Pharmacosurveillance Data Repository of Patients With and Without History of Anaphylactic Reactions Subsequent to Xolair Dosing (X-PAND)

June 8, 2017 updated by: Genentech, Inc.

Pharmacosurveillance Data Repository of Patients With and Without History of Anaphylactic Reactions Subsequent to Xolair(R) Dosing

This study will establish a clinical data and serum repository of anaphylaxis cases associated with Xolair administration and control patients who have received Xolair without associated anaphylaxis. This is an observational repository and not an investigational clinical trial. Associated with the repository is an optional skin testing substudy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
118

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90025
        • Investigational Site
    • Florida
      • Valrico, Florida, United States, 33596
        • Investigational Site
    • Illinois
      • Hinsdale, Illinois, United States, 60521
        • Investigational Site
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
        • Investigational Site
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10022
        • Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, United States, 19422
        • Investigational Site
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

primary care clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Cases:

  • Confirmed anaphylaxis based on Sampson criteria subsequent to Xolair

Inclusion Criteria for Controls:

  • At least 1 patient control among 4 controls who discontinued Xolair for at least 16 weeks but not more than 18 months at enrollment
  • At least one dose of Xolair in the 18 months before the date of the case event (index date)
  • No prior anaphylaxis or other hypersensitivity reaction subsequent to Xolair dosing, including any reactions to its components

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Adjudicated Anaphylaxis Events - Case Participants
Time Frame: Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Clinical signs and symptoms of adjudicated anaphylaxis events included: Cutaneous/Subcutaneous/Mucosal, Respiratory (R), Cardiovascular (CV), and Gastrointestinal (GIT) signs and symptoms.
Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Time From Last Omalizumab Dose to Adjudicated Anaphylactic Symptoms - Case Participants
Time Frame: Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Categorical Time From Last Omalizumab Dose to Adjudicated Anaphylactic Symptoms - Case Participants
Time Frame: Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Time from last omalizumab dose to adjudicated anaphylactic symptoms was classified as: less than (<) 30 minutes, 30-60 minutes, greater than (>) 60-90 minutes, >90-120 minutes, >120 minutes to 360 minutes, and missing. Number of participants in each time category is reported.
Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Total Omalizumab Doses Received When Adjudicated Anaphylactic Event Occurred - Case Participants
Time Frame: Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Omalizumab doses were classified as: 1 dose, 2 doses, 3 doses, 4-20 doses, 21-40 doses, 41-60 doses, >60 doses, and missing. Number of participants in each dose category is reported.
Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Treatment Received Following Adjudicated Anaphylactic Event - Case Participants
Time Frame: Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Treatment received following adjudicated anaphylactic event was classified as: antihistamine, epinephrine, inhaled beta agonists, systemic corticosteroids, and other. Number of participants in each treatment category is reported. Participants could have received more than 1 treatment.
Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Outcome Attributed to Adjudicated Anaphylactic Event - Case Participants
Time Frame: Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Outcomes of adjudicated anaphylactic event were classified as: death, life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or its prolongation, disabling, congenital anomaly/birth defect in offspring of participant, and other (outcome did not meet any of the above criteria, but may jeopardize the participant, and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above). Number of participants in each outcome category is reported. Only outcomes with results are reported.
Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Number of Participants Reinitiating Omalizumab After Adjudicated Anaphylactic Event - Case Participants
Time Frame: Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Number of Participants With Prior Unadjudicated Anaphylactic Events - Case Participants
Time Frame: Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Treatment Following Prior Unadjudicated Anaphylactic Events - Case Participants
Time Frame: Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Treatment received following prior unadjudicated anaphylactic events was classified as: antihistamine, epinephrine, inhaled beta agonists, systemic corticosteroids, and other. Number of participants in each treatment category is reported. Participants could have received more than 1 treatment.
Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Number of Participants With Subsequent Unadjudicated Anaphylactic Events - Case Participants
Time Frame: Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Treatment Following Subsequent Unadjudicated Anaphylactic Events - Case Participants
Time Frame: Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Treatment received following subsequent unadjudicated anaphylactic event was classified as: antihistamine, epinephrine, inhaled beta agonists, systemic corticosteroids, and other. Number of participants in each treatment category is reported. Participants could have received more than 1 treatment.
Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Medications Received Within Two Weeks Prior to the Adjudicated Anaphylactic Event - Case Participants
Time Frame: Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Number of participants in each medication class is reported. Participants could have received more than 1 medication class. NEC: Not Elsewhere Classified.
Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Medications Within Two Weeks Prior to Blood Draw
Time Frame: Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Number of participants in each medication class is reported. Participants could have received more than 1 medication class.
Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Number of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) - Main Study
Time Frame: Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Participants with positive immunoglobulin G (IgG) ATA, negative IgG ATA, positive immunoglobulin E (IgE) ATA, and negative IgE ATA are reported.
Baseline (Enrollment Visit)
Number of Participants With Positive Skin Reaction After Skin Prick Test - Skin Testing Substudy
Time Frame: Substudy Day 1
Substudy Day 1
Number of Participants With ATA - Skin Testing Substudy
Time Frame: Substudy Week 10
Participants with positive IgG ATA, negative IgG ATA, positive IgE ATA, and negative IgE ATA are reported.
Substudy Week 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Genentech, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Abdelkader Rahmaoui, M.D., Genentech, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 22, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 22, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 23, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 8, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Q4458g

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings