Techniques to Improve Efficacy of Second Trimester Medical Termination

July 23, 2013 updated by: Jan Dickinson, King Edward Memorial Hospital

Comparison of 3 Regimens Using Mifepristone and Misoprostol for Second Trimester Pregnancy Interruption.

Interruption of a pregnancy after 14 weeks gestation may be required when the fetus is dead, severely malformed or in cases of maternal illness. This process is usually conducted medically in Australia, using the synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol. This prostaglandin, although not licensed for use in pregnancy termination, is now a common abortifacient with a large accumulated experience both within Australia and internationally. Since 1996, misoprostol has been used at King Edward Memorial Hospital as the principal agent for second trimester pregnancy termination.

Misoprostol may be administered vaginally, orally, sublingually or buccally in the process of pregnancy termination. Each route of administration has its own advantages and disadvantages. The most appropriate route of administration, with the shortest duration of abortion and lowest side-effect profile has not been determined for all circumstances.

The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is an established and effective method for second trimester pregnancy termination. Prior studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in the duration of abortion with misoprostol when mifepristone priming is used. In November 2007, the TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) approved an application by the Principal Investigator of this planned study for Authorised Prescriber status for use of the antiprogesterone agent mifepristone. Since January 2008 the combination of mifepristone and misoprostol has been used at KEMH for first and second trimester pregnancy termination of pregnancy, predominantly for circumstances of severe fetal abnormality.

There is however limited data on the impact of gestation on the duration of second trimester termination. Almost all published studies to date have recruited women in the early second trimester (typically with a median of 16 weeks gestation). However, most terminations of pregnancy for fetal abnormality (the most frequent reason for pregnancy interruption of a live fetus at KEMH) occur at 18-24 weeks gestation. The investigators' experience indicates a significant impact of increasing gestation with prolongation of the duration of pregnancy termination. In this study the investigators aim to evaluate three misoprostol regimens for second trimester pregnancy termination following mifepristone priming with the primary intention to develop a protocol which results in a delivery rate within 24 hours for 95% of women at gestations <24 weeks.

Secondary aims of this study will be to assess the incidence of maternal side-effects for each of the three regimens, the placental retention rates and the need for curettage for retained placental tissue. As the investigators will be using 3 different methods of misoprostol administration, the investigators will also review women's satisfaction with the three regimens for pregnancy termination.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Aims:

  1. To compare the efficacy of the vaginal and sublingual administration of the synthetic prostaglandin misoprostol with the currently used vaginal administration route in second trimester pregnancy termination.
  2. To compare the impact of gestation of the duration of abortion within these three misoprostol regimens.
  3. To compare the incidence of maternal side-effects between the three routes of prostaglandin administration.
  4. To compare the incidence of placental retention and need for curettage between the three groups

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

302

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Western Australia
      • Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6008
        • King Edward Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 50 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 14-24 weeks pregnant
  • planned medical termination
  • able to speak and understand English
  • no contraindication to prostaglandins

Exclusion Criteria:

  • gestation < 13 weeks
  • allergy/contraindication to misoprostol
  • allergy/contraindication to mifepristone
  • fetal demise

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Vaginal misoprostol

Women allocated to the vaginal misoprostol management protocol will receive a loading dose of 800 mcg misoprostol vaginally followed in 4 hours by 400 mcg vaginal misoprostol, the latter repeated every 4 hours for a maximum of 4 doses.

If abortion does not occur within 24 hours of commencement of this regimen, the sequence will be repeated.

If delivery is not accomplished within 48 hours of prostaglandin commencement, a transcervical Foley catheter will be inserted and a solution of prostaglandin F2 alpha infused 2-hourly until delivery occurs.

Comparison of 3 routes of administration of misoprostol for termination of pregnancy 14-24 weeks
Active Comparator: Oral misoprostol

Women allocated to the standard management protocol will receive a loading dose of 800 mcg misoprostol vaginally followed in 3 hours by 400 mcg misoprostol orally, the latter repeated every 3-hours to a maximum of 4 oral doses.

If abortion does not occur within 24 hours of commencement of this regimen, the sequence will be repeated.

If delivery is not accomplished within 48 hours of prostaglandin commencement, a transcervical Foley catheter will be inserted and a solution of prostaglandin F2 alpha infused 2-hourly until delivery occurs.

Comparison of 3 routes of administration of misoprostol for termination of pregnancy 14-24 weeks
Active Comparator: Sublingual misoprostol

Women allocated to the sublingual misoprostol protocol will receive a loading dose of 800 mcg misoprostol vaginally followed in 3 hours by 400 mcg sublingual misoprostol, the latter repeated every 3 hours for a maximum of 4 doses.

If abortion does not occur within 24 hours of commencement of this regimen, the sequence will be repeated.

If delivery is not accomplished within 48 hours of prostaglandin commencement, a transcervical Foley catheter will be inserted and a solution of prostaglandin F2 alpha infused 2-hourly until delivery occurs.

Comparison of 3 routes of administration of misoprostol for termination of pregnancy 14-24 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare the efficacy of the vaginal and sublingual administration of the synthetic prostaglandin misoprostol with the currently used oral administration route in second trimester pregnancy termination.
Time Frame: Induction to delivery interval
Induction to delivery interval

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare the incidence of maternal side-effects between the three routes of prostaglandin administration.
Time Frame: Admission to hospital discharge
Admission to hospital discharge
To compare the incidence of placental retention and need for curettage between the three groups
Time Frame: Delivery of fetus to delivery of placenta interval
Delivery of fetus to delivery of placenta interval
To compare the impact of gestation of the duration of abortion within these three misoprostol regimens.
Time Frame: Interval from commencement of prostaglandin to delivery of fetus
Interval from commencement of prostaglandin to delivery of fetus

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jan E Dickinson, MD, The University of Western Australia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

March 19, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 24, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2013

Last Verified

July 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy

Clinical Trials on Misoprostol

Subscribe