Techniques to Improve Efficacy of Second Trimester Medical Termination

July 23, 2013 updated by: Jan Dickinson, King Edward Memorial Hospital

Comparison of 3 Regimens Using Mifepristone and Misoprostol for Second Trimester Pregnancy Interruption.

Interruption of a pregnancy after 14 weeks gestation may be required when the fetus is dead, severely malformed or in cases of maternal illness. This process is usually conducted medically in Australia, using the synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol. This prostaglandin, although not licensed for use in pregnancy termination, is now a common abortifacient with a large accumulated experience both within Australia and internationally. Since 1996, misoprostol has been used at King Edward Memorial Hospital as the principal agent for second trimester pregnancy termination.

Misoprostol may be administered vaginally, orally, sublingually or buccally in the process of pregnancy termination. Each route of administration has its own advantages and disadvantages. The most appropriate route of administration, with the shortest duration of abortion and lowest side-effect profile has not been determined for all circumstances.

The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is an established and effective method for second trimester pregnancy termination. Prior studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in the duration of abortion with misoprostol when mifepristone priming is used. In November 2007, the TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) approved an application by the Principal Investigator of this planned study for Authorised Prescriber status for use of the antiprogesterone agent mifepristone. Since January 2008 the combination of mifepristone and misoprostol has been used at KEMH for first and second trimester pregnancy termination of pregnancy, predominantly for circumstances of severe fetal abnormality.

There is however limited data on the impact of gestation on the duration of second trimester termination. Almost all published studies to date have recruited women in the early second trimester (typically with a median of 16 weeks gestation). However, most terminations of pregnancy for fetal abnormality (the most frequent reason for pregnancy interruption of a live fetus at KEMH) occur at 18-24 weeks gestation. The investigators' experience indicates a significant impact of increasing gestation with prolongation of the duration of pregnancy termination. In this study the investigators aim to evaluate three misoprostol regimens for second trimester pregnancy termination following mifepristone priming with the primary intention to develop a protocol which results in a delivery rate within 24 hours for 95% of women at gestations <24 weeks.

Secondary aims of this study will be to assess the incidence of maternal side-effects for each of the three regimens, the placental retention rates and the need for curettage for retained placental tissue. As the investigators will be using 3 different methods of misoprostol administration, the investigators will also review women's satisfaction with the three regimens for pregnancy termination.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Aims:

  1. To compare the efficacy of the vaginal and sublingual administration of the synthetic prostaglandin misoprostol with the currently used vaginal administration route in second trimester pregnancy termination.
  2. To compare the impact of gestation of the duration of abortion within these three misoprostol regimens.
  3. To compare the incidence of maternal side-effects between the three routes of prostaglandin administration.
  4. To compare the incidence of placental retention and need for curettage between the three groups

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
302

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
    • Western Australia
      • Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6008
        • King Edward Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 50 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 14-24 weeks pregnant
  • planned medical termination
  • able to speak and understand English
  • no contraindication to prostaglandins

Exclusion Criteria:

  • gestation < 13 weeks
  • allergy/contraindication to misoprostol
  • allergy/contraindication to mifepristone
  • fetal demise

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Vaginal misoprostol

Women allocated to the vaginal misoprostol management protocol will receive a loading dose of 800 mcg misoprostol vaginally followed in 4 hours by 400 mcg vaginal misoprostol, the latter repeated every 4 hours for a maximum of 4 doses.

If abortion does not occur within 24 hours of commencement of this regimen, the sequence will be repeated.

If delivery is not accomplished within 48 hours of prostaglandin commencement, a transcervical Foley catheter will be inserted and a solution of prostaglandin F2 alpha infused 2-hourly until delivery occurs.
Drug: Misoprostol
Comparison of 3 routes of administration of misoprostol for termination of pregnancy 14-24 weeks
Active Comparator: Oral misoprostol

Women allocated to the standard management protocol will receive a loading dose of 800 mcg misoprostol vaginally followed in 3 hours by 400 mcg misoprostol orally, the latter repeated every 3-hours to a maximum of 4 oral doses.

If abortion does not occur within 24 hours of commencement of this regimen, the sequence will be repeated.

If delivery is not accomplished within 48 hours of prostaglandin commencement, a transcervical Foley catheter will be inserted and a solution of prostaglandin F2 alpha infused 2-hourly until delivery occurs.
Drug: Misoprostol
Comparison of 3 routes of administration of misoprostol for termination of pregnancy 14-24 weeks
Active Comparator: Sublingual misoprostol

Women allocated to the sublingual misoprostol protocol will receive a loading dose of 800 mcg misoprostol vaginally followed in 3 hours by 400 mcg sublingual misoprostol, the latter repeated every 3 hours for a maximum of 4 doses.

If abortion does not occur within 24 hours of commencement of this regimen, the sequence will be repeated.

If delivery is not accomplished within 48 hours of prostaglandin commencement, a transcervical Foley catheter will be inserted and a solution of prostaglandin F2 alpha infused 2-hourly until delivery occurs.
Drug: Misoprostol
Comparison of 3 routes of administration of misoprostol for termination of pregnancy 14-24 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare the efficacy of the vaginal and sublingual administration of the synthetic prostaglandin misoprostol with the currently used oral administration route in second trimester pregnancy termination.
Time Frame: Induction to delivery interval
Induction to delivery interval

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare the incidence of maternal side-effects between the three routes of prostaglandin administration.
Time Frame: Admission to hospital discharge
Admission to hospital discharge
To compare the incidence of placental retention and need for curettage between the three groups
Time Frame: Delivery of fetus to delivery of placenta interval
Delivery of fetus to delivery of placenta interval
To compare the impact of gestation of the duration of abortion within these three misoprostol regimens.
Time Frame: Interval from commencement of prostaglandin to delivery of fetus
Interval from commencement of prostaglandin to delivery of fetus

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
King Edward Memorial Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jan E Dickinson, MD, The University of Western Australia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 18, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 18, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 19, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 24, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 23, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1624/EW

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy

Clinical Trials on Misoprostol

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings