A Randomized Double-Blind Study Testing the Effects of Pregabalin on Diabetic Neuropathy (Pregabalin)

July 11, 2014 updated by: Duke University

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single Center Study Designed to Assess the Effects of Pregabalin on Change in Patients With Diabetic Neuropathy

This study is designed to examine how pregabalin affects parameters of autonomic nerve regulation in correlation with change in pain, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in patients with diabetic neuropathy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is designed to primarily examine how pregabalin affects the autonomic nerve or sympathetic-parasympathetic regulation in patients with diabetic neuropathy and its relationship to neuropathic pain. The goals of this study include (1) assessing the change of parameters of autonomic nerve function such as heart rate variability (HRV), respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), minute ventilation, and changes in objective sleep parameters measured by means of the LifeShirt, upon treatment of pregabalin in comparison to placebo; (2) assessing the symptom change of neuropathic pain upon treatment of pregabalin in comparison to placebo; (3) assessing the change of anxiety symptoms upon treatment of pregabalin in comparison to placebo; (4) assessing the change of depressive symptoms upon treatment of pregabalin in comparison to placebo; (5) assessing the relationship of autonomic nerve function with neuropathic pain at baseline prior to treatment and the correspondences to the study drug; (6) assessing the relationship of autonomic nerve function with anxiety and depressive symptoms at baseline prior to treatment and their correspondences to the study drug; (7) identifying sensitive and reliable parameters of autonomic nerve regulation as predictor(s) of the severity and improvement of neuropathic pain and/or anxiety; and (8) to assess the change in objective sleep parameters (EEG/EOG) by means of the LifeShirt, upon treatment of pregabalin in comparison to placebo

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Outpatients aged 18 years or older
  • Meet criteria for diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy
  • Average daily pain scores greater than or equal to 4 by Visual Analog Scale
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • No pregnancy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with clinically significant psychiatric disorders requiring vigorous interventions, i.e., moderate to severe depressive disorder, psychotic disorders, PTSD, obsessive compulsive disorder, panic disorder, substance abuse, or personality disorders, or active suicidal/homicidal ideations, or past history of active suicidal ideation and/or attempts
  • Patients on gabapentin which cannot be discontinued, meaning a dose greater than 1200mg. If a patient is on a dose of gabapentin that is less than 1200mg and he or she is willing to stop taking the medication, he or she can participate in the study. These patients must take the last dose of gabapentin the night before starting the study.
  • Patients being non-compliant with diabetic control
  • Inability to wear the LifeShirt
  • Unable to participate or answer questions using a personal digital assistant input device

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Placebo
Subjects will take placebo for the duration of four weeks. The dosage will range from 75 mg twice a day to 300 mg twice a day.
Experimental: Pregabalin
Pregabalin medication
Drug: Pregabalin
Subjects will take pregabalin for the duration of four weeks. The dosage will range from 75 mg twice a day to 300 mg twice a day.
Other Names:
  • Lyrica

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessing the Change in Resting Blood Pressure Upon Treatment of Pregabalin vs. Placebo in Patients With Diabetes and Peripheral Neuropathy.
Time Frame: baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
Assessing the Change in Heart Rate by Means of the LifeShirt System Upon Treatment of Pregabalin vs. Placebo in Patients With Diabetes and Peripheral Neuropathy.
Time Frame: baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
The LifeShirt System, developed by VivoMetrics, is a lightweight vest with embedded sensors that continuously collect information on a range of cardiopulmonary parameters. It was used to collect and store the respiratory rate, posture, activity level, QRS complexes, and R-R intervals via a 3-axis accelerometer and a 3-lead, single channel electrocardiogram.
baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
Assessing the Change in Heart Rate Variability by Means of the LifeShirt System Upon Treatment of Pregabalin vs. Placebo in Patients With Diabetes and Peripheral Neuropathy.
Time Frame: baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
Heart rate variability parameters generated by the frequency domain analysis included: total power (area under the curve) over all frequencies, very low frequency (VLF, 0-0.04 Hz),low frequency (LF, 0.04-0.15 Hz), and high frequency (HF,0.15-0.4 Hz).
baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
Assessing the Change in Heart Rate Variability by Means of the LifeShirt System Upon Treatment of Pregabalin vs. Placebo in Patients With Diabetes and Peripheral Neuropathy.
Time Frame: baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
Heart Rate Variability parameters generated by the frequency domain analysis included: Low Frequency / High Frequency (LF/HF), as well as normalized LF (normalized LF=LF/[total power-VLF]) and normalized HF (normalized HF=HF/[total power-VLF]).
baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
Assessing the Change of Parameters of Autonomic Nerve Function Such as Heart Rate Variability by Means of the LifeShirt System Upon Treatment of Pregabalin vs. Placebo in Patients With Diabetes and Peripheral Neuropathy.
Time Frame: baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
Heart rate variability parameters yielded by time domain analysis included the mean of all R-R intervals (ANN), standard deviation of all R-R intervals (SDNN), root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), and standard deviation of the averages of R-R intervals for all 5-minute segments within the block (SDANN).
baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
Assessing the Change of Parameters of Autonomic Nerve Function Such as Heart Rate Variability by Means of the LifeShirt System Upon Treatment of Pregabalin vs. Placebo in Patients With Diabetes and Peripheral Neuropathy.
Time Frame: baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
Heart rate variability parameters yielded by time domain analysis included the number of N-N intervals that differ by more than 50 milliseconds from adjacent intervals divided by the total number of all N-N intervals (pNN50).
baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To Assess the Change of Pain Symptoms Upon Treatment of Pregabalin in Comparison to Placebo.
Time Frame: baseline and end of 4 week intervention
Pain severity was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale, the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, and the Neuropathy Pain Scale. The Visual Analog Scale was scored within a range of 0-100 with 0=no pain and 100=the worst imaginable pain. The Brief Pain Inventory is made up of two parts: total pain and pain interference. The total pain score is the sum of most, least, average, and now pain scored within a range of 0-10 with 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. The pain interference score is the sum of affective and activity interference - how pain interfered with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relationships, sleep, and enjoyment of life. It was scored within a range of 0-10 with 0=pain does not interfere and 10=pain completely interferes. The Neuropathy Pain Scale total is the sum of 10 items -cold, sharp, deep, dull, hot, intense, itchy, sensitive, surface, and unpleasant pain scored within a range of 0-10 with 0=no pain and 10=most pain.
baseline and end of 4 week intervention
To Assess the Change of Anxiety Symptoms Upon Treatment of Pregabalin in Comparison to Placebo.
Time Frame: baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
Anxiety symptoms were measured using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Scale (STAI) for symptoms of anxiety. State anxiety: score range, 20-80 (higher score=greater levels of state anxiety). Trait anxiety: score range, 20-80 (higher score=greater levels of trait anxiety).
baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
To Assess the Change of Depressive Symptoms Upon Treatment of Pregabalin in Comparison to Placebo.
Time Frame: baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
The Beck Depression Inventory Scale measures symptoms of depression, score range, 0-63 (higher score=greater severity of depressive symptoms)
baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
To Assess the Change in Disability Scale Upon Treatment of Pregabalin in Comparison to Placebo.
Time Frame: baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention
The Sheehan Disability Scale was used to evaluate functional impairment in work/school, social and family life, score range, 0-10; the 3 items can be summed into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that ranges from 0(unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired).
baseline and at end of a 4-week intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Duke University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 12, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 12, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 14, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 21, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 11, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00009557
  • 2005-0003 (Other Identifier: Pfizer)
  • 7511-05-8 (Other Identifier: Duke legacy protocol number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings