Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Denosumab in the Treatment of Osteoporosis

November 4, 2022 updated by: Amgen

An Open Label, Single Arm, Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Sustained Efficacy of Denosumab (AMG162) in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

The primary objective was to describe the safety and tolerability of up to 10 years or 7 years denosumab administration as measured by adverse event monitoring, immunogenicity and safety laboratory parameters in participants who previously received denosumab or placebo, respectively.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4550

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 94 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Postmenopausal women who have attended the 20030216 (NCT00089791) study month 36 visit will be eligible to participate if they meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria given below.

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects must sign the informed consent before any study specific procedures are performed and agree to receive denosumab 60 mg subcutaneous injection every 6 months
  • Subjects must not have discontinued investigational product during the 20030216 study and must have attended the 20030216 study month 36 visit
  • Subjects must be re-consented prior to (or at) the 24 month visit for participation beyond month 24.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Permanently non-ambulatory subjects (use of an assistive device eg, cane, walker, etc. is permitted)
  • Missed 2 or more investigational product doses during the 20030216 study
  • Any disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or comply with study procedures
  • Developed sensitivity to mammalian cell derived drug products during the 20030216 study
  • Unable to tolerate calcium supplementation during the last 6 months of participation in the 20030216 study (between the month 30 and month 36 20030216 study visits)
  • Currently receiving any investigational product other than denosumab or having received any investigational product during the 20030216 study
  • Current use of the following osteoporosis agents: bisphosphonates, calcitonin, fluoride, parathyroid hormone, selective estrogen receptor modulators, systemic oral or transdermal estrogen (except vaginal preparations and estrogen creams which are acceptable), strontium, or tibolone
  • For bone biopsy sub-study subjects only: known or suspected sensitivity or contraindication to tetracycline derivatives

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Denosumab
Participants received a 60 mg subcutaneous injection of denosumab every 6 months for seven years.
Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 6 months.
Other Names:
  • Prolia
  • AMG 162

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: 84 months
A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an adverse event that: • is fatal • is life threatening • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • is other significant medical hazard. Treatment-related adverse events includes only events for which the investigator indicated there was a reasonable possibility they may have been caused by study drug. The following were classified as adverse events of interest (events that are considered to be identified or potential risks of denosumab treatment): positively adjudicated osteonecrosis of the jaw, positively adjudicated atypical femoral fracture, hypocalcemia, adverse events potentially related to hypersensitivity, serious infection (including bacterial cellulitis), malignancy, cardiac disorders, vascular disorders, fracture healing complications, eczema, acute pancreatitis, and musculoskeletal pain.
84 months
Number of Participants With Laboratory Toxicities of Grade ≥ 3
Time Frame: 84 months
Laboratory toxicity grading was based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. Grade 3 indicates severe toxicity and Grade 4 indicates life-threatening toxicity.
84 months
Number of Participants With Antibodies to Denosumab
Time Frame: Every 12 months through Month 84
Every 12 months through Month 84

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center.
Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
Total hip bone mineral density was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center.
Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
Femoral neck bone mineral density was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center.
Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in 1/3 Radius Bone Mineral Density by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
1/3 radius bone mineral density was measured in a subset of participants by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center.
Baseline (of extension study) and months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
Percent Change From Study 20030216 Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density by Visit
Time Frame: Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
Lumbar spine bone mineral density was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center. Measurements at some time points during the core study 20030216 were only taken in a subset of participants.
Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
Percent Change From Study 20030216 Baseline in Total Hip BMD by Visit
Time Frame: Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
Total hip bone mineral density was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center. Measurements at some time points during the core study 20030216 were only taken in a subset of participants.
Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
Percent Change From Study 20030216 Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD by Visit
Time Frame: Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
Femoral neck bone mineral density was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center. Measurements at some time points during the core study 20030216 were only taken in a subset of participants.
Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60 and 84
Percent Change From Study 20030216 Baseline in 1/3 Radius BMD by Visit
Time Frame: Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84
1/3 radius BMD was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center. Measurements at some time points during the core study 20030216 were only taken in a subset of participants.
Study 20030216 baseline and extension study months 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84
Number of Participants With New Vertebral Fractures
Time Frame: 84 months
A new vertebral fracture, assessed by lateral spine X-ray using Genant semiquantitative scoring method, was identified as an ≥ 1 grade increase from the previous grade of 0 in any vertebra from T4 to L4, excluding any fracture associated with high trauma severity or a pathologic fracture.
84 months
Number of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fractures
Time Frame: 84 months
Non-vertebral fractures (osteoporotic) were defined as a fracture present on a copy of radiographs or other diagnostic images such as computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirming the fracture, and/or documented in a copy of the radiology report, surgical report, or discharge summary, excluding skull, facial, mandible, cervical vertebrae, thoracic vertebrae, lumbar vertebrae, metacarpus, finger phalanges, and toe phalanges. In addition, fractures associated with high trauma severity or pathologic fractures were excluded.
84 months
Percent Change From Baseline in C-Telopeptide 1 (CTX-1) by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (of extension study), day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
Bone turnover markers were collected in a subset of participants who participated in the 20030216 Bone Marker sub-study and in new participants continuing beyond month 24 who were not previously in the Bone Turnover Markers sub-study.
Baseline (of extension study), day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 N-telopeptide (P1NP) by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (of extension study), day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
Bone turnover markers were collected in a subset of participants who participated in the 20030216 Bone Marker sub-study and in new sparticipants continuing beyond month 24 who were not previously in the Bone Turnover Markers sub-study.
Baseline (of extension study), day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
Percent Change From Study 20030216 Baseline in CTX-1 by Visit
Time Frame: Study 20030216 Baseline and extension study day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
Bone turnover markers were collected in a subset of participants who participated in the 20030216 Bone Marker sub-study and in new participants continuing beyond month 24 who were not previously in the Bone Turnover Markers sub-study.
Study 20030216 Baseline and extension study day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
Percent Change From Study 20030216 Baseline in P1NP by Visit
Time Frame: Study 20030216 Baseline and extension study day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
Bone turnover markers were collected in a subset of participants who participated in the 20030216 Bone Marker sub-study and in new participants continuing beyond month 24 who were not previously in the Bone Turnover Markers sub-study.
Study 20030216 Baseline and extension study day 10, and months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Albumin-adjusted Serum Calcium at Day 10
Time Frame: Baseline (of extension study) and day 10
Baseline (of extension study) and day 10
Serum Denosumab Concentration
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-dose in extension study), day 10, and Months 3, 4 and 6 (pre-dose)
Serum concentrations of denosumab were measured by a validated conventional sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.8 ng/mL. Values of 0 in the table below indicate data below the lower limit of quantification.
Baseline (pre-dose in extension study), day 10, and Months 3, 4 and 6 (pre-dose)
Bone Histomorphometry: Cancellous Bone Volume
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Cancellous (trabecular) bone volume is the percent of the total marrow cavity that is occupied by cancellous bone (both mineralized and non-mineralized) measured by quantitative histomorphometry.
Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Trabecular Number
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Trabecular number is the number of trabeculae present per lineal mm and is calculated as trabecular bone volume/trabecular thickness. Trabecular number is a measure of trabecular connectivity and decreases with bone loss.
Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Trabecular Separation
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Trabecular separation is the mean distance between trabeculae (measured by integrated computer graphics). Trabecular separation increases with trabecular bone loss.
Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Trabecular Thickness
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Mean trabecular thickness is a measure of trabecular structure and is calculated as the reciprocal of total bone (trabecular) surfaces. Trabecular thickness is reduced by aging and osteoporosis.
Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Cortical Width
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Cortical width is the average width of both inner and outer cortices.
Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Cancellous Bone Volume by TRAP Histomorphometry
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Cancellous (trabecular) bone volume is the percent of the total marrow cavity that is occupied by cancellous bone (both mineralized and non-mineralized) measured by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining histomorphometry.
Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Surface Density
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Surface density is calculated by total bone (trabecular) surfaces / total tissue volume.
Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoblast - Osteoid Interface
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Osteoblast - osteoid interface is calculated as osteoblast surface / osteoid surface * 100.
Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoid Surface
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Osteoid surface is the percent of bone surface covered in osteoid.
Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoid Thickness
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Osteoid thickness (width) is the mean thickness of osteoid seams on cancellous surfaces. Osteoid thickness is normally <12.5 µm. Increased osteoid thickness suggests abnormal mineralization (osteomalacia).
Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Wall Thickness
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. Wall thickness is the average thickness of trabecular bone structural units (BSU) and is used to assess the overall balance between resorption and formation.
Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Eroded Surface/Bone Surface
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

Eroded surface/bone surface is the percentage of bone surface occupied by eroded (resorption) cavities (Howships lacunae), with or without osteoclasts.

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoclast Number - Length Based
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

Osteoclast number was measured by quantitative histomorphometry and is expressed per mm of bone.

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoclast Number - Surface Based
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

Osteoclast number was measured by quantitative histomorphometry and is expressed per 100 mm of bone surface area.

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoclast Number by TRAP - Length Based
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

Osteoclast number was measured using TRAP staining and is expressed per mm of bone.

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoclast Number by TRAP - Surface Based
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

Osteoclast number was measured using TRAP staining and is expressed per 100 mm of bone surface.

Da

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Single-label Surface
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. A single label is deposited if formation either started or ended during the interval between the uses of the two courses of tetracycline administration. Single-label surface is expressed as a percentage of total bone surface.

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Double-label Surface
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. The presence of double labels indicates that normal bone mineralization was actively occurring over the entire labeling interval. Double-label surface is expressed as a percentage of total bone surface.

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Mineralizing Surface
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. Total mineralizing surfaces (MS) include all double and half of single-labeled surfaces. MS is expressed as a percentage of total bone surface.

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Mineral Apposition Rate
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. The mineral apposition rate (MAR) is the avarage rate at which new bone mineral is being added on any actively forming surface. MAR is calculated as the average distance between visible labels, divided by the labeling interval.

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Adjusted Apposition Rate
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. The mineral apposition rate (MAR) is the average rate at which new bone mineral is being added on any actively forming surface. Adjusted MAR is calculated as: (average distance between visible labels / labeling interval) * (total mineralizing surface/total bone surface).

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Bone Formation Rate - Surface Based
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. Bone formation rate - surface based is the calculated rate at which cancellous bone surface is being replaced annually, derived from the Mineral Appositional Rate * 365 * (relative mineralizing surface / total bone surface).

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Bone Formation Rate - Volume Based
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. Bone formation rate - volume based is the calculated rate at which cancellous bone volume is being replaced annually, derived from the Mineral Appositional Rate * 365 * (relative mineralizing surface / total bone volume).

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Formation Period
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. Formation period (FP) is the mean time required to rebuild a new bone structural unit or osteon from the cement line back to the bone surface at a single location, and is given by wall width / adjusted apposition rate.

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Activation Frequency
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken. The average time that it takes for a new remodeling cycle to begin on any point on a cancellous surface is called the activation frequency. Activation frequency is calculated as the bone formation rate / wall width.

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Osteoid Volume
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry.

Osteoid volume is the percentage of a given volume of bone tissue that consists of unmineralized bone (osteoid).

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histomorphometry: Mineralization Lag Time
Time Frame: Month 24 and month 84

Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histomorphometry. A double tetracycline labeling procedure was used to allow visualization and quantification of sites of new bone formation. Tetracycline was given for two periods of 3 days separated by 14 days where no tetracycline was taken.

Mineralization lag time is the average time interval between osteoid formation and its subsequent mineralization and is calculated by dividing the osteoid width by the apposition rate.

Month 24 and month 84
Bone Histology at Month 24
Time Frame: Month 24
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histology to determine if there were any histological abnormalities in the bone. Results are reported for the number of biopsies with normal bone micro-architecture: normal lamellar bone, normal mineralization, and osteoid, and biopsies with abnormal bone histology: osteomalacia, marrow fibrosis, or woven bone.
Month 24
Bone Histology at Month 84
Time Frame: Month 84
Bone biopsy samples were prepared according to standard procedures for bone histology to determine if there were any histological abnormalities in the bone. Results are reported for the number of biopsies with normal bone micro-architecture: normal lamellar bone, normal mineralization, and osteoid, and biopsies with abnormal bone histology: osteomalacia, marrow fibrosis, or woven bone.
Month 84

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 7, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 19, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 19, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2007

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 31, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20060289

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on Denosumab

Search Similar Trials