Safety And Efficacy Of Rifabutin In Patients For Non-HIV Patients

November 12, 2018 updated by: Pfizer

Special Investigation For Non-hiv Patients Of Mycobutin (Regulatory Post Marketing Commitment Plan).

The objective of this surveillance is to collect information about 1) adverse drug reaction not expected from the LPD (unknown adverse drug reaction), 2) the incidence of adverse drug reactions in this surveillance, and 3)factors considered to affect the safety and/or efficacy of this drug.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

All the patients whom an investigator prescribes the first Mycobutin® should be registered consecutively until the number of subjects reaches target number in order to extract patients enrolled into the investigation at random.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
628

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients whom an investigator involving A0061006 prescribes the Mycobutin®).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients need to be administered Mycobutin® in order to be enrolled in the surveillance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not administered Mycobutin®.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
rifabutin
Patients administered Rifabutin.
Drug: rifabutin

Mycobutin® capsules150mg depending on the Investigator prescription. Frequency and duration are according to Package Insert as follows. " 1.Tuberculosis : The usual adult dosage for oral use is 150 mg to 300 mg of rifabutin once daily.For the treatment of multiple-drug resistance tuberculosis, the usual dosage for oral use is 300 to 450 mg of rifabutin once daily.

2.Treatment of non-tuberculous mycobacterial diseases (including MAC disease) : The usual adult dosage for oral use is 300 mg of rifabutin once daily".

Other Names:
  • Mycobutin.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 1 year
A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Mycobutin in a participant who received Mycobutin. Relatedness to Mycobutin was assessed by the physician/investigator.
1 year
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Unexpected From Japanese Package Insert
Time Frame: 1 year
A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Mycobutin in a participant who received Mycobutin. Expectedness of the adverse event was determined according to the Japanese package insert. Relatedness to Mycobutin was assessed by the physician/investigator.
1 year
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events by Diagnosis
Time Frame: 1 year
A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Mycobutin in a participant who received Mycobutin. Relatedness to Mycobutin was assessed by the physician/investigator. Participants with treatment related adverse events were counted by diagnosis to assess whether they were risk factors for the treatment related adverse events.
1 year
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events by Gender
Time Frame: 1 year
A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Mycobutin in a participant who received Mycobutin. Relatedness to Mycobutin was assessed by the physician/investigator. Participants with treatment related adverse events were counted by gender to assess whether they were risk factors for the treatment related adverse events.
1 year
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events by Age
Time Frame: 1 year
A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Mycobutin in a participant who received Mycobutin. Relatedness to Mycobutin was assessed by the physician/investigator. Participants with treatment related adverse events were counted by age to assess whether they were risk factors for the treatment related adverse events.
1 year
Clinical Efficacy Rate
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical effectiveness rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved clinical effectiveness over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI. Clinical effectiveness of Mycobutin was assessed as "effective," "ineffective," or "unassessable" by the physician/investigator. Overall effectiveness of Mycobutin was determined by the physician/investigator based on clinical symptoms, laboratory values, and other examinations such as bacterial values.
1 year
Clinical Efficacy Rate by Diagnosis
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical effectiveness rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved clinical effectiveness over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI. Clinical effectiveness of Mycobutin was assessed as "effective," "ineffective," or "unassessable" by the physician/investigator. Overall effectiveness of Mycobutin was determined by the physician/investigator based on clinical symptoms, laboratory values, and other examinations such as bacterial values. Participants achieved clinical effectiveness by diagnosis were counted to assess whether they contribute to the clinical effectiveness.
1 year
Clinical Efficacy Rate by Gender
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical effectiveness rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved clinical effectiveness over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented. Clinical effectiveness of Mycobutin was assessed as "effective," "ineffective," or "unassessable" by the physician/investigator. Overall effectiveness of Mycobutin was determined by the physician/investigator based on clinical symptoms, laboratory values, and other examinations such as bacterial values. Participants achieved clinical effectiveness by gender were counted to assess whether they contribute to the clinical effectiveness.
1 year
Clinical Efficacy Rate by Age
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical effectiveness rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved clinical effectiveness over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented. Clinical effectiveness of Mycobutin was assessed as "effective," "ineffective," or "unassessable" by the physician/investigator. Overall effectiveness of Mycobutin was determined by the physician/investigator based on clinical symptoms, laboratory values, and other examinations such as bacterial values. Participants achieved clinical effectiveness by age were counted to assess whether they contribute to the clinical effectiveness.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 9, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 17, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 18, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 12, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • A0061006

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings