Width
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.
Cortical width is the average width of both inner and outer cortices.
|
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Cancellous Bone Volume by TRAP Histomorphometry
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.
Cancellous (trabecular) bone volume is the percent of the total marrow cavity that is occupied by cancellous bone (both mineralized and non-mineralized) measured by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining histomorphometry.
|
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Surface Density
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.
Surface density is calculated by total bone (trabecular) surfaces / total tissue volume.
|
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoblast - Osteoid Interface
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.
Osteoblast - osteoid interface is calculated as osteoblast surface / osteoid surface * 100.
|
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoid Surface
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.
Osteoid surface is the percent of bone surface covered in osteoid.
|
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoid Thickness
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.
Osteoid thickness (width) is the mean thickness of osteoid seams on cancellous surfaces.
Osteoid thickness is normally <12.5 µm.
Increased osteoid thickness suggests abnormal mineralization (osteomalacia).
|
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Wall Thickness
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.
Wall thickness is the average thickness of trabecular bone structural units (BSU) and is used to assess the overall balance between resorption and formation.
|
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Eroded Surface/Bone Surface
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Eroded surface/bone surface is the percentage of bone surface occupied by eroded (resorption) cavities (Howships lacunae), with or without osteoclasts. |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoclast Number - Length Based
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Osteoclast number was measured by quantitative histomorphometry and is expressed per mm of bone. |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoclast Number - Surface Based
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Osteoclast number was measured by quantitative histomorphometry and is expressed per 100 mm of bone surface area. |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoclast Number by TRAP - Length Based
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Osteoclast number was measured using TRAP staining and is expressed per mm of bone. |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoclast Number by TRAP - Surface Based
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Osteoclast number was measured using TRAP staining and is expressed per 100 mm of bone surface. Da |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Single-label Surface
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. A single label is deposited if formation either started or ended during the interval between the uses of the two courses of tetracycline administration. Single-label surface is expressed as a percentage of total bone surface. |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Double-label Surface
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. The presence of double labels indicates that normal bone mineralization was actively occurring over the entire labeling interval. Double-label surface is expressed as a percentage of total bone surface. |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Mineralizing Surface
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. Total mineralizing surfaces (MS) include all double and half of single-labeled surfaces. MS is expressed as a percentage of total bone surface. |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Mineral Apposition Rate
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. The mineral apposition rate (MAR) is the avarage rate at which new bone mineral is being added on any actively forming surface. MAR is calculated as the average distance between visible labels, divided by the labeling interval. |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Adjusted Apposition Rate
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. The mineral apposition rate (MAR) is the average rate at which new bone mineral is being added on any actively forming surface. Adjusted MAR is calculated as: (average distance between visible labels / labeling interval) * (total mineralizing surface/total bone surface). |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Bone Formation Rate - Surface Based
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. Bone formation rate - surface based is the calculated rate at which cancellous bone surface is being replaced annually, derived from the Mineral Appositional Rate * 365 * (relative mineralizing surface / total bone surface). |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Bone Formation Rate - Volume Based
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. Bone formation rate - volume based is the calculated rate at which cancellous bone volume is being replaced annually, derived from the Mineral Appositional Rate * 365 * (relative mineralizing surface / total bone volume). |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Formation Period
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. Formation period (FP) is the mean time required to rebuild a new bone structural unit or osteon from the cement line back to the bone surface at a single location, and is given by wall width / adjusted apposition rate. |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Activation Frequency
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. The average time that it takes for a new remodeling cycle to begin on any point on a cancellous surface is called the activation frequency. Activation frequency is calculated as the bone formation rate / wall width. |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoid Volume
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Osteoid volume is the percentage of a given volume of bone tissue that consists of unmineralized bone (osteoid). |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histomorphometry: Mineralization Lag Time
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. Mineralization lag time is the average time interval between osteoid formation and its subsequent mineralization and is calculated by dividing the osteoid width by the apposition rate. |
Month 24 and month 84
|
|
Bone Histology at Month 24
Time Frame: Month 24
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histology to determine if there were any histological abnormalities in the bone.
Results are reported for the number of biopsies with normal bone micro-architecture: normal lamellar bone, normal mineralization, and osteoid, and biopsies with abnormal bone histology: osteomalacia, marrow fibrosis, or woven bone.
|
Month 24
|
|
Bone Histology at Month 84
Time Frame: Month 84
|
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histology to determine if there were any histological abnormalities in the bone.
Results are reported for the number of biopsies with normal bone micro-architecture: normal lamellar bone, normal mineralization, and osteoid, and biopsies with abnormal bone histology: osteomalacia, marrow fibrosis, or woven bone.
|
Month 84
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cummings SR, Ferrari S, Eastell R, Gilchrist N, Jensen JB, McClung M, Roux C, Torring O, Valter I, Wang AT, Brown JP. Vertebral Fractures After Discontinuation of Denosumab: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized Placebo-Controlled FREEDOM Trial and Its Extension. J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Feb;33(2):190-198. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3337. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
- Dempster DW, Brown JP, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Kendler D, Rizzo S, Valter I, Wagman RB, Yin X, Yue SV, Boivin G. Effects of Long-Term Denosumab on Bone Histomorphometry and Mineralization in Women With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Jul 1;103(7):2498-2509. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-02669.
- Bone HG, Wagman RB, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Chapurlat R, Cummings SR, Czerwinski E, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Kendler DL, Lippuner K, Reginster JY, Roux C, Malouf J, Bradley MN, Daizadeh NS, Wang A, Dakin P, Pannacciulli N, Dempster DW, Papapoulos S. 10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extension. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Jul;5(7):513-523. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30138-9. Epub 2017 May 22.
- Ferrari S, Eastell R, Napoli N, Schwartz A, Hofbauer LC, Chines A, Wang A, Pannacciulli N, Cummings SR. Denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and diabetes: Subgroup analysis of FREEDOM and FREEDOM extension. Bone. 2020 May;134:115268. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115268. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
- Ferrari S, Lewiecki EM, Butler PW, Kendler DL, Napoli N, Huang S, Crittenden DB, Pannacciulli N, Siris E, Binkley N. Favorable skeletal benefit/risk of long-term denosumab therapy: A virtual-twin analysis of fractures prevented relative to skeletal safety events observed. Bone. 2020 May;134:115287. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115287. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
- Kendler DL, Chines A, Brandi ML, Papapoulos S, Lewiecki EM, Reginster JY, Munoz Torres M, Wang A, Bone HG. The risk of subsequent osteoporotic fractures is decreased in subjects experiencing fracture while on denosumab: results from the FREEDOM and FREEDOM Extension studies. Osteoporos Int. 2019 Jan;30(1):71-78. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4687-2. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
- Watts NB, Brown JP, Papapoulos S, Lewiecki EM, Kendler DL, Dakin P, Wagman RB, Wang A, Daizadeh NS, Smith S, Bone HG. Safety Observations With 3 Years of Denosumab Exposure: Comparison Between Subjects Who Received Denosumab During the Randomized FREEDOM Trial and Subjects Who Crossed Over to Denosumab During the FREEDOM Extension. J Bone Miner Res. 2017 Jul;32(7):1481-1485. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3119. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
- Watts NB, Grbic JT, Binkley N, Papapoulos S, Butler PW, Yin X, Tierney A, Wagman RB, McClung M. Invasive Oral Procedures and Events in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis Treated With Denosumab for Up to 10 Years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Jun 1;104(6):2443-2452. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-01965.
- Adachi JD, Bone HG, Daizadeh NS, Dakin P, Papapoulos S, Hadji P, Recknor C, Bolognese MA, Wang A, Lin CJF, Wagman RB, Ferrari S. Influence of subject discontinuation on long-term nonvertebral fracture rate in the denosumab FREEDOM Extension study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Apr 27;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1520-6.
- Bilezikian JP, Lin CJF, Brown JP, Wang AT, Yin X, Ebeling PR, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Franek E, Gilchrist N, Miller PD, Simon JA, Valter I, Zerbini CAF, Libanati C, Chines A. Long-term denosumab treatment restores cortical bone loss and reduces fracture risk at the forearm and humerus: analyses from the FREEDOM Extension cross-over group. Osteoporos Int. 2019 Sep;30(9):1855-1864. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05020-8. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
- Ferrari S, Butler PW, Kendler DL, Miller PD, Roux C, Wang AT, Huang S, Wagman RB, Lewiecki EM. Further Nonvertebral Fracture Reduction Beyond 3 Years for Up to 10 Years of Denosumab Treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Aug 1;104(8):3450-3461. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00271.
- Ferrari S, Libanati C, Lin CJF, Brown JP, Cosman F, Czerwinski E, de Gregomicronrio LH, Malouf-Sierra J, Reginster JY, Wang A, Wagman RB, Lewiecki EM. Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density T-Score and Nonvertebral Fracture Risk Over 10 Years of Denosumab Treatment. J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Jun;34(6):1033-1040. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3722. Epub 2019 May 29.
- Broadwell A, Chines A, Ebeling PR, Franek E, Huang S, Smith S, Kendler D, Messina O, Miller PD. Denosumab Safety and Efficacy Among Participants in the FREEDOM Extension Study With Mild to Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jan 23;106(2):397-409. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa851.
- Cosman F, Huang S, McDermott M, Cummings SR. Multiple Vertebral Fractures After Denosumab Discontinuation: FREEDOM and FREEDOM Extension Trials Additional Post Hoc Analyses. J Bone Miner Res. 2022 Nov;37(11):2112-2120. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4705. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
- Bone HG, Chapurlat R, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Czerwinski E, Krieg MA, Mellstrom D, Radominski SC, Reginster JY, Resch H, Ivorra JA, Roux C, Vittinghoff E, Daizadeh NS, Wang A, Bradley MN, Franchimont N, Geller ML, Wagman RB, Cummings SR, Papapoulos S. The effect of three or six years of denosumab exposure in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from the FREEDOM extension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Nov;98(11):4483-92. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1597. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
- Papapoulos S, Chapurlat R, Libanati C, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Czerwinski E, Krieg MA, Man Z, Mellstrom D, Radominski SC, Reginster JY, Resch H, Roman Ivorra JA, Roux C, Vittinghoff E, Austin M, Daizadeh N, Bradley MN, Grauer A, Cummings SR, Bone HG. Five years of denosumab exposure in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from the first two years of the FREEDOM extension. J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Mar;27(3):694-701. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1479.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20060289
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis
-
NCT03710889CompletedOsteoporosis | Osteoporosis Risk | Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal | Osteoporosis Fracture | Osteoporosis, Age-Related | Osteoporosis Localized to Spine | Osteoporosis Senile | Osteoporosis of Vertebrae | Osteoporosis Vertebral
-
NCT03512262CompletedOsteoporosis | Age Related Osteoporosis | Osteoporosis, Age-Related | Osteoporosis Localized to Spine | Osteoporosis Senile | Osteoporosis of Vertebrae
-
NCT06938152RecruitingOsteoporosis | Osteoporosis Postmenopausal
-
NCT02604836Completed
-
NCT02598934Completed
-
NCT03026660CompletedPostmenopausal Osteoporosis | Osteoporosis, Osteopenia
-
NCT05571514Recruiting
-
NCT02347865CompletedPost Menopausal Osteoporosis
-
NCT00377234CompletedPost Menopausal Osteoporosis
-
NCT00048074Completed
Clinical Trials on Denosumab
-
NCT07085520Not yet recruitingHealthy | Osteoarthritis | Osteoporosis | Osteoporosis (Senile) | Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee
-
NCT07028268RecruitingFor Prevention of Bone Events in Patients With Bone Metastases From Solid Tumors
-
NCT03532087Withdrawn
-
NCT00980174CompletedOsteoporosis | Osteopenia | Low Bone Mineral Density | Low Bone Mass | Males With Osteoporosis
-
NCT01457950CompletedOsteoporosis, Postmenopausal
-
NCT04664959CompletedPostmenopausal Osteoporosis
-
NCT02157948Completed
-
NCT02053753Completed