An Efficacy and Safety Study of Oxybutynin Chloride Oral Osmotic Therapeutic System (OROS) in Korean Overactive Bladder Participants

October 24, 2013 updated by: Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea

The Efficacy of Oxybutynin Chloride OROS in Patient-Reported Outcomes With Dose Escalation in Korean Overactive Bladder Patients

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of oxybutynin chloride oral osmotic therapeutic system (OROS) on patient-reported outcomes after 12 weeks of treatment by dose escalation in participants with overactive bladder.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study), open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention), prospective (study following participants forward in time) Phase 4 study of oxybutynin chloride OROS in participants with overactive bladder. The total study duration will be 12 weeks and will include following visits: Screening (Week -2), Baseline, Week 2, 4, 6 and 12. Participants will receive oxybutynin chloride OROS tablet at starting dose of 10 milligram (mg) orally once daily. The dose will be adjusted by 10 mg every 2 weeks up to first 6 weeks, based on the criteria for evaluation of optimal dose. The optimal dose obtained in first 6 weeks will be continued up to Week 12. Maximum allowed dose will be 30 mg per day. Efficacy will primarily be evaluated by assessment of goal achievement (percentage of participants who show a score 4 or 5 in the Likert scale for treatment goal) at Week 12. Participants' safety will also be monitored at each visit.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
345

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who fulfilled all of the following criteria in their micturition charts completed for 3 days prior to visit 2 (Baseline): mean voiding frequency greater than or equal to 8 times per 24 hours and mean frequency of urinary urgency greater than or equal to 2 times per 24 hours (urgency means sudden and strong urge to urinate and a urinary sensation scale score greater than or equal to 3 in the micturition chart)
  • Participants with overactive bladder symptoms lasting for 3 months or longer prior to study initiation
  • Participants who were capable of completing micturition chart and survey questionnaires and provided informed consent to complete them
  • Participants who could sign on the informed consent form after fully listening to and understanding about characteristics, risks and benefits of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with stress urinary incontinence (not able to control bladder actions) or participants with complicated incontinence dominantly presenting stress urinary incontinence when judging based on medical history
  • Participants with a hepatic (pertaining to liver) or renal (pertaining to kidneys) disease indicating serum aspartate transaminase (AST [SGOT]), alanine transaminase (ALT [SGPT]), alkaline phosphatase or creatinnine concentration twice or more of normal upper limit
  • Participants contraindicated to use anticholinergics including uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma (increased pressure inside the eye that causes visual problems), urinary retention or gastrointestinal tract retention
  • Participants experiencing a symptom of acute urinary tract infection (UTI) during the run-in period
  • Participants with recurrent UTI who had medical history of treatment for UTI symptom 5 times or more in the past one year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Oxybutynin Chloride OROS
Drug: Oxybutynin chloride OROS
Participants will receive oxybutynin chloride OROS tablet at starting dose of 10 milligram (mg) orally once daily. The dose will be adjusted by 10 mg every 2 weeks up to first 6 weeks, based on the criteria for evaluation of optimal dose. The optimal dose obtained in first 6 weeks will be continued up to Week 12. Maximum allowed dose will be 30 mg per day.
Other Names:
  • Lyrinel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Treatment Goal
Time Frame: Week 12
Goal achievement was measured by using the 6-point Likert scale (0=not achieved at all and 5=completely achieved). Achievement of treatment goal was defined by a score of 4 or 5 in the Likert scale. Percentage of participants who achieved their treatment goal defined at Baseline (for a maximum of 3 items among the 10 items including incontinence, urinary urgency, frequent urination, nocturnal frequent urination, tenesmus, general health, life habit, activity, pain/pressure pain, and sexual function) was reported.
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Response to Primary Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptom Questionnaire (POSQ): Urinary Urgency at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
Participants assessed their bothering for overactive bladder symptom by completing POSQ rated on a 5-point scale: how much they were bothered by urinary urgency (strong micturition desire indicated) in the past two weeks. The responses were indicated as: 1 (not bothered at all), 2 (slightly bothered), 3 (average), 4 (strongly bothered) and 5 (very strongly bothered). Number of participants with change from Baseline in the response to this question at Week 12 was reported.
Baseline and Week 12
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Response to Primary Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptom Questionnaire (POSQ): Frequent Daytime Urination at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
Participants assessed their bothering for overactive bladder symptom by completing POSQ rated on a 5-point scale: how much they were bothered by daytime frequent urination (frequent urination was required more than the frequency desired during daytime) in the past two weeks. The responses were indicated as: 1 (not bothered at all), 2 (slightly bothered), 3 (average), 4 (strongly bothered) and 5 (very strongly bothered). Number of participants with change from Baseline in the response to this question at Week 12 was reported.
Baseline and Week 12
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Response to Primary Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptom Questionnaire (POSQ): Frequent Nighttime Urination at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
Participants assessed their bothering for overactive bladder symptom by completing POSQ rated on a 5-point scale: how much they were bothered by nighttime frequent urination (waking up from sleep in order to void urine at nighttime [period from time of going to bed to time planned to wake up in the morning]) in the past two weeks. The responses were indicated as: 1 (not bothered at all), 2 (slightly bothered), 3 (average), 4 (strongly bothered) and 5 (very strongly bothered). Number of participants with change from Baseline in the response to this question at Week 12 was reported.
Baseline and Week 12
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Response to Primary Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptom Questionnaire (POSQ): Urge Urinary Incontinence at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
Participants assessed their bothering for overactive bladder symptom by completing POSQ rated on a 5-point scale: how much they were bothered by urge urinary incontinence (involuntary voiding or urinary leakage due to sudden micturition desire, not by sneezing, coughing or laughing) in the past two weeks. The responses were indicated as: 1 (not bothered at all), 2 (slightly bothered), 3 (average), 4 (strongly bothered) and 5 (very strongly bothered). Number of participants with change from Baseline in the response to this question at Week 12 was reported.
Baseline and Week 12
Patient's Perception of Symptom Improvement (PPSI) Score for Overactive Bladder
Time Frame: Week 12
Participant's perception about decrease in the most bothering symptom of overactive bladder (defined at Baseline) was evaluated by using visual analogue scale (VAS) at Week 12. The total score range was 0 to 100 where 0=symptom disappeared and 100=symptom unchanged or worsened compared to Baseline.
Week 12
Number of Participants With Response to Patient's Perception of Treatment Benefit (PPTB) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 2, 4, 6 and 12
The PPTB was used to assess participant's perception about treatment benefit and satisfaction of the study drug. Regarding benefit, participants indicated whether they had any benefit obtained from the treatment. If yes, then the participants indicated whether it was weak benefit or strong benefit. Regarding satisfaction, participants indicated whether they were satisfied with the treatment. If yes, then they indicated if the treatment was slightly satisfactory or very satisfactory. If no, then they indicated if the treatment was slightly unsatisfactory or very unsatisfactory.
Week 2, 4, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With Response to Patient's Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
Participant's perception about bladder condition was evaluated by using self administered PPBC questionnaire. Participants answered "Which of the following statements describes your bladder condition best at the moment?" on a 6-point scale: 1= not problematic at all, 2=mild problem, 3=more or less a mild problem, 4=moderate problem, 5=severe problem and 6=very severe problem.
Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Score at Week 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6, 12 or early discontinuation (ED)
The OAB-q was used to evaluate influence of overactive bladder symptom on health-related quality of life (HRQL). It consisted of 2 parts: Symptom bother (6 items) evaluating how much symptoms related to overactive bladder were bothering in the last 4 weeks and HRQL (13 items) evaluating how general symptoms related to the bladder influenced life in the last 4 weeks. Each item was rated on 6-point Likert scale: 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Total score range: 6 to 36 for symptom bother and 13 to 78 for HRQL. Transformed score calculated as ([Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score]/range)*100 for symptom bother where higher score indicates greater symptom bother and as ([Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score]/Raw score range)*100 for HRQL where higher scores indicate better HRQL. Transformed score range: 0-100 for both, symptom bother and HRQL.
Baseline, Week 6, 12 or early discontinuation (ED)
Mean Voiding Frequency
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED
Mean voiding frequency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total voiding frequency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Participants completed micturition chart for 3 days at Baseline, Week 6 and 12/ED. Mean daytime voiding frequency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total daytime voiding frequency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Mean nighttime voiding frequency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total nighttime voiding frequency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Nighttime voiding was defined as voiding during the sleep cycle.
Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Voiding Frequency at Week 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED
Mean voiding frequency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total voiding frequency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Participants completed micturition chart for 3 days at Baseline, Week 6 and 12/ED. Mean daytime voiding frequency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total daytime voiding frequency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Mean nighttime voiding frequency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total nighttime voiding frequency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Nighttime voiding was defined as voiding during the sleep cycle. Percent change was calculated as (change value/Baseline value)*100.
Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED
Frequency of Urinary Urgency and Urinary Incontinence
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED
Urinary urgency means sudden and strong urge to urinate. It was rated by participant on 5-point scale (1=no urinary urgency and 5=urge urinary incontinence). Total frequency of urinary incontinence (UI) for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total frequency of incontinence divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Participants completed micturition chart for 3 days at Baseline, Week 6 and 12/ED. Mean frequency of urinary urgency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total frequency of urinary urgency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Urinary urgency was defined as voiding with urinary sensation scale score greater than or equal to 3.
Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED
Percent Change From Baseline in Frequency of Urinary Urgency and Urinary Incontinence at Week 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED
Urinary urgency means sudden and strong urge to urinate. It was rated by participant on 5-point scale (1=no urinary urgency and 5=urge urinary incontinence). Total frequency of UI for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total frequency of incontinence divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Participants completed micturition chart for 3 days at Baseline, Week 6 and 12/ED. Mean frequency of urinary urgency for 24 hours was calculated as sum of total frequency of urinary urgency divided by the number of days when micturition chart was completed. Urinary urgency was defined as voiding with urinary sensation scale score greater than or equal to 3. Percent change was calculated as (change value/Baseline value)*100.
Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED
Mean Severity of Urinary Urgency at Urination
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED
Urinary urgency means sudden and strong urge to urinate. It was rated by participant on 5-point scale (1=no urinary urgency, 2=light urinary urgency, 3=moderate urinary urgency, 4=severe urinary urgency and 5=urge urinary incontinence). Mean severity of urinary urgency at urination was calculated as sum of all degrees of urinary urgency measured divided by the voiding frequency.
Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score for Dry Mouth
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED
Severity of dry mouth was evaluated in participants by using VAS: how much dry mouth they have experienced in the past one week. The total score range was 0 (no dry mouth) to 100 (unimaginably most severe dry mouth).
Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED
Percent Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score for Dry Mouth at Week 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED
Severity of dry mouth was evaluated in participants by using VAS: how much dry mouth they experienced in the past one week. The total score range was 0 (no dry mouth) to 100 (unimaginably most severe dry mouth). Percent change was calculated as (change value/Baseline value)*100.
Baseline, Week 6, 12 or ED

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 31, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 31, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 13, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 19, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 24, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR013840
  • OXY-KOR-4001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings